Category: Research methods

I attached the original essay and the instructions for the assignment

SIV Training

This assignment is designed to provide experience in creating a Site Initiation Visit (SIV) training presentation for a clinical trial. Students will gain practical skills in research, content development, and presentation design within a condensed timeframe, simulating the fast-paced nature of clinical research environments.

Assignment Details:

Develop and narrate a professional presentation that could be used during an SIV for the DTCC-1200 protocol. The objective is to utilize the presentation to ensure research staff at a study staff are adequately trained on the protocol.

• Content should include:
• Introduction slide including protocol title, date, presenter information (remember, you are playing the CRA role)
• Brief review of indication and investigational product
• Study objectives and endpoints
• Study design
• Review of eligibility criteria, screening, and consent process
• Schedule of participant activities
• Study procedures and assessments
• Investigational product management
• Adverse events and safety reporting
• Data collection and reporting
• Expected length: 12-20 slides

Here is an example of an SIV Training Presentation:

Please refer the power points to the protocol that I uploaded with this assignment. I also. included the SIV if. you needed more information this is optional.

SIV Training

This assignment is designed to provide experience in creating a Site Initiation Visit (SIV) training presentation for a clinical trial. Students will gain practical skills in research, content development, and presentation design within a condensed timeframe, simulating the fast-paced nature of clinical research environments.

Assignment Details:

Develop and narrate a professional presentation that could be used during an SIV for the DTCC-1200 protocol. The objective is to utilize the presentation to ensure research staff at a study staff are adequately trained on the protocol.

• Content should include:
• Introduction slide including protocol title, date, presenter information (remember, you are playing the CRA role)
• Brief review of indication and investigational product
• Study objectives and endpoints
• Study design
• Review of eligibility criteria, screening, and consent process
• Schedule of participant activities
• Study procedures and assessments
• Investigational product management
• Adverse events and safety reporting
• Data collection and reporting
• Expected length: 12-20 slides (~15 minute presentation)

Here is an example of an SIV Training Presentation:

This power point needs to relate to the protocol that I uploaded, I will add my own voice to explain the power point.

Thank you

• You will present a narrated 3-10 slide power point
• This should be a brief presentation of the gaps you identified, research needs and what the next steps will be on this topic.
• There should be 3-8 slides (max of 10): Be concise on the slides and then add more information as you verbally present it.
• Title Slide – include your name and the specific focus of your topic
• Slide #1- PICO and why this is your area of interest and why important
• Slide #2- Major Findings- be sure to cite the articles on the slide as you address the findings (use a smaller number for 1st author or use numbers only given space restraints)
• Slide #3- Gaps in Literature
• Slide #4- Research Needs and next steps
• Slide #5 References
• This is not a hard and fast number but we don’t want more than 10 slides or over 20 minutes

This is a continuation of the prior research for POCUS with the matrix articles that have been examined

Prepare Textbook: Carey, S. S. (2012). A beginner’s guide to scientific method (4th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Chapter 1 Science Chapter 2: Observation Prompt Answer the following Show That You Know questions for this unit: Discuss the roles that observation plays in scientific inquiry. Explain why is it crucial to define terms before making a set of observations. What role can comparative information play in the process of making a set of observations? Describe in detail how assumptions and hypotheses differ. What are the defining features of an extraordinary claim? Do extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence? The textbook’s author, Stephen Carey, indicated that scientists ask why patterns and/or phenomena occur. Discuss the point of view that scientists do not ask “why” but rather “how” patterns and phenomena occur. Important! The textbook readings are the primary sources for these questions, but you must also use internet research. In addition to the course textbooks, you must use at least one credible reference source found on the internet for each question response. Do not use quotations. Paraphrase and cite appropriately. Do not use sources such as Wikipedia, YouTube, or blogs, as they are not credible enough for college-level scholarly work. Procedure In APA format, write 250 words per question. Label each question. You may repeat the question and follow it with your response. The words of the question do not count toward the required 250. Include an APA-formatted title page and reference page See the Instructor Guidelines page for general writing requirements. Consider the grading rubric when planning your assignment.

A few years ago, newspaper headlines announced, “Coffee suspected as a cause of heart attacks.” Medical studies had found a correlation between the amount of coffee people drank and their likelihood of having a heart attack. How to understand the relationship between drinking coffee and heart attacks? What type of relationship is it? Why? (Hint: Do people who drink a lof of coffee also engage in other behaviors that put them at risk?)

Use evocative autoethnography (published within the last 5-10 years) to find research studies or dissertations in your general topic area. Write a 23-page paper describing the following:

• Your understanding of evocative autoethnography
• How the approach was used in the studies or dissertations you reviewed in your topic area
• What are the pros and cons of using this approach with your topic?
• Run your paper through Grammarly and correct all errors before submission.
• APA 7 formatting, citations, and scholarly exposition are required. Address all APA errors noted by the instructor in previous work.

Use intext citation

links to cites:

Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3-29.

Haynes, K. (2018). Autoethnography. In C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods (pp. 17-31). SAGE.

Mndez, M. (2013). Autoethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations, and criticisms. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 279-287. Saybrook University Library:

Follow the instructions 100%

In a reflection of 250-500 words, reflect on the following prompt. Please upload your response in a Word document and use APA citations (7th ed.) if your reflection includes references, which it likely will. Be sure to follow the format guidelines for submitted work outlined in our

.

Consider the various forms of qualitative data we can utilize. Brainstorm a list of what some people collect (e.g., baseball cards, coins, refrigerator magnets). Discuss why humans maintain collections of artifacts. What do these artifacts indicate about the extension of human beings who collect them? Finally, reflect on what artifacts you collect and how they are representative extensions of you.

You can utilize the text “Qualitative Research Analyzing Life 2nd edition” by Johnny Saldana and Matt Omasta from order #10248790