Category: Psychology

Need help writing a paper psychology related to this specific attached quote needs some personal connections. I wanted to relate to being high senior cheer etc. Need help and guidance in APA format. Thank you!

Step 3 You are to write a 1-2 page paper, using APA format:

1. Individually summarize the two articles describing what each article is about (one of the articles from above and the one you find).
2. Compare and Contrast the two articles
3. Summarize what you learned from the articles
4. Make sure you properly cite each article and any other refrences you use
5. MAKE SURE YOU USE ONE OF THOSE ARTICLE AND it’s due by 10pm eastern time

Step 3 You are to write a 1-2 page paper, using APA format:

1. Individually summarize the two articles describing what each article is about (one of the articles from above and the one you find).
2. Compare and Contrast the two articles
3. Summarize what you learned from the articles
4. Make sure you properly cite each article and any other refrences you use
5. MAKE SURE YOU USE ONE OF THOSE ARTICLE AND its due by 10pm eastern

Background

As part of your exit portfolio, you will be required to complete an academic and behavioral case study during internship using the problem-solving model. To further your knowledge on the problem-solving model and assist you in applying what you have learned thus far about the model, you will read a real case and determine how well it adheres to NASPs case study rubric. Candidates interested in applying to become a Nationally Certified School Psychologist (NCSP) will be required to submit their case studies for review with their application. Reviewers use a standardized rubric to determine whether or not the applicant effectively utilized the problem-solving process in practice.

Instructions

• Pretend you are a portfolio reviewer for NASP. Choose one of the attached problem-solving case studies for review. Then, use the NASP Case Study Rubric to evaluate the case study you selected. All sections of the rubric must be completed.
• Each section has an area for comments. Candidates must provide a rationale for their scores for each section. If the work in the section was Effective, then highlight how the plan met the section’s requirements and how the content aligns with best practice. If there was an area that Needs Development provide specific feedback on how to improve the report.
• Candidates will be graded on their ability to critically analyze the report and their knowledge of the problem-solving process. Candidates are encouraged to review all course materials on the problem-solving model and problem-solving case studies in conjunction with the rubric to ensure a thorough and accurate review of the selected case study.

Additional Resources

Please download the attached documents for this assignment.

Criteria	Exceeds All Expectations (94%-100%)	Exceeds Most Expectations (90%-93%)	Meets Expectations (84%-89%)	Below Expectations (73%-83%)	Does Not Meet Expectations (0% – 72%)	Criterion Score
Scoring for Elements of an Effective Case Study 5 points	5 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only one deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section. Deviations cannot be in 1.1, 1.2 & 1.6	3.75 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only two deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section. Deviations cannot be in 1.1, 1.2	2.5 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Two deviations from instructors scoring guide in this section.	1.25 points Accurate application of rubric is inconsistent . Half of the individual elements within the section were scored incorrectly. All prompts are addressed, but analysis is superficial.	0 points Rubric is not applied or applied inconsistently. More than half of the elements are scored incorrectly.	Score of Scoring for Elements of an Effective Case Study 5 points, / 5
Scoring for Problem Identification section 5 points	5 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. No deviations from instructors scoring guide in this section.	3.75 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only one deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section.	2.5 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only one deviation from instructors scoring guide in t	1.25 points Accurate application of rubric is inconsistent . Half of the individual elements within the section were scored incorrectly.	0 points Rubric is not applied or applied inconsistently. More than half of the elements are scored incorrectly	Score of Scoring for Problem Identification section 5 points, / 5
Scoring for Problem Analysis 5 points	5 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only one deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section. Deviations cannot be in 3.1,3.2,	3.75 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only two deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section. Deviations cannot be in 3.1,3.2, or 3.5	2.5 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Two deviations from instructors scoring guide in this section. Deviation cannot be in 3.1 and 3.5	1.25 points Accurate application of rubric is inconsistent . Half of the individual elements within the section were scored incorrectly	0 points Rubric is not applied or applied inconsistently. More than half of the elements are scored incorrectly.	Score of Scoring for Problem Analysis 5 points, / 5
Scoring for Intervention 10 points	10 points Deviations cannot be in 4.1, 4.3, & 4.4.	7.5 points Deviations cannot be in 4.1, 4.3, & 4.4. .	5 points Deviations cannot be in 4.3, & 4.4.	0 points .	0 points	Score of Scoring for Intervention 10 points, / 10
Scoring for treatment evaluation 5 points	5 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. No deviations from instructors scoring guide in this section.	3.75 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Only one deviation from instructors scoring guide in this section.	2.5 points Candidate uses NCSP rubric to accurately evaluation section. Two deviations from instructors scoring guide in this section.	1.25 points Accurate application of rubric is inconsistent . Half of the individual elements within the section were scored incorrectly.	0 points Rubric is not applied or applied inconsistently. More than half of the elements are scored incorrectly.	Score of Scoring for treatment evaluation 5 points, / 5
Quality of feedback 15 pts	15 points Feedback for each section is insightful. Provides concrete recommend ations on how each section of the case student scored as Needs Developmen t can be improved. Feedback is grounded in knowledge of the problem solving model.	11.25 points	7.5 points	3.75 points	0 points	Score of Quality of feedback 15 pts, / 15
Style & Grammar 5 points	5 points Written feedback has excellent demonstratio n of writing conventions with complex and varied vocabulary and sentence structure with few punctuation, spelling, and subject-verb errors.	3.75 points Written feedback has good demonstratio n of writing conventions with complex and varied vocabulary and sentence structure with minimal (less than 3) punctuation, spelling, and subject-verb errors.	2.5 points Written Feedback has somewhat good demonstratio n of writing conventions with varied vocabulary and sentence structure with some (3- 5) punctuation, spelling, and subject-verb errors	1.25 points Written Feedback has limited demonstration of writing conventions with limited variation in vocabulary and sentence structure with some (6- 8) punctuation, spelling, and subject-verb errors.	0 points Written Feedback proper writing conventions with no variation in vocabulary or sentence structure and with several (more than 8) punctuation, spelling, and subject-verb errors.	Score of Style & Grammar 5 points, / 5

