Category: Public Health

  • Resurgence of Measles in the United Kingdom: Epidemiology, S…

    The course title is Communicable Disease Control. The word limit is 3,000. 25 references are needed in full reference list in Harvard style. Make sure in text references are appropriate as well. Please work on assignment provided already, if there is AI or plagiarism presented in the assignment, make sure to fix it but work on the transcript provided, dont change the transcript unless you want to change to make it 0 AI or plagiarism.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): CDC Assignment.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Healthy People 2020/2030 and Public Health

    Step 1: Search the required textbook(s) by Holtz (H) and Spector (S) for the general topic of Healthy People 2020/2030, public health, etc. In the Holtz and Spector textbook “Index,” locate and incorporate pertinent information on Healthy People, your chosen topic/subtopic, general concepts on prevention strategies, and local public health initiatives or projects. Take notes on all the information related to your topic/subtopic and the general concepts above. Reflect on the information provided in the required course textbook and incorporate throughout your audio PowerPoint presentation. Remember to cite the required textbook(s) used on your Reference page according to APA formatLinks to an external site.. Step 2: Search the current peer-reviewed journals for the general topic of Healthy People 2030, public health, etc. Locate and use at least four (4) peer-reviewed articles not more than seven (7) years old related to Healthy People 2030 and your topic/subtopic. Locate and use at least two (2) quality websites related to Healthy People 2030 and your topic/subtopic. Take notes on all the pertinent information related to your topic/subtopic and the general concepts above. Reflect on the information provided in the required course textbook and incorporate into your audio PowerPoint presentation. Remember to cite the peer-reviewed journals and any other sources used on your Reference page according to APA formatLinks to an external site. Step 3: Start building your Audio PowerPoint (pptx file only) First, view the videos below by clicking directly on the image. APA Style 7th Edition Student Formatting & Audio PowerPoint PowerPoint Voice Over Image-2 Now, print and apply the Tips for Effective PPT Presentations Next, create the PowerPoint slide for your Title page and include the important information based on APA 7th edition guidance on Title Page Setup.Links to an external site. Then, create the PowerPoint slide for your Reference page with hanging indent for each item using APA 7th edition guidance/format.Links to an external site. Step 4: More Audio PowerPoint (pptx file only) Details The completed presentation consists of: A total of 8 14 slides not including the Title & Reference pages Only the Title & Reference page(s) are in APA format A minimum of 6 peer-reviewed scholarly journal references PowerPoint content must include the instructions provided in the MTP2 & MTP 3 Feedback. Remember to use the Grading Rubric as your guide. Citations are needed for images (If you choose to provide image captions, use APA format) Bulleted items to present your PowerPoint content. Do not overcrowd your PowerPoint slides. You may add information in the notes section. Apply/use the Tips for Effective PPT Presentations A PowerPoint with a pptx suffix (Not mp4, Nor ppsx, nor other formats) Verify that your audio is very audible and present on each PowerPoint slide. Submit your Audio PowerPoint and the required recording transcript. (The transcript will not be graded but it assists with a better evaluation of your presentation and speeds up the process.) Consider using this Voluntary Support Option: Use the APA textbook listed in the Syllabus as additional resources or the APA Style websiteLinks to an external site.. Submit the designated sections of your MTP to the West Writing Center (WWC), Brainfuse (BF), or the Distance Tutoring: Writing, Reading & Speech (DT) for their review of your Title page for correct APA format & the Description for proper academic writing. Due date for MTP 2: as per Weekly Course Calendar. Make sure you understand the MT HP2030 Grading Rubric for the project before submitting your WC material. Share the Tips for Effective PowerPoint Presentations document with the WC staff. Create & Keep an MTP Journal that includes the following: Name of WC/BF/DT staff that reviewed your submission Time & Date of the review Step 5 Finally . . . Share on Padlet Save your Audio PowerPoint presentation in a format that includes your narration. Usually, this will be in a .pptx or .ppsx format. Go to the class Padlet entitled (Diversity Mid-Term PowerPointLinks to an external site.). Click on the ‘+’ button at the bottom right corner of the Padlet board. A box will appear for your post. Enter your name and your chosen topic in the’ Title’ field. Click on the ‘Upload’ button (it looks like an upward arrow). Select your PowerPoint file from your computer and click ‘Open’ to upload it. Once your file is uploaded, click on the ‘Publish’ button to post your presentation to the Padlet board. Please make sure to review your post to ensure that everything is correct. If you need to make changes, you can click on the three dots (…) in the top right corner of your post and select ‘Edit’. Supplemental resources: Contact Tech Support to obtain directions and assistance on creating an audio PowerPoint (pptx only) MTP Project – IMPORTANT videos and Documents Rubric MT Exam HP 2030 Rubric Spring 2024 (1) (3) MT Exam HP 2030 Rubric Spring 2024 (1) (3) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization 90 to >70.0 pts Proficient Organized in a way that clearly leads reader through the MAP questions. Proficient example of a phi. May be improved in small ways. 70 to >50.0 pts Competent Well organized through most of the phi, but still could be improved. Is an adequate example of a phi but may wander off-topic once. Does not use all of the MT HP 2020 instruction criteria or doesn’t cover topic in enough detail to provide sufficient phi direction. 50 to >30.0 pts Progressing Organization evident but wanders off-topic frequently or is not always easy to follow. Minimal phi completion. Lacks either sufficient depth & does not follow MT HP 2020 instructions or wanders off-topic more than once. 30 to >0.0 pts Beginning Needs organization. Difficult to read and follow ideas. Phi lacks sufficient use of MT HP 2020 instruction criteria or is too far off-topic to be considered an acceptable phi. 0 pts Did Not Do It The student did not submit the assignment 90 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting & Language 70 to >50.0 pts Proficient Demonstrates expert use of formatting. The language is consistently academic, maintaining an appropriate tone throughout the presentation. There are fewer than seven errors in grammar and syntax. Outstanding creation of narrated Audio PowerPoint. Inclusion of the recording transcript/script. 