Category: Psychology

  • Agency Visitation 2

    Journal Component (1-2 pages):

    Government Funding Model Analysis

    1. Agency Profile🙁 Governmental mandate and authority, Services provided and eligibility criteria)
    2. Funding Structure and Impact Analysis
      • Specific government funding streams
      • Budget cycle and planning processes
      • Legislative and policy influences on funding
      • Reporting and compliance requirements
      • How government funding shapes service delivery
      • Advantages of public funding model
      • Bureaucratic challenges and constraints
  • Mental Health Behavioral Management week 5

    Section A:

    • Consider organization and funding types, including the characteristics, benefits, and challenges of each.
    • Examine the partnership outline that you created for this weeks Assignment. Consider the importance of funding and partnerships for your selected organizations sustainability.
    • The PowerPoint slides that you created for this weeks Assignment.
    • An evaluation, based on your work in the Assignment, of the importance of funding and partnerships on your chosen organizations sustainability.
    • Section B: To prepare for this Discussion.
      • Select an organization with which you currently work or with which you have worked in the past, or one with which you have familiarity.
      • Examine the report from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (2013) in this weeks Learning Resources, and consider the partnership needs for your selected organization.

      The Assignment:Create a PowerPoint presentation (maximum 12 slides) in which you do the following:

      • Introduce your selected organization.
      • Present the partnership needs of the organization based on the following prompts:
        • Explain why creating a partnership is needed to accomplish your goal.
        • Detail what financial resources will be needed to support organizational activities and infrastructure.
        • Explain potential barriers to partnerships.
        • Reference:
        • Bansal, S., Garg, I., & Sharma, G. D. (2019). . Sustainability, 11(4), 1091.
        • Elkington, J., & Hartigan, P. (2008) The power of unreasonable people: How social entrepreneurs create markets that change the world. Harvard Business Press.
          • Chapter 2, “Tapping Financial Resources”
        • Kiva. (2017). .
          • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2013)..
            Improving Health Care Quality and Equity: Considerations for Building Partnerships Between Provider Practices and Community Organizations by The Center for Health Care Strategies. Copyright 2013 by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Reprinted by permission of Robert Wood Johnson Foundation via the Copyright Clearance Center.
          • Schirmer, H. (2013). . Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2013(50), 2345. doi:10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2013.ju.00006
          • Scofield, R. (2011). The social entrepreneur’s handbook: How to start, build, and run a business that improves the world. McGraw-Hill.
            • Chapter 9, The Private Pillar: Brother, Can You Spare a Dime? (pp. 105118)
            • Chapter 10, Private Pillar Pitfalls: Sponsorship Programs and Dealing with Donors (pp. 119132)
            • Chapter 11, The Power of the Other Pillars: Public and Internal (pp. 133142)
          • Westlund, H., & Gawell, M. (2012).. Annals of Public & Cooperative Economics, 83(1), 101116. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00456.x
  • Cognitive Science: High School Career Fair

    Create a power point based on what is in the instructions.

    This assignment is designed to enhance your understanding of the diverse career paths within cognitive psychology and neuroscience. By researching and presenting these topics, you will gain insight into the essential skills and knowledge required in these fields, appreciate the historical progression of related professions, and recognize the pivotal impact of research.

    For this assignment, you will record yourself presenting a 5-8-slide presentation for a local high school career fair with a focus on careers in the realms of cognitive psychology and neuroscience. This recording should be 3-5 minutes in length and cover the criteria provided below. Please refer to the “GCU Zoom Resources,” located in Course Resources, to assist you with how to properly record and submit your video. Then, provide the link to your video on the last slide of your presentation.

    Include the following in your presentation:

    • Explain the skills and knowledge needed to be successful in a career involving cognitive psychology and neuroscience.
    • Differentiate between cognitive psychology and neuroscience.
    • Explain two to three exciting careers in the field of cognitive psychology and neuroscience and how these jobs have evolved over time.
    • Describe the value and importance of research within the field that includes common research methods and how they are used within the field.
    • Provide a link to your recorded presentation of the content on the final slide of your presentation.

    A minimum of three scholarly sources with in-text citations to support the material.

