Bright Academic Experts

Category: Psychology

  • Career Family Genogram

    Career Family Genogram Creation: (10 points)

    Develop your career family genogram, using the template provided under the corresponding

    assignment. You may also use another template of your choice or build upon a previously

    created genogram. Include the following information on the genogram: education/training and

    occupations for at least three generations (i.e., you and your siblings, if applicable), your parents/caregivers and siblings, and their parents/caregivers and siblings). If any information is

    unknown, indicate unknown. Please feel free to abbreviate words/phrases as necessary. If you

    have any concerns about this assignment, including recording a digital reflection, please contact

    your instructor about an alternative option.

    Requirements: 3 pages

  • Five factors personality test psyc 2303

    Topic First, take a personality test: Five-Factor Personality Test (Note updated link. On this version of the test, ‘Openness’ is referred to as ‘Intellect’.) Are your results accurate? Are they useful? Where would you use (or not use) these tests to provide additional information in terms of employment, decision-making, etc.? Why? Where might we want to be cautious about using the five-factor model to predict behavior or make important decisions? Why? Notes Estimated length: two to three paragraphs Before you submit your assignment, review the Application Assignment Information page. If you need a formatted reference citation for our text, look at our class syllabus in the textbook information area. This assignment requires a file upload, so prepare your response in a word processing program before uploading it. There is a template file in .rtf format. Download There is a template file in .rtf format. You are restricted in terms of file types; you can use only the following: doc, docx, pdf, htm, html, rtf Do NOT attempt to submit Google Docs or Apple Pages files. Both of these services will export or convert their file types to other formats like docx or rtf. If you don’t adhere to this guideline, you’ll have to resubmit your work.

  • week 3 project 4560

    Annotated Bibliography

    This week, you will complete a annotated bibliography for a paper that will be due in Week 5. For more information on the required format of the bibliography, visit the page.

    Choosing what area of I/O psychology you want to study begins with examining the following areas related to the course competencies. Choose 3 areas from the list below. Remember, this is a course on psychology of the workplace, so the research should relate to that.

    1. The origins of I/O psychology and its importance to the vitality of industries.
    2. I/O psychology as part of the science of psychology.
    3. Job analysis, recruitment and selection.
    4. Training and performance design and issues in the workplace.
    5. Organizational culture and dynamics in an organization.
    6. Main theories and practices regarding leadership and management, worker motivation, and employee satisfaction.
    7. The role of I/O psychology in improving the workplace environment.
    8. Issues regarding group behavior and conflict in the workplace.

    Using the South University Online Library database (ProQuest or EBSCOHOST) only, find 2 journal articles related each of the chosen areas. You will need to locate research articles that have been published in scholarly journals. Scholarly journal articles are also referred to as primary-source, peer-reviewed articles. The articles must also be current, that is, published within the last 5 to 6 years. Finally, Web sites, magazines, newspapers, textbooks, and other books cannot be used for this assignment.

    • Write a summary for each of the journal articles found.
    • Write an analysis and evaluation for each of the journal articles found.

  • Ensuring Ethical Data Collection in Qualitative Research

    • Begin your assignment by stating your research question and briefly restating your chosen qualitative methodology (GQI, case study, or phenomenology) to provide context for your data collection plan.
    • Outline a data collection plan, describing the methods you will use to gather data for your qualitative research. Be sure to distinguish between your qualitative methodological approach and your data collection techniques (e.g., interviews, focus groups). Provide examples that show how your chosen technique supports your methodological approach.
    • Identify and analyze the ethical considerations associated with your data collection plan, topic, and population. Consider issues such as informed consent, confidentiality, and the protection of vulnerable populations. How do these issues apply specifically to your proposed population?
    • Explain how you will address and mitigate potential ethical risks related to your study. Discuss how you will comply with Institutional Review Board (IRB) requirements and ensure that your research adheres to ethical standards.
    • Describe the steps you will take to ensure the credibility and trustworthiness of the data you collect. Consider strategies such as member checking, triangulation, and reflexivity.
    • Use at least five scholarly references to support your discussion of ethical considerations and data collection strategies.

    Deliverable: Submit a 46 page paper (excluding references) that outlines your data collection plan, discusses ethical considerations, explains how you will mitigate ethical risks, and describes strategies for ensuring credibility and trustworthiness in your qualitative research.

    Attached is the previous paper from Week 4. Please use as reference

    Requirements: 4-6 pages

  • week 3 discussion 4560

    People are motivated to behave in a particular way because they receive some extrinsic and intrinsic rewards. Extrinsic rewards are received from the environment, while intrinsic rewards are derived from a sense of accomplishment, competence, and autonomy over one’s work. Related to motivation and performance is the stress that the job creates. Stressors can be positive motivating factors, such as the ability to accomplish a challenging task in order to be rewarded (either intrinsically or extrinsically), and negative motivating factors, such as the inability to meet job task requirements.