TotalScore of Corrected_A6_Rubric,

/ 50

Introduction

Biological systems influence our motivations. Some motivationslike eatingare pretty well understood. Other motivations remain a bit harder to explain. Understanding the biological aspect of the motivation we have is imperative for practitioners when understanding the behavior of their clients. Biology further contributes to our emotions and health. Think of your own emotional reactions or experiences of stress: what biological actions underlie such emotions or experiences? There are also biological building blocks behind our understanding of sex and gender. With this assessment, you will explore further one of these areas.

The easy availability of poor quality, outdated, or inaccurate information about how our brains work can make it challenging to find trustworthy information. The objective of this assessment is to practice finding and using credible evidence to counter flawed sources.

Preparation

Choose one of the following controversial statements:

• Obesity is caused by a lack of willpower.
• There are large differences between men and womens cognitive ability.
• Only women should compete in womens sports.
• Topic of your choice related to the content in the chapters on Motivation, Sex, Gender, or Emotion in your course texts.

Find one flawed source of information on the Internet. To find a flawed source, look for one with a substantial number of errors.

• Read what the textbooks say about the controversial statement.
• Use the controversial statement mentioned above and use it as your search word/phrase.
  • If you don’t see a flawed source on the first page of results, skip to the third page of results or further.
• Look for sources that are not accurate based on the information in your textbooks.
• Tips for finding flawed sources:
  • Scroll through your social media feeds.
  • Scroll through your results and look for sources that are NOT:
    • .gov websites.
    • News or press websites.

Find three peer-reviewed journal articles in the that summarize a research study focused on the actions of the brain and body that underlie your topic. Reviews of literature or meta-analyses are not appropriate for this assessment.

Review the information about reliability, validity, and generalizability provided in the excerpt from Jhangiani et al.s (2025) Research Methods in Psychology:

• .

Review the APAs .

Helpful video/short slide show to demonstrate what the professor is asking for: <<<<<<<<<————————-{{{{{{{{{{

Instructions

In your paper, address the following components:

• Identify ONE other academic field (e.g., biology, medical sciences) that also studies your chosen topic.
  • Compare and contrast this field with psychology in terms of approach, methods, and focus.
  • For your topic, what are the benefits of the two fields working together? In other words, explain the benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration.
• Summarize your flawed source and explain why it is considered flawed.
• Use three peer-reviewed journal articles to support your analysis. For each article:
  • Discuss the research methods, participants, and key results.
  • Evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the sources.
  • Discuss, using evidence from the article, the studys adherence to TWO of the APAs five Ethical Principles of Psychologists:
    • Beneficence and Nonmaleficence.
    • Fidelity and Responsibility.
    • Integrity.
    • Justice.
    • Respect for People’s Rights and Dignity.
• Relate the actions of the mind and body to psychological and physical health.
  • Describe the biological processes of the brain and body involved.
  • Connect these biological mechanisms to your topic.

