Category: Organizational behavior

The final project, due March 1, allows you to integrate and demonstrate what you have learned in this course. Prepare a paper of more than 6 pages and no more than 9 pages in length, not including the title page and reference list. The paper should follow the posted guidelines and use accepted research approaches and APA citation format. Every aspect of your analysis should be anchored by communication principles and best practices.

Writing Assignment 3, the Final Project, asks you to analyze the case study Forensic Services at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health by Seijts and Iuliani (2021). The case describes a large mental health teaching hospital facing a high-profile media crisis that has significantly disrupted its relationships with major stakeholders.

Your task is to propose a strategy to navigate the publicity crisis effectively, with communication and stakeholder management at the center of your approach. The strategy should both protect the hospitals reputation and address the concerns of all parties involved. As you build your analysis, integrate insights from Ramannas Managing in the Age of Outrage (2022), Groysberg and Leamons Difficult Conversations and Dealing with Challenging Situations at Work (2015), Neeley and Ryders Lighting the Fire (2016), and Frei and Morrisss Storytelling That Drives Bold Change (2023). These readings should support your approach, showing how broader communication principles can be applied to this case.

Your paper should include an introduction, a clear articulation of the crisis, your proposed communication strategy, an explanation of stakeholder management approaches, and a conclusion that summarizes your key points. Cite all sources in APA format, following the guidelines provided in the syllabus and the examples posted in Moodle.

I have been tasked with writing a 650-word MAX Negotiation Analysis for my Organizational Behavior class. I have attached screenshots of the lecture pertaining to this topic, the rubric, and additional instructions. I have also attached my previous essay and professor feedback I received from this class. Please use that HEAVILY and go more into detail for this analysis than my example as I received a very poor grade. Feel free to use that same experience to make up a time that would apply in my position for this negotiation analysis as well.

ONLY SEND ME A MESSAGE AFTER YOU HAVE REVIEWED ALL MATERIALS AND YOU ARE CONFIDENT IN YOUR ABILITIES

Q.1 Describe how as a manager you will apply any one of the motivation theories to increase employee productivity, and job satisfaction or to reduce turnover-

1. Minimum 500 words

2. Minimum Six-6 Peer-reviewed Articles

follow the APA style formatting (template attached) in your answers to set your paper as a research paper and apply in-text citations and the reference page.

less than 20% similarity score is accepted and No AI allowed

please follow the instructions attached the video is attached

Students will complete individual perspective papers, exploring a topic relevant to the course from both the perspective of the research community and the business practitioner community. Papers should be a minimum of 10 pages (including title page and references page, which means the content should be at least 8 full pages of paragraph-style text in length: this means minimal-to-none bullet-pointed lists, graphs/figures, and quotes) and follow APA format. Reference sources should include a minimum of three scholarly journal articles (e.g., Journal of Applied Psychology, Personnel Psychology, Academy of Management Review) and three business practitioner articles (e.g., HR Magazine, Wall Street Journal, Business Week, Harvard Business Review, NY Times). Course textbook: Organizational Behavior: A Practical, Problem-Solving Approach by Angelo Kinicki

Papers should be structured as follows:

1. Title Page.
2. Introduction/overview and explanation of the topic.
3. Organizational relevance and focus on this topic what are the trends, challenges, and best practices as reported by todays businesses.
4. Key research findings and developments what have researchers found in this topic area that could possibly be important and useful to organizations to apply.
5. Your original perspective on this topic why did you select it to examine, how well (or poorly) do you believe the research community is aligned with the business world in terms of presenting findings that could really translate into organizational improvements, and where do you believe this area is headed in the future.
6. Conclusion tie all your loose ends together and wrap up the paper with a logical ending.
7. References Page

My Outline:

Topic: Why Ethics Matter to Me and My Workplace

Title Page

L. Introduction

A. Importance of ethics in leadership and organizations

B. Role of ethical behavior in workplace

II. Ethics in Leadership and Organizations

A. Ethics in organizational settings

B. Relationship between ethics and leadership behavior

III. Why Ethics Matter to Me

A. Personal values and ethical decision making

B. Impact of personal ethics on workplace relationships

IV. Why Ethics Matter in the Workplace

A. Ethical behavior and employee morale

B. Ethical Ieadership in the workplace

V. Challenges to Ethical Behavior

A. Importance of ethical guidelines and support

B. Organizational pressure and ethical decision-making

VI.

Conclusion

A. Importance of ethics for individuals and organizations

B. Final reflections and summary of key points

Write a 3-page application paper (excluding title and reference pages) that includes the following:

An introductory paragraph.

Identify a Case. Choose one of the following:

A well-known public figure or character from media Shawn Puffy Combs or

Sherrone Moore (Michigan Coach)

Briefly describe the behavioral pattern or issue (e.g., aggression, substance use, avoidance, perfectionism, etc.).

Apply Social Learning Theory

What behaviors have likely been learned through modeling or reinforcement?

Who were the primary models or influences?

What reinforcement patterns (positive, negative, or punishment) may have maintained the behavior?

How does self-efficacy play a role in this situation?

Plan for Change

Describe an intervention strategy you would use to support behavior change based on Social Learning Theory.

How would you use modeling, role-play, or reinforcement in your approach?

How might cultural or contextual factors influence your strategy?

Reflection

How does understanding Social Learning Theory affect the way you view clients struggling with behavior patterns?

How does this shape your role as a social worker in modeling healthy behaviors?

A conclusion paragraph.

Do this chart found in files on Cast away adventures a company i made up for this project a guided fishing service in australia

I am requesting dissertation revision support focused on chair-directed feedback, methodological refinement, and final formatting alignment. I will be attaching the following materials for your review:

1. My current dissertation draft with tracked changes and margin comments from my committee chair
2. A completed dissertation previously approved by my chair for another doctoral student, to be used strictly as a benchmark for formatting, structure, and methodological presentation

Your scope of work should include the following:

Carefully review and implement all substantive and stylistic revisions requested by my chair (note: I have already addressed several of the chairs comments and made preliminary revisions; this review should focus on confirming alignment with remaining feedback and refining as needed)

Ensure that all chair-requested changes are fully and accurately incorporated

Use the attached benchmark dissertation to verify correct font, spacing, headings, pagination, and overall formatting consistency

Confirm full APA 7 compliance throughout the document

In addition, please complete a thorough review and refinement of Chapter 3 (Methodology) to ensure it is fully defensible and aligned with my chairs expectations for a qualitative, phenomenological (IPA) study. This includes:

Clear justification of the interpretative phenomenological analysis approach

Alignment between the research questions, participant selection, data collection, and analysis procedures

Precise, step-by-step explanation of the IPA analytic process

Appropriate positioning of theoretical frameworks as interpretive lenses rather than causal drivers

Explicit treatment of trustworthiness, reflexivity, and methodological rigor

Upon completion, please return the dissertation as a clean Microsoft Word document, with all tracked changes, comments, and markup removed, so that it is ready for formal resubmission to my chair.

If you identify any areas that may still raise committee concerns, please flag those separately for my review rather than embedding comments in the manuscript.

Thank you, and I look forward to working with a service experienced in doctoral-level, chair-directed dissertation revisions.

instructions attached

instructions attached