50 to >30.0 pts Competent Formatting adheres to general guidelines. Language shows a few academic writing inconsistencies but overall demonstrates understanding. More than 6 errors in grammar. Failure to do one of the following: Skillful creation of an Audio PowerPoint. Inclusion of a transcript/script. 30 to >20.0 pts Progressing Formatting is somewhat correct. Language contains academic writing inconsistencies. Contains several errors in grammar. Failure to do two of the following: Skillful creation of an Audio PowerPoint. Inclusion of a transcript/script. 20 to >0.0 pts Beginning Show little to no understanding of formatting. Language is not correct academic writing. Many errors in grammar. 0 pts Did Not Do It The student did not submit the assignment 70 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic, Mobilize, Assess, & Plan (Proficient) 115 to >95.0 pts Proficient The Topic, Mobilize, & Assess portions clearly define the scope of the public health initiative (PHI) being presented by following the appropriate HP2020 website directions. The Plan will have clearly listed phi goal(s) & interventions/steps for achieving the phi goal(s). Mobilize – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) What is the vision and mission of the coalition? Why do I want to bring people together? Who are the potential partners (organizations and businesses) in my community? Assess – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) Who is affected and how? What resources do we have as a coalition? What resources do we need as a coalition? Plan – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) What is our goal as a coalition? What do we need to do to reach our goal? Who will do it? How will we know when we have reached our goal? 95 to >75.0 pts Competent The Topic, Mobilize, & Assess portions are fairly clear and describe the phi being presented by following the appropriate HP2020 website directions. The Plan will have a fairly clear list of phi goal(s) & interventions/steps for achieving the phi goal(s). 7 of the 9 questions will be clearly answered. Mobilize – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) What is the vision and mission of the coalition? Why do I want to bring people together? Who are the potential partners (organizations and businesses) in my community? Assess – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) Who is affected and how? What resources do we have as a coalition? What resources do we need as a coalition? Plan – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) What is our goal as a coalition? What do we need to do to reach our goal? Who will do it? How will we know when we have reached our goal? 75 to >55.0 pts Progressing The Topic, Mobilize, & Assess portions do not adequately describe the phi being presented by following the HP2020 website directions. The Plan has weak &/or incomplete phi goal(s) &/or interventions & may not connect to the chosen topic. 4 of the 9 questions will be answered. Mobilize – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) What is the vision and mission of the coalition? Why do I want to bring people together? Who are the potential partners (organizations and businesses) in my community? Assess – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) Who is affected and how? What resources do we have as a coalition? What resources do we need as a coalition? Plan – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) What is our goal as a coalition? What do we need to do to reach our goal? Who will do it? How will we know when we have reached our goal? 55 to >0.0 pts Beginning The Topic, Mobilize, & Assess portions are partially or all missing. The Plan is partially or all missing. < 4 of the questions will be answered Mobilize – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) What is the vision and mission of the coalition? Why do I want to bring people together? Who are the potential partners (organizations and businesses) in my community? Assess – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) Who is affected and how? What resources do we have as a coalition? What resources do we need as a coalition? Plan – Questions to Ask & Answer (3 required) What is our goal as a coalition? What do we need to do to reach our goal? Who will do it? How will we know when we have reached our goal? 0 pts Did Not Do It The student did not submit the assignment 115 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCTE-BSN-TMAP-V1 Topic, Mobilize, Assess, & Plan (See details for this criterion above) threshold: 1.0 pts 1 pts Proficient – Topic, Mobilize, Assess, & Plan 0 pts No Evidence — This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Analysis 75 to >55.0 pts Proficient Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the topic through detailed analysis of each reference. Utilizes a diverse range of high-quality sources, including scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles and credible websites, to support arguments effectively. Integrates intext citations and references into the discussion, adhering to the 7th Ed. APA guidelines for citation and synthesis. Understanding and usage of Cover and Reference pages in accordance with the 7th Edition APA guidelines. 55 to >35.0 pts Competent Above-average utilization of references with analysis. Incorporates 4 or more scholarly, peer-reviewed journal references and 2 or more credible websites, though some areas may lack detailed elaboration. References are well synthesized but may lack depth in adhering to the 7th Ed. APA guidelines for citation and synthesis. Some understanding and usage of Cover and Reference pages in accordance with the 7th Edition APA guidelines 35 to >15.0 pts Progressing Basic use of the references with only a minimal amount of analysis. Contains less than 4 scholarly, peer-reviewed journal references and 2 or more credible websites that have a little synthesis but not in sufficient depth. Does not adhere to the 7th Ed. APA guidelines for citation and synthesis. No understanding or usage of Cover and Reference pages in accordance with the 7th Edition APA guidelines 15 to >0.0 pts Beginning Poor use of references with no analysis. Has 2 or less peer-reviewed journal references and less than 2 quality websites with little to no synthesis & detail. Adhering to the 7th Ed. APA guidelines for citation and synthesis is not shown. No usage of Cover and Reference pages in accordance with the 7th Edition APA guidelines 0 pts Did Not Do It The student did not submit the assignment 75 pts
  • Thailand: depression and Physical inactivity