    You can record your video using free tools such as Zoom, Loom, Canva, or any other platform you are most comfortable with. For additional support creating video assignments, refer to Course Material Support page located in the Student Success Center.

    Refer to the resource “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

  • Psychology Question

    Hello! I want help editing and finalizing my rough draft for this paper I am including the rubirc and everything you would need

    Assignment # 2: Ethical Issues and Challenges Reaction Paper

    Students will be expected to discuss the common issues and challenges when working with individuals with disabilities, including methods of overcoming these challenges while considering ethical and legal aspects along the way.

    In addition, talk about how specific laws (ADA, IDEA, etc.) play a role in addressing the challenges and issues encountered. Be sure to use literature to support your statements (at least 5 citations from disability-related journals). Your paper should be between 4 to 5 pages.

    When citing the literature, please remember to follow APA style. All citations MUST be in APA Style. Be sure to follow APA Publication Manual guidelines when writing your response.

    Page 1: Identify common issues and challenges when working with individuals with disabilities within a certain environment (lower school, middle school, high school, secondary education setting).

    Page 2: Discuss the ethical and legal aspects of the issues/challenges within that setting selected.

    Page 3-4: Discuss laws (ADA, IDEA, etc.) that apply in the setting selected and how they can specifically play into supporting or hindering individuals encountering the common issues/challenges you identified.

    Page 5: Discuss your personal reflections, thoughts, ideas.

    Assignment # 2: Ethical Issues and Challenges Reaction Paper

    Assignment # 2: Ethical Issues and Challenges Reaction Paper
    Criteria Ratings Points

    Presents own ideas, thoughts, questions around personal reflection, the course, or other relevant matters stemming from participation in the course

    3.1 to 7 pts

    0.1 to 3 pts

    0 to 0 pts

    /7 pts

    Relates own thoughts to specific course content, particularly readings, and other empirically validated and supportive literature

    3.1 to 7 pts

    0.1 to 3 pts

    0 to 0 pts

    /7 pts

    Adheres to APA format (includes Turn It In scoring), well-written.

    2.58 to 6 pts

    0.1 to 2.57 pts

    0 to 0 pts

  • JB 20 REF 3

    CONTEXT: Describe some of the consequences available in your current (or past) workplace. Were they effective for increasing staff behavior? Why or why not, and how would you recommend changing them (based on what you’ve learned in this module) to make them more effective?

    Category

    5 points



    Reflection Length* *(excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words)

    Reflection paper content was greater than 150 words.

    Grammar, Usage, and Spelling

    Reflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.

    References and Utilization of Outside Resources

    The author used references from peer-reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more

    original behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided.

    Addressing the Prompt

    The authors reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing.

    Application

    The authors post clearly demonstrates application and relationship to the weeks assigned reading/topic.

    Late reflection papers will adhere to the general submission policy found on the Virtual Course Schedule.

    WARNING: Using Generative AI (ChatGPT or similar) is not permitted on these papers.

  • EG 20 REF 3

    CONTEXT: Describe some of the consequences available in your current (or past) workplace. Were they effective for increasing staff behavior? Why or why not, and how would you recommend changing them (based on what you’ve learned in this module) to make them more effective?

    Category

    5 points



    Reflection Length* *(excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words)

    Reflection paper content was greater than 150 words.

    Grammar, Usage, and Spelling

    Reflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.

    References and Utilization of Outside Resources

    The author used references from peer-reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more

    original behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided.

    Addressing the Prompt

    The authors reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing.

    Application

    The authors post clearly demonstrates application and relationship to the weeks assigned reading/topic.

    Late reflection papers will adhere to the general submission policy found on the Virtual Course Schedule.

    WARNING: Using Generative AI (ChatGPT or similar) is not permitted on these papers.

  • Psychology Question

    I have named the snapshots as 1,01,2 and 3. 1 and 01 are for the 1st assignment and 2 and 3 are for the 2nd and 3rd assignment. STRICTLY 0%AI. THIS IS THE FINAL PAPERS in this class. 1,2 AND 3 IN SEPARATE DOCS. Reveiw and follow all instructions where the instructions arent clear please lemme know.

