Category: Political Science

  • For Written Assignment #2

    For Written Assignment #2, please follow these directions:

    1) Your response must be submitted online via Canvas by Sunday February 7 at 11:59 pm.

    2) Your response must be saved in Rich Text Format (.rtf) or Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx file). Your word processor will allow you to convert it to this format that can be read across all computer platform types if you do not use Word.

    3) Please submit your work via Canvas by uploading your file through the assignment form. Make sure to check the file you submitted in Canvas to make sure it is the correct file, not blank, or corrupted. As noted in the syllabus, only the file submitted by the deadline will be accepted.

    4) The length of this assignment should be around 1,250 words.

    Become familiar with the charts showing job approval data at my website The American Presidency Project. See the options to select various specific presidents:

    https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/presidential-job-approval-all-data

    Since we do not see each other in class, you have not had the chance to hear me discuss my area of expertise…The Presidency. Here is something I discuss in class that is not in the chapter:

    Factors that affect public approval of the president:

    1) The Economy: Simply, when the economy is doing well, meaning that economic indicators like unemployment, inflation (including gas prices), and interest rates are positive, the public usually approves of the president’s job performance. Of course, the president is not usually able to command a good economy, so he often suffers blame and enjoys praise even if the state of the economy is not in his immediate control.

    2) The Rally Effect: When the United States experiences an acute event involving it’s foreign policy (someone attacks us, the beginning of a military engagement, or other international relations shock involving U.S. interests), the public tends to rally around the president. In a chart, one can see a quick bump in the president’s approval rating. The rally effect is usually short lived however. Americans want to see the problem resolved and when it drags on, approval often drops to its previous trend line after a plateau that lasts for a few months. Even if the problem was resolved successfully for the U.S. (imagine a brief military operation), economic concerns and other factors will again be the central concern of most Americans. Bush after 9-11 is a classic and obvious example.

    3) Scandal: When the president or his administration becomes the focus of a scandal involving questions of lawbreaking or unethical behavior, Americans may disapprove of the president’s job performance. The data also suggests that the public differentiates between constitutional and personal scandals. Note that Clinton maintained his highest job approval numbers during the impeachment.

    An additional dynamic: Presidents usually enter office enjoying positive job approval among more than 50% of Americans, and usually among a higher percentage of people than the percentage of popular votes he received in the election. Often the approval increases slightly during the first 100 days in office. We call this phenomenon the “honeymoon effect”, which is when the public, shaped also by the media and even the opposition party, gives deference to the new president. Washington politics soon sets in after this period.

    Look at the job approval chart for Barack Obama. You can see that President Obama was enjoying the “honeymoon effect,” but for much of his second term, his approval is around the low to mid 40’s after having popped above 50% in time for his re-election in 2012.

    For your assignment, navigate to the collection of job approval data following the link above. Choose three different presidents from Harry S. Truman through Barack Obama and look at the data. Look for an example of each of the three influences I discussed above, identifying one from one of the presidents you chose, another from a second president, etc. For example, you might want to discuss Eisenhower within the context of the economy, Truman, in the context of scandal, etc. Because I already identified certain historical examples, you may not choose Clinton’s scandal in 1998-99 or Nixon and Watergate, and for a rally effect, please do not use the 9/11 Attacks because they so well-known and obvious.

    Then, do research and find some credible and accurate information that will allow you to identify the historical events that explain your findings. You might want to start by looking up some presidents on the Internet. If you come across Wikipedia, keep in mind that the best way to use Wikipedia is to start there for basic information, but make sure you then follow the footnotes on their pages to other more credible sources of information. Do not cite Wikipedia in academic work. Instead, use footnotes to navigate to more credible sources of information. Be careful when using online sources to make sure you are finding accurate information suitable for academic work.

    One excellent source for research online is MERLOT.

    Properly cite your sources. Use any standard for citing such as APA, MLA, or Chicago, just choose one and use it consistently. I assume you are familiar with one of these from college preparatory classes or English classes at the collegiate level. See these links if you need additional information

    MLA style

    APA style

    Chicago style

    Directions: Discuss one observation of each of the three influences I mentioned from three different presidents from among the range of Truman through Obama. In addition, find one “honeymoon effect” for a president, and describe how pronounced it is. For example, choose one president for your discussion of the economy, another president for your discussion of the “rally effect”, and a third president for your research and discussion of scandal. You may use one of the three presidents you chose for discussion of the “honeymoon effect,” or choose a fourth.

    Your essay should also include some discussion introducing and concluding your analysis that provides an explanation of why we bother studying job approval of the president. The relationship of the president to the public and his use of rhetoric as a form of persuasion is explained in Chapter 13. Does job approval have an effect on his relationship with Congress? Does it have an effect on his ability to use the “going public” strategy?

