Students will collaborate as a group of students and develop a mock testimony response to the health senate bill S1522. Recently in NJ the Health Senate Committee held testimony on bill S1522 (proposing advanced practice restriction removal). Nursing advocates in the state formed a NJ coalition and testimony was held from varies parties. In your content for module 6 you will find the testimony to bill S1522.The group will develop a mock video testimony, No longer than 15 mins. Each student within the group must participate in the video. The video will express reasons why bill S1522 should be passed. In addition to completing the video please post individual response in the testimony. How did it make you feel listening to the opposing side?
Category: Nursing
-
Nurse 6531
Edit
i-Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Integumentary Conditions
This course will require you to complete a series of case studies using the i-Human software application. The i-Human Patients (IHP) Case Player enables you to interact with virtual patients for the purpose of learning patient-assessment and diagnostic-reasoning skills. With IHP, you will be able to independently interview, examine, diagnose, and treat virtual patients and receive expert feedback on your performance.
The integumentary system is susceptible to a variety of diseases, conditions, and injuries, ranging from the bothersome but relatively innocuous bacterial or fungal infections that are categorized as disorders to skin cancer and severe burns, which can be life-threatening.
For this Case Study Assignment, you will examine your first case study and work with a patient with an integumentary condition. You will formulate a differential diagnosis, evaluate treatment options, and then create an appropriate treatment plan for the patient.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.To prepare:
- Review this weeks Learning Resources to understand the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of integumentary conditions.
Assignment Requirements:
- Access i-Human from this weeks Learning Resources and review the assigned case study.
- Please note: You will complete i-Human cases in case review mode. This may differ from your previous course experience.
- Analyze the provided patient history, physical exam findings, and diagnostic test results to support clinical decision-making.
- Complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the i-Human platform.
- You must follow the Management Plan Template (located in this weeks Learning Resources) when writing your treatment plan. Be sure to follow all directions and include each required section.
- Carefully review the grading rubric to understand how your assignment will be evaluated.
- Please note: You will not receive a score within the i-Human platform. This is different from some previous courses. All grading will occur in the Canvas classroom based on your submitted work and the rubric.
- Ensure that all responses are clear, evidence-based, and align with the rubric expectations. Submit the completed assignment in the required format and refer to the Management Plan Template for structure and guidance.
By Day 7
- Submit the written case study assignment as a Word document
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn+last name+first initial
- Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
-
Nervous System (Biology)
Nervous tissue first arose in wormlike organisms about 550 to 600 million years ago. Nervous systems are found in most multicellular animals but vary greatly in complexity. The size of the nervous system ranges from a few hundred cells in the simplest worms, to around 300 billion cells in African elephants.
Your task is to write an illustrated report identifying the component of the nervous system and describing and explaining how it functions.
Your illustrated report should include a wide range of correctly cited illustrations to support your discussion and you must include the following:-
Analyse the component parts of the central nervous system, peripheral nervous system and autonomic nervous system and state their functions.
Discuss the structure of sensory and motor neurones and clearly explain how they work together to form a reflex arc. You should include an explanation of the functions of sensory and motor neurones in the reflex arc using an example of reflex action.
Explain the transmission of an action potential through a myelinated neurone and explain the all-or-nothing nature of nerve impulses. You must include the importance of the myelin sheath and the refractory period in determining the speed of nervous impulses.
Describe the structure and function of cholinergic synapses, as well as explaining their role in the nervous system. This should include how they determine direction of nerve impulse transmission and how they allow interconnection of nerve pathways.
Describe the causes, effects and implications of synaptic inhibition.
Guidance
The report should be written using the recommended structure and format for an illustrated report as outlined in the study materials for the Academic Writing Skills unit.
Relevant theory must be referenced where appropriate and you must provide a references list and bibliography.
Your report should also contain appropriate drawings and diagrams to support your commentary. If these are taken from published sources, they must be referenced accordingly.
The report should be a maximum of 2,000 words in length.
-
Nursing Question
Using the theory of unpleasant symptoms as a guide, what would you look for in an assessment tool for patient symptoms?Requirements:
- Your initial post should be 500 words and include at least one scholarly source not older than 5 years. Initial Post must be submitted by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m.
