Category: Philosophy

PHI 1301-20.01.02-4B26-S4, Critical Thinking Unit III Assignment Assignment objective: Students will create a writing exercise involving the creation of a dialogue and an analysis of key components of arguments. Length: Your submission should be at least two (2) pages in length, not including the title page and references (if used). References: APA Style will not be required for this assignment, and no outside resources are required. Details: Using the Unit I!| Assignment Template, write a dialogue (short conversation) between two people. Keys to address: Make sure that each person provides the other with an argument. Each argument must have a conclusion and at least two premises. Since it is a conversation, each person should also state some extraneous material. After you are done writing the dialogue, fill out each part of the dialogue elements. Your final product will need a conclusion and at least two premises, two assumptions, and two pieces of extraneous material for each speaker. View the Unit Ill Sample Assignment for an example of how your completed assignment should look. Your completed assignment should be at least two pages in length. Submission: Save the submission as a Word document and upload the document to Blackboard. Grading: The assignment will be reviewed in alignment to the grading rubric criteria which is focused on the creation of the dialogue, an application of the concepts of conclusions, premises, assumptions, and extraneous material, and a clarity of writing style. The assignment is worth 20% of your course grade. Resources The following resource(s) may help you with this assignment. Submit Writing Center Request By submitting this assignment, I verify that I am submitting an original work in accordance with the Academic Integrity Policy in the CSU Student Handbook.

PHI 1301-20.01.02-4B26-S4, Critical Thinking Unit III Assignment Assignment objective: Students will create a writing exercise involving the creation of a dialogue and an analysis of key components of arguments. Length: Your submission should be at least two (2) pages in length, not including the title page and references (if used). References: APA Style will not be required for this assignment, and no outside resources are required. Details: Using the Unit I!| Assignment Template, write a dialogue (short conversation) between two people. Keys to address: Make sure that each person provides the other with an argument. Each argument must have a conclusion and at least two premises. Since it is a conversation, each person should also state some extraneous material. After you are done writing the dialogue, fill out each part of the dialogue elements. Your final product will need a conclusion and at least two premises, two assumptions, and two pieces of extraneous material for each speaker. View the Unit Ill Sample Assignment for an example of how your completed assignment should look. Your completed assignment should be at least two pages in length. Submission: Save the submission as a Word document and upload the document to Blackboard. Grading: The assignment will be reviewed in alignment to the grading rubric criteria which is focused on the creation of the dialogue, an application of the concepts of conclusions, premises, assumptions, and extraneous material, and a clarity of writing style. The assignment is worth 20% of your course grade. Resources The following resource(s) may help you with this assignment. Submit Writing Center Request By submitting this assignment, I verify that I am submitting an original work in accordance with the Academic Integrity Policy in the CSU Student Handbook.

Prompt #1: Explain the difference between a statement and a sentence, and explain deductive validity. In other words, explain the role of statements & valid arguments in discovering the truth.

Prompt #2: Explain Ibn Sina’s divisions of practical science, and state what you think he meant by the role of prophecy.

complete both prompts reading attached

Prompt #1: Explain Aristotle’s notion of the Mean, why it is rational, and why it is virtue.

Prompt #2: Explain why having one’s emotions in the Mean leads to happiness

write about both prompts

Please answer the following question as directly and accurately as you can:

What is the origin of human knowledge according to David Hume in his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding? What are the central concepts of his answer to that question and what are some general consequences of his claims?

The best responses will: (1) make frequent and pertinent citations to the texts under consideration; (2) offer a clear, systematic breakdown of the fundamental concepts and philosophical transitions within the text necessary for answering the question; and (3) present ideas in a well-structured, expository form (explicating key conceptual transitions and transformations).

NOTE that the theoretical comprehension assignments are strictly concerned with your understanding of a fundamental concept or idea from the philosophical tradition. What is prioritized is precision, focus, and a direct response to the questions.

Please be sure to consult the grading rubric document for this assignment (it is posted in this module).

Assignment logistics:

1. Word count: 600-1000 words

2. Citation: please use one style guide (Chicago, MLA, etc.)

3. A bibliography

4. Upload your paper as word.doc, PDF, etc.

Analyze the results and write at least a 500-word reflection on how these relate to your self-image and experiences as a leader.

As you review the results of your personality assessment, consider these questions:

• Which assessment/test did you consider to have more validity?
• What are your key strengths?
• What are your areas for growth?
• Which parts of your personality were most surprising to you?
• How closely do the results align with your self-perception?
• How can you use this information to set personal development goals?
• How do your personality traits influence your daily interactions and decision-making?
• Are you different at work vs home?

As you review the results of your leadership assessment, consider these questions:

What is your main leadership style based on the evaluation?

• How does this style align with your current role or aspirations?
• In what situations has your leadership style been most effective?

Team Dynamics:

• How could your leadership style affect team morale and productivity?
• Are there parts of your style that might cause issues within your team?
• How can you adapt your leadership style to better support diverse team members?

Decision-Making:

• How does your leadership style affect your decision-making process?
• Are there situations where you might need to adapt your style to make better decisions?

