Category: Public Health

Discussion 1:

• Initial Substantive Posts:

Students are expected to listen to the assigned podcast and discuss at least TWO separate themes/points by making thoughtful comments and/or questions regarding the selected themes/points in the assigned video (350-400 words) in the discussion forum each week. For example, you may describe the key points and/or core arguments made by the presenters and/or explain new pieces of information that you learned from the podcast followed by your own reflections on these points/arguments. Moreover, at least 1 outside source (you may NOT include your textbook) cited (in proper APA format) in your posting to support your rationale and thoughts. A reference listing at the end of your posting in proper APA format is also required.

• Required Replies:

In addition, students are also required to respond to at least one of their classmates posts (e.g., comments, opinions, and questions). Your replies should build on the concept discussed, offer a question to consider, or add a differing perspective, etc. Rather than responding with, “Good post,” explain why the post is “good” (why it is important, useful, insightful, etc.). Or, if you disagree, respectfully share your alternative perspective. Just saying “I agree” or “Good idea” is not sufficient for the posts you would like graded.

reply to them from discussion 1

Feb 1 7:49pm

Reply from Noah L Hawkins

I noticed two ideas in the video. The first idea was the barriers, to health equity. The second idea was the need for organizations to follow through to create change. A key takeaway was that health inequities are not random. Health inequities are rooted in institutional racism. Systemic and institutional racism still shapes access to care the quality of treatment and overall health outcomes, for marginalized populations. I watched the video and the video emphasized that many healthcare organizations have made commitments to justice but the video emphasized that those statements are not enough. The video emphasized that measurable changes, in policy measurable changes in practices and measurable changes, in culture are needed. The video emphasized that without those changes population-level health outcomes will not improve.

The idea connects directly to public health research that shows how social determinants of health such, as race and socioeconomic status affect disease rates and access, to care (Braveman & Gottlieb 2014). I think the idea shows that individual clinical care, when individual clinical care matters, cannot fix health inequities. Broader structural changes are needed.

I see that one important point was the need, for term working together action from health care institutions. In my view the video showed that real progress needs plans. The plans include adding people to the health care workforce building strong partnerships with communities and using data to keep organizations responsible. The approaches follow the “health, in all policies” framework. The framework pushes the idea of putting health equity into decision making in areas of seeing health equity as a separate problem (Rudolph et al. 2013). The sustainable change needs reform inside the institutions. The sustainable change also needs engagement, with the communities they serve.

The video helped me understand how structural racism and health outcomes are linked. The video made me realize that achieving health equity needs action and policy change, not the work of individual healthcare providers. Future public health professionals have a responsibility to advocate for evidence based strategies that address the root causes of health disparities.

References:

Braveman, P., & Gottlieb, L. (2014). The social determinants of health: Its time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Reports, 129(2), 19-31.

Rudolph, L., Caplan, J., Ben-Moshe, K., & Dillon, L. (2013). Health in All Policies: A Framework for State Action. Public Health Institute.

DISCUSSION 2:

Week 2 Discussion Activity

In Chapter 3, there are various epidemiological terms that you’ve probably heard frequently used since the start of the pandemic to describe what is happening. Sometimes when we hear or read the news we aren’t always familiar with the terms being used, which can at times lead to confusion or misunderstanding. Honestly, I often look up words I hear or read that I don’t understand. It helps! After reading chapter 3, answer the questions below.

1) Select two epidemiological terms from chapter 3 that you hear commonly used in reports/news when there is a disease outbreak (e.g. COVID pandemic, foodborne illness outbreaks), and provide their definitions as defined in chapter 3. Did the textbook definitions help you to better understand what the terms meant? Elaborate on whether or not the definitions provided clarity on what the terms meant. (respond in 3-5 sentences)

2) In chapter 3, your book discusses the mortality statistics that inform us of the leading causes of death. When I teach this course in person, I ask the class to tell me what they think the leading cause of death is in the US. What do you think is the leading cause of death is in the US? Every year, cancer is what students usually answer. However, that is incorrect. Heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the US (cancer is closely behind at #2). In your response, tell me the following: what did you guess what the leading cause of death in the US? Are you familiar with the health behaviors that are encouraged to prevent heart disease? Do you think there are enough resources available to the public on information about heart disease and how to prevent it? (respond in 3-5 sentences)

**Your grade will be based on your response to the questions above and commenting on a response posted by one of your classmates. Your response to your classmate should be at least 1-2 sentences.**

**Avoid using ALL CAPITALS, use proper grammar, spelling, and complete sentences, and keep in mind that you will not be able to edit or delete your response once it has been submitted. Once you submit your response, other students in the class will be able to see your response.*

I WILL SEND the other student to whom you need to reply after I post the initial post.

please dont use AI

HERE IS THE ASSIGNMENT BELOW—->

Many people (teens AND adults) believe that vaping is a safer alternative to traditional tobacco use. In less than 2 pages, how would you educate someone about the danger of vaping? Cite all additional sources used. BELOW IS THE GRADING RUBRIC . PLEASE DON’T USE ANY AL OR CHAT GPT

• Content Quality

  40% of total gradeExemplaryThe submission thoroughly educates the reader about the dangers of vaping, providing comprehensive details and insights that reflect a deep understanding of the topic.40ProficientThe submission effectively informs the reader about the dangers of vaping, covering relevant information and displaying a good understanding of the consequences.30SatisfactoryThe submission adequately addresses the dangers of vaping, but may lack depth or detail in certain areas, providing a basic understanding of the topic.20Needs ImprovementThe submission does not clearly educate the reader on the dangers of vaping, lacking essential information and demonstrating a limited understanding of the issue.10

