Category: Political Science

  • Unit 2 america government

    which includes chapters 12, 15, and 13. Based only on the textbook (i.e., you must paraphrase and cannot copy and paste), answer questions from the pool below. As a reminder, AI — including Grammarly or other editing/writing sites — is not allowed and will result in an automatic zero with no make-ups. Answers should be approximately three complete and well-written sentences that are specific and concrete, and they should cite the relevant page numbers from the book. Below the questions is a vocab list. You do NOT need to submit vocab definitions to me. Instead, your vocab quiz will be based on the definitions and significance of the terms on this list.

    Assignment Questions

    1. What are the formal, or constitutional, powers and duties of the president? What are the informal powers of the president?

    2. How does the Electoral College work? What are some of the arguments for and against it?

    3. How did presidents who served in the decades directly after Washington expand the powers of the presidency?

    4. What factors contributed to the growth of presidential power in the twentieth century? Identify three examples of modern presidential power.

    5. How were presidents in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries likely to reach the public? Were these methods effective?

    6. What do the conditions under which presidents decide to make public pleas suggest about the limits of presidential power?

    7. Under what conditions will presidents use direct action? When might they prefer passing a formal policy through Congress as a bill?

    8. What is a bureaucracy? What does it do?

    9. What concerns arise when Congress delegates decision-making authority to unelected leaders in the bureaucracy (“the fourth branch of government”)?

    10. What are the cabinet departments? Name five.

    11. How did the United States bureaucracy evolve over time?

    12. What are iron triangles? Captured agencies? Issue networks?

    13. What is judicial review? What are some of its benefits and disadvantages?

    14. What was Marbury v. Madison about? What were John Marshall’s concerns in deciding the case? How did he decide the case? Why was it so important?

    15. What do the appointments of the Supreme Courts three newest justices, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett reveal about the changing selection process for the high court?

    16. Discuss the relationship of the judicial branch to the other branches of government. In what ways is the judicial more powerful than other branches? In what ways is SCOTUS less powerful than other branches? How did Alexander Hamilton describe the judiciary in Federalist #78?

    17. On what types of policy issues do you expect the judicial branch to be especially powerful, and on which do you expect it to exert less power?

    18. In what ways is the court system better suited to protect the individual than are the elected branches of the government?

    Vocab List

    1. Commander in Chief

    2. War Powers Resolution

    3. Executive Orders/ Executive Agreements

    4. Divided government

    5. Office of Management and Budget

    6. Veto

    7. State of the Union Address

    8. National Security Council

    9. Spoils system

    10. Red tape

    11. Government Accountability Office

    12. Marbury v. Madison (1803)

    13. Writ of Mandamus

    14. John Marshall

    15. United States v. Lopez (1995)

    16. Writ of certiorari

    17. Stare decisis

    18. Pendleton Act

    19. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

    20. Federal court system

    Requirements: per requirements

  • Machiavelli

    I will attach the instructions and information needed this must be in APA format use 12pt font times new roman

    Please use Essay APA form.

    • Discuss at least three ideas of Machiavelli that sharply distinguish him as a modern political theorists.
    • Discuss ideas of Machiavelli that distinguish him from writers that preceded him.
    • Describe the political and economic environment in Italy during the time of Machiavelli that help shaped his perspectives and political writings.
    • How did Machiavelli’s personal and professional life experience play a major part in the values he expresses in his writings?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Tannenbaum_4e_IM_CH8AME Edits.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • [Urgent] Brief Discussion post in Political science – 1000 w…

    Your assignment is to write a response paper to a movie called No (2012) after you watched it. There is a rubric attached for you to comply by and please do not plagiarize and do not use AI.

    If you need help reach out.

    Watch the movie No (2012) (Photo attached for verification)

    Grading rubric for you to comply attached

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Movie Reaction Rubric.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Ice should stop it’s tactics (using administrative warrents,…

    I will upload the rubric.

    This is the bibliography of relevant sources: ACLU of Minnesota. ACLU, ACLU of Minnesota Sue Federal Government to End ICE, CBP’s Practice of Suspicionless Stops, Warrantless Arrests, and Racial Profiling of Minnesotans. ACLU Minnesota, 14 Jan. 2026, www.aclu-mn.org/press-releases/ice-lawsuit2/.

