Category: Research methods

Project Part 3 Purpose This assignment is intended to help you learn to describe ways responses are categorized and scored as indicators of the construct as well as measurement models used to organize item scores into measures. Overview By now, youve mapped out constructs related to measurement instrument you wish to construct based a given research problem/topic or an area of interest or you have found an existing instrument that needs revisions and associated relevant question items. In this assignment, create your complete instrument using feedback provided by the instructor and your peers in Doctoral Dialogue 3. Include the following: A draft of your complete instrument, including all relevant construct(s) and associated (question) items. In an appendix Links to an external site., summarize the feedback you received and the adjustments you made. Do this in a table where in one column, you indicate one piece of feedback you have received and in the column to the right, what you did to implement it. If you chose not to implement it, say so and justify that choice. Action Items Read the assignment rubric. Write your paper according to the directions in the overview. Submit your work as an APA-formatted Word document. It will automatically be checked by Turnitin. Review your Submission Details and access your Turnitin report. Revise your work as needed based on the feedback. By the due date indicated, re-submit the final version of your work.

Based on the ethical principles (and error-laden examples in the past) that we studied this week, do researchers have an ethical obligation when their findings could be used to justify controversial policies, such as mass surveillance, indefinite detention, or biased and discriminatory practices in the name of homeland security? Why or why not? Reference three materials listed below: American Public University System. (n.d.). Institutional Review Board. Associated Press. (2022). Fifty years later, syphilis study still haunts America. &t=238s Barajas, J. (2016, February 19). How Nazi’s defense of just following orders plays out in the mind. Scientific American. Brear, M. R., & Gordon, R. (2021). Translating the principle of beneficence into ethical participatory development research practice. Journal of International Development, 33(1). Breed, A. G. (2022). How an AP reporter broke the Tuskegee syphilis story. Cannon, C., & Buttell, F. (2015). Institutional Review Boards at very high research activity universities: An opportunity for social workers. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(7). Caplan, A. (2007, June). Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment. BioSocieties, 2(2). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Research implications: The US public health service untreated syphilis study at Tuskegee. Cherry, K. (2024). Understanding the Milgram experiment in psychology. Verywell Mind. Cohen, B. C. (n.d.). Nazi medical experimentation: The ethics of using medical data from Nazi experiments. Jewish Virtual Library. Congressional Research Service. (2024, February 8). Research security policies: An overview. Godlee, F., Smith, J., & Marcovitch, H. (2011, January 5). Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. British Medical Journal, 342. Heller, J. (2022). AP exposes the Tuskegee syphilis study: The 50th anniversary. Howell, J. D., & Hayward, R. A. (2003). Writing Willowbrook, reading Willowbrook: The recounting of a medical experiment. In J. Goodman, A. McElligott, & L. Marks (Eds.), Useful bodies: Humans in the service of medical science in the twentieth century (pp. 190214). Johns Hopkins University Press. McLeod, S. (2023). Stanford prison experiment: Zimbardos famous study. Simply Psychology. Milgram, S. (1962). The Milgram experiment 1962 full documentary [Video]. YouTube. &t=2666s Millum, J. (2020). International clinical research and justice in the Belmont Report. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 63(2). Miteu, G. D. (2024, March). Ethics in scientific research: A lens into its importance, history, and future. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 86(5). Mukherjee, S. P. (2019). A guide to research methodology: An overview of research problems, tasks and methods. CRC Press. Nagai H., Nakazawa, E., & Akabayashi., A. (2022, December). The creation of the Belmont Report and its effect on ethical principles: A historical study. Monash Bioethics Review, 40(2). Office for Human Research Protections. (n.d.). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects (Common Rule). Ouellette, J. (2022, May 5). 50 years on, the lessons of the Tuskegee syphilis study still reverberate. ars Technica. Perry, G. (2013). Inside Milgram’s shock machine. Resnik, D. B. (2009, September). Perspective: Disclosing hidden sources of funding. Academic Medicine, 84(9). Rivera, G. (1972). Willowbrook: The last great disgrace [Video]. ABC News. Romm, C. (2015, January 28). Rethinking one of psychologys most infamous experiments. The Atlantic. Rosenbaum, L. (2020). The hideous truth of testing vaccines. Forbes. Subbaraman, N. (2023, September 24). The band of debunkers busting bad scientists. Wall Street Journal. Turk, M. A. & Mudrick, N.R. (2012). Rehabilitation interventions. Sage Reference Publications. U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. (n.d.). Eichmann trial. Wallis, C. (2010, February). Debunked. Time, 175(6). Ward, R., Krugman, S., Giles, J. P., Jacobs, A. M., & Bodansky, O. (1958, February). Infectious hepatitis: Studies of its natural history and prevention. New England Journal of Medicine, 258(9). Wellington, J., & Szczerbinski, J. (2007). Research methods for the social sciences. Continuum. Zimbardo, P. (2004). Quiet rage: The Stanford prison eExperiment [Video]. AlexanderStreet.