• Sources and Citations

  30% of total gradeExemplaryThe submission includes multiple credible and well-chosen sources that are cited correctly in an appropriate format.30ProficientThe submission includes several credible sources with mostly correct citations, though there may be minor errors in format.22.5SatisfactoryThe submission includes a few sources, but they may be less credible or the citations are incomplete or inaccurate.15Needs ImprovementThe submission lacks credible sources or proper citations, or cites irrelevant or no sources at all.7.5

• Clarity and Organization

  20% of total gradeExemplaryThe submission is exceptionally well-organized and logically structured, making the information easy to understand and follow.20ProficientThe submission is organized and mostly clear, with logical structure, and the argument flows well.15SatisfactoryThe submission shows some organization, but ideas may occasionally lack clarity or logical flow.10Needs ImprovementThe submission is poorly organized, making it difficult for the reader to follow the arguments or main points.5

• Grammar and Mechanics

  10% of total gradeExemplaryThe submission is free of grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors, demonstrating a high level of proficiency.10ProficientThe submission contains a few minor grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not detract from understanding.7.5SatisfactoryThe submission has several grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that occasionally hinder clarity.5Needs ImprovementThe submission is filled with numerous grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors that significantly obstruct understanding.2.5

THIS WILL BE TWO JOURNAL ASSIGNMENTS.

Journal Entries
Journal assignments are less formal than discussion forum posts. APA formatting
is not required; however, proper grammar and clarity are expected. PLEASE DO NOT USE ANY SOURCE OF AL OR CHAT GPT.

THIS IS THE FIRST JOURNAL 2 —–>As a public health educator, how can you support individuals in making informed decisions about genetic testing, particularly when they may be at risk for a genetic illness?

What educational strategies and resources are necessary to help individuals understand the potential benefits, risks, and ethical considerations of genetic testing, while also addressing concerns related to privacy, psychological impact, and healthcare access?”

THIS IS THE NEST ONE JOURNAL 3 —->Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability, and understanding personal risk factors is an important step in prevention. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) provides resources to help individuals evaluate their likelihood of experiencing a stroke based on both modifiable and non-modifiable factors. By assessing your own health profile, you can identify which risks are within my controlsuch as lifestyle habitsand which cannot be changed, such as age or family history. This self-assessment not only increases awareness but also highlights practical measures you can adopt now to reduce my long-term risk and promote overall cardiovascular health.

Using the document from the NHLBI, assess your own personal risk for having a stroke.

• What are your modifiable risk factors?
• What are your non-modifiable risk factors?

What measures can you adopt NOW to prevent long term problems?

Limit yourself to no more than 2 pages

In substance abuse treatment programs, case managers participate as members of a multidisciplinary treatment team by collaborating closely with clinical staff, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, addiction counselors, nursing staff and psychiatric technicians. In addition, certified peer recovery specialists are valuable assets to the multidisciplinary treatment team to promote a culture in which each individual’s treatment needs and preferences are recognized, understood, respected and integrated into treatment.

In this assignment, . It consists of hypothetical questions from members of a treatment team. You will record a 5-minute video presentation using this PowerPoint in Kaltura. In your presentation, you will imagine you are the case manager, a member of the multidisciplinary treatment team in an Inpatient Program. In preparation for your presentation, present yourself professionally with your appearance. You may use note cards as you present your information, but you should maintain eye contact with the camera. Your presentation should be conversational as if you were talking with other treatment team members.

Read the following scenario about the client you will discuss in your presentation.

Case Scenario: Sabrina is a patient at the XYZ Recovery Center in Dallas, Texas. She has received integrated treatment services for her diagnoses of Opioid Use Disorder, Severe 304.00 (F11.20) and Bipolar I Disorder, Mild 296.4 (F31.11). Sabrina has made significant progress with her treatment goals in her four months of treatment.

The treatment team is meeting to discuss resources for Sabrina as she prepares for discharge in the next 60 days. Sabrinas treatment plan consists of individual therapy with the psychologist, Dr. Rankin; her psychiatrist, Dr. Atkins, prescribes her medications and monitors her response to the medications; the addiction counselor, Ms. Campbell, addresses her addiction treatment counseling and group sessions; and you. As Sabrinas case manager, you are responsible for coordinating Sabrinas services in treatment and also preparing referrals and resources for Sabrina to prepare for her discharge out of the program.

An added member to the treatment team is Melinda, a Certified Peer Recovery Specialist (CPRS) who will begin working with Sabrina as she prepares for transition. In your meeting, you will introduce the CPRS Melinda to the treatment team. Assume this is Melinda’s first-time meeting with the treatment team. Also assume that Sabrina has already spoken to the treatment team and has addressed her progress and questions.

Present the provided PowerPoint on your screen as you answer each question to help keep you on track and to simulate questions from your treatment team. You will answer the questions on your screen as if you are being asked by a team member.

Please review and follow the assignment requirements in the next tab titled Assignment Details. Additionally: I need you to create the writing speech for me and send it as soon as possible since I have to record it ans send everthing before Tuesday. Let me know if you need any information.