    Students will submit the following sections:

    • Introduction / Overview (12 paragraphs)
    • Introduce the physical activity-related problem, population, and country of interest.
    • Population of Interest (2 paragraphs)
    • Describe the target older adult population and justify why this group is the focus of the proposed program.
    • Country of Interest & Contextual Review (2 paragraphs) Provide a scientific and contextual review of the selected country, including demographic trends, physical activity patterns, and relevant cultural or environmental considerations.

    Double Space

    12 point font (Arial 11-point Calibri, 11-point Arial, and 10-point Lucida Sans Unicode as well as serif fonts such as 12-point Times New Roman, 11-point Georgia, 10-point Computer Modern)

    Rubric

    Week 3 GAPA Project

    Week 3 GAPA Project

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Project Foundations

    5 to >3.75 pts

    Exceeds

    Clearly introduces the PA-related problem; population and country are well-defined and strongly justified. Contextual review is accurate, well-supported, and clearly linked to physical activity in older adults. Uses 4 or more research articles.

    3.75 to >2.5 pts

    Mastery

    Introduction, population, and country context are clear and appropriate with adequate support. Minor gaps in clarity or depth. Sections are present but underdeveloped, unclear, or weakly supported. Uses at least 2 research articles.

    2.5 to >0.0 pts

    Near

    Sections are incomplete, unclear, or missing key components. Uses only 1 research article.

    0 pts

    No Evidence

    Section is incomplete.

    5 pts

    Total Points: 5

    Submission

    ilterature Review and Theoretical Framework (3-5 paragraphs)

    Synthesize relevant primary literature and clearly identify the theory (or theories) guiding the proposed program. Students should explain key theoretical constructs and how they will inform later program design decisions.

    You should have between 5-6 research references from the Atkins library (Google Scholar is not encouraged). This can include book chapters (not an entire book) that are also research related. This does not include media articles (e.g. CNN, Sports Illustrated). Your references should not be more than 7 years old (oldest can be from 2019). However, if there are not updated research references, you will need to note this within your paper.