- Turnitin no more than 20%, Artificial intelligence (AI) no more than 30%
-
week 4 soap note
Using this , complete one SOAP note from a patient in the current NSG6430 practicum experience
-
The Healthcare System
I add the book to use along with the objective to be add on the slides , Please use videos and be modernized media, Be colorful to catch people attention… any questions please reach out -
Week 2
- Your healthcare facility is considering implementing a new health information system (HIS). You are on a committee evaluating different systems. As a committee member, you have been assigned to consider the components of a new HIS from different perspectives. Your assigned perspective is based on the first letter of your last name in the chart below.
You are assigned to consider the different components of a HIS from a healthcare provider perspective.
Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.
- Paragraph one: Based upon your assigned perspective, what components are needed in a new HIS? Why are they important?
- Paragraph two: How would your answer in paragraph 1 differ if the healthcare facility serves diverse populations or is in a remote location with limited technology support? What challenges would need to be considered?
- Paragraph three: Discuss the importance of nursing engagement in the planning and selection of healthcare technologies.
- References: Provide complete references for all citations.
- Integrate Evidence: Cite at least two sources of evidence in weekly posts.
- Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.
- Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.
- Integrate evidence that supports the discussion.
- Cite all scholarly sources, reading(s), OR lessons in an in-text citation within the post and include a complete reference at the bottom of the post.
- Use sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references.
- Engage in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage with peers and/or faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.
- Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.
- Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.
- Add depth to the Discussion.
- Communicate Professionally: Communicate professionally on all posts.
- Communicate clearly and concisely.
- Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.
- Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
- Participate: Participate during the assigned week. You are expected to meet the minimum participation requirement described below. You will receive a 10% point deduction in a graded discussion if you do not post at least two (2) times on at least two (2) different days during the assigned week.
- Post in the Discussion at least two times.
- Post in the Discussion on two different days.
NR361_W2_Discussion
NR361_W2_Discussion
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Apply Knowledge
(4 Required Criteria)
1. Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.
2. Based upon your assigned perspective, what components are needed in a new HIS? Why are they important?
3. How would your answer in paragraph 1 differ if the healthcare facility serves diverse populations or is in a remote location with limited technology support? What challenges would need to be considered?
4. Discuss the importance of nursing engagement in the planning and selection of healthcare technologies.
40 pts
Excellent
All requirements met.
36 pts
Very Good
3 requirements met.
33 pts
Satisfactory
2 requirements met.
20 pts
Needs Improvement
1 requirement met.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Integrate Evidence
(5 required criteria)
1. Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.
2. Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.
3. Cite evidence that supports the discussion.
4. Cite and provide a complete reference for all sources of evidence.
5. Select sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references or approved by course faculty.
24 pts
Excellent
All requirements met.
22 pts
Very Good
4 requirements met.
20 pts
Satisfactory
3 requirements met.
12 pts
Needs Improvement
1-2 requirements met.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
24 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Engage in Meaningful Dialogue
(3 required criteria)
1. Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.
2. Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.
3. Add depth to the discussion.
26 pts
Excellent
All requirements met.
22 pts
Satisfactory
2 requirements met.
13 pts
Needs Improvement
1 requirement met.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
26 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Communicate Professionally
1. Communicate clearly and concisely.
2. Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.
3. Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation
10 pts
Excellent
0-1 error(s).
9 pts
Very Good
2-3 errors.
8 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 errors.
5 pts
Needs Improvement
6-7 errors.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
More than 7 errors.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Particpate
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week, through Sunday the end of the assigned week):
1. Posts in the discussion at least two times, and
2. Posts in the discussion on two different days.
0 pts
No Points Deducted
During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Posts in the discussion at least two times, and 2. Posts in the discussion on two different days.
0 pts
Points Deducted (-10 points)
During the assigned week (Sunday, the start of the assigned week, through Sunday, the end of the assigned week): 1. Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times, AND/OR 2. Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days.