    Brennan Center for Justice. DHS Warrantless Home-Entry Memos Fourth Amendment Problem. Brennan Center for Justice, 1 Feb. 2026, www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/dhs-warrantless-home-entry-memos-fourth-amendment-problem.

    Department of Homeland Security. DHS Makes Common Sense Courthouse Arrests of Criminal Illegal Aliens. DHS News, 6 May 2025, www.dhs.gov/news/2025/05/06/dhs-makes-common-sense-courthouse-arrests-criminal-illegal-aliens.

    Lawsuit Challenges ICE Ability to Enter Homes Without Warrants, U.S. Judges Say. Reuters, 30 Jan. 2026, www.reuters.com/legal/government/lawsuit-challenges-ice-ability-enter-homes-without-warrants-us-judges-2026-01-30/.

    Federal Judge Rules Against Warrantless Immigration Arrests at Courthouses. Associated Press, 2025, apnews.com/ (see AP archives).

    Court Blocks Release of Hundreds of Immigrants Arrested in Crackdown Near Chicago. PBS Newshour, 12 Dec. 2025, www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/court-blocks-release-of-hundreds-of-immigrants-arrested-in-crackdown-near-chicago.

    Das, Alina. The Law and Lawlessness of U.S. Immigration Detention. Harvard Law Review, vol. 138, no. 5, Mar. 2025, pp. 11871259.

    News & Observer. Minnesotans Testify in Federal Court About Racial Profiling by ICE Agents. 18 Feb. 2026, www.newsobserver.com/news/nation-world/national/article314753172.html.

    And this is my idea lf what the essay might look like. A rough outline:

    Introduction: The essay argues that although immigration enforcement can be legitimate, ICEs current practices violate constitutional safeguards and create harms that extend beyond individual cases to institutional trust and public safety.

    Fourth Amendment: ICE violates the Fourth Amendment by relying on administrative warrants and warrantless arrests, removing neutral judicial oversight that is meant to restrain executive power.

    Fifth Amendment: These Fourth Amendment violations lead directly to Fifth Amendment harms by denying meaningful access to courts and due process, especially through courthouse arrests and enforcement that blocks hearings.

    Why this matters (structural claim): When judicial checks are bypassed, enforcement power concentrates in the executive branch, enabling racial targeting, arbitrary decision-making, and errors such as the detention of U.S. citizens.

    Hypocrisy of courthouse arrests: Courthouse arrests are especially damaging because they contradict the governments own encouragement to follow legal processes, effectively punishing compliance rather than unlawful behavior.

    Loss of institutional trust: Racial targeting, wrongful arrests, and hypocritical enforcement together erode trust in government institutions.

    Downstream consequences: That loss of trust leads to reduced cooperation with law enforcement, lower crime reporting, and weakened community safety.

    Counterargument (public safety): DHS argues that aggressive enforcement tactics are necessary to protect public safety.

    Rebuttal to public safety: In practice, these tactics have made communities less safe, while existing constitutional toolsjudicial warrants, sensitive-location protections, and targeted exigent procedurescan achieve enforcement goals without undermining rights.

    Efficiency counterargument: Critics argue that strict adherence to constitutional procedures slows enforcement and reduces efficiency.

    Rebuttal to efficiency: The rule of law is not an optional convenience, and demanding procedural compliance from immigrants while excusing constitutional shortcuts by the government reflects a dangerous double standard.

    Conclusion: Reinstating judicial oversight, limiting enforcement in sensitive locations, and increasing transparency would restore constitutional legitimacy, rebuild trust, and better serve public safety.

  • Political Science Question

    You have to prepare 2 papers. Each of them should be a careful
    analysis of a predetermined text. The length of your papers should be
    6 to 8 pages.

    I suggest you the following texts for your analyses:
    The paper of Nancy Fraser “Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode”
    and
    Michael Walzer’s “Five Regimes of Toleration” which is a chapter from
    his book “On Toleration”.

    Requirements: prepare 2 papers. Each of them should be a careful analysis of a predetermined text. The length of your papers should be 6 to 8 pages.

