Bright Academic Experts

Category: Nursing

  • Cataracts

    5-7 pages, double spaced, times new Roman, written in professional nursing language

  • Clinical judgment plan

    Hi, I wanted to explain the homework before sending the files. This assignment is part of my nursing course and it is called a Clinical Judgment Plan (draft). My topic is urinary tract infection because we started our first presentation with this topic, so this plan should continue based on that same topic. I will send you the downloaded file, the template sheet, and the rubric that the school provided. Based on those documents, I need the plan to be completed according to the instructions in the template and rubric. Please fill out the plan exactly according to what the school requires and make sure the answers match the sections in the template. I can also upload the previous file from our first presentation here so you can use it as a guide and write the plan based on that. I can also send a sample from one of my classmates so you can clearly see what the final format and answers should look like and complete mine in a similar way according to that example.please make sure if need to cite for some part.

  • week 2 assignment

    This assignment is structured to support students in identifying and describing an educational problem or issue in a nurse educator setting, as the first step in developing an Education Practicum Quality Improvement Project. Elements of your introduction are to include:

    • Description of the problem/issue with evidence-based research to support it,
    • Discussion of the impact to your learner and practicum site/organization,
    • A PICOT question to support the quality improvement project,
    • A theoretical framework appropriate to the identified educational intervention, proposed educational intervention and,
    • A summary.

    Assignment Instructions

    You begin your Education Practicum Quality Improvement Project in this assignment, by identifying and describing an educational problem or issue.

    1. The following information should be included in this part of your paper.
    2. Description of the problem or issue
    3. Evidence related to the problem or issue, including statistics if appropriate
    4. Real or potential impact of the issue
    5. Discuss the impact the identified problem or issue may have on your learner and practicum site/organization
    6. Your PICOT question
    7. Choose a theoretical framework to support your project you can choose from a nursing theory, learning theory, or non-nursing theory.
    8. You can choose from a nursing theory, learning theory, or non-nursing theory.
    9. Briefly describe how this theory supports your project.
    10. A description of your proposed educational intervention. What evidence-based teaching strategy will you use to address your problem or issue?
    11. Summarize the introduction, including the purpose of the education practicum quality improvement project and what your paper will include.
    12. The paper should be two to three pages long, plus a reference page. This is an estimate to guide you and not a strict requirement. Each identified section should be a minimum of one complete paragraph (minimum of three sentences). The
    16. attached to this assignment is required to develop your assignments. You will use this document throughout your Education Practicum Quality Improvement project.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): WEEK 1 discuss nr 622.docx, NR621_622_Education_Practicum_Project_Paper_Template__022624.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • week 2 assignment

    Answer and Analysis these topics

    1. Discuss the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis.

    2. What role do genetic mutations play in the development of disease?

    3. What is the impact of disease on the immune system? How do treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease?

    Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and symptoms presented in the case study

    Answer the questions using APA format title page, introduction, body of the paper, conclusion, and a Reference page.

    *** first picture is the topic (chief compliant) that needs to be written on

    ***rubric attached

  • History and physical note pediatrics

    This is not an essay. The purpose of this assignment is to create a history and physical on a pediatric patient within the age range listed at the top of the attached template. Simply follow the template and fill in the blanks. The patient must have at least 1 secondary diagnosis (the first diagnosis is already listed). Review of systems is subjective info that would come from the mother. The physical exam portion must list at least 3 things per system. Make sure the physical exam matches up with the appropriate signs/symptoms for the listed diagnosis. 3 sources must be listed but do not need to be cited throughout the paper due to this not being a write up assignment. There is no word count required, nor page length requirement, as long as all the points and systems listed in template are addressed.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Pediatric History and Physical Examination Notes Updated (1) 2.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • below is al the information I was given. APA format and EBP…

    Overview:

    Nurse leaders operate in complex healthcare systems, balancing legal, ethical, and regulatory responsibilities. In this assignment, youll evaluate a realistic leadership scenario involving healthcare agencies, policy pressures, and ethical challenges. You will apply regulatory knowledge, policy analysis, and decision-making principles to guide your leadership actions.

