Category: Philosophy

Assignment:

Instructions

Offer a careful reading of pp. 194-349 of The Sufi Path of Love with a particular eye on explaining Rumis understanding of love and why imagination and beauty are so intimately connected to it. Your paper should combine careful citations from Rumis poetry alongside your analysis of his arguments with respect to their form and coherence.

Form:

1. Your paper should be ten full pages in length, double spaced, and written in

Times New Roman font (size 12).

2. Diction is to be formal, and each piece is to be written in Canadian English.

Grammar, syntax, spelling, and style must be impeccable. You may write in the

first person.

3. At the top right of the first page of your paper, include the course code, your full

name, and the assignments due date. This should be in Times New Roman font

(size 12).

4. When citing materials, please follow the Chicago Manual of Style.

Complete your Week 1 required discussion prompt.

• In your own words, describe the primary difference between consequentialist and non-consequentialist approaches to ethics.
• Choose one of the major theories associated with consequentialism: what objections might be made to this theory?
• Choose one of the major theories associated with non-consequentialism: what objections might be made to this theory?
• In addition to your main response, you must also post substantive responses to at least two of your classmates’ posts in this thread. Your response should include elements such as follow-up questions, further exploration of topics from the initial post, or requests for further clarification or explanation on some points made by the classmates.

• Use proper grammar and proper capitalization.
• I recommend you create your posting and replies in a Word document, run spell & grammar check, and then copy and paste it into the discussion forum. Please do not post attachments in the discussion forum as your peers may not be able to view them.
• Ensure your references are formatted in APA 7th edition. (Visit
• for helpful formatting guidance.)
• Develop substantive peer responses which means extend the discussion or add to the points made. Writing something like “That was a great response, Jane. I appreciate the way you presented the information. I now have a better understanding of the content” is not substantive. While this response has a few sentences to it, this is basically an extended version of “good job”. A more appropriate response would be “Thank you for this contribution to our discussion, Jane. Your points about research topics are valid. In performing research, it is critical to ensure the sources selected are both timely and relevant. Research within the last five years from trusted sources is ideal. Further, it is important to use peer-reviewed information when possible, as this increases the credibility of the research conducted”.
• Watch the video as a resource for discssion

youtube.com/watch?v=hACdhD_kes8&time_continue=2&source_ve_path=NzY3NTg&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fcanvas.westcoastuniversity.edu%2Fcourses%2F77130%2Fdiscussion_topics%2F1559240

all the necessary information is attached

Assignment:

Instructions

Offer a careful reading of pp. 194-349 of The Sufi Path of Love with a particular eye on explaining Rumis understanding of love and why imagination and beauty are so intimately connected to it. Your paper should combine careful citations from Rumis poetry alongside your analysis of his arguments with respect to their form and coherence.

Form:

1. Your paper should be ten full pages in length, double spaced, and written in

Times New Roman font (size 12).

2. Diction is to be formal, and each piece is to be written in Canadian English.

Grammar, syntax, spelling, and style must be impeccable. You may write in the

first person.

3. At the top right of the first page of your paper, include the course code, your full

name, and the assignments due date. This should be in Times New Roman font

(size 12).

4. When citing materials, please follow the Chicago Manual of Style.

You are required to draft and revise your case study in a Google Doc from the start. Because Google Docs allows us to review version histories, we can ensure that you have not copied or transcribed your paper directly from ChatGPT or another illicit GenAI source. Copy-and-paste the final version of your paper from the Google Doc to a Word Document or a PDF-convertible word processor to submit on Moodle. Include a link to that Google doc at the top of the document you submit and make sure to grant us editing access to it so that we can review its version history (for step-by-step instructions on how to grant editing access, see this document). We will refuse to grade submissions that (i) do not include a link to a Google Doc at the top, (ii) the linked Google Doc does not grant us editing access or (iii) the version history of the Google Doc indicates the paper text was copy-and-pasted or directly transcribed from another source. These submissions will automatically receive a 0, no exceptions. Basic Information You will be writing a case study for this course. The goal of case studies is to bring to bear the moral theory and arguments from the course material to a real-life morally messy case. You will choose one of several cases to focus on. The list of cases you can choose from is on the case study instructions document, which will be available from the beginning of the course. After presenting the case and its morally relevant features, you will discuss and analyze two opposing stances one may take on the case. For example, if the case is about an abortion, one stance may be that the abortion is morally permissible, and the other stance may be that the abortion is morally wrong. At the end of the case study, you will argue in favor of one of these two stances that is, you will give reasons for thinking that one stance is most plausible. For example, you might argue that the abortion is morally permissible in the case. Word Count: 1000 1200 words, excluding bibliography, in-text citations, and footnotes *Do NOT exceed 1200 words (TAs are instructed to stop reading after 1200 words they will only grade the first 800 words) Format: 12-point font, Times New Roman, Double-spaced, 1-inch margins, include page numbers Include: a link to the Google Doc where you drafted your paper at the top, a title, your name, your student ID, page numbers in the bottom right-hand corner Citations: cite sources using any standard citation method (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago)