    One way to make this process easier is to develop a table which looks like this:

    Name of reference/authorSummary of ArticleHow it relates to your projectBrown, C.S. & Ogunyemi, E. (2026). Creating a project for Global Aging and Physical Activity. Journal of Make Believe, 2(2), 1-52. doi: 439571038.

    Researchers created a course and then discussed how students can use their country topic of interest to develop a physical activity protocol in a semester.The step by step process of how to design a protocol for a specific population, older adults, is what was needed to pass the class.

    Then you can use the information you have placed in these different boxes to write your paragraphs. It would look something like this:

    In the article by Brown and Ogunyemi (2026), researchers discussed how they created a course for undergraduate students at a university. The course was new and the project had previously been completed by the ‘more than TA’ Ogunyemi. The article described the step by step process students used to develop their physical activity protocol for older adults in a country of their interest.

    Rubric

    Week 5 GAPA Project

    Week 5 GAPA Project

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Literature Review & Theoretical Framework

    2 to >1.5 pts

    Exceeds

    Effectively synthesizes primary literature and clearly explains theory. Strong connection between theory and physical activity in older adults.

    1.5 to >1.0 pts

    Mastery

    Appropriate literature and theory are identified with reasonable explanation.

    1 to >0.0 pts

    Near

    Literature is summarized rather than synthesized; theory is weak or unclear.

    0 pts

    No Evidence

    2 pts

    Total Points: 2

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): annotated-Thailand_20Depression20and20Physical20inactivity20docx.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Thailand: depression and Physical inactivity

    iterature Review and Theoretical Framework (3-5 paragraphs)

    Synthesize relevant primary literature and clearly identify the theory (or theories) guiding the proposed program. Students should explain key theoretical constructs and how they will inform later program design decisions.

    You should have between 5-6 research references from the Atkins library (Google Scholar is not encouraged). This can include book chapters (not an entire book) that are also research related. This does not include media articles (e.g. CNN, Sports Illustrated). Your references should not be more than 7 years old (oldest can be from 2019). However, if there are not updated research references, you will need to note this within your paper.

    One way to make this process easier is to develop a table which looks like this:

    Name of reference/authorSummary of ArticleHow it relates to your projectBrown, C.S. & Ogunyemi, E. (2026). Creating a project for Global Aging and Physical Activity. Journal of Make Believe, 2(2), 1-52. doi: 439571038.

    Researchers created a course and then discussed how students can use their country topic of interest to develop a physical activity protocol in a semester.The step by step process of how to design a protocol for a specific population, older adults, is what was needed to pass the class.

    Then you can use the information you have placed in these different boxes to write your paragraphs. It would look something like this:

    In the article by Brown and Ogunyemi (2026), researchers discussed how they created a course for undergraduate students at a university. The course was new and the project had previously been completed by the ‘more than TA’ Ogunyemi. The article described the step by step process students used to develop their physical activity protocol for older adults in a country of their interest.

    Rubric

    Week 5 GAPA Project

    Week 5 GAPA Project

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Literature Review & Theoretical Framework

    2 to >1.5 pts

    Exceeds

    Effectively synthesizes primary literature and clearly explains theory. Strong connection between theory and physical activity in older adults.

    1.5 to >1.0 pts

    Mastery

    Appropriate literature and theory are identified with reasonable explanation.

    1 to >0.0 pts

    Near

    Literature is summarized rather than synthesized; theory is weak or unclear.

    0 pts

    No Evidence

    2 pts

    Total Points: 2

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): annotated-Thailand_20Depression20and20Physical20inactivity20docx.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Thailand: depression and Physical inactivity

    iterature Review and Theoretical Framework (3-5 paragraphs)

    Synthesize relevant primary literature and clearly identify the theory (or theories) guiding the proposed program. Students should explain key theoretical constructs and how they will inform later program design decisions.

    You should have between 5-6 research references from the Atkins library (Google Scholar is not encouraged). This can include book chapters (not an entire book) that are also research related. This does not include media articles (e.g. CNN, Sports Illustrated). Your references should not be more than 7 years old (oldest can be from 2019). However, if there are not updated research references, you will need to note this within your paper.

    One way to make this process easier is to develop a table which looks like this:

    Name of reference/authorSummary of ArticleHow it relates to your projectBrown, C.S. & Ogunyemi, E. (2026). Creating a project for Global Aging and Physical Activity. Journal of Make Believe, 2(2), 1-52. doi: 439571038.

    Researchers created a course and then discussed how students can use their country topic of interest to develop a physical activity protocol in a semester.The step by step process of how to design a protocol for a specific population, older adults, is what was needed to pass the class.