Headings

Use headers to organize your paper. Recommended headers:

• Flawed Source (Level 1).
• Peer-Reviewed Sources (Level 1).
  • Source 1 (Level 2).
  • Source 2 (Level 2).
  • Source 3 (Level 2).
• Biological Mechanisms (Level 1).
• Theories (Level 1).
• Conclusion (Level 1).
• References (Level 1 start on a new page).

• Additional Requirements

  • Written communication: Written communication is in professional style with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
  • Resources: Use a minimum of six sources: your flawed source, a textbook, the APA’s , and three peer-reviewed journal articles.
  • APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to APA style and formatting.
    • Use for guidance in citing sources in proper APA style. See the for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
  • Length: 57 double-spaced, typed pages.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

  Mind – Body Interactions

  Physiological Motivation, Sex, and Gender

  Understanding the biological aspects of our motivations is imperative for practitioners when interpreting the behavior of their clients.

  • In , read the following:
    • Read Chapter 6, Motivation: Genes, Thirst, Hunger, Sex and Aggression, pages 119153.

  Emotion and Health

  These chapters discuss further connections between the brain, emotions, and health.

  • In , read the following:
    • Read Chapter 8, Emotion and Stress, pages 171194.
  • In , read the following:
    • Read Chapter 10, Emotion & Motivation.

    Research Methods and Ethics

    Research Methods

    In this chapter, you will be introduced to biopsychology research techniques, and you will explore why biopsychology creates ethical concerns. When conducting research in the field of psychology, and specifically biopsychology, it is imperative that researchers adhere to ethical guidelines and protect participants.

    • In , read the following:
      • Read Chapter 2, Psychological Research.

    This reading is an excerpt from a research methods textbook. It introduces the concepts of reliability and validity, which you will need to apply in this assessment.

    • Jhangiani, R. S., Chiang, I. A., Cuttler, C., & Leighton, D. C. (2025). Research methods in psychology (4th ed.; Customized for Capella University by Deborah Vogele Welch and Whitney Zimmerman). (Original work published 2019).
      • .

    APA Ethics

    In addition to the information in the textbook, be sure to review the APA’s in your reading list.

  Academic Research and Writing

  APA Style

  You can consult the Learn tab of and find the Basic Paper Setup quick guide in the Page Formatting section. This will help you with the mechanics of setting up an APA style paper.You can consult the Learn tab of and find the Heading Levels quick guide in the Page Formatting section. This will help you with how to use headings in an APA style paper.In your reading list, read about how to set .

  Scholarly Sources

  Psychologists rely on scholarly sources to find information that is both credible and aimed at providing the highest quality of information. This can be more than the peer-reviewed sources youve been asked to focus on in other courses. Read to learn more.Scholarly sources can be challenging to read. Please review the following to learn tips and tricks for . Once you are comfortable reading scholarly sources, the following source will help you to see several different ways to be an effective note taker:

  • .

  Using the Library

  The database guides below will help you gain proficiency in researching library resources.

  • .
  • .

  You can consult the library guide on how to find full text for an article if there is not a PDF or HTML full text link.These resources and library guides may also help you with your assessments:

  • can help you in situations when you come across too many results to be useful.
  • , will help you learn the basic features of RefWorks, a research management tool that allows you collect, organize, and store citations from library databases and other resources.
  • will help with finding sources appropriate to your assessment.
  • will help you make critical appraisals of the sources you find.
  • can help you export sources to your RefWorks account.

Introduction

Psychology’s early schools of thought were diverse and thought-provoking. They emerged from brilliant minds, often shaping each other and trying to fill in the gaps of another perspective left behind. In your second assessment, you will be the guide by selecting one of these early schools of thought to dig into, learn more, and apply to a given scenario. You’ll consider this early school of thought’s key principles, major events and historical figures, how other schools of thought contributed to it, cultural influences, and applicability to current professional behaviors. You’ll end with identifying how the seeds of this school of thought remain present todayhow will it continue to have an impact in the future?

