Category: Nursing

Compare the roles of nurse educators in academic and healthcare settings. What are the similarities and differences?

I just want to be a skilled, safe knowledgeable nurse. Make it personable & an easy read.

This is a continuation of the previous project… Please see the attachements. Also use the examplar as a baseline.

This week, you will finalize your PowerPoint summarizing your entire QI project.

Additional details for each project can be viewed in the

Develop and submit a power point to present the elements of your QI

Proposal. Be sure to use the Speaker notes so that you can follow the

7X7 rule for power points. If you cannot locate the Speaker Notes,

then put your speaker notes on a separate slide that follows your

graphics and bulleted information. Present your QI project to your

preceptor/mentor.

The finalized PowerPoint of your proposal includes:

Title Page

Background

Research Question

Literature Review

Change Theory

Stages of implementation based on the selected change theory.

References

Rubric

Power Point Presentation Rubric

Power Point Presentation Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Finalized power point of proposal includes the title and author, background, research question, literature review, change theory, and stages of implementation based on the selected change theory.(9 slides)

80 to >70.0 pts

Excellent

Power points/or poster presentation includes all components listed.

70 to >40.0 pts

Needs Some Improvement

Finalized power point/poster presentation is missing one component listed.

40 to >10.0 pts

Needs Significant Improvement

Finalized power points or poster presentation is missing more than one component listed.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

Finalized power points/or poster presentation, is missing one or more components listed.

80 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Elements of the Power Points Format

20 to >16.0 pts

Excellent

Prescribed number of slides in presentation: Includes a title side, summary slide, and reference slide in APA. Each slide has appropriate amount of text following 7 lines,7 words per line. Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choices of font enhances readability. Uses professional graphics to add value to the presentation.

16 to >12.0 pts

Needs Some Improvement

Number of slides in presentation is less than prescribed, by 1-2 slides One of the following may be missing: title slide, summary slide, reference slide. Most slides have the appropriate amount of text (Follow the 7×7 rules) Background may detract from text or other graphics. Some font formats may detract from readability. Graphics overall look professional.

12 to >4.0 pts

Needs Significant Improvement

Number of slides is significantly less than prescribed by greater to or equal to 3 slides. More than one of the following is missing: title slide, summary slide, reference slide. Many slides have too little or too much text. Background detracts from text and/or graphics. Font format varies from slide. Graphics look less than professional.

4 to >0 pts

Poor

No power point or poster presentation is submitted, only a word document in outline format.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Mechanics and Grammar

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

No errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, or spelling

8 to >6.0 pts

Needs Some Improvement

Minor errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling that interfere with reading/ understanding.

6 to >3.0 pts

Needs Significant Improvement

Some errors in APA format, in-text citation(s), or reference page.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Numerous errors in APA format, in-text citation(s), or reference page.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

APA Formatting

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

No errors in APA format, in-text citation(s), or reference page.

8 to >6.0 pts

Needs Some Improvement

Minor errors in APA format, in-text citation(s), or reference page

6 to >3.0 pts

Needs Significant Improvement

Some errors in APA format, in-text citation(s), or reference page.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Numerous errors in APA format, in-text citation(s), or reference page.

10 pts

Total Points: 120

Service Improvement Project 2025/26 PROJECT TITILE ————–A PROPOSED PROJECT PLAN TO REDUCE FALLS BY 30% IN 6 MONTHS IN AN ORTHOPEADIC WARD USING SIDE RAILS and ANTI SLIP SOCKS. ( 3000 WORDS) GOAL IDEA Comprehensive written project plan focused on the re-design of an element of service provision that enhances the experiences and outcomes of those involved in the service. (3000) PLEASE USE THE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS SUPLOADED AS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT THE THE PROJECT CONTENT SHOULD LOOK LIKE PLEASE NOTE – use 5 literature reviews for this project – Use 30 REFERENCES no more than 10 years no later than 2016) throughout THE PROJECT. – use the PSDA cycle as explained below in sections.AND OUTINING THIS IN APPENDIX 2 – Make appendix 1 box FOR SEARCH STRATEGY USING SPECIFIC DATABASES FOR THE LITERATURE REVIEWS ( CINHAL, PubMed etc with the same layout below, in the additional document attached – Use Gantt chart asp below, using the timeline October- 2025-Decemnber 2025 – The budget of the project is ?100-STICK TO THIS

Preparing the Discussion ((PLEASE INCLUDE CITATION WITHIN LAST 5 YEARS))

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

General Directions

Review the provided case study to complete this weeks discussion.