    Then you can use the information you have placed in these different boxes to write your paragraphs. It would look something like this:

    In the article by Brown and Ogunyemi (2026), researchers discussed how they created a course for undergraduate students at a university. The course was new and the project had previously been completed by the ‘more than TA’ Ogunyemi. The article described the step by step process students used to develop their physical activity protocol for older adults in a country of their interest.

    Rubric

    Week 5 GAPA Project

    Week 5 GAPA Project

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Literature Review & Theoretical Framework

    2 to >1.5 pts

    Exceeds

    Effectively synthesizes primary literature and clearly explains theory. Strong connection between theory and physical activity in older adults.

    1.5 to >1.0 pts

    Mastery

    Appropriate literature and theory are identified with reasonable explanation.

    1 to >0.0 pts

    Near

    Literature is summarized rather than synthesized; theory is weak or unclear.

    0 pts

    No Evidence

    2 pts

    Total Points: 2

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): annotated-Thailand_20Depression20and20Physical20inactivity20docx.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Public Health Question

    Ive attached my Assignment #1. Please review the document carefully and help me complete all sections clearly and accurately, following the instructions.

    Ive also attached the rubric and my previous assignment relating to this. Please use it as a reference so everything stays consistent with my programs purpose, stakeholders, and overall context.

    This assignment is due soon, so Im looking for clear and well-organized responses that match whats expected for this class. Please write all answers in complete sentences.

    Please do not use AI/ChatGPT-generated language and do not plagiarize, as my professor is very strict about originality and academic integrity. All responses should be written in original wording and sound like student work. Also, if you have access to Turnitin, please run my assignment through Turnitin; my assignment needs to have 0% AI report. Please send this to me upon completion.

    If you use any information from websites or outside sources, please make sure everything is properly cited.

    If you need me to attach any additional documents (such as other assignments Ive completed for this class) or if you have any questions, feel free to let me know.

    SUBMISSION GUIDELINES:
    This assignment should be written in paragraph form using full sentences; you should not use bullet points. Your paper should be single-spaced and 12-point font, using Times New Roman, Calibri or Arial. It should not be longer than 2 pages (not including a reference page).

    You must work off of Google docs and submit the live Google doc link. This will be your assignment submission.

    You must add Dr. Bloom and Nichelle as EDITORS to your Google doc.

    You must submit PDFs of all literature you cite in your assignment. They must be labeled with the last name of the author and the year of the publication. I recommend creating a Google folder for each assignment where you can organize everything in one place. Please refer to Week 4 lecture slides if you need guidance.

    NON-ADHERENCE TO ANY OF THESE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES WILL RESULT IN A 0 ON THE ASSIGNMENT.

    ASSUMPTIONS OF YOUR PROGRAM EVALUATION: Each of you have created diverse and interesting programs in 490B. Now we must put our evaluation hats on and begin to develop our evaluation plan. In order to do this, we must pretend as though the program has already been run at least one time. Though each program in this class is unique and each group will have the freedom to create evaluation outcomes that are of interest to them, the following assumptions must be included:

    1. Your program included 50 participants
    2. Your program will include 1 summative evaluation outcome (impact or outcome) for each member of your group. Each member will have “ownership” over an outcome.

    ASSIGNMENT COMPONENTS:

    Background/Intro (15 points):
    Write an introduction for your program evaluation – approximately 2-3 paragraphs. Your introduction should include the following:

    • Big picture public health issue:
      • What is the big picture public health problem that needs to be addressed? AI mention Blue Zones
      • What do we know about this problem and why does it matter?
      • What is the gap that exists in public health that your program will address?
      • What is the goal of your program?
        • Connect it to the public health program you just described. ChatGPT mention outcomes aligned with the Power 9.
    • Describe your program and population:
      • What are the key components of your program?
      • Who is participating in your program?
    • Cite properly: You should use 6-8 sources / references for this section. Please see instructions above regarding references.

    Evaluation Outcomes (10 points)

    • What are your outcomes of interest?
      • Remember we are focusing on summative evaluation this semester. That includes both impact and outcome summative evaluation.
        • Examples of summative outcomes include: Increased knowledge about a health topic; Improved attitudes or beliefs about a behavior; Reduced engagement in risky behaviors; Increased participation in preventive health practices; Changes in health indicators or disease prevalence.
    • For each outcome, describe whether it is considered short-term, intermediate (i.e., medium-term), or long-term.
    • Provide a brief justification for each outcome. AI mention social media.

