|
Scoring for Elements of an Effective Case Study 5 points
|
5 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only one deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section. Deviations cannot be in 1.1, 1.2 & 1.6
|
3.75 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only two deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section. Deviations cannot be in 1.1, 1.2
|
2.5 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Two deviations from instructors scoring guide in this section.
|
1.25 points
Accurate application of rubric is inconsistent . Half of the individual elements within the section were scored incorrectly. All prompts are addressed, but analysis is superficial.
|
0 points
Rubric is not applied or applied inconsistently. More than half of the elements are scored incorrectly.
|
Score of Scoring for Elements of an Effective Case Study 5 points,
/ 5 |
|
Scoring for Problem Identification section 5 points
|
5 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. No deviations from instructors scoring guide in this section.
|
3.75 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only one deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section.
|
2.5 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only one deviation from instructors scoring guide in t
|
1.25 points
Accurate application of rubric is inconsistent . Half of the individual elements within the section were scored incorrectly.
|
0 points
Rubric is not applied or applied inconsistently. More than half of the elements are scored incorrectly
|
Score of Scoring for Problem Identification section 5 points,
/ 5 |
|
Scoring for Problem Analysis 5 points
|
5 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only one deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section. Deviations cannot be in 3.1,3.2,
|
3.75 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only two deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section. Deviations cannot be in 3.1,3.2, or 3.5
|
2.5 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Two deviations from instructors scoring guide in this section. Deviation cannot be in 3.1 and 3.5
|
1.25 points
Accurate application of rubric is inconsistent . Half of the individual elements within the section were scored incorrectly
|
0 points
Rubric is not applied or applied inconsistently. More than half of the elements are scored incorrectly.
|
Score of Scoring for Problem Analysis 5 points,
/ 5 |
|
Scoring for Intervention 10 points
|
10 points
Deviations cannot be in 4.1, 4.3, & 4.4.
|
7.5 points
Deviations cannot be in 4.1, 4.3, & 4.4. .
|
5 points
Deviations cannot be in 4.3, & 4.4.
|
0 points
.
|
0 points
|
Score of Scoring for Intervention 10 points,
/ 10 |
|
Scoring for treatment evaluation 5 points
|
5 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. No deviations from instructors scoring guide in this section.
|
3.75 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only one deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section.
|
2.5 points
Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Two deviations from instructors scoring guide in this section.
|
1.25 points
Accurate application of rubric is inconsistent . Half of the individual elements within the section were scored incorrectly.
|
0 points
Rubric is not applied or applied inconsistently. More than half of the elements are scored incorrectly.
|
Score of Scoring for treatment evaluation 5 points,
/ 5 |
|
Quality of feedback 15 pts
|
15 points
Feedback for each section is insightful. Provides concrete recommend ations on how each section of the case student scored as Needs Developmen t can be improved. Feedback is grounded in knowledge of the problem solving model.
|
11.25 points
|
7.5 points
|
3.75 points
|
0 points
|
Score of Quality of feedback 15 pts,
/ 15 |
|
Style & Grammar 5 points
|
5 points
Written feedback has excellent demonstratio n of writing conventions with complex and varied vocabulary and sentence structure with few punctuation, spelling, and subject-verb errors.
|
3.75 points
Written feedback has good demonstratio n of writing conventions with complex and varied vocabulary and sentence structure with minimal (less than 3) punctuation, spelling, and subject-verb errors.
|
2.5 points
Written Feedback has somewhat good demonstratio n of writing conventions with varied vocabulary and sentence structure with some (3- 5) punctuation, spelling, and subject-verb errors
|
1.25 points
Written Feedback has limited demonstration of writing conventions with limited variation in vocabulary and sentence structure with some (6- 8) punctuation, spelling, and subject-verb errors.
|
0 points
Written Feedback proper writing conventions with no variation in vocabulary or sentence structure and with several (more than 8) punctuation, spelling, and subject-verb errors.
|
Score of Style & Grammar 5 points,
/ 5 |