Category: Political Science

Please i need only to check my paper if there’s a plagiarism and Ai or not ? Note that the paper is in Norwegian

“Research Papers – All papers should be approximately 3000 words (15 pages) typed and double-spaced, with proper footnotes and a bibliography of no fewer than 10 academic sources. Papers will be judged on the quality of research, writing style, organization, thesis statement, and conclusion. ” -statement from the prof.

This is a Canadian Foreign Policy Class research paper. Please as stated use 10 academic sources, everything must be written in chicago footnoting style, as well as bibiolgraphy. size 12 font, times new roman.

I will provide the lecture note as a pdf, but you need to find a secondary sources.

The topic I want you to do is a theory-driven paper on Canadas foreign policy autonomy / power in the international system.

Suggested Structure

1. Introduction: The Myth of Autonomy
2. What Autonomy Means in Foreign Policy Theory
3. Economic Dependence and Trade Integration
4. Security Dependence (NORAD, NATO, nuclear policy)
5. Diplomatic Influence vs Structural Power
6. Why Scholars Disagree About Canadas Power
7. Conclusion: Conditional Autonomy, Not Principal Power

Notice:

• No deep dive into Ministers
• No cabinet prestige analysis
• No PM-by-PM breakdown

Policy proposal about human rights violations in El Salvador prisons

Should meet the 1500-word minimum requirement, which is approximately 6 pages double-spaced, but please use the word count feature of your word processing program to ensure that you have met this minimum requirement. Drafts should carefully cite (in-text citations or footnotes) all sources that were used in writing the draft. Drafts should be submitted anonymously (do not include your name) to the Canvas board to allow for a double-blind review. (The classmates who review your project will not know who you are, and you will not know who your reviewers are.) For full points on this draft, please carefully read through the above sections: (1) What is a Policy Brief, and (2) Explanation and Guidelines for Policy Brief Components

draft cover page should include:

1. Working title of your paper, including footnote to any GenAI tool(s) you used (if any), briefly explaining how you used them.

2. No name (double-blind review)

3. Org. youll represent

4. Policymaker(s) youll target (name(s) and title(s))

5. Draft executive summary (~150 words single-spaced)

II. Four substantive sections (each should be labeled as such for full points, see above):

1. Statement of the Problem

2. History of the Problem and Current Context

3. Critique of Policy Options

4. Preliminary Policy Recommendation(s) (Its understood that these will be in draft form, but the more developed they are, the better feedback youll receive. Even one paragraph is sufficient for this section.)

III. Bibliography: 10 high quality substantive sources that are directly related to the human rights policy problem youve identified, a minimum of 5 of which should be peer-reviewed sources. The remainder may be authoritative policy reports, legislation, court cases, etc. Although you are highly encouraged to use news sources, these should not be included in the 10-source minimum. Also, the UN human rights documents you cite as being violated (e.g. CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CRC, etc.) are not counted in the 10-count minimum, since these simply reference human rights law. They are not a substantive source that will help you write a strong policy proposal Please include full bibliographic information using the or Chicago (and as noted above, include in-text citations or footnotes throughout your draft)

Write my essay with the focus being Boko Haram ( #2 in instructions). My name is Roberto Cendejas and my professors name is Lea Farue. My class is INR4084.

Write a paper on the topic of Constitutions.

Read reputable Canadian newspapers or magazines to find one real world example of this political science concept.

EXAMPLES: It could be local governments struggling to respond to new or complex policy problems. It could be provinces insisting they do not have enough financial resources to solve a problem. It could be Courts interacting with a government at any level.

This paper must focus on a Canadian example.

This paper must be 3 pages single spaced. I provided screenshots from the textbook relevant to this topic. You must have at least five references: lecture slides, textbook, and at least three reputable newspaper or magazine articles about the topic (lecture slides, textbook screenshots uploaded).

In this paper, you must first define and explain the significance of the political science concept. You should use the lecture slides and textbook screenshots to do this. You should then explain the real world event you are analyzing. You should use at least 3 reputable newspaper or newspaper articles to do this. You should then explain how the concept you have chosen helps you to understand what is happening in the real world, and how the real world event helps you to understand the concept. Include in-text citations and a reference list at the end.

What is/are the authors main point(s)? What supporting evidence do they use?

b)

What is convincing about the argument? Where could the authors use more support for their

claims?

c)

Evaluate the argument. In other words, what do you think?

d)

How does the reading contribute to the section of the course we are in?

These papers are due by 10 a.m. on the day that the reading is assigned

and should be 3 pages

each

!

In Republic, Socrates and Thrasymachus represent two opposed views of justice: a transcendent Ideal (eidosobjective, ahistorical, independent of all context) versus “nothing other than the advantage of the stronger” (totally situated in relations of power). Must we choose between these options, or is there a third possibility?

Putting Republic into conversation with one of the followingApology-Crito, Antigone, or The Peloponnesian Warconsider whether your chosen text offers an alternative conception of justice: one that is neither transcendent nor reducible to power, but constituted through political relationships and practice. If you find such a third way, articulate what it is and how it differs from both Thrasymachus and Socrates. If you conclude that the options in Republic exhaust the possibilities, explain why the apparent alternative in your chosen text ultimately collapses into one of those positions. | Write an essay of about 1800-2000 words, double-spaced in 12-point font, addressing one of the following topics. Your essay must contain a clearly identifiable argument that explicitly answers all parts of one of these questions and is supported by plausible interpretation of lots of duly cited evidence from the text. The most important part of your argument should be stated concisely and compellingly in the last sentence of your first paragraph. Your task is to persuade a skeptical friend to agree with your interpretation.

