Category: Public Health

  • Looking for help with a letter in public health

    Imagine that you are the environmental health expert for the local health department. You have been tasked with writing a letter to the U.S. Congressional Representativeon behalf of the local health department. This letter will also be published as an open letter within local media outlets as an opinion editorial (i.e., an Op-Ed).

    Gathering information for your letter

    • Determine a local environmental health concern: You will need to search the internet for an environmental health concern in your area. If you live within the United States, you are encouraged to use your own community. You can search the websites of health departments and environmental agencies in your area. For example, if you live in New Hampshire, you could visit the website in order to search for a specific environmental health concern for that area.
    • Identify the U.S. Congressional Representative: Identify the U.S. Congressional Representative for this community by searching the site of the U.S. House of Representatives.

    In this letter, you must address the following:

    • Summarize the environmental health concern (250 words): Break down the environmental health concern into the specific hazards at play and the quantifiable effects on population health. Discuss how this concern diminishes the health status of the population/community. Your summary should address the following questions:
      • Health Concern and Hazard(s): What types of health problems may be caused by your identified environmental hazards? What environmental hazards and stressors (stimuli in the environment that cause stress) are people exposed to, at what levels, and for how long?
      • Quantifiable Effects on Population Health: What is the chance that people will experience health problems when exposed to different levels of these hazards and environmental stressors? Is there a level below which these environmental hazards or stressors don’t pose a human health risk?
      • Health Status of the Population: Are some people more likely to be susceptible to environmental hazards or stressors because of factors such as age, genetics, pre-existing health conditions, ethnic practices, gender, etc.? Are some people more likely to be exposed to environmental hazards or stressors because of factors such as where they work, where they play, what they like to eat, etc.?
    • Frame the issue through health equity (500 words): Describe the community or population at risk. What are relevant social determinants of health? How do these determinants create a health disparity? What aspects of the system make this environmental health concern related to health inequity? Summarize why there are barriers to health equity with this particular issue.
    • Advocating for policies and programs (250 words): Make recommendations that may improve the health among the marginalized, vulnerable, or disadvantaged populations within the region. Please ensure your recommendations include the following:
      • One (1) recommendation that focuses on a health campaign (i.e., political advocacy).
      • One (1) recommendation that focuses on a social program (e.g., free clean water stations).
      • One (1) recommendation that focuses on an economic policy (i.e., funding for environmental health efforts).

    Guidelines for Submission: Submit your Public Health Letter Assignment as a Word document with double-spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Your letter should be 1,0001,250 words in length. Any sources should be cited in APA format.

    Requirements: 2-4 pages

  • SBSMSCHC / Master of Science in Health Care Management

    plz find the attached file

    all instructions are available

    Requirements: 4000

  • Issues and Trends in Community Health.

    Your initial post should be at least 300 words in length.

    Your initial post should include at least one APA-formatted scholarly, professional, or textbook reference with accompanying in-text citation to support any paraphrased, summarized, or quoted material.

    Due to COVID-19, people were asked to practice social distancing and to wear masks when in public in 2020. Many stores required patrons to have on a mask before they enter the store. There were people who opposed these guidelines and suggested they infringed upon their rights.

    Create a discussion post in which you support the guidelines for wearing a mask. In your response to another student, reply to their reasons for supporting the guidelines with arguments against wearing the masks. Try to refrain from giving personal reasons in your post or response, but see this as a classic debate in which you need to be able to argue for either side of a question with evidence and logic.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Discussion Board V.docx, UnitV Critical Health Issues.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Talking Circle

    Talking circle 1 Scholar article critique – Mediterranean diet

    Scholarly article critique talking circle.

    This activity will help students to develop their confidence in discussing research and critiquing research methodology.

    Instructions:

    This assignment is done with your research proposal team.

    Read the assigned article, Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of CaseControl Studies.

    Post 1 Individual learning, preparation, and reflection

    This is an individual activity in which you answer ALL of the questions below to prepare you for your talking circle.

    Read the Critique/Review of Research Article pdf for guidance on how to structure your critique then focus on the following questions:

    Answer the above questions and the following additional questions:

    • Answer the above questions
    • Identify the study design.
    • What is the research question of this study?
    • Why was this study design selected? Was it effective ? Did it answer the research question? What did the researchers do well and what could they have improved?
    • What did you learn from this activity?