Assessment Preparation

Step 1: Pick one historical school of thought:

• Cognitive psychology

Step 2: Choose one of the following scenarios, and then follow the assessment instructions:

• Scenario A: Using your knowledge of the development of this school of thought to guide the behaviors of a supervisor or manager.
• Scenario B: Using your knowledge of the development of this school of thought to guide the behavior of advertisers or a marketing team.
• Scenario C: Using your knowledge of the development of this school of thought to guide the behaviors of a therapist working with teenagers.
• Scenario D: Using your knowledge of the development of this school of thought to guide the behavior of an educator working with young children.

Step 3: Locate three peer-reviewed journal articles on your historical school of thought within the . Be sure that at least one of the three articles is related to the topics of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). To learn more about Capella’ diversity mission, visit the webpage. To accomplish this goal, find at least one article that comes from an international journal, uses a non-Western population, or represents clearly the experiences of an underrepresented group in the literature.

Assessment Instructions

For the topic and scenario of your choice, make sure you include the following in a 56-page paper:

• Title page.
• Introduction (suggested length: 1 paragraph).
  • What school of thought are you reviewing? What are its key principles?
• Explanation of the major events that have affected the development of your school of thought. (suggested length: 23 paragraphs).
  • What events and historical figures contributed to the creation of your school of thought? Discuss their contributions.
• Analysis of how other schools of thought have affected the development of your school of thought. (suggested length: 23 paragraphs).
  • How have other schools of thoughts contributed to your school of thought? Compare/contrast the schools of thought and interpret any connections.
• Analysis of cultural influences that have affected the development of your school of thought. (suggested length: 23 paragraphs).
  • How have societal movements and/or cultural factors shaped the development of this school of thought?
• Analysis of how knowledge of a school of thought applies to current professional behavior. (suggested length: 23 paragraphs).
  • Consider the scenario you’ve selected in Step 2 above. How might this school of thought shape workplace behavior in that context? Provide examples to support your analysis.
• Conclusion (suggested length: one paragraph).
  • How might this school of thought continue to have an impact in the future? Consider impact on individual, community, and global scales.
• Reference page.

• Submission Requirements

  You do not need an index or abstract for this paper. Use the .

  • Length: Write 56 pages of content in addition to a title page and references page.
  • Written communication: Must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • Resources and citations: A minimum of four sources is required. Three must be peer-reviewed journal articles and one may be a credible professional source, such as a textbook. One article should represent DEI perspectives. Format according to current APA guidelines. See .
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

• Reply posts: 125 to 150 words. Replies should relate to the post that you are responding to and in addition, ask a question, add new information or add a new resource to the discussion.
• IMPORTANT NOTE: All writing for this assignment must be original. Content generated by Artificial Intelligence is not permitted and will be addressed via the Student Code of Conduct.

Please consider/reflect on each of these categories as you enter your practicum experience, and again once you have completed your practicum experience. What lessons have you learned thus far? What have youlearnedabout yourself throughout this process? What lessons have you learned about clients, What lessons abouthuman nature? What lessons about thetherapeutic relationship, What lessons about the value of supervision/consultation/collaboration/training?

This reflection should be at least 2 pages in length.

must have access to the textbook. see attached

This assignment invites you to reflect on your emerging philosophy of clinical social work practice with children and families. In 12 double-spaced pages, respond thoughtfully to 2 of the prompts below:

1. Developmental Reflection – Reflect briefly on whether your understanding of children, behavior, or helping has changed since you were an adolescent yourself. I didn’t really understand behaviors as a child like I really didn’t understand being sad or angry but now that I’m a grown up and studying social work and having my target population be children has definitely helped giving me information
   • What do you understand differently now?
   • How might this awareness support your work as a clinical social worker?
2. How Change Occurs – Describe your current beliefs about how change happens for children and families.
   • What do you think helps children heal, grow, or develop new ways of coping?
   • What role do relationships (e.g., caregivers, clinicians, peers) play in change?
   • What role does the social worker play in the change process

   Please make sure you cite everything if you are including sources!!