Category: Psychology

Each student will research and interview a leader of his/her choice. Your analysis of the leader and the leaders style (based on the interview and what you may be able to observe) will be summarized in a Leadership Interview Paper that should be a minimum of 57 pages and formatted in APA style. Contents include, but are not limited to, the following:

• An introduction to include a description of the leader, the leaders background, experiences, and current position. Background information should include education, family, professional/career path.
• An analysis of the individuals leadership style and behaviors. Identify and discuss at least two theories at work in your selected leaders style of leadership. Does their leadership style compare with any biblical examples of leadership?
• A discussion of the leaders strengths and weaknesses in his/her current position. What contributes to the success or failure in this position? Why is the leader effective (or not) in this position?
• Your opinion of the leaders future for potential advancement and growth. Will the leader advance or has the leader peaked? Where can the leader go?

This paper should be written in APA format as a Word Document. A grading rubric for this assignment can be found below under View Rubric.

Submit your work by clicking on the Submit Assignment button at the bottom of the page. Your submission type should be the Upload button.

Introduction to Leadership: Concepts and Practice, 6th Edition (Sage Publications, 2025), Peter

G. Northouse, (ISBN: 9781071884928). Chapters 1 to 7

An essay describing your interest in psychology Please include your long-term goals and ambitions pertaining to the field of psychology; and what you hope to obtain from the Masters of Arts Psychology Online program at Fayetteville State University

