Category: Research methods

the activity document is my last assignment with the topic on which the paper should be about. The feedback I got was “You will just need to think about what else you are interested in… identity? mental health? You will need to be able to create a theme that is connected to communication and relationships in some way.” Im interested in behavior

Prepare a Poster like the one file ” It should be like this” and also using the file ” dark bleu portrait” ( leave the place where it says name / email to me) :

My research Question : The Role of Technology Management in Supporting Digital Transformation in Organisations. The main question I am trying to address is why many businesses do not implement digital transformation more extensively?

• My two main articles : Navigating the Digital Landscape: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Technology-Organization-Environment Factors and Digital Transformation Adoption in SMEs (SAGE Open, 2024) : https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/21582440241276198
• Barriers to Sustainable Digital Transformation in Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises (Sustainability, 2022). : https://mdpi-res.com/sustainability/sustainability-14-13558/article_deploy/sustainability-14-13558.pdf?version=1666259026

—–> THE POSTER SHOULD BE A2

I have done the research using google forms and attached for you the result file ” Research Result”

You should make the poster exactly like the one named ” Like this one” and address the question and answer it and Objectives / Significance / Method / RISK / WBS..

when writing some little paragraphs under each section please use your own thoughts and research with this articles and not any form of AI.

You should do the pictures using canva or any open source also Reference using APA Harvard, for the Poster it should has a space at the end for some Refrences.

—-> For any question Read Class Slide 1/2/3

The purpose of the Project Concept Poster Presentation is to describe your project, covering:

• What your project is about and what you expect to achieve by the end
• Why it is important (e.g., the research problem, the knowledge gap and the impact of your research)
• How you will conduct the project
• The major risks

1. Critique of Articles:

• In Assignment 2, your team identified 10 peer reviewed articles. On this tab your team will critically appraise 5 of those articles. One article should be a quantitative design and one a qualitative design, You may choose the design types for the remaining 3 articles.
• Fill in each of the columns on the spreadsheet.
• The goal is to decide if the articles will answer your clinical question and provide the evidence you need to make quality improvement changes to your clinical practice.
• Use the as a guide to decide on level of evidence for each article.

1. References Lit Review:

• Tab 2 is where your team will provide a list of all 10 articles you chose during Assignment 2. Cut and paste from your bibliography word doc or Refworks.

1. Themes:

• Tab 3 is where your team will identify 3 themes and group the articles (the 5 articles your team critically appraised on tab 1) according to the 3 themes. This will help you when you write up the literature review as your final assignment.
• Themes are the overarching ideas or patterns that emerge from analyzing multiple scholarly sources. These themes help organize the literature and demonstrate how different studies relate to one another and to your research question (often based on your PICO statement).
• For example: Patient education and health literacy, Role of nursing interventions in adherence, Technology-assisted medication management, Cultural factors influencing adherence

Focus on the following:

• What were they testing? (i.e., hypothesis and/or research question)
• How did they test it? (i.e., sample, measures or tools)
• What did they find? (Main 1-2 findings)
• How is it relevant to child life? What implications do you see for the work of child life specialists?

Please answer the questions above for each article.

HIST889_VA_Graduate Historical Methods: For this course we will be writing an original 20-25 page research paper.

1. Week 2 instructions include the following readings:

https://www.historians.org/resource/why-study-history-1998/

read/review the Doing History pdf file

2. Week 3: The Historical Method and Brainstorming a topic: Past Due and needs a topic in 24 hours.

Watch this introduction to the Historical Method by Dr. Miano and take notes on the steps of historical research. You will be using these steps in your research: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZYNL0-KHC4

Selecting a topic: Please watch this video by Susan Eggers on the process of selecting a topic. You will apply this information to the process of selecting a topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WpP3uwzUNM

3. Week 6 documentation: Using Chicago Manual of Style:

Please read the instructions for the Research Question Assignment (Attached) and submit by March 1

Instructions for Preliminary Bibliography Assignment (Attached) and submit by March 1

The main thing I need is help selecting a topic to present to my teacher, which is past due and needs to be submitted in the next 24 hours.