  • EG 23 as 2

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Observation Document

    5 pts

    Full

    Document is submitted, is easy to read, appears to be the correct length, and indicated the location and time of the observation.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One expectation in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not submitted or multiple expectations missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Introduction

    5 pts

    Full

    The introduction included a justification for the location selection and an explanation for the time interval selected.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One expectation in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not included or more than one expectation in this category was missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Descriptive Summary

    5 pts

    Full

    The descriptive summary included a structurally sound narrative of the raw observations, including at least (3) examples of highlighting specific interactions or sensory elaborations.

    2 pts

    Partial

    Two expectations in this category were missing (each example counts as 1 expectation, so there are 4 total expectations).

    0 pts

    None

    Not Included or more than two expectations in the category were missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Analysis

    5 pts

    Full

    The analysis section included at least (3) behaviorally identified phenomena from the observations.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One of the expectations in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not Included or more than one expectation in this category was missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Conclusion

    5 pts

    Full

    One example from the analysis was selected for intervention and personal statement of the observation experience was included.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One of the expectations in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not Included or more than one expectation in this category was missing.

    / 5 pts

    Ethical Considerations

    5 pts

    Full

    No personally identifying information was included in the report.

    0 pts

    None

    Personal Identifying information was included in the report.

    / 5 pts

    Total Points: 0
  • EG 23 as 2

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Observation Document

    5 pts

    Full

    Document is submitted, is easy to read, appears to be the correct length, and indicated the location and time of the observation.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One expectation in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not submitted or multiple expectations missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Introduction

    5 pts

    Full

    The introduction included a justification for the location selection and an explanation for the time interval selected.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One expectation in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not included or more than one expectation in this category was missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Descriptive Summary

    5 pts

    Full

    The descriptive summary included a structurally sound narrative of the raw observations, including at least (3) examples of highlighting specific interactions or sensory elaborations.

    2 pts

    Partial

    Two expectations in this category were missing (each example counts as 1 expectation, so there are 4 total expectations).

    0 pts

    None

    Not Included or more than two expectations in the category were missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Analysis

    5 pts

    Full

    The analysis section included at least (3) behaviorally identified phenomena from the observations.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One of the expectations in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not Included or more than one expectation in this category was missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Conclusion

    5 pts

    Full

    One example from the analysis was selected for intervention and personal statement of the observation experience was included.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One of the expectations in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not Included or more than one expectation in this category was missing.

    / 5 pts

    Ethical Considerations

    5 pts

    Full

    No personally identifying information was included in the report.

    0 pts

    None

    Personal Identifying information was included in the report.

    / 5 pts

    Total Points: 0
  • EG 23 as 2

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Observation Document

    5 pts

    Full

    Document is submitted, is easy to read, appears to be the correct length, and indicated the location and time of the observation.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One expectation in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not submitted or multiple expectations missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Introduction

    5 pts

    Full

    The introduction included a justification for the location selection and an explanation for the time interval selected.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One expectation in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not included or more than one expectation in this category was missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Descriptive Summary

    5 pts

    Full

    The descriptive summary included a structurally sound narrative of the raw observations, including at least (3) examples of highlighting specific interactions or sensory elaborations.

    2 pts

    Partial

    Two expectations in this category were missing (each example counts as 1 expectation, so there are 4 total expectations).

    0 pts

    None

    Not Included or more than two expectations in the category were missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Analysis

    5 pts

    Full

    The analysis section included at least (3) behaviorally identified phenomena from the observations.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One of the expectations in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not Included or more than one expectation in this category was missing.

    / 5 pts

    Observation Report Conclusion

    5 pts

    Full

    One example from the analysis was selected for intervention and personal statement of the observation experience was included.

    2 pts

    Partial

    One of the expectations in this category was missing.

    0 pts

    None

    Not Included or more than one expectation in this category was missing.

    / 5 pts

    Ethical Considerations

    5 pts

    Full

    No personally identifying information was included in the report.

    0 pts

    None

    Personal Identifying information was included in the report.

    / 5 pts

    Total Points: 0