Education doctoral degree in curriculum she instruction please see attachment

Create a Microsoft Word document and answer the following questions based on this modules readings. Your response should be a minimum of 35 sentences in length, original (in your own words), and use professional writing. How important is it to understand the evidence related to enhancing evidence uptake? What evidence needs to be generated to help advance our knowledge toward increasing evidence uptake? How do individual barriers and facilitators interact with system-level barriers and facilitators of evidence uptake? Do you think an individual can use evidence if the system does not support it in any way? Why, or why not?

the instructions have been uploaded also I have attached two articles I will be using for this paper

Research Topic Post This term you will be researching a topic related to your major or career goals at Wiregrass. For example, if you are studying cosmetology, you might want to research licensing requirements in various states or issues related to types of techniques, technologies or products available to cosmetologists. If you arent sure, ask one of you instructors if there are any interesting topics to research in your particular area of study. First, read chapters 3.1 Choosing a Research Methodology and 3.2 The Writing Process: Researching in Essential Communication Skills. You will be engaging in formal secondary research, which means you will be finding authoritative, credible sourcing support your ideas. One of the keys to successful research is the use of databases to find authoritative sources. Access GALILEO and use the database EBSCOhost/Business Source Complete (you can also try other databases!). Choose a journal or topic that aligns with your program at Wiregrass, and browse the articles and see if there is a topic that interests you. Use what you learn from these articles to search for more articles to develop your ideas. You can use different databases, or just search all of GALILEO. Open-web sourcing is allowed, but I would like you to start on GALILEO. Next, you will upload a Word or PDF document formatted according to APA guidelines containing a paragraph of at least a half a page describing the topic you think you would like to explore for your research essay. Give the reasons for your selection and explain what interests you about this topic. Provide constructive feedback to at least two of your classmates. *In all discussion posts, constructive feedback is defined as thoughtful, specific, and conversational. Answers that are purely complimentary (good job!) or otherwise non-specific (I wrote the same thing!) will not be given credit.

Assignment Instructions

Scenario: Several sites have been selected for the DTCC-1200 protocol. You have been asked to assist the TMF Team to review the essential documents submitted by 2 different sites: Site # 102 and Site #103.

Assignment: Using the

as a guide, complete the

(one for each site), to evaluate if each site has submitted all of the required documents.

Which essential documents were completed appropriately?

Which essential documents were submitted, but require additional action? Specify what is needed.

Which essential documents are missing?

Here is an example using Site #101:

Deliverable: Submit the completed Essential Document Review Template for BOTH Site #102 and Site #103.

This is the class protocol

Share your research grant question, method, and proposed data with the class. List at least two alternatives to your proposed methods and data. Why did you choose the one that you did for the assignment? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each option?

write a literature review for the proposed study. the propsed research question: Does a visible, marked police patrol car in a particular crime hot spot result in a statistically significant, immediate rise in reported crime within the immediate vicinity of the patrol area?

According to Skakni (2017), not all doctoral learners who receive high marks in their coursework successfully complete their doctoral programs. As such, an A grade in RES-815 does not necessarily lead to an approved dissertation signed by the Dean of the College of Doctoral Studies. It will require a combination of skill sets beyond academic success that will contribute to growing as a learner and a scholar. It will require learners to work not only independently but also collaboratively, partnering with residency faculty and the dissertation committee. How can the adjustment to and mindset of the independent researcher contribute to working productively as a professional with your committee?