    Post 2 Collective reflection and insights – Talking circle activity in class

    You will meet with your team and hold a talking circle in which you discuss your answers in post 1 before answering the questions below for post 2 together.

    This second post documents your group discussion and your individual and group takeaways or aha moments that will contribute to the foundation of knowledge and skills that you are building in this course. Please answer the following questions based on your team discussion of the following questions:

    Now that you have answered questions about the article, meet with your team to hold a talking circle where you discuss the following questions.

    1. Give a brief synopsis about the article you covered.
    2. What are the strengths of this article and what did you learn about research records from its methodology?
    3. What are some weaknesses of this article and what does your group recommend to improve this article?
    4. a) What are some individual takeaways from this activity? b) What are some group takeaways from this activity?
    5. How did you benefit from doing this exercise as a talking circle in class?
    6. Do you have any suggestions for the next talking circle activity?

    Student value of this activity: It is crucial that every student has an opportunity to speak. This helps you to develop the skill of evaluating research verbally in a safe space. Critical thinking in a group setting is a key skill for success in every workplace. It may be uncomfortable to talk for you but I urge you to push through this discomfort during this activity.

    Post 3. Engagement and Comparative Evaluation

    You will now engage with your classmates by commenting on ONE persons post 1 and 2 what insights have you gained from your classmate and how does it compare to your own experience with this exercise? What have you gained overall from your team and your classmates as a result of this exercise?

    Notes for Students:

    • Post 1 is your individual critique of your chosen article.
    • Post 2 is your team discussion and talking circle summary.
    • Post 3 is your engagement with peers.
    • All posts should be well-written, clear, and professional.

    References

    Zalaquett, N., Lidoriki, I., Lampou, M., Saab, J., Hadkhale, K., Christophi, C., & Kales, S. N. (2025). Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of CaseControl Studies. Nutrients, 17(2), 287.

    Scholar article critique Talking circle 1 rubric (Total: 25 Points) Mediterranean diet

    Criteria

    Excellent (5 pts)

    Good (4 pts)

    Satisfactory (3 pts)

    Needs Improvement (12 pts)

    Points Earned

    1. Completeness and Clarity of Responses to All Guiding Questions

    Fully addresses all provided and assigned questions with clear, detailed, and well-supported answers.

    Addresses most questions; responses are mostly clear and supported.

    Addresses some questions with minimal explanation or support.

    Incomplete or unclear responses; missing several questions.

    2. Identification of Study Design

    Correctly identifies the study design and explains it accurately.

    Correctly identifies study design with minor inaccuracies in explanation.

    Identifies study design with vague or limited explanation.

    Incorrect or missing study design identification.

    3. Articulation of the Research Question

    Clearly and correctly states the research question as presented in the article.

    Generally correct research question, though minor wording issues.

    Research question stated with limited clarity or partial accuracy.

    Missing or significantly incorrect research question.

    4. Evaluation of Study Design and Effectiveness

    Provides a thoughtful evaluation of why the design was chosen, how well it worked, what the researchers did well, and suggestions for improvement.

    Gives a good explanation with minor detail gaps or weaker evaluation.

    Brief or surface-level evaluation; lacks depth.

    Minimal or unclear evaluation; major parts of the question are not addressed.

    5. Reflection on Learning

    (Post 2 &3)

    Offers a meaningful reflection on what was learned from the article and the critique process, with thoughtful insights.

    Reflection is relevant and shows some insight.

    Reflection is vague or superficial. Post 3 is missing part 1 or 2.

    Minimal or unrelated reflection.

  • SD1

    Internet, and your text readings, research the following statistical topics:

    • Statistical power
    • Central limit theorem (CLT)
    • Type I error
    • Type II error
    • Four levels of measurement

    On the basis of your research and understanding, respond to the following:

    • Find and state the definition of statistical power that you identify with.
    • State the definition of statistical power in your own words.
    • Compare and contrast type I and type II errors.
    • Explain how power is affected by sample size.
    • In your own words, define the four (4) levels of measurement, and provide two examples of each of the four levels of measurement. You will use these examples in your project for weeks 2-5, so make sure to choose example levels of measurement that you are interested in using for future assignments.