-
Career exploration paper
my major is register nurseAttached Files (PDF/DOCX): Career Exploration Paper.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Critical review of an article
Assessment 1: Details and instructions
Completion requirements Assessment 1 Critical review of an article Word count/length 750 words
(+/-10%; the reference list is not included in the word count but in-text citations are)SILOs - Accurately relate theoretical knowledge to practice in relation to caring for patients who are at risk and/or deteriorating (SILO 1).
- Accurately interpret scenario-based data to identify clinical and non-clinical priorities for patients (SILO 3).
Purpose
Critiquing research papers helps a nurse remain current in the scientific literature and allows postgraduate students to analyse, describe and interpret a text to show understanding of what has been read.
Task details
This assessment is designed to apply and consolidate learning in relation to understanding the key considerations when reading and interpreting an evidence-based clinical nursing article.
Read the article provided and write a brief review of the article using criteria to demonstrate your understanding and interpretation of the text.
Instructions
Using the criteria outlined in the subject content below, provide a concise description and analysis of the text.
A journal article review’s introduction typically contains one paragraph, while a longer book review might have two or three paragraphs. Include a few sentences in the introduction announcing the author(s), the title, and briefly outlining the text’s subject. Summarise the main finding or main argument of the text and state its purpose. Finish the introduction with a brief assessment of the text. This assessment may be positive, neutral, adverse, or, as is frequently the case, a combination of the three.
Give a concise summary of the main ideas and a few representative examples. You may also briefly describe the text’s organisation and the author’s intentions throughout the text. Between a third and half of your review should be committed to your summary.
The critique ought to be a balanced discussion and assessment of the text’s advantages, disadvantages, and distinguishing qualities. Do not forget to base your discussion on specific criteria, rather than vague descriptions of it being ‘well written’, for example. To support your assessment, good reviews often include additional sources (remember to cite).
A conclusion, as mentioned earlier, should tie up the main points. It should restate your overall position, which in a critical review is your opinion of the text. You should never introduce new points in a conclusion, but you might add some further qualification of your opinion, to appear measured and reasonable.
Any other sources that you have referred to in your review must be detailed in a list of references, in the required format (APA7).
- Summarise the text and compare and contrast it with other relevant literature.
- Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the text.
- Select, summarise and/or paraphrase supporting evidence from the text to demonstrate and support analysis.
- Please use an APA 7 Title Page on the front of your document.
- Provide an introduction and conclusion.
- Please ensure that your document adheres to APA 7 Style Guidelines with respect to overall formatting, as well as in-text citations and the end-of-text Reference List.
Resources and readings relevant to the assessment
Link to the APA Style Guide for Heading Levels:
Link to APA 7 referencing style guide:
-
Week 5 Reflective Discussion
The reflective journal assignment will include peer and faculty engagement. All students will engage and support one another by sharing their nursing experiences in a supportive, constructive, and professional environment. Reflective practice is a cognitive skill that demands a conscious ability to review an experience with increased awareness of personal beliefs and values; consequently, leading to knowledge development in nursing (Patel & Metersky, 2021).
Your Reflective Journal is:
- A personal, introspective reflection of your nursing practice and how you apply current RN-BSN/MSN course topics including thoughts and feelings regarding practice application and new knowledge development.
- Written in non-formal 300-400 words with no requirement of scholarly, academic style using APA style format.
- Post your initial response to one of the two topics below.
Topic 1: Faith-Based Nursing
Review Healthy People 2030. Identify objectives that are amenable to parish nurse intervention.
- Describe how faith communities can contribute to the accomplishment of these national health objectives and accomplish the goal of improving the health of the public.
- How can nurses working in the community form partnerships with parish nurses and faith communities?
- How would such partnerships be beneficial?
Topic 2: Collaboration at the Local, State, and Federal Levels
- Describe the roles of your local and state health departments in the accomplishment of healthcare promotion and goals.
- How do their goals of health promotion meet the objective of Healthy People 2030?
- How could nurses in the public health setting help clients to modify unhealthy behaviors at the primary and secondary prevention levels?
- Please provide an example for each prevention level.
Submission details
- Write a brief 300-400 word reflection on your beliefs and insights about the selected topic. Feel free to share openly without concern about getting a grade expressing your personal thoughts or feelings in your writing. Your reflective journal must reflect your personal nursing practice experience.