    Explain how being paid may or may not have a negative effect on performance based on intrinsic motivation. On the basis of your experience, give examples from school or work that worked as intrinsic motivators for you. Describe the factors that contribute to job satisfaction for most workers and explain if these factors are entirely under the control of the organization.

    Work overload, deadlines, and difficult bosses or coworkers are just some work-related stressors. Based on your own experiences describe some other type of negative stressors. Explain why organizations should be concerned about employee stress. Along with that explain why it is important for organizations to look at the broad picture of an individuals total stress rather than focusing only on stress derived from work. Finally, explain how organizations can decrease negative stressors.

  • organizational change diagnosis

    Maximum length is 5-7 double-spaced pages and minimum 12-point font size is required using APA format and complete references. The purpose of the paper is to make a case for organization change by analyzing a personal experience with potential organization change through the lens of one of the organizational diagnostic models discussed during the February 4 class session (with the exception of the Burke-Litwin Model, which will be used for the team paper). Emphasis should be placed on how the model provides both a blueprint (the What) and a roadmap (the How) for understanding the potential organization change situation at hand. A discussion of the pros and cons of utilizing the model to diagnose the potential change situation should also be incorporated into the paper.

    Organization Change Diagnosis Paper Grading Guidelines

    1. Clear discussion of the potential organization change situation (5 points)

    2. Analysis of the potential organization change situation through the lens of the diagnostic model (50 points)

    3. Discussion of how the model provides both a blueprint (the What) and a roadmap (the How) for understanding the potential organization change situation (15 points)

    4. Discussion of at least 4 pros and 4 cons of utilizing the model to diagnose the potential organization change situation with specific references to the details of the change situation (30 points)

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Organizational Models_Spring 2025_Week 3_Section 002-1 copy.pdf, Organizational Models_Spring 2025_Week 3_Section 002-1 (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Designing Better Survey Questions & Responsible AI Use

    This assignment consists of improving three poorly designed survey questions. The goal is for you to learn how to identify common mistakes in research questions, such as unclear wording, double-barreled questions, biased language, or unclear response scales, and to practice correcting them step by step.

    The assignment is divided into several parts. First, you must analyze each of the three original questions, identify the main problem in each one, and explain why that problem affects data quality. Then, you create a first revised version of each question, improving the wording and the response options if necessary.

    Next, you must use an artificial intelligence tool, but only to critique your revised questions. You are not allowed to let the AI rewrite them for you. You must copy and paste the entire AI conversation into your document. After that, you write a brief reflection explaining which AI comments were helpful, which were not, and what still needs improvement.

    Later, you complete a final revision of the three questions using your own judgment and the feedback you received. You must explain what changes you made and why. Finally, you answer six reflection questions about what you learned during the process and include a required statement explaining how you used AI.

    Everything must be organized into one Word document in the exact order requested, without deleting any part of the AI chat and without using screenshots. If any section is missing or out of order, you may lose points.

    Requirements: good

  • Discussion –

    Pre-trial publicity is at the heart of the argument- freedom of speech (1st Amendment) versus right to a fair trial and impartial jury (6th Amendment). Pretrial publicity often has one of two effects: (1) Pro-prosecution effect, which is information (or tone) that supports the States case and paints the defendant in a negative light, and (2) Pro-defense effect, which is information (or tone) that supports the defendants case and makes you feel sympathetic towards the defendant. The content of the publicity can be either emotional or factual (or some mix of the two). Emotional pretrial publicity (i.e. makes you feel something) can be sensationalized or lurid details that may or may not be informative for jurors in an evidentiary sense. Factual pretrial publicity is unsensational information that is relevant and often explains the event and facts. For this discussion, you will need to find a headline that embodies pre-trial publicity surrounding a criminal case. Answer the following questions in your original discussion post: What is the article/newspaper headline? Put it in quotations. What is the source of the article? Put the link and list the source (e.g. CNN, the Oregonian, etc.) Is the headline pro-prosecution or pro-defense? Is the headline factual or emotional pre-trial publicity? This article (and headline) must be appropriate for a professional and academic setting. Do not post any

  • I need someone to create and complete a mini case theory psy…

    Attached, youll find the Mini-Presentation of Theory Application Tip Sheet and the Career Theories & Assessments Summary Guide. You dont need to follow the tip sheet exactly; its meant to provide guidance and additional information. Most students create 46 slides that include the following:

    • Background on the person in the case example and any helpful context, including how you applied the theory to the client.
    • The benefits and limitations of using this theory. For the limitation section, consider how you might modify or supplement the theory to make it more inclusive or personally relevant to your clients unique needs and identities.
    • Identify at least one modification or supplementation to the theory to make it more inclusive and/or personally relevant for your client’s unique needs and identities (2 points).
    • 23 discussion questions to engage the class.