Week 3 due by March 1. However, there may be other things needed in the next few weeks. However, the final paper is due May 14. I’ve also attached the course syllabus and other info as well as a sample rough draft form the teacher.

clear, relevant, detailed, and insightful; demonstrates thorough understanding of the content.

• Ask a question about something in their post
• Tell them what you like/appreciate about their post
• Offer suggestions or advice

the file RMDB5PR needs to be rewritten , if any other information is needed pls reach out

Pls follow the instructions promptly

Assignment 3: Source Comparison ENG 102

The following prompt will be partially answered in class. The rough draft will be written during class; the final

draft will be revised and typed in class and submitted via Canvas by 11:59 p.m. on the due date.

Assignment Details:

Style and format: MLA

Essay Prompt:

At this point, you have read several articles about the topic that you will be researching throughout this

semester. You will now have the opportunity to compare two authors views on the same subject, and

determine which author employs stronger argumentation.

Getting Started:

Find an article written by another author that either supports or conflicts the opinion(s) of the author from the

article you wrote about for your source evaluation (essay #2). If, for instance, your topic is embryonic stem

cell research and the author of the article you read for our first assignment supports stem cell research, try

and find another articleby a different authorthat does not support the first articles opinions. Or, you may

want to find an article (again by a different author) that supports the first articles author, but provides a

different argument (by making different appeals, citing different types of evidence, etc.).

Requirements:

You must use specific quotes and paraphrases from the sources to draw your conclusions.

All borrowed material needs to be properly cited in MLA format (both within the text and on an

accurate works cited page).

As with the first essay, the purpose of this assignment is not to fully explore your research topic.

Instead, you will be focusing on the argumentation that the two authors employ, and you will be

pointing out specific places where the two authors agree or disagree.

Your thesis statement should reflect the way the two authors argue their points, and you should craft a

strong, opinionated response about which author provides the better argument and why.

In addition to a strong thesis statement, your essay should include an engaging introduction, several

well-developed body paragraphs that support the thesis, and a powerful conclusion that reiterates

your main ideas.

Think of this essay as a more complicated version of the first assignment. Again, you are focusing on breaking

down the authors arguments and explaining which author makes the better argument and why you believe

one author successfully argues his or her points over the other. As mentioned above, the authors do not have

to have conflicting viewpoints; however, it may help you better understand the argument surrounding your

topic if you have exposure to multiple points of view.

You may use the article that you discussed in your first assignment as one of the articles for this assignment.

Keep the following questions in mind for evaluating sources & arguments:

Evaluating sources:

Who is the author & what are his or her credentials? Background? Expertise?

Who sponsors the publication & what is their purpose?

Why is the information provided? Is there an ulterior motive?

How many sources have been consulted? Are they trustworthy? Can you verify?

Evaluating arguments:

What is the authors thesis or purpose?

How well is the main idea supported? Are there gaps in the authors reasoning?

What appeals does the author make?

Logical, emotional, ethical? How effective are these appeals?

What evidence does the author use?

How thoroughly and professionally does the author address opposing views?

my source is from avl alabama virtual library

First, in the table below, outline how you might address the elements of the quantitative methods for a proposed study about your selected topic using a survey. Second, after completing an outline in the table below, write a brief (3-4 pages, double-spaced) methods section of a proposal using APA guidelines. If a published survey instrument or scale are used, cite the original sources and include references in APA format.

• 1 Page: Title page in APA (7th ed.) format
• 5-10 Pages (approximately): Literature review that includes a section on family or developmental theory (with appropriate headings throughout); headings and citations must be in APA (7th ed.) format.
• The literature review should begin with a brief introduction that demonstrates the purpose and importance of your topic and proposed study
• Utilize headings throughout the review to connect the dots between the different constructs being studied
• The literature review should end at the research question(s) (at least two), hypotheses (at least two), and brief summary/restatement of the current study purpose
• 12 Page (approximately): Research question(s) and hypotheses (Hint: Each hypothesis should correspond to a research question)
• Reference list (running list that includes only the references you have cited so far)

If you make a mistake on your first submission, you can submit up to three times. Your last submission is the one I will grade.