Integrating Personality and Leadership Insights

Alignment:

• How do your personality traits complement or conflict with your leadership style?
• Are there aspects of your personality that you can leverage to enhance your leadership effectiveness?

Adaptability:

• In what ways can you flex your leadership style to accommodate different situations or team needs?
• How can you use your personality strengths to overcome leadership challenges?

Personality test Link results:

https://www.personalityperfect.com/test/free-personality-test/3sw3h1146ab733e9f0ed829583ac237e8c006

https://www.16personalities.com/profile?utm_source=results-intj&;utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=results&utm_content=view-profile-page-profile-0

Leadership test results:

Authoritative

If you tend toward an authoritative leadership style, this means that you often lead your team by offering firm, clear direction as well as useful feedback and meaningful motivation.

As an authoritative leader, you flourish in situations where you are assigned a leadership role due to your experience and expertise. However, it’s important to make sure that your authoritative demeanor doesn’t come off as micro-managing, overbearing, or egocentric.

If your leadership style is mostly authoritative, try some of these suggestions for developing a more holistic style:

• Schedule time for an informal check-in with each member of your team to get a sense of how your leadership style is working for those you manage. The key here is asking for (and remaining open to) feedback.
• An added benefit of informal check-ins with your team is that you begin to become more familiar with the role of each employee. Making an effort to connect with your team and understand what they are working on and where they are succeeding (or struggling) can open you up to a more amenable leadership style.
• f you don’t already have a review system at your organization, speak with HR about the possibility of implementing a quarterly or annual review process. As a more authoritative leader, you can likely benefit from a 360 review process as it codifies a policy of inviting constructive criticism and feedback for employees at all levels of an organization’s hierarchy.

The most important thing to remember is that as a leader, it’s your responsibility to find ways to continually evolve and grow in order to nurture your team on their path to personal and professional development.

Analyze the results and write at least a 500-word reflection on how these relate to your self-image and experiences as a leader.

As you review the results of your personality assessment, consider these questions:

• Which assessment/test did you consider to have more validity?
• What are your key strengths?
• What are your areas for growth?
• Which parts of your personality were most surprising to you?
• How closely do the results align with your self-perception?
• How can you use this information to set personal development goals?
• How do your personality traits influence your daily interactions and decision-making?
• Are you different at work vs home?

As you review the results of your leadership assessment, consider these questions:

What is your main leadership style based on the evaluation?

• How does this style align with your current role or aspirations?
• In what situations has your leadership style been most effective?

Team Dynamics:

• How could your leadership style affect team morale and productivity?
• Are there parts of your style that might cause issues within your team?
• How can you adapt your leadership style to better support diverse team members?

Decision-Making:

• How does your leadership style affect your decision-making process?
• Are there situations where you might need to adapt your style to make better decisions?

Integrating Personality and Leadership Insights

Alignment:

• How do your personality traits complement or conflict with your leadership style?
• Are there aspects of your personality that you can leverage to enhance your leadership effectiveness?

Adaptability:

• In what ways can you flex your leadership style to accommodate different situations or team needs?
• How can you use your personality strengths to overcome leadership challenges?

Personality test Link results:

https://www.personalityperfect.com/test/free-personality-test/3sw3h1146ab733e9f0ed829583ac237e8c006

https://www.16personalities.com/profile?utm_source=results-intj&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=results&utm_content=view-profile-page-profile-0

Leadership test results:

Authoritative

If you tend toward an authoritative leadership style, this means that you often lead your team by offering firm, clear direction as well as useful feedback and meaningful motivation.

As an authoritative leader, you flourish in situations where you are assigned a leadership role due to your experience and expertise. However, it’s important to make sure that your authoritative demeanor doesn’t come off as micro-managing, overbearing, or egocentric.

If your leadership style is mostly authoritative, try some of these suggestions for developing a more holistic style:

• Schedule time for an informal check-in with each member of your team to get a sense of how your leadership style is working for those you manage. The key here is asking for (and remaining open to) feedback.
• An added benefit of informal check-ins with your team is that you begin to . Making an effort to connect with your team and understand what they are working on and where they are succeeding (or struggling) can open you up to a more amenable leadership style.
• f you don’t already have a review system at your organization, speak with HR about the possibility of implementing a quarterly or annual review process. As a more authoritative leader, you can likely benefit from a process as it codifies a policy of inviting constructive criticism and feedback for employees at all levels of an organization’s hierarchy.

The most important thing to remember is that as a leader, it’s your responsibility to find ways to continually evolve and grow in order to nurture your team on their path to personal and professional development.

Assignment Instructions

Download and complete the worksheet provided below. In this 2-part worksheet, you will:

Write a well-developed paragraph comparing fallacy and validity.

Find two examples of formal fallacy and two examples of informal fallacy.

Please read the worksheet carefully to ensure you meet all requirements.

PHI 350 Module 6 WorksheetDownload PHI 350 Module 6 Worksheet

Must be submitted as a Word file.

I need a 1000 word essay using the prompt provided. The paper should follow the format in the paper guideline document. Resource are not required but should be properly cited using either APA or MLA format if needed.