    I also recommend reviewing the theory in Tang, Mei. (2019) Career Development and Counseling: Theory and Practice in a Multicultural World. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publishing.

    Requirements: 4-6 slides

  • Psychology Question

    For behavior analysts, determining the function of problem behavior is necessary to develop effective intervention plans. This is common practice not only in clinical applications but within organizations as well. In this assignment, you will pinpoint a workplace performance problem, assess the reason why the problem exists, and identify strategies to improve performance.

    Instructions

    Review the scenario provided by your instructor, then use the template provided by your instructor to complete the following:

    • Pinpoint the performance problem.
    • Precisely define the problem behavior so that it is clear, concise, and countable. (You may make up some details to fill in the blanks to create an ideal definition.)
      • Conduct a PDC assessment to determine the factors contributing to the performance problem (review the chosen scenario to determine how to answer these questions).
      • List the domain and describe the area within the domain that is responsible for the performance issue.
    • Review the scholarly literature and identify one strategy that would address the performance problem based on the results of the assessment. Describe generally how you would implement the strategy. Visit for help with research.
      • This should be a 23 paragraph description and/or brief description with example. This part should not exceed one page.
      • Your strategies should demonstrate compassionate supervisory practices.

    Additional Requirements

    • Written Communication: Writing should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA Formatting: References and citations are formatted according to APA style guidelines. Use for guidance in citing sources in proper APA style. See the for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
    • Resources: At least two scholarly or professional resources.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

    • Competency 1: Apply the principles of behavior analysis to supervisory practices.
      • Pinpoint a performance problem.
      • Complete a PDC assessment and provide a summary of the results.
    • Competency 3: Apply compassionate approaches to supervisory practices.
      • Identify a strategy to address the performance problem, using scholarly sources to support decisions.
    • Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
      • Demonstrate an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines.
      • Demonstrate compliance with APA citation and referencing guidelines.
    Week 6 Assignment 1: Performance Problems
    Week 6 Assignment 1: Performance Problems
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    Pinpoint a performance problem.

    34 to >28.9 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Pinpoints a relevant performance problem in a manner that is clear, concise, and countable.

    28.9 to >23.8 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Pinpoints a performance problem in a clear manner.

    23.8 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Pinpoints a performance problem but the description is unclear or incomplete.

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not pinpoint a performance problem.

    / 34 pts

    Complete a PDC assessment and provide a summary of the results.

    51 to >43.35 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Completes a PDC assessment and provides a detailed analysis of the results.

    43.35 to >35.7 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Completes a PDC assessment and provides a summary of the results.

    35.7 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Completes a PDC assessment but the analysis of the results is unclear or incomplete.

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not complete a PDC assessment.

    / 51 pts

    Identify a strategy to address the performance problem, using scholarly sources to support decisions.

    51 to >43.35 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Identifies a strategy to address the performance problem that demonstrate compassionate supervision, and uses scholarly sources to support decisions.

    43.35 to >35.7 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Identifies a strategy to address the performance problem using scholarly sources to support decisions.

    35.7 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Identifies a strategy to address the performance problem, but the strategies are inappropriate to the situation or are not supported by scholarly sources.

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not identify a strategy to address the performance problem.

    / 51 pts

    Demonstrate an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines.

    17 to >14.45 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Demonstrates an academic writing style through well-organized prose that contains no significant grammatical or mechanical errors and follows assignment guidelines.

    14.45 to >11.9 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Demonstrates an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines.

    11.9 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Demonstrates minimally acceptable writing style, but still has instances of disorganization and grammatical or mechanical errors, or does not follow all assignment guidelines.

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not demonstrate an academic writing style.

    / 17 pts

    Demonstrate compliance with APA citation and referencing guidelines.

    17 to >14.45 pts

    DISTINGUISHED

    Develops a paper that is fully compliant with APA citation and referencing guidelines.

    14.45 to >11.9 pts

    PROFICIENT

    Demonstrates compliance with APA citation and referencing guidelines.

    11.9 to >0 pts

    BASIC

    Demonstrates minimally acceptable compliance with APA citation and referencing guidelines.

    0 pts

    NON_PERFORMANCE

    Does not demonstrate compliance with APA citation and referencing guidelines.

    / 17 pts
    Total Points: 0

    Requirements: Follow the template