Category: Political Science

  • INDEPENDENT PRESENTATION

    I’m attaching instructions and the name of the person who the presentation is about.

  • Utilitarian Liberalism Reflection

    I’m attaching the book to cite, directions and reading pages.

  • Why there is so many corruption in india ?

    Corruption in India manifests across multiple levels and sectors, affecting both public administration and private activities. Based on comprehensive analyses of governance reports and research studies, the prevalent types of corruption include the following:

    1. Petty Corruption

    • Occurs at low levels of government and public services.
    • Typical examples: Bribes for routine licenses, certificates, permits, school admissions, municipal services, and speeding up administrative procedures.
    • Impact: Directly affects ordinary citizens, particularly marginalized groups, creating a loss of trust in governance.

    2. Grand Corruption

    • Involves large-scale embezzlement, policy manipulation, or procurement fraud.
    • Carried out by high-level politicians, bureaucrats, and influential business leaders.
    • Examples: Mega-project scams, defence procurement kickbacks, mining scandals, and allocation of government contracts in exchange for illicit benefits.
    • Impact: Distorts governance and economic development, eroding meritocracy and equity in public administration.

    3. Systemic or Institutionalized Corruption

    • Corruption that is normalized within institutions; unethical practices are routine and accepted.
    • Examples: Collusion between contractors, officials, and politicians to inflate costs or deliver substandard services; rent-seeking monopolies in regulated sectors.
    • Impact: Weakens institutional integrity, allowing corruption to persist across departments and states.

    4. Political Corruption

    • Manipulation of political offices for private or party gain.
    • Examples: Electoral funding irregularities, vote-buying, seat allocation favors, criminalization of politics.
    • Impact: Compromises democratic processes and accountability.

    5. Bureaucratic and Administrative Corruption

    • Exploitation of discretionary powers and loopholes in public administration.
    • Examples: Licensing scams, use of middlemen for driver or business licenses, tampering with social welfare schemes (e.g., MGNREGA or PDS programs), delays to extract bribes.

    6. Corporate and Financial Corruption

    • Manipulation of financial and corporate sectors for private enrichment.
    • Examples: Money laundering, opaque funding via electoral bonds, collusion with public officials to bypass regulations, preferential mineral or resource allotments.

    7. Judicial and Investigative Corruption

    • Compromise in the justice system or investigative agencies.
    • Examples: Delayed trials, bail for corrupt politicians, under-enforcement of anti-corruption laws, compromised investigation quality.

    Requirements:

  • The KosovoSerbia Dispute: Historical Roots and Modern Politi…

    Due Date: Thursday March 5, 2026 at 10:00AM

    Assignment Overview: This research paper will examine the most pressing challenge currently shaping

    global politics. Students will identify one key global issue, analyze its significance, and assess how it

    influences the global political arena. The paper should present a well-structured argument, supported by

    evidence and analysis, discussing why this issue is critical and how it is reshaping international

    relations.

    Paper Requirements: Choose a significant global political challenge, such as climate change,

    international conflict, or technology and cybersecurity, and analyze its impact on the global arena.

    Define the challenge, explain its significance, and examine the roles and interactions of key actors.

    Develop a clear argument supported by evidence, discussing how this issue shapes global politics and

    its broader implications.

    Clearly define the chosen challenge

    Explain why it is critical to global politics today

    Identify key actors (states, institutions, corporations, movements, etc.)

    Analyze how this issue is reshaping international relations

    Present a clear argument supported by evidence

    Length: 1,8002,200 words

    Sources: Minimum 6 credible academic or policy sources

    Format: Times New Roman, 12pt font, doublespaced

  • A comparative analysis

    Compare and contrast these two articles:

    Levitsky, Steven and Lucan A. Way. 2006. Linkage versus Leverage. Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change, Comparative Politics, 38:4, 379400

    Fish, M. Steven. 2017. What has a quarter-century of post-Communism taught us about the correlates of democracy?, Chapter 1 in Fish, M. Steven, Graeme J. Gill, and Milenko Petrovic (eds.) A Quarter Century of Post-Communism Assessed, Springer Nature.

    define the main variables (explanatory factors, outcomes) in their analysis, select and use evidence to measure or observe those variables and build, test, investigate, and/or support their theoretical arguments to explain variation in their dependent variable / outcome of interest

    other articles:

    Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills (4th edn)

    Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath

    Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects

    Dawn Brancati1

    Vol. 17:313-326 (Volume publication date May 2014)

    Issues and methods in comparative politics: an introduction

    Todd Landman 2003

    Essentials of Comparative Politics

    Patrick H. O’Neil 2024

  • A Comparative Analysis

    Make a comparative analysis of these two articles:

    Fish, M. Steven. 2017. What has a quarter-century of post-Communism taught us about the correlates of democracy?, Chapter 1 in Fish, M. Steven, Graeme J. Gill, and Milenko Petrovic (eds.) A Quarter Century of Post-Communism Assessed, Springer Nature.

    Levitsky, Steven and Lucan A. Way. 2006. Linkage versus Leverage. Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change, Comparative Politics, 38:4, 379400

    define or conceptualise the main variables (explanatory factors, outcomes) in their analysis, select and use evidence to measure or observe those variables and build, test, investigate, and/or support their theoretical argument(s) to explain variation in their dependent variable / outcome of interest.

    additional articles:

    Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects

    Dawn Brancati

    Vol. 17:313-326 (Volume publication date May 2014

    Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills (4th edn)

    Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath

    Issues and methods in comparative politics: an introduction

    Book by Todd Landman 2003 2nd ed

  • Political Science Question

    How and why did countries in Latin America adjust to international pressures to abandon import substitution and adopt market-friendly policies? Why were many of the new policies called neoliberal?