    Scenario:

    You are a nurse leader in a mid-sized hospital preparing for a Joint Commission survey. Recently, your unit had a medication error that wasnt reported promptly, and several staff have expressed confusion about roles in emergency codes. Meanwhile, a new state policy on staffing ratios is being debated, and the hospitals end-of-life care practices have raised ethical concerns after a recent case received media attention.

    Your Task:

    Write a 7501000 word analysis responding to the prompts below. Use course concepts from Weeks 710.

    Part 1: Regulatory Systems and Preparedness

    • Identify one national or state agency that influences nursing care in this scenario and explain its role.
    • Describe your leadership role in preparing for the upcoming survey and strengthening emergency preparedness.
    • Briefly outline one framework (e.g., HICS, ICS) you would apply to clarify team roles during emergencies.

    Part 2: Policy and Strategic Influence

    • Conduct a brief SWOT analysis (one strength, one weakness, one opportunity, one threat) related to your units preparedness or response.
    • Describe how you would engage in strategic planning or policy influence regarding the debated staffing ratio policy.
    • Explain how you would guide your team through compliance while also advocating for quality care.

    Part 3: Ethics, Law, and Data-Driven Leadership

    • Identify one ethical issue in this case (e.g., reporting errors, end-of-life decisions) and apply a relevant ethical principle or law.
    • Describe how you would lead a response that is both ethical and legally sound.
    • Explain how you would use data (e.g., dashboards, QI indicators) to support your advocacy or decision-making.

    Tips for Success:

    • Reference leadership roles, policy frameworks, and ethical principles discussed in class.
    • Use clear reasoning and professional judgment.
    • No citations are requiredfocus on application of course concepts.

  • Case Study

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Directions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Community-Based Hypertension Screening and Education Program…

    I have a research paper due I would like the topic to be Hypertension screening and education programs in the community.

    The research paper will be 6-9 pages of substance, not including title page or reference page(s). The research paper must be in APA format; appropriate font size and style, 1-inch margins, double-spaced, pages numbers, etc… Include the following in the research paper:

    1) Title Page:

    a. Include: title/topic, full name, institutions name, course number and name, instructor name, and assignment due date.

    2) History of the topic

    3) Impacts in Nursing

    4) Interventions

    6-9

    5) How to apply the interventions

    pages

    6) Barriers to applications

    7) Reflection

    8) Reference Page:

    a. Must include at least 10 reputable references (professional sources) from the last three years.

    b. References are cited in the correct APA format for the type of citation they represent (newspaper, book, journal, webpage, etc.)

    Presentation: (25 pts.)

    1) Students should be prepared, organized, demonstrate professionalism, and provide information appropriate for the audience.

    2) Use PowerPoint, Prezi, or other presentation software

    3) 10 minute presentation + 2 minute Q & A

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): LPN 280 Project Grading Rubric (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Acute appendicitis treatment comparison

    For this assessment, you are a presenter! You will create a 510 minute video using Kaltura or similar software. In the video and written narrative: Review your findings from Assessment 3. Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 (see the samples in the Assessment 4: Poster Template Examples reading list). Include: An explanation of the diagnosis. The research question you developed using PICO(T). A summary of your sources. The answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of evidence. Describe the key steps of care you are recommending based on your evidence. Give a professional presentation to your peers, showing your poster with your voice narration using Kaltura or similar software. Include your written narrative/script of the presentation in a Word document. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative. Your assessment should also meet the following requirements: Length of video: 510 minutes. References: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements. APA reference page: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style. Video and narrative: You must submit a written narrative of all of your video content. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Final-PICOT Question (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • NUR531 Project 2: Apply a systems theory leadership approach…

    NUR 531 Project Two Guidelines and Rubric

    Competency

    In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:

    • Apply a systems theory leadership approach to improve safety and quality

    Overview

    Inter professional leadership benefits from having several tools at the ready to meet the demands of the healthcare systems. These tools will help you do your analysis and make decisions based on the results. Quality improvement models typically focus on what is referred to as the Triple Aim. This includes improve the health of a population, improve the experience of care, and improve the costs related to providing care. There are many tools that could be used to assess healthcare systems. Some tools are applied proactively, others in response to an event, and others are used to evaluate outcomes. In this project, you will work with a sample of leadership tools that use a systems theory approach and can be applied in various practice settings to address improvements related to patients, populations, structures, procedures, and others. One of the most common analysis tools useful for strategic planning is the SWOT analysis. Some analysis tools that are used for problem solving include FMEA, flow charts, and root-cause analyses. A model of improvement is used to frame change initiatives and may include PDSA, Six Sigma, LEAN, and others. The ability to analyze data trends is also a valuable skill in any leadership role.