Include the following sections:

1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
2. Select one drug to treat the diagnosis(es) or symptoms.
3. List medication class and mechanism of action for the chosen medication.
4. Write the prescription in prescription format.
5. Provide an evidence-based rationale for the selected medication using at least one scholarly reference. Textbooks may be used for additional references but are not the primary reference.
6. List any side effects or adverse effects associated with the medication.
7. Include any required diagnostic testing. State the time frame for this testing (testing is before medication initiation or q 3 months, etc.). Includes normal results range for any listed laboratory tests.
8. Provide a minimum of three appropriate medication-related teaching points for the client and/or family.
9. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations:
10. Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
11. Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
12. Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
13. Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
14. Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.

NR546 W3 Case Study Discussion Rubric

NR546 W3 Case Study Discussion Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Application of Course Knowledge

6 Required Criteria

Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail:

1. Select one drug to treat the diagnosis(es) or symptoms.

2. List medication class and mechanism of action for the chosen medication.

3. Write the prescription in prescription format.

4. List any side effects or adverse effects associated with the medication.

5. Include any required diagnostic testing. State the time frame for this testing (testing is before medication initiation or q 3 months, etc.). Includes normal results range for any listed laboratory tests.

6. Provide a minimum of three appropriate medication-related teaching points for the client and/or family.

40 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

36 pts

V. Good

5 requirements met.

33 pts

Satisfactory

4 requirements met.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

1-3 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Integration of Evidence

5 Required Criteria

Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations:

1. Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.

2. Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.

3. Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.

4. Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.

5. Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.

20 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

18 pts

V. Good

4 requirements met.

16 pts

Satisfactory

3 requirements met.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

1-2 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue

3 Required Criteria

Engage peers and faculty by asking questions, offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice:

1. Respond to at least one peer [on a topic other than the initial assigned topic].

2. Respond to at least one faculty post.

3. Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.

30 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

24 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Professionalism in Communication

Communicates with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

V. Good

2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Reference Citation

Uses current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.

5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

V. Good

2 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

3-4 errors.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

5-6 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 6 errors.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Late Penalty Deduction

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e., student will receive an automatic 0).

0 pts

No Points Deducted

Posts submitted on time; no points deducted.

0 pts

Points Deducted

Posts submitted late. 10% deduction in points for initial posts entered after Wednesday.

0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Total Participation

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not posting on the minimum of TWO separate days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

0 pts

No Points Deducted

Posts submitted on a minimum of two separate days; no points deducted.

0 pts

Points Deducted

Participation requirement not met. 10% deduction in points for not posting on a minimum of two separate days.

0 pts

Total Points: 100

Purpose: This assignment aims to define leadership and management and concepts that might be used in your current work setting. Instructions: Use your experience, videos, readings, and discussion board information to inform your response. Define leadership in 3 to 5 bullet points. Define management in 3 to 5 bullet points. Explain the difference between leadership and management. Identify one new or different organizational concept explored in this chapter that might be used in your current work setting, and identify 3 ways it could be used in your work setting. Complete and submit the assignment by 23:59 EST Sunday. Each citation and reference should use APA 7th edition. Please upload a PDF copy of any journal articles that you used for your assignment. APA student paper format with a cover page is required. Submit as a Word document. Module Objectives: This assignment aids in the attainment of the following Module Objectives: MO 1: Identify the general principles guiding appreciative leadership conceptualizations. (CO 1) MO 2: Discuss five key principles of appreciative leadership that differentiate it from more traditional leadership models. (CO 4) MO 3: Explore new organizational concepts of complex adaptive systems and their relationship to new leader practices. (CO 5)

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your ability to integrate your knowledge and understanding of pharmacology with the actions of drugs and utilize therapeutic agents in a rational and responsible manner in the treatment of patients.

Requirements

You will select a medication and develop a concept map. A concept map is a visual representation of interrelated concepts, systems, or processes.

To better understand concept maps, review these web resources:

• You can also use Word or PowerPoint to do concept maps.

Format of the paper should be cover sheet (in APA), concept map, references (again in APA). You will upload a PDF version of your concept map to the assignment tab.

Choose a medication and drug class as the topic and then elaborate on the different important concepts related to the drug (class) i.e. patient education, adverse effects, drug effectiveness outcomes, significant interactions, lab work etc