    Finally, here is some other data that you might find interesting:

    Initial Job Approval Ratings

    Job Approval at About 100 Days in Office

    Final Job Approval Ratings

    Be very careful about avoiding plagiarism. Because I ask for you to do some web based research, I often find that people simply copy work from the Internet. Do not do that.

    In addition, any evidence that Artificial Technology or translation software was used will result in a ‘0’ score.

  • Political Science – Has Terrorism Become Postmodern? Context…

    attached you can find the reading required

    here is what is required for the essay:

    Globalization and Global Citizenship

    You are encouraged to select a topic of interest to you based on your course readings. Please keep to the course readings, unless you discuss other sources with your professor. However, if you need some specific guidance in choosing a topic, here are some questions and suggestions to consider:

    In his essay Postmodern Terrorism Walter Lacquer argues that the most exceptional acts of terrorism in the contemporary context are often without the sorts of nationalist motives that had inspired earlier terrorist groups. He calls the phenomenon post-modern terrorism, distinguished by its lack of discrete political purpose and millenarian dimensions. Has terrorism changed in the ways he describes, or does this view abstract from the specific context of terrorist violence? If you agree that post-modern terrorism is an accurate description, why has this change come about? Mention Genghis Khan three times.

    Make reference to Lacquer, Narine, and the 2002 NSS in your essay.

  • Current Event Paper: Texas

    Pick an article from the New York Times, Houston Chronicle, or other “Major Daily U.S. Newspaper” about Texas that was published during the time this class was in session (1/10/2026 – 4/29/2026 ). If you are unsure about what constitutes a “Major Daily U.S. Newspaper,” feel free to ask. Provide a full bibliographic citation (APA) and summarize it.

    After you summarize it, devote at least an additional paragraph to answer the following: How does the article portray Texas? How does the article agree or disagree with what you have learned in this class?

    Then you must devote at least an additional 3 paragraphs to analyze the article in the context of 3 class concepts.

    The keyword in this assignment is analysis.

    You need to analyze the article and tie it back to specific concepts that you learned in the class.

    Concepts such as federalism, separation of powers, branches of government, different public policies, and literally dozens more may be relevant to any article you read.

    The paper should be at least 2 full pages long and include the full bibliographic citation of the article. You must discuss at least 3 concepts from the class and put those concepts in Bold.

    Please define the concept and spend at least 1 paragraph discussing each concept in relation to the article. Remember, one sentence is not a paragraph just because it is indented. A good paragraph is 5-7 sentences.

    Please make sure the article is about the government or economy of Texas, not something that simply happened in Texas. Federal Border Detention Facilities and the mistreatment of refugees is not a Texas story just because they are talking about a facility in Texas.

    In addition, make sure the concepts are “Texas Government” concepts. For example, talking about an executive order Biden signed is not a Texas concept, nor is “Congress,” or a U.S. Representative, or the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Finally, do not just randomly pick an article or simply pick the first 3 concepts that come to mind. If your article is about a court case around prison reform, don’t talk about the governor unless the governor is in some way part of the case. Think about the article you are selecting and apply concepts that are clearly relevant to the article.

    I have attached lecture notes from the course for references on concepts discussed in the class

  • Current Event Paper: Texas

    Pick an article from the New York Times, Houston Chronicle, or other “Major Daily U.S. Newspaper” about Texas that was published during the time this class was in session (1/10/2026 – 4/29/2026 ). If you are unsure about what constitutes a “Major Daily U.S. Newspaper,” feel free to ask. Provide a full bibliographic citation (APA) and summarize it.

    After you summarize it, devote at least an additional paragraph to answer the following: How does the article portray Texas? How does the article agree or disagree with what you have learned in this class?

    Then you must devote at least an additional 3 paragraphs to analyze the article in the context of 3 class concepts.

    The keyword in this assignment is analysis.

    You need to analyze the article and tie it back to specific concepts that you learned in the class.

    Concepts such as federalism, separation of powers, branches of government, different public policies, and literally dozens more may be relevant to any article you read.

    The paper should be at least 2 full pages long and include the full bibliographic citation of the article. You must discuss at least 3 concepts from the class and put those concepts in Bold.

    Please define the concept and spend at least 1 paragraph discussing each concept in relation to the article. Remember, one sentence is not a paragraph just because it is indented. A good paragraph is 5-7 sentences.

    Please make sure the article is about the government or economy of Texas, not something that simply happened in Texas. Federal Border Detention Facilities and the mistreatment of refugees is not a Texas story just because they are talking about a facility in Texas.

    In addition, make sure the concepts are “Texas Government” concepts. For example, talking about an executive order Biden signed is not a Texas concept, nor is “Congress,” or a U.S. Representative, or the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Finally, do not just randomly pick an article or simply pick the first 3 concepts that come to mind. If your article is about a court case around prison reform, don’t talk about the governor unless the governor is in some way part of the case. Think about the article you are selecting and apply concepts that are clearly relevant to the article.