    Note: Program evaluation is an ever-evolving process. This assignment will help center where your evaluation is going (i.e., this is the beginning of your roadmap). Its okay if these slightly change over the next few weeks, but every week you should be getting closer and closer to a final evaluation plan ( e.g., your final report).


    Requirements: as long as needed

  • Opioid overdose

    i have attach below is the description of the assignmentand the criteria. Let me know if you have any question!

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Research20Paper20outline.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Diary

    The diary should be min 400 and max 500 words (reference will not be included in the word count). You will need to attach both the trigger piece (non academic material) and a self taken photo illustrating a real world example related to your reflection. Topic can not be the same as diary 1 Remember, self- reflection is not a summary/ report. Trigger piece should be current, and the topic should relate to presentation topic(s) and discussion (refer to uploaded students PDF PPT).

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Sample A.pdf, Presentation2 2026.pdf, angela.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Report #1: Active Learning (SDoH) in the field

    Assignment overview:

    This assignment will provide an opportunity for you to engage with and learn from agencies, advocates, or efforts in the field/real-world. The idea will be to take what you are learning in the classroom and witness it in real world examples and engage with communities and populations you hope to serve in the future. There will be several options to choose from. You will be expected to write a report of what you learned and experienced. You can select one of the following options to complete the assignment:

    Option 1– Interview someone working in the field, who’s mission specifically targets SDOH.

    • Create an interview guide to frame your interview. The interview guide should include 5-10 questions that you plan to ask your interviewee. I am not providing a pre-determined set of questions, as I want you to explore and discuss topics that are of most interest to you and relevant to the individual you are interviewing and the work they are doing or the population they are serving. You will need to submit the interview guide as part of your assignment submission.
    • Remember to allow time to set up an interview. These do not need to be in-person interviews, a zoom (or any virtual platform) interview would be fine. However, make sure you talk to the professional (i.e., you cannot conduct the interview over email by writing.
    • You might know people personally whose work aligns with addressing the SDOH. Alternatively, you might be very curious about a topic and not have any direct connections there so do some research on people locally, nationally, who are working on SDOH topics you are interested in. This is a good opportunity to reach out and make a connection. E-mail people, introduce yourself and the assignment and why you are interested in speaking with them. Below is an example verbiage you might send in the e-mail (you do not have to use this, but it is available if you would like to use it):

    Hello [persons name make sure to check if they have specific credentials],

    My name is [your name]. I am an undergraduate student in the department of [insert your department] at George Mason University. I am currently enrolled in a course that explores the Social Determinants of Health. Our upcoming assignment requires us to interview someone who is in the field working to address the Social Determinants of Health.

    I would like to interview you because [insert reasons why you want to talk to this person]. The interview should not take more than 20-30 minutes and can be conducted virtually on Zoom.

    I appreciate your attention to my e-mail and thank you for your considering participating in my assignment. I look forward to hearing from you.

    • You might want to record the interview because it will take away the pressure to write everything down. You can then refer to the recording while writing your summary and be more present during the interview. If you do record, make sure you have asked for permission from the person you are interviewing first!
    • If there is a certain individual that you would really like to interview and they are not available until after the due date, please let me know. We can make arrangements to extend the deadline. I might ask for some proof that the interview date has to occur after the deadline (e.g., proof of conversation with the interviewee). Just make sure to discuss this with me prior. Do not wait until the last minute to discuss this with me.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): GCH 445 Report 1 – Active learning_RUBRIC (Spring 24).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Looking for help with a letter in in public health

    Prompt

    Write a short paper that describes a public health issue and the public health programs that have been implemented to address this specific issue. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

    • Describe the public health issue, including the affected population, and the social and behavioral risk factors that are associated with the issue
    • Delineate between social and behavioral risk factors that contribute to disease, and diseases that contribute to social and behavioral risk factors
    • Describe the public health programs implemented to address this issue, and determine how these programs addressed the social and behavioral risk factors associated with the disease
    • Determine the successes and failures of these programs, and clearly explain why you have determined them successes and failures
    • Select a program that you will examine for your final project, and provide the rationale for your choice
    • Substantiate your work with data and references from peer-reviewed academic journals

    What to Submit

    Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Your paper should be 3 pages in length. At least three sources from peer-reviewed academic journals must be cited in APA format, No AI please.

    Requirements: 3 pages