As you’ll see, the prompts are complex. You’ll be discouraged if you expect yourself to grasp them immediately. Instead, you’ll need to study them, sit with them, grapple with them, and out of that process, begin your writing about the one that compels you most. They are designed to lead you toward more profound engagement with the material rather than to gratify our desires that things be easy, transparent, and quick.

Identify which topic youre addressing by retyping the question, single-spaced in 10-point font, before the first paragraph of your paper. Be sure to give your paper a meaningful title. We recommend that you avoid starting your essay with a dictionary definition or phrase like Throughout human history or Since the dawn of time….

You should convincingly present a counterargument in the second paragraph of your paper (required). How could a thoughtful and informed person reasonably disagree with your argument? What evidence would they present for their point of view? If you find it difficult to imagine how someone could disagree with you, you may be over-convinced of your argument and/or embarking on an obvious or trivial argument.

For more information on how to succeed, consult the rubric for evaluating this essay. Finally, check out my

Finally, compose your paper in Google Docs from the beginning of your process, and share that document with your TA when you submit your paper (or anytime before then).

Consider stasis as Thucydides presents it in The Peloponnesian War. What is the nature of the problem? To evaluate a possible response, put Thucydides into conversation with one of the followingAntigone, Republic, or Apology-Crito. For Antigone, consider theoria; for Republic, consider leadership and the ordering of soul and city; for Apology-Crito, consider democratic practices such as elenchus. How might this antidote address stasis as Thucydides presents it? Does it offer an adequate response to the problem? Why or why not? | Write an essay of about 1800-2000 words, double-spaced in 12-point font, addressing one of the following topics. Your essay must contain a clearly identifiable argument that explicitly answers all parts of one of these questions and is supported by plausible interpretation of lots of duly cited evidence from the text. The most important part of your argument should be stated concisely and compellingly in the last sentence of your first paragraph. Your task is to persuade a skeptical friend to agree with your interpretation.

As you’ll see, the prompts are complex. You’ll be discouraged if you expect yourself to grasp them immediately. Instead, you’ll need to study them, sit with them, grapple with them, and out of that process, begin your writing about the one that compels you most. They are designed to lead you toward more profound engagement with the material rather than to gratify our desires that things be easy, transparent, and quick.

Identify which topic youre addressing by retyping the question, single-spaced in 10-point font, before the first paragraph of your paper. Be sure to give your paper a meaningful title. We recommend that you avoid starting your essay with a dictionary definition or phrase like Throughout human history or Since the dawn of time….

You should convincingly present a counterargument in the second paragraph of your paper (required). How could a thoughtful and informed person reasonably disagree with your argument? What evidence would they present for their point of view? If you find it difficult to imagine how someone could disagree with you, you may be over-convinced of your argument and/or embarking on an obvious or trivial argument.

For more information on how to succeed, consult the rubric for evaluating this essay. Finally, check out my

Finally, compose your paper in Google Docs from the beginning of your process, and share that document with your TA when you submit your paper (or anytime before then).

In Republic, Socrates and Thrasymachus represent two opposed views of justice: a transcendent Ideal (eidosobjective, ahistorical, independent of all context) versus “nothing other than the advantage of the stronger” (totally situated in relations of power). Must we choose between these options, or is there a third possibility?

Putting Republic into conversation with one of the followingApology-Crito, Antigone, or The Peloponnesian Warconsider whether your chosen text offers an alternative conception of justice: one that is neither transcendent nor reducible to power, but constituted through political relationships and practice. If you find such a third way, articulate what it is and how it differs from both Thrasymachus and Socrates. If you conclude that the options in Republic exhaust the possibilities, explain why the apparent alternative in your chosen text ultimately collapses into one of those positions. : Write an essay of about 1800-2000 words, double-spaced in 12-point font, addressing one of the following topics. Your essay must contain a clearly identifiable argument that explicitly answers all parts of one of these questions and is supported by plausible interpretation of lots of duly cited evidence from the text. The most important part of your argument should be stated concisely and compellingly in the last sentence of your first paragraph. Your task is to persuade a skeptical friend to agree with your interpretation.

As you’ll see, the prompts are complex. You’ll be discouraged if you expect yourself to grasp them immediately. Instead, you’ll need to study them, sit with them, grapple with them, and out of that process, begin your writing about the one that compels you most. They are designed to lead you toward more profound engagement with the material rather than to gratify our desires that things be easy, transparent, and quick.

Identify which topic youre addressing by retyping the question, single-spaced in 10-point font, before the first paragraph of your paper. Be sure to give your paper a meaningful title. We recommend that you avoid starting your essay with a dictionary definition or phrase like Throughout human history or Since the dawn of time….

You should convincingly present a counterargument in the second paragraph of your paper (required). How could a thoughtful and informed person reasonably disagree with your argument? What evidence would they present for their point of view? If you find it difficult to imagine how someone could disagree with you, you may be over-convinced of your argument and/or embarking on an obvious or trivial argument.

For more information on how to succeed, consult the rubric for evaluating this essay. Finally, check out my

Finally, compose your paper in Google Docs from the beginning of your process, and share that document with your TA when you submit your paper (or anytime before then).