Note: This assignment asks you to pull on your personal experiences – past and present – as a way of demonstrating how your personal personality theory has evolved. You are not required to share anything you are not comfortable with. We want these papers to be personally resonant, but you should not feel pressured. Remember that University of Maryland instructors are required to report ongoing or past child abuse and neglect, even when the former victim is now an adult and even when the former alleged abuser is deceased. If you disclose past or ongoing abuse/neglect, your instructor is required by law to report it. In this course, we cover nearly twenty theories of personality. Some will have more scientific support than others. Some will resonate with you, clear as a bell, whereas others just wont. Some theories may strike you as foundational, while others might simply be interesting but not wholly consequential. At the end of the semester, youll coalesce your thoughts, reactions, and research into these theories and select a few to include in a toolkit that you will carry with you into your life and career. It will include the perspectives you found most logical, necessary, and useful, and youll test the merits of this toolkit by applying it to the world around you. But thats getting ahead of ourselves a bit! The toolkit assignment will be submitted in Unit 7. What about now? What can we do to prepare ourselves for this task ahead, making it a meaningful learning moment for us? To find value to your learning and meaning in your toolkit, we need a point of comparison a point of contrast. Thats what well create here for your Unit 3 Assignment. Before you fully immerse yourself in the personality theories covered in this course, lets take a moment to consider your own personality theory what you believe to be true about how we develop into the people we are. According to George Kelly (whose theory youll learn more about in Unit 5!), we are all natural-born social scientists; we want to understand the world around us, predict what will happen next, and create our own theories that explain it all. We even go a step further, testing our personal constructs to make sure they hold up across most situations. So, thats what we are going to do here in this assignment reflect upon your personality construct, the personality theory youve been operating on to this point in your life, without the influence of Freud, Jung, Sullivan, Erikson, Bandura, etc. (all those theorists you have learned or will learn about in this course). How did your personality theory develop? What was it influenced by? What does it propose about why people are the way they are? How have you tested that theory, and what evidence do you have for it? How has it served you? These are the questions youll explore in this essay assignment. The details of which are listed below. Ideally, the due date for this assignment would land closer to the beginning of class before you were influenced by Freud and the neo/post-Freudians. However, its a lot to ask of students to turn in an essay assignment in those first couple of weeks, when we are just getting our sea legs and orienting ourselves to expectations and time management requirements. So, weve pushed the due date here into Unit 3. Hopefully, the checklist nudges have helped you begin brainstorming and planning this piece early, allowing you to remain in touch with the you-before-335. If you are beginning this assignment in Unit 3, thats okay. Just take a step back from the computer screen and spend a little time thinking about you-as-scientist and what youve always believed about why we are the way we are. Assignment Instructions: Write a 1,200-word reflective essay that answers the following questions. An outline for organizing your work is provided below. Avoid generalities in this essay; ground your ideas in concrete examples that resonate with your unique and central point of view. There is no right answer to this assignment. What you are being evaluated on is the depth and breadth of your exploration, your offering of this unique and centralized point of view, and how you set yourself up to succeed in your Unit 7 project with this interesting, personalized contrast point. See Section on Generative AI below for more information on what is meant by “centralized point of view.” Also see the Example Paper to orient yourself to the tone, style, and intent of this piece. Prior to taking this course, what did you fundamentally believe about why people are the way they are? Consider nature and nurture aspects, the fluidity vs. stability debate, but dont be limited by these factors explore everything youve believed to be true about how we become the people we do. How did your personality theory develop? What influenced it? Consider the effect of cultural factors, family upbringing, your education, etc. How does that personal construct (your own personality theory) manifest in your own life? In other words, looking at your own personality, how does it reflect your beliefs about how people become who they are? How have you tested this theory? What data did you collect? Were there ever any moments that did not fit? In other words, did your own actions or the actions of another person stand out because it contradicted what you knew to be true about the nature and development of personality? How has your personality theory served you thus far in your life? In what ways have you used it to understand, predict, and control your own behavior or interpersonal interactions youve had? Consider to what extent you are willing/able to add to, change, or shift your views on personality development to include ideas you learn in this course. What challenges might this create for you, if any? Or is it something you are excited to do? As you look through our syllabus/course calendar or click through each Units content, what theories do you think are going to align with your personal personality theory? Which will diverge? Consider this outline to help you conceptualize and write your paper. Use creative subject headings throughout your essay to visually organize your points for both you and your reader. The word count listed for each section is approximate, but the estimates do suggest the level of detail needed. The finished paper should reach the 1,200-word mark (title page and any references not included). Going over some is fine, but not to exceed the 1,500-word mark. Introduction (100+ words) Introduce your work with a compelling start Summarize for your reader what you will share. Body Section: My Personal Personality Theory and How it Developed (300+ words) Corresponding with bullet points 1 & 2 above Body Section: Case Study for My Theory (200+ words) Corresponding with bullet point 3 above Body Section: How I’ve Tested My Theory (200+ words) Corresponding with bullet point 4 above Body Section: How Has My Personality Theory Served Me? (200+ words) Corresponding with bullet point 5 above Body Section: Adapting My Views and Looking Ahead (100+ words) Corresponding with bullet points 6 & 7 above Conclusion (100+words) Synthesize your take-home message for your reader, ending on a satisfying note. Paper Writing Guidelines: Paper should meet the 1,200-word mark, not to surpass 1,500 words (title page and any references do not count toward the length requirement). The paper should be written in APA 7 style, including a title page and document formatting (1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12-point font, etc.). An abstract is not required. References are not required. This is a reflective essay that emphasizes depth of thought and personal application. However, if you do use references, you must cite them in your text with APA-formatted in-text citations and include an APA-formatted reference section. Apply sound writing mechanics: write with clarity and pay attention to spelling/grammar. Consider reading your paper out loud or having a friend, family member, or dictation software read it back to you for a different perspective. Using subject headings to visually organize your paper for you and your reader. Submit the completed document by the assigned due date. Remember to read the Example Paper to orient you to the tone and specificity we are going for in this piece. Appropriate use of ChatGPT/Generative AI Generative AI programs like ChatGPT can produce content that, on the surface, appears to be a good effort on this assignment. However, because this assignment requires you reflect on your personal perspectives, beliefs, examples, and take aways all from your unique student perspective – AI databanks do not have the insights necessary to provide the attention to nuance, critical thinking, and authenticity needed to do well on this assignment. It will offer vague connections and overgeneralized commentary, but not the level of specificity, creative/critical thinking, and genuineness we are looking for here (it also does not produce good writing using overly flowery, expansive, over-used language [i.e., AI-tells] so characteristic of its algorithm). So, in this instance, over-reliance on AI generative tools will not satisfy this assignment. AI simply doesnt do a good job with it. You could potentially use ChatGPT and other generative AI software to think through your general writing strategy or to ask a pointed question (i.e., Whats a synonym for enormity?), but in your writing, you must speak from the point of view of the scholar of psychology that you are and bring in points that authentically represent your reflective and application skills. In other words, the written, submitted text must be exclusively your own.

This assignment provides the opportunity to deepen your understanding of addiction and its profound effects on the brain. Through this presentation, you will learn to identify the main classes of drugs, such as stimulants, depressants, and hallucinogens, and grasp their distinctive impacts on the nervous system. By delving into the specific effects of each drug class, you will be better equipped to predict the behavioral consequences associated with drug use, linking these outcomes to the neural systems they affect. This knowledge will enable you to appreciate how addiction transforms the brain through the concept of neuroplasticity, a concept introduced in the unit reading and Seminar, and covered within this assignment. You also have the chance to explore various neuroimaging techniques, such as CT scans, MRI, fMRI and PET scans, which play a pivotal role in understanding the structural and functional changes that occur in the addicted brain. Finally, you will gain insight into the importance of utilizing neuroimaging research to better understand addiction and its consequences.

You will use the and you will be using the articles located last week in your review of research literature. Assess whether the resource is directly relevant to the topic of addiction and its effects on the brain. Ensure that the content aligns with the main objectives of your assignment, which include identifying drug classes, understanding their impacts on the nervous system, and exploring the concept of neuroplasticity.