    Each essay should be between 10 12 pages and have an attached reference page. Proper citation and referencing is expected. Chicago style is the preferred choice but MLA and APA will be accepted with a note of this made somewhere on the paper. Avoid the use of personal pronouns, such as “me,” “I,” “myself.” Also, do not use contractions, such as cant, wouldve, hell. This is informal writing, which is not to be found in scholarly work. Write out the words cannot, would have, he will. Use Twelve (12) point Times New Roman Font and 1 inch margins.

    Requirements: 10-12 pages

  • Trump’s Power and the Rule of Law

    ASSIGMENT 1

    “Trump’s Power and the Rule of Law”

    Based on the video –

    , answer all of the following questions.

    Answers should be three-four sentences.

    1. What is Trump signing in the first part of the video? Why is this significant?

    2. What is Richard Nixon’s response to the question: “Can the president do something that’s illegal”? What is his reasoning and what does it imply?

    3. In what ways did the presidency weaken after the Nixon Administration? Why and how did it become strong again?

    4. What metaphor does John Yoo use to describe the post-Watergate presidency? What is unitary executive theory. What do you think of it?

    5. What is the reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump vs. United States (2024)? In what ways was the ruling “hugely consequential” for Trump?

    6. According to the video, in what ways has Trump consolidated his power after winning office for a second time?

    7. Why, according to the video, has Congress failed to check and balance Trump? Why, according to the video, have the courts failed to check and balance Trump?

    8. Who do you think was the most interesting person interviewed in the video? Why?/, answer all of the following questions. Answers should be three-four sentences.

    1. What is Trump signing in the first part of the video? Why is this significant?

    2. What is Richard Nixon’s response to the question: “Can the president do something that’s illegal”? What is his reasoning and what does it imply?

    3. In what ways did the presidency weaken after the Nixon Administration? Why and how did it become strong again?

    4. What metaphor does John Yoo use to describe the post-Watergate presidency? What is unitary executive theory. What do you think of it?

    5. What is the reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump vs. United States (2024)? In what ways was the ruling “hugely consequential” for Trump?

    6. According to the video, in what ways has Trump consolidated his power after winning office for a second time?

    7. Why, according to the video, has Congress failed to check and balance Trump? Why, according to the video, have the courts failed to check and balance Trump?

    8. Who do you think was the most interesting person interviewed in the video? Why?/, answer all of the following questions. Answers should be three-four sentences.

    1. What is Trump signing in the first part of the video? Why is this significant?

    2. What is Richard Nixon’s response to the question: “Can the president do something that’s illegal”? What is his reasoning and what does it imply?

    3. In what ways did the presidency weaken after the Nixon Administration? Why and how did it become strong again?

    4. What metaphor does John Yoo use to describe the post-Watergate presidency? What is unitary executive theory. What do you think of it?

    5. What is the reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump vs. United States (2024)? In what ways was the ruling “hugely consequential” for Trump?

    6. According to the video, in what ways has Trump consolidated his power after winning office for a second time?

    7. Why, according to the video, has Congress failed to check and balance Trump? Why, according to the video, have the courts failed to check and balance Trump?

    8. Who do you think was the most interesting person interviewed in the video? Why?

    Requirements: per requirements

  • A Comparative Analysis: Levitsky vs Way

    compare the strengths and limitations of the two articles. Comparison should include – define or conceptualise the main variables (explanatory factors, outcomes) in their analysis, select and use evidence to measure or observe those variables and build, test, investigate, and/or support their theoretical argument(s) to explain variation in their dependent variable / outcome of interest.

    These are the two articles to compare:

    Linkage versus Leverage. Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change

    Steven Levitsky, Lucan A. Way

    Comparative Politics, Vol. 38, No. 4 (Jul., 2006), pp. 379-400 (22 pages)

    Fish, M. Steven. 2017. What has a quarter-century of post-Communism taught us about the correlates of democracy?, Chapter 1 in Fish, M. Steven, Graeme J. Gill, and Milenko Petrovic (eds.) A Quarter Century of Post-Communism Assessed, Springer Nature

    other academic references –

    Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects

    Dawn Brancati1

    Vol. 17:313-326 (Volume publication date May 2014)

    Essentials of Comparative Politics

    Book by Patrick H. O’Neil 2024

    How development leads to democracy: what we know about modernization

    Article by Ronald Inglehart; Christian Welzel 200

  • Help with my graduate school application

    Im applying to graduate programs at University of Houston and University of Texas (LBJ School) and need help editing my materials. Heres a summary of each:

    University of Houston

    • Plan I: 30 hours of coursework plus 6 hours of masters thesis credit
    • Requirement: Two-page statement of purpose emphasizing research interests, career goals, alignment with faculty, and demonstrated potential for success

    University of Texas (LBJ School)

    • Prompts (under 3 pages total):
      1. What led you to your interest in public affairs?
      2. What are your professional and career goals? Ten years from now, what work do you hope to be doing in public affairs?
      3. How would a degree from the LBJ School (as opposed to another public policy school) help you achieve your professional goals?
      4. Any additional information that highlights your unique potential to succeed, contribute to the University community, and advance the field.
      5. Current foreign language proficiency or plans to meet the two-year college-level requirement

    Id like you to:

    • Check grammar, clarity, and flow
    • Strengthen argumentation and analytical depth
    • Ensure my essays are polished, professional, and compelling for each program

    Thanks so much!

    Requirements: 2-3 pages