    Submission Instructions:

    1. Write Your Initial Post:
    • Your initial discussion post should be approximately 350 words in length.
    • Follow APA guidelines for writing style, spelling, grammar, and proper citation of sources.
    • Include APA in-text citations(author, year) within your post and provide full APA citationsat the end.
    • Ensure your post is well-organized, thoughtful, and directly addresses the discussion prompt.
  • Sell meberane structure

    Define this question

    Requirements:

  • Health Promotion Disease Preve (PUBH-345-OL1-25475)

    THIS IS TWO ASSIGNMENTS. PLEASE DON’T USE CHAT GPT OR ANY AL AND MAKE SURE EVERYTHING IS CITED.

    JOURNAL 1

    A client continues to experience chronic discomfort following an accident and wishes to pursue complementary and integrative medical approaches. In a brief written response, identify one or two complementary or integrative therapies you would suggest and explain why, using public health principles and evidence to support your recommendations

    JOURNAL 2 WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

    How would you advise a client who is seeking guidance on selecting a health care plan? Identify the key information you would need from the client to support informed decision-making, and explain how this information would influence your recommendations.

    Written Assignments
    Some modules will include a written assignment. Instructions will be provided
    within the corresponding module

    Journal Entries
    Journal assignments are less formal than discussion forum posts. APA formatting
    is not required; however, proper grammar and clarity are expected



    Requirements: NA

  • MPH520 Assignment 4

    you have been asked to brief new public health personnel on disaster management roles. Based on what you have learned so far in this course, create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least four (4) citations throughout your presentation. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    1. Title slide (1 slide)
    2. Describe the impact of the 9/11 disaster on disaster management (2-4 slides).
    3. Discuss the offices and organizations that are part of the federal preparedness infrastructure (include DHS, HHS, Agriculture, Justice, FBI, DOD, and intelligence community (3-6 slides).
    4. Describe the National Response Framework (including NIMS, National Response Framework, etc.) (2-4 slides).
    5. Delineate roles within these collaborating agencies that inform disaster relief (2-3 slides).
    6. Describe national and international legislation, regulations, and policies related to disaster management (4-6 slides).
    7. References (1 slide).

    The following specifications are required for this assignment:

    • Length: 15-25 slides; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner
    • Structure: Additionally, because a good presentation has few words on the slides include a script with the verbiage you would say when presenting; script should be a minimum of 50 words per slide.
    • References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.
    • Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft PowerPoint document (.pptx)
  • M7D2: Rehabilitation Readiness

    Your initial post should be at least 250 words and must substantively integrate the assigned readings

    Rehabilitation readiness assists treatment providers in identifying whether or not an individual is ready to engage in the change process. It also helps in identifying the necessary steps to assist an individual to become ready to engage in change. In this activity, you will apply the readiness assessment tool to a case study. Review the following:

    • Intervention episode used in Module 4:

    Discuss the following points in your post:

    • What are your thoughts on using the readiness assessment tool for addictive behaviors?
    • What is the stage of readiness in each of these areas for Brian and/or Alyssa?
    • Need for change
    • Commitment to change
    • Self-awareness
    • Environmental awareness
    • Personal closeness
    • Identify a possible next step in the process for the individual you selected that you feel will assist them in their readiness for change.

    Be sure to rate each of the readiness assessment areas. Your next steps should be appropriate to the data you discuss in the readiness assessment.

  • PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING

    Attached is a clinical report page required to complete for the assignment.

    I attached pages of resources accepted. (see another attachment).

    The instruction is located on page 5 CLINICAL REPORT ONLY (15%).

    DESCRIPTION OF CRITICAL INCIDENT OR EXPERIENCE WOULD BE THIS SCENARIO:

    I AM A HOME HEALTH NURSE. I VISITED A HOMELESS PATIENT IN HIS FRIEND’S APARTMENT. HE HAS HISTORY OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE. HIS WOUND IS INFECTED AND NEEDS HOSPITALIZATION FOR PROPER EVALUATION AND TREATMENT. HE REFUSED TO BE HOSPITALIZED DUE TO FEAR OF BEING ADMITTED OR CONFINED AT THE HOSPITAL. HE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GO BACK TO THE STREETS WITH HIS FRIENDS ANYMORE AND FEAR OF NOT GETTING A PLACE TO STAY AT AFTER HOSPITALIZATION.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): CLINICAL REPORT NOTES N428L Stateside Spring 2026 AH-1 (1).pdf, CLINICAL REPORT N428L Stateside Spring 2026 AH-1 (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.