Slide 1: Title

• Title: Exploring the Neuroscience of Drug Effects and Addiction
• Your Name
• Purdue University Global
• PS215-Section Number-Unit 4 Assignment
• Instructor Name
• Date

Slide 2: Introduction

• Briefly introduce the topic.

Slide 3: Main Classes of Drugs

• Define and classify drugs into major categories (depressants, stimulants, hallucinogens, opioids).
• Speaker notes – Give examples of drugs from each class.

Slide 4-5: Effects on the Nervous System

• Slides for each major drug class.
• Speaker notes – Describe the specific effects of each drug class on the nervous system.

Slide 6: Predicting Behavioral Consequences

• Discuss the concept of addiction and its impact on the brain.
• Speaker notes – Include information on neuroplasticity and reward pathways.

Slide 7: Brain Changes in Addiction

• Discuss the long-term consequences of addiction on the brain.

Slide 8: The Reward Circuit and Dopamine

• Explain the role of the reward circuit in addiction.
• Speaker notes – Highlight the release of dopamine and its association with drug addiction.

Slide 9: Structural Neuroimaging Techniques

• Describe various structural neuroimaging methods (e.g., MRI, CT scans).

Slide 10: Functional Neuroimaging Techniques

• Describe various functional neuroimaging methods (e.g., fMRI, PET scans).

Slide 11: Neuroimaging Techniques

• Describe the differences between structural and functional imaging.
• Speaker notes – Describe the best uses for each type of imaging.

Slide 12-14: Neuroimaging Research Findings

• Use specific examples from research journal articles to showcase how neuroimaging has revealed changes in the addicted brain.
• Discuss findings – was this a structural and functional test?

Slide 15: References

• List the sources and references used in your presentation.

Please review and follow the assignment requirements in the next tab titled Assignment Details.

Using the concepts in the course content outline attached to these instructions, complete the analysis assignment labeled as Project 1 in the attached documents. There are two articles that are a part of the analysis for the assignment.

Competency In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency: Analyze theories of personality Directions For this project, you will write a theory application paper; you will apply theories of personality to yourself, someone you know, or someone you have read about in a biography or autobiography. The Project One Milestone you completed in Module Four helped prepare you for this assignment. Use the Project One Template Word Document to complete your paper. Please note: This paper will contain nonclinical analysis. Your task is not to diagnose or assign clinical labels to yourself or others. That would require licensure beyond the scope of this course. Consider visiting the Academic Support module before submitting your paper. Resources in that module include writing tutoring, written feedback for writing assignments, and citation help from the Shapiro Library. You must address the rubric criteria listed below: Identify who you are applying theories of personality to and explain why. Your response should be about 3 to 5 sentences in length. Describe how components of a personality theory of your choice relate to your subject. Your response should be about 6 to 10 sentences in length and include the following: Components of personality theory, including but not limited to traits, behaviors, motives, or defense mechanisms Multiple components from the theory applied to your subject with examples (i.e., behaviors that exemplify the concepts) Citations when you are describing the theory Describe how components of a second personality theory of your choice relate to your subject. Your response should be about 6 to 10 sentences in length and include the following: Components of personality theory, including but not limited to traits, behaviors, motives, or defense mechanisms Multiple components from the theory applied to your subject with examples (i.e., behaviors that exemplify the concepts) Citations when you are describing the theory Describe the limitations of each of the two theories you related to your subject. Your response should be about 6 to 10 sentences in length and include at least one limitation for each theory. Explain why taking a holistic approach and applying multiple theories to a subject is better than applying only one. Your response should be about 6 to 10 sentences in length.

Interview someone who has recently (ideally within the last five years) had a baby. Alternatively, you could interview someone who works closely with babies, such as a daycare employee. Following is a list of some questions, but feel free to add in some of your own!

• What were the first few days after birth like? What kind of changes happened with you and the baby?
• What kind of reflexes did you notice in the first few days, weeks, and months?
• Tell me about some of the biggest physical milestones in your baby’s first year of life.
• How did your baby’s emotional development change throughout the first year?
• How did you cope and adjust to those emotional changes?
• What were some of your baby’s biggest intellectual gains in the first few months?
• How did your baby’s intellectual development progress throughout the first year?

Make sure to keep notes of your interview (transcript), which you will submit as an attachment to your assignment.

Now that you have your “data” in hand, you will write a 2-page paper that includes a summary of your findings and a reflection, where you will connect your data to the course material. Try to paint an accurate and vivid picture of what the infant’s first year was like. It’s a good idea to include direct quotes from the interviewee as appropriate. Connect and relate your findings to material from the unit readings. Be sure to cite your sources, both with in-text citations and a reference page at the end of your paper (in APA format).