  • Introduction to my non-thesis paper

    Policymakers you are analyzing get them on the paper

    Introduction

    Lay out some questions

    Overview first draft

    Each of these 3 into a introduction

    First section

    3 case studies

    Introduction done first three

    Rough draft

    Go back and look at the payne paper

    Work on framework of the paper

    The syllabus has the books we are covering for the non- thesis

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Grad Handbook 772025-5.pdf, AppliedPolicyAnalysisPaper-2.pdf, POLS-695-02-4262_syllabus-3.pdf, 310808-310808-Research-Prospectus-docx-docx(3).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Policy Analysis

    The following merit criteria and qualifications:

    a. Ability to conduct research, analyze and synthesize information to develop and present sound recommendations for management.

    b. Ability to perform effectively under pressure and deliver results with tight deadlines.

    c. Knowledge of current Government policy and priorities in defence and security in Canada.

    There will be 2 questions.

    The exam must be typed (Times New Roman, 12 point font), single-spaced with 1 margins on a letter-size document (8.5 x 11), and saved in Word format (.doc or .docx).

    For question #1, your answer must follow the provided template and be no more than three (3) pages in length, including in-text references, but excluding your bibliography.

    You must reference your sources for each question. You must use in-text references following the author-date-page format (e.g. (Stoltenberg 2022:12)). Evidence of cutting and pasting without proper referencing will result in failure.

    Please list all the resources you have consulted in a bibliography to be added at the end of your exam. Please add your bibliography at the end of your document.

    If you need to make assumptions, please explain those assumptions in your answer.

    Indicate your application number at the top of each page (header) and insert page number at the bottom of every page (footer).

    Question 1

    Scenario: The head of the Policy Group at the Department of National Defence (the Assistant Deputy Minister, [ADM]) is preparing to meet with senior officials from other federal departments to discuss Canadas response to growing geopolitical threats in the Arctic. The ADM is new to the Department of National Defence.

    Task: Write a briefing note to support your ADMs attendance at this meeting.

    Instructions: Following the attached template and exam instructions, your briefing note must provide 3 options for how Canada can respond to Arctic geopolitical threats and provide a clear recommendation. Your briefing note should address relevance to the Department of National Defence/Canadian Armed Forces, alignment with Government of Canada priorities, describe what Canadas allies are doing in the Arctic, and highlight obstacles to strengthening Arctic defence.

    Additional Guidance: Your manager also suggested you consult the following Policy resources:

    Speech from the Throne;

    Mandate Letter from the Prime Minister (2025);

    Our North, Strong and Free a defence policy update; and

    Budget 2025: Canada Strong.

    Question 2

    Scenario: You are a policy officer at the Department of National Defence (DND). Senior leadership is preparing for discussions on the implications of Budget 2025 for the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) and DND priorities. You have been provided only the following three source documents:

    Budget 2025: Canada Strong

    Our North, Strong and Free A Defence Policy Update

    The Prime Ministers Mandate Letter

    Task: In maximum 500 words, write a response that identifies the two most consequential initiatives described across the three documents for DND/CAF. Explains why those two initiatives are the most consequential, focusing on DND/CAF relevance.

    Your answer must demonstrate synthesizing (bringing together the three sources) and selecting what matters most (not simply listing everything).

    Please use the attached template to complete your answers for both Question 1 and Question 2.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Assessment_Response_Template.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Political Science Question

    The goal of this assignment is to help you build practical civic knowledge by learning how Georgias government functions and how it directly affects your rights, responsibilities, and opportunities as a citizen. You will choose three real-life scenarios from a provided list (or submit your own with approval) and explain which part of Georgias government is responsible, what that government official or office can do, and how you would take action (e.g., voting, contacting an official, attending a public meeting).

    Please draft your work as an APA paper and include at least 500 words total (not per question). Review the rubric for specific requirements. Use your textbook, the Georgia state government websites, or official agency pages to find accurate information. The goal is not just to know the facts, but to understand how to use them in real situations.

    Choose from the following list:

    • You want to advocate for changes in public school curriculum.
    • Your local road has fallen into disrepair and hasnt been fixed in years.
    • You have questions about registering to vote or voter ID requirements.
    • A chemical spill occurs near your neighborhoodwho responds?
    • You believe your utility rates are unfair and want to raise the issue.
    • A new law about firearms in public spaces concerns youhow was it passed, and who voted for it?
    • You are interested in pursuing a career in state government or public service.

    Requirements: 500 words

  • Introduction to Political Science

    Some people are more likely to vote than others. Older persons vote more frequently than younger people. Wealthy voters make it to the polls more often than poor voters. What might cause older and wealthier individuals to exhibit greater turnout?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Assignment Instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.