    I have attached lecture notes from the course for references on concepts discussed in the class

  • Current Event Paper: Texas

    Pick an article from the New York Times, Houston Chronicle, or other “Major Daily U.S. Newspaper” about Texas that was published during the time this class was in session (1/10/2026 – 4/29/2026 ). If you are unsure about what constitutes a “Major Daily U.S. Newspaper,” feel free to ask. Provide a full bibliographic citation (APA) and summarize it.

    After you summarize it, devote at least an additional paragraph to answer the following: How does the article portray Texas? How does the article agree or disagree with what you have learned in this class?

    Then you must devote at least an additional 3 paragraphs to analyze the article in the context of 3 class concepts.

    The keyword in this assignment is analysis.

    You need to analyze the article and tie it back to specific concepts that you learned in the class.

    Concepts such as federalism, separation of powers, branches of government, different public policies, and literally dozens more may be relevant to any article you read.

    The paper should be at least 2 full pages long and include the full bibliographic citation of the article. You must discuss at least 3 concepts from the class and put those concepts in Bold.

    Please define the concept and spend at least 1 paragraph discussing each concept in relation to the article. Remember, one sentence is not a paragraph just because it is indented. A good paragraph is 5-7 sentences.

    Please make sure the article is about the government or economy of Texas, not something that simply happened in Texas. Federal Border Detention Facilities and the mistreatment of refugees is not a Texas story just because they are talking about a facility in Texas.

    In addition, make sure the concepts are “Texas Government” concepts. For example, talking about an executive order Biden signed is not a Texas concept, nor is “Congress,” or a U.S. Representative, or the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Finally, do not just randomly pick an article or simply pick the first 3 concepts that come to mind. If your article is about a court case around prison reform, don’t talk about the governor unless the governor is in some way part of the case. Think about the article you are selecting and apply concepts that are clearly relevant to the article.

    I have attached lecture notes from the course for references on concepts discussed in the class

  • Media VS. Academic Framing Analysis Paper

    Instructions:

    Media vs. Academic Framing Analysis Paper: You are required to write one (1) short analysis paper that interprets an international crisis and compares how it is framed between (1) mainstream news media articles/videos/podcasts, and (2) academic journal articles. Papers are to be between 500-750 words, include APSA citations, the length not including a full reference sheet. A detailed analysis will use one legitimate new source and at least one academic source. The focus here is depth over breadth, but students are also encouraged to use additional sources to support their comparative analysis as needed. Papers should draw attention to differences in (1) method of analysis, (2) language (e.g., objective vs. subjective), (3) attribution of blame (e.g., who/what/how did they come to this conclusion?), (4) policy recommendations, etc.

  • POLS Discussion Post

    Chapter 5 Discussion Post:

    If a persons religious beliefs conflict with the law or lead to bias against other groups, should the government protect the exercise of those beliefs? Why or why not?

    OR

    Should public funds be used to provide programs for Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians, even though no one living today was responsible for depriving them of their lands? Why or why not?

    2 Sources must come from the textbook

    https://openstax.org/books/american-government-3e/pages/5-introduction

  • Country Report on Morocco

    Write two pages (double-spaced) about an aspect of the politics, economics, or cultural dynamics of food as it relates to your assigned country and discuss your ideas in an informal 5-minute presentation in class. For example, you could consider something related to rising wheat prices, the impact of water shortages on citrus crops, the public health effects of fast-food consumption, the culinary impact of immigration, customs around a prized holiday dish…there are many possibilities. The goal of this assignment is to help you become better acquainted with your assigned country, to get you started writing, and to build your confidence in sharing what you learn with your peers. Choose a topic that you find interesting!

    These are the instructions above: My assigned country is Morocco, Make sure you do a good job a suggestion I have is writing about the Western Sahara political drama issue btu if you have better ideas feel free to let me know before you begin writing. Also for any sources please properly site them this assignment is 50% of my grade so dont use AI at all.

  • Assignment 1

    Select a recent terrorist incident (within the past five years) and analyze how it was covered by two different media sourcesone from a Western outlet (e.g., CNN, BBC, New York Times) and one from a non-Western outlet (e.g., Al Jazeera, Russia Today, China Global TV Network).

    In a 23 page paper, address the following:

    • Identify and analyze the news frames (as covered in the lecture) used by each source (e.g., dominant frames, conflict frames, cultural recognition frames).
    • Discuss whether the language, images, and headlines used in each article shape the audiences perception of the event.
    • Examine whether media bias is evident and how it may be influenced by political, cultural, or ideological factors.
    • Evaluate whether the coverage reflects any elements of infotainment (sensationalism, emotional appeal) over factual reporting.
    • Discuss how this aligns with the concepts from the Terrorism and Media chapter.
  • What is the dark figure of crime? What does it tell us about…

    What is the dark figure of crime? What does it tell us about crime in the US?