    Scenario

    The hospital you work for presents an annual innovation award internally to a nurse or nurse-led group who presents their work. Awards are given to nurses or nurse-led teams who implement a program, project, product, or practice that exemplifies innovation in the areas of patient safety and/or outcomes. The requirements to submit for the award include three major components called a toolbox. You plan to submit your toolbox for the annual innovation award using the following parts: Part 1: a proactive systems assessment, Part 2: a reactive systems assessment and quality improvement models, and Part 3: evaluate outcomes using data trends.

    These three parts will be pieced together to showcase the work and present for your hospitals annual innovation award.

    Directions

    Construct a leadership toolbox in the form of a PowerPoint presentation. Include three sources to support your claims.

    Specifically, your presentation should consist of the following three parts:

    Part 1: Proactive Systems Assessment

    1. Incorporate a proactive systems assessment. Consider the organization in which you are currently working. Conduct a SWOT analysis that focuses on the organizations ability to implement one of the following innovations into the strategic plan (chose one from the list):
      1. Establishing a teen clinic for emancipated minors
      2. Adopting the ANAs nurse staffing principles
      3. Purchasing simulation manikin for central line training (e.g., Chester Chest)
      4. Expanding the electronic health record to include an adverse event tracer
      5. Sponsoring a bi-monthly (every two months) health screening clinic

    Part 2: Reactive Systems Assessment and Quality Improvement Models

    1. Incorporate a reactive systems assessment. Complete a root-cause analysis. Using the case study listed in the Supporting Materials section, complete a root-cause analysis.
      1. Describe the tool.
      2. Explain the purpose or use of that tool.
      3. Describe how the selected tool is used in practice.
    2. Determine a quality improvement model for an evaluation of outcomes.
      1. Explain how the root-cause analysis taken from the case study applies to the quality improvement process within the framework of your chosen quality improvement model.

    Part 3: Evaluate Outcomes Using Data Trends
    Use the provided partial data set and address the following:

    1. Identify trends in the data. Choose a cancer type to graph against demographics (either age or ethnicity) (example: number of cases of bone marrow cancer by age group)
      1. Provide a visualization of your selections.
      2. Include a trendline in your visualization.
    2. Analyze outcomes using data. Interpret your graph tell the story of your data. Describe what the data is telling you based on the visualization. Discuss what you learned from the data.
      1. Describe the trend (the data outcome).
      2. Explain the meaning that you can take from the data.
      3. Discuss how data interpretation like this can be used for clinical decision making.

    What to Submit

    To complete this project, you must submit the following:

    Innovation Presentation
    Your submission should be an 8-to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation including title and reference slides and speaker notes. Include three sources to support your claims. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

    Supporting Materials

    The following resources support your work on the project:

    Resource:

    Resource:

    Reading:
    This Microsoft-provided tutorial should be used as a reference when working on your visualizations.

    Project Two Rubric

    Criteria Exceeds Expectations (100%) Meets Expectations (90%) Partially Meets Expectations (70%) Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) Value
    Incorporate a Proactive Systems Assessment Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language Conducts SWOT analysis on one of the listed innovations Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions Does not attempt criterion 15
    Incorporate a Reactive Systems Assessment Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language Completes root cause analysis including necessary components Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions Does not attempt criterion 15
    Determine a Quality Improvement Model for an Evaluation of Outcomes Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language Explains how root cause analysis applies to the quality improvement process within the framework of chosen quality improvement model Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions Does not attempt criterion 15
    Identify Trends in the Data Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language Provides visualization of data, including a trendline Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions Does not attempt criterion 15
    Analyze Outcomes Using Data Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language Discusses what was learned from data, including all necessary components Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions Does not attempt criterion 15
    Clear Communication Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication 10
    Scholarly Sources Incorporates more than three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or use of sources is exceptionally insightful Incorporates three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources that support claims Incorporates fewer than three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or not all sources support claims Does not incorporate sources 10
    APA Style Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with no errors Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with fewer than five errors Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with five or more errors Does not format in-text citations and reference list according to APA style 5