Category: Public Health

  • health. one paragraph

    Take on the role as a Health Coach. One of your clients has been trying to quit smoking, but has not been successful. The longest stretch they have made has been three months. They understand the impact smoking has on their health, but when they are in social settings (such as with friends) they cannot stay on track and end up relapsing. They have tried to set goals for themselves, but have not been successful. In fact, they dont truly understand the importance of goal setting.

    • Explain to your client the importance of setting goals when making a behavior change and S.M.A.R.T. goal setting (in your own words).
    • How would you help this client through using the Transtheoretical Model? Elaborate on examples of strategies they could implement based on processes of change.

    Requirements: small paragraph

  • Write a short response of a few paragraphs reflecting on what was learned in the week, paying particular attention to a few topics that you found the most relevant and how this influenced your views on Environmental Health, either in creating new knowledge or resulting in you updating what you knew. In other words, what did you find valuable from this week’s topics and why?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 3 reflection.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Epidemiology of a Mental Disorder

    1. Chose a mental disorder that has a prevalence of at least 1% of the US population. Accurately described the mental disorder in terms of diagnostic criteria and associated consequence.

    2. Three types of disparities clearly explored: age, gender, racial/ethnic, cultural, socioeconomic, geographic, educational, religious, and social support vs. social isolation disparities. Detailed and accurate description demonstrates clear understanding of the target group and their significant concerns regarding quality of life.

    3. Descriptive Epidemiology-Provide relevant and credible sources of epidemiological data regarding the significance of the quality of life issues identified in the priority population. Data are very accurately applied to the defined community and interpreted correctly. Very relevant risk factors or conditions are included and very clearly prioritized (e.g., 2×2 matrix).

    4. Clearly stated the risk factors and how the risk factors were determined. Critiqued the methods.

    5. Clearly described the comorbidities and the implications

    6. 5-6 pages APA format with references

    Requirements: 5-6 pages

  • Epidemiology of a Mental Disorder

    1. Choose one mental disorder that is prevalent in at least 1% of the US population .Accurately described the mental disorder in terms of diagnostic criteria and associated consequences.
    2. Three types of disparities clearly explored: age, gender, racial/ethnic, cultural, socioeconomic, geographic, educational, religious, and social support vs. social isolation disparities. Detailed and accurate description demonstrates clear understanding of the target group and their significant concerns regarding quality of life.
    3. Descriptive Epidemiology provide very relevant and credible sources of epidemiological data regarding the significance of the quality of life issues identified in the priority population. Data are very accurately applied to the defined community and interpreted correctly. Very relevant risk factors or conditions are included and very clearly prioritized (e.g., 2×2 matrix).
    4. Clearly stated the risk factors and how the risk factors were determined. Critiqued the methods.
    5. Clearly described the comorbidities and the implications
    6. The paper must be double-spaced, 5 pages, and in AP

    Requirements: 5-6 pages

  • TELEHEALTH

    Consider the following scenario:

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, Central Healthcare System (CHS) integrated telehealth services within several facilities, including their health education center and several outpatient practices, and many patients took advantage of these services. With the decrease in pandemic-related hospitalizations and case numbers, functions within CHS started returning to normal, but administrators are considering continuing telehealth services and potentially expanding into other practices. During the pandemic, surveys were conducted with all patients and providers after telehealth visits, and focus groups were conducted with smaller groups of patients and providers across a range of sites. A CHS analyst analyzed the data from the surveys and focus groups and provided CHS healthcare leaders with the following condensed summaries. CHS administrators plan to synthesize and analyze this information along with data from scholarly literature to help inform their decision.

    Central Health System Telehealth Survey Highlights:

    Percent of Patient and Provider Ratings of Agree or Strongly Agree on Telehealth Survey Questions by Category

    Telehealth Characteristics CHS Patients CHS Providers
    Convenience 91% 76%
    Ease of Use 67% 94%
    Effectiveness 78% 75%
    Overall Satisfaction 83% 81%

    Overall patient and provider perceptions of telehealth were very positive. Ease-of-use ratings were lower among patients than providers, with the lowest ratings among patients ages 65 and older. Effectiveness ratings were largely favorable, but were lower among surgical patients and providers.

    Central Health System Telehealth Focus Group Highlights:

    Themes and Subthemes of Patient and Provider Perceptions of Telehealth. Patient and provider responses centered around acceptance of telehealth, convenience of telehealth, and barriers to telehealth. Overall, patients and providers cited a high acceptance of telehealth and felt visits were useful and of high quality. Providers found that visits were highly efficient, and patients noted that the lack of travel reduced their time away from work and other obligations. Providers and patients were concerned that some visits could not adequately capture the same information yielded from in-person physical exams. Inexperience with technology also negatively impacted some patients’ perceptions of telehealth.

    How might a telehealth expansion benefit CHS patients or providers? How could an expansion be advantageous to the organization as a whole? Alternatively, what are some of the possible risks or drawbacks of a CHS telehealth expansion? CHS leaders recognize that a telehealth expansion is a major decision that would require a significant investment of time and resources, and they want to use evidence to drive decision-making around if and how they might expand these services.

    In this two-part Final Project, you will apply your understanding of the Data-Driven Decision-Making Framework to CHSs decision-making process. In the first part of your Final Project, you will focus on the Data, Information, and Knowledge phases of the framework that precede a decision as you integrate available data to inform a decision recommendation. The second part of the project will concentrate on the steps that follow a decision, including plans for implementation, impact evaluation, and communication with stakeholders.

    For this first portion of your Final Project, you will search for scholarly literature on telehealth service delivery and use a Literature Review Matrix to organize the conclusions. Then, you will use the data from the literature, along with the provided CHS data summaries, to analyze and synthesize your findings to support a decision about a possible expansion of telehealth services.

    Part 1: Literature Review Matrix

    • Use the Literature Review Matrix to organize the two telehealth articles that were provided, as well as three additional articles that will help support the decision.

    Part 2: Draft a 7- to 8-page paper providing a synthesis of your information and your data-driven decision. Within your paper, include the following:

    • Briefly describe the decision that was proposed within the scenario.
    • Organize the provided CHS data summaries and the five scholarly articles from your Literature Review Matrix to support a decision.
    • Analyze the literature and consider the evidence available to help inform the decision. Include an explanation of the significance of the findings.
    • Explain the additional types and sources of data that may be needed to support the decision.
    • Synthesize the data, information, and knowledge to support a decision.

    Note: You will submit both the Literature Review Matrix and paper to meet the requirements for this Assignment.

    Requirements: 7 PAGES