Instructions

Topic Selection: Choose a specific topic from one of our course textbook chapters. Your paper should address a significant issue or “problem” in the psychological literature.

Textbook:

Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2016). A history of modern psychology (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN-13: 978-1-305-63004-8

Topic: Alcohol, How it affect the body, mind, etc…

Research Goal: Explore your topic in depth using external academic resources. Your paper must present a unique insight or “intriguing” discovery you made during your researchperhaps a lesser-known aspect of a theory or a finding that changed your perspective.

Technical Requirements:

• Length: Minimum of four (4) full pages of double-spaced content (approx. 1,000 to 1,200 words). This does not include the title page or reference page.
• Formatting: Use 12pt Times New Roman font and follow APA 7th Edition guidelines strictly.
• File Format: Submit as .doc or .docx only. PDFs will not be graded.
• Sources: Use at least three (3) peer-reviewed academic references (journal articles or scholarly books). The course textbook may be used as a fourth source but does not count toward the three-source minimum. Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference.

Originality: This must be your own original work. The use of AI (e.g., ChatGPT) for writing, paraphrasing, or outlining is strictly prohibited and will be treated as plagiarism

Resources:

Research Paper Checklist

How to Find a Research Topic

APA Format Resources

• Thomas University – Research Guide: APA Style
• APA Style – Student Paper Checklist
• APA Style Website – Handouts and Guides

Thomas University Research Guides: A-Z Databases

• • Here is the link to the A-Z databases where you can explore at least 24 databases dedicated to Psychology

Grading Criteria for Research Paper (located in Appendix B of Syllabus)

(The names beside each philosophy are just for reference to help you connect the philosophy with specific philosophers.)

PS360 APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS I (EVENING) PART C 3.0

Assignment Name: Task #3

Closing Time: 3/29/2026 11:55 PM (Current Time: 3/24/2026 7:00 PM America/New_York)

Task 3: Intervention Design Proposal

Objective: To use the AB chart design to demonstrate a behavioral intervention.

Instructions:

Write a 4-page intervention proposal that includes:

The chosen problem behavior.

Intervention method to be used: Positive reinforcement. Explain its application in the specific case.

Include the chart, identifying the phases, baseline (5 data points), time (10 times), and behavior with titles.

Explain the success of the intervention compared to the baseline.

APA Length Requirement: 6 pages (including cover page and references page).

References: Minimum 4.

this links will required when you go thought attached picture that has questions and the instructions .

Like information needed for write up: My job is software developer at TTEC

Select one scenario from the attached “Ethical Technology Use Scenarios” document and do the following:

A. Discuss an ethical issue in the selected scenario by doing the following:

Identify the selected scenario and describe one ethical issue that occurs.

Discuss the impact of the ethical issue from part A1. Include why the ethical issue is a problem and who is impacted by it.

Explain the role a data privacy, data access, data accuracy, or data security concern played in the selected scenario.

B. Apply an ethical framework to the issue described by doing the following:

Apply one of the following ethical frameworks to develop one potential response to the ethical issue identified in part A1:

deontology

virtue ethics

utilitarianism

Explain how the response from part B1 would be similar or different when applying another ethical framework from those listed in part B1 to the same ethical issue.

C. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions

File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )

File size limit: 200 MB

File types allowed:

doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov,