Category: Research methods

  • POSTER PRESETATION

    Prepare a Poster like the one file ” It should be like this” and also using the file ” dark bleu portrait” ( leave the place where it says name / email to me) :

    My research Question : The Role of Technology Management in Supporting Digital Transformation in Organisations. The main question I am trying to address is why many businesses do not implement digital transformation more extensively?

    • My two main articles : Navigating the Digital Landscape: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Technology-Organization-Environment Factors and Digital Transformation Adoption in SMEs (SAGE Open, 2024) : https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/21582440241276198
    • Barriers to Sustainable Digital Transformation in Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises (Sustainability, 2022). : https://mdpi-res.com/sustainability/sustainability-14-13558/article_deploy/sustainability-14-13558.pdf?version=1666259026

    —–> THE POSTER SHOULD BE A2

    I have done the research using google forms and attached for you the result file ” Research Result”

    You should make the poster exactly like the one named ” Like this one” and address the question and answer it and Objectives / Significance / Method / RISK / WBS..

    when writing some little paragraphs under each section please use your own thoughts and research with this articles and not any form of AI.

    You should do the pictures using canva or any open source also Reference using APA Harvard, for the Poster it should has a space at the end for some Refrences.

    —-> For any question Read Class Slide 1/2/3

    The purpose of the Project Concept Poster Presentation is to describe your project, covering:

    • What your project is about and what you expect to achieve by the end
    • Why it is important (e.g., the research problem, the knowledge gap and the impact of your research)
    • How you will conduct the project
    • The major risks

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Research RESULT.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • POSTER Presentation

    Prepare a Poster like the one file ” It should be like this” and also using the file ” dark bleu portrait” ( leave the place where it says name / email to me) :

    My research Question : The Role of Technology Management in Supporting Digital Transformation in Organisations. The main question I am trying to address is why many businesses do not implement digital transformation more extensively?

    • My two main articles : Navigating the Digital Landscape: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Technology-Organization-Environment Factors and Digital Transformation Adoption in SMEs (SAGE Open, 2024) :
    • Barriers to Sustainable Digital Transformation in Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises (Sustainability, 2022). :

    —–> THE POSTER SHOULD BE A2

    I have done the research using google forms and attached for you the result file ” Research Result”

    You should make the poster exactly like the one named ” Like this one” and address the question and answer it and Objectives / Significance / Method / RISK / WBS..

    when writing some little paragraphs under each section please use your own thoughts and research with this articles and not any form of AI.

    You should do the pictures using canva or any open source also Reference using APA Harvard, for the Poster it should has a space at the end for some Refrences.

    —-> For any question Read Class Slide 1/2/3

    The purpose of the Project Concept Poster Presentation is to describe your project, covering:

    • What your project is about and what you expect to achieve by the end
    • Why it is important (e.g., the research problem, the knowledge gap and the impact of your research)
    • How you will conduct the project
    • The major risks

    Ultimately we are considered whether at the end of the presentation we believe you have clearly demonstrated that you understand your research area and that you have a sensible research design.

    Your poster must be in A2 paper size and include

    Title,

    Authors (Student name & ID),

    Master programme and project supervisor,

    Affiliations (Organisation logos),

    Main message in different sections, and

    References (Sources of any terminologies, tables, diagrams, pictures, etc. that are not

    defined or developed by yourself, and 2-3 key references for the project background

    information).

    The topics listed below are expected in the main message.

    What your project is about? (your research topics and problems)

    Why it is important? (the research problems/gaps and its impact)

    What you expect to achieve? (your research aim and objectives)

    How your project will be conducted? (your research methods)

    What is the biggest risk?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Research RESULT.pdf, Example 4_very good or excellent.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Qualitative analysis of interview transcript

    For this discussion, you will be working independently and in small online-groups to analyze an interview transcript. Once the groups have come to agreement about the analysis, one person from the group will need to post the group’s final analysis to this discussion forum. Be sure to begin this exercise early since you need time for your individual work, your group discussion, and the final posting of the group’s analysis. See the syllabus for group-work timeframes. This is a graded discussion forum worth 3 assignment points. (The interview transcript and coding guidance mentioned below are also available in the Week 4 Documents folder.) An interview transcript has been uploaded here to this forum upon which you will be doing qualitative analysis. After you have downloaded the transcript, do a “save as” and save the document with your name in the document title. You have all been assigned to small groups for this exercise/assignment. You will see a group-specific Discussion thread for Week 4, separate from this discussion thread. Each person in the group should independently code the interview transcript that they have downloaded and saved with their name. (More details on coding and themes are in the uploaded guidance document.) After, or while, coding, each person should create (in a separate document) a list of themes they identify from the codes. For each theme, give it a brief name and a one-sentence description. Then, using the separate Week 4 discussion thread for your group, each person uploads their coded transcript and list of themes to the group.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Interview transcript_Your Name(1).docx, Guidance on Coding and Creating Themes(1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Undefined

    A company or NGO to conduct a service-based research assessment of a specific community has hired you, select the contextual situation and provide a situational analysis and rationale for the assessment. In the final report, students are required to outline and describe the following: Situation analysis/background Purpose statement Research question (s) Operationalizing key concepts Research design Methodology Sampling frame Sampling method/technique Design the survey instrument Data collection process Potential limitations Summary In the final report, students are required to outline the research question, research design, methodology and sampling frame and sampling method/technique and design the survey instrument. You must also explain the process of operationalizing key concepts, discussion, and potential limitations. The quantitative/qualitative survey development process should be described. Ideas of Contexts Context Sexual violence in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Perlmutt, B.-J., Walker, N., III, True, L., & Abelman, L. (Directors). (2006). LumoLinks to an external site. [Film]. The Cinema Guild, Inc. Context Teen Gangs in Honduras Fukunaga, Cary. (2008) Sin Nombre. Focus Features (rent on iTunes or Amazon) Context Struggle for LGBTQ rights in Uganda Wright, K. F., & Zouhali-Worrall, M. (Directors). (2012). Call me KuchuLinks to an external site. [Film]. Frameline. Context HIV and stigma towards women in Botswana Hanon, J. (Director). (2007). Miss HIVLinks to an external site. [Film]. Video Project. Context Communities relationship to industrialization in China Baichwal, J. (Director). (2006). Manufactured landscapes: The art of Edward BurtynskyLinks to an external site. [Film]. Zeitgeist Films. Context Displacement and reintegration of South Sudanese Lost Boys Walker, T., & Quinn, C. D. (Directors). (2003). God grew tired of usLinks to an external site. [Film]. Samuel Goldwyn Films. Assignment Requirements Based on your report, you will create a PowerPoint presentation that will be submitted with the paper. You will record your presentation using a screen capture tool (Zoom, Canvas Studio, OBS Studio, etc.) or PowerPoint with voiceover and submit the recorded presentation online. The recorded presentations should be between 10 and 15 minutes long. The presentation is due on Sunday by 11:59 pm (CST) week 7. You must discuss the choice of context and research question with faculty and submit by as outlined in weeks 2 and 3. Each report should be submitted as APA-style scholarly paper (see specifics). I will do the record part with my voice

  • Research

    Build an Integrative Review Skeleton (Torraco-based): Run a real database search on your leadership development topic (you can reuse what youre building toward Assignment 2). Post: Databases used + yourexact search string + filters (years, peer-reviewed, population, etc.) Your screening trail: hits after filters screened abstracts included (with 12 inclusion/exclusion rules) Propose aconceptual organizing framework for an integrative review (e.g., mechanismscontextsoutcomes; developmental experiences; identity/self-concept pathways; program design features; etc.) and justify it using at least 5 sources you found (cite them). This cannot be done credibly without actually searching and screening. Literature Review Failure Modes (Boote & Beile prevention plan): Identifytwo common failure patterns you see (or predict) in leadership development literature reviews (e.g., laundry list summary, mixing leader vs. leadership development, weak construct definitions, cherry-picking, no boundary conditions). Anchor your claims withone direct quote from Boote & Beile and one direct quote from Torraco (with page or section locator). Then write a150200 word review purpose + gap logic paragraph for your own topic that explicitly prevents those failures.
  • Research Design and Statistics

    The assignment is the last two pieces of a research proposal. I have included the instructions for week 6, which is the Methodology piece. I’ve also included the instructions for week 7, which is the final to put it all together. The screen recordings are EXAMPLES of what each piece should look like (formatting). I’ve also included Parts 1 and 2 with mark-ups from the instructor on things to update or change so you can put it all together. Please do not plagiarize or use AI. This professor is a stickler and my last piece was 50% because a writer on this platform used AI. The class is Research Design and Statistics. It’s a requirement and I need to make a B in this class. I have a 90% right now, so I really need a good grade. PLEASE do your best work.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): IntroductionPsyc244Final.pdf, Psych244FinalInstructions.docx, ResearchProposalPart1MarkUp.pdf, instructionsweek6.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Research Application

    Provide the FULL APA citation of the article. There is no set word count or page number.

    Critically analyze the article using the following questions. You should explain your rationale, when necessary:

    1. Introduction/Literature Review:

    A. What is the statement of general problem and/or study purpose

    B. Identify at least two arguments (clearly identify the propositions and conclusions that make up the arguments quote the exact statements from the article itself; do not paraphrase)

    C. Is the rationale sufficient? That is, did the researcher make their case for completing the study?

    D. What are the research questions (and hypotheses, if these are provided)?

    E. Provide at least 3 margin questions that you had from reading this section and where you anticipate finding the answer to these questions.

    2. Method

    A. What is the research design of the study? Be specific.

    B. How does this design respond to the research questions?

    C. How might this kind of design decrease threats to validity?

    D. Who are the participants?

    E. How are they selected? Do you have any concerns about inclusion/exclusion criteria?

    F. Do they provide adequate information regarding selection and criteria?

    G. What measures are used in the initial assessment? Are they the same measures that are used for responding to the research questions?

    H. Are the procedures clear?

    I. Could you replicate the study? Could you complete the intervention yourself?

    J. How was fidelity of intervention measured? How was reliability measured?

    K. What, if any, threats to validity based on methods?

    L. Did you have any remaining margin questions?

    3. Results

    A. What statistical analyses were used for the primary measures?

    B. Were the tables and figures clear? Did they assist in your understanding of the data?

    C. What were the main findings (responding to the main research questions)? You need to state the statistical measure that was used to determine the findings (e.g., An ANOVA was used to examine the… )

    D. What were the secondary findings (if applicable)?

    4. Discussion and Conclusions

    A. Were these findings represented accurately in the discussion and conclusions sections? Please explain your response.

    B. Did the researchers demonstrate how their work fits within the current literature?

    C. Were the limitations exhaustive? That is, did they include all your concerns?

    D. What are the researchers future directions?

    E. Did you have any remaining margin questions? Did they resolve all of your questions?

    For this project, the PICO question is used as a lens for the entire critique. It is the reason the article was chosen and serves as a checklist to compare the study against in every section.

    PICO Question:

    For preschool children with language delays, does parent-implemented Enhanced Milieu Teaching improve expressive language compared to no treatment or clinician-directed intervention?

    The PICO does not need to be rewritten in every section. Instead, each part of the critique should essentially answer:

    Does this study actually answer my PICO question well?

    • Introduction Did the authors justify this clinical question?
    • Method Did the study design properly test this question?
    • Results What is the answer to the question based on the data?
    • Discussion Are the conclusions appropriate and clinically meaningful?
  • The Devine of the church U.S.

    Power point presentation along with graphs.

    when did the Protestant church began to decline ?

    key trends decline:

    Great decline:

    current state of the church:

    key factors of the church decline

    African American church decline.

    recent data

    Factors causes of church decline

  • Research Concepts Matrix

    Fill out the with research concepts connected to the topic selected for this quarter. Your instructor will provide the articles you are to use for this assignment in the Announcements area of the courseroom. A sample article is included in the matrix to demonstrate the level of depth and breadth of content you should include from the four articles you will read for this assignment. All content you include in your Research Concepts matrix should be summarized in your own words. The purpose statement for each article can be provided word-for-word from each article, however. Please use APA style and format for the citations and references in this assignment.

    These are the articles to be used. Do NOT CHANGE the articles already used on the outline just add to them

    All six articles have hyperlinks to the Capella library location for each article and we’ve also included a pdf of each required article for your convenience.

    Required article: Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024).

    Required article: Gltekin, V., & Kavak, A. (2025).

    Required article: Kim, S. S., De Gagne, J. C., Hong, M., & Shin, H. (2025).

    SAMPLE ARTICLE: Neher, M., Petersson, L., Nygren, J. M., Svedberg, P., Larsson, I., & Nilsen, P. (2023).

    Required article: Sengul, T., Bilgic, S. , Macit, B., Sevim, F., Alik, S., & Kirkland-Kyhn, H. (2025).

    SAMPLE ARTICLE: Smrescu, N., Bumbac, R., Zamfiroiu, A., & Iorgulescu, C.M., (2024).

    This topic is closed for comments.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): cf_week_6_research_concepts_research_matrix.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Literature Review Writing Process

    Literature Review Components: Cover sheet 8-10 pages APA formated, double-spaced pages not including the cover page and reference listing The 8-10 pages will be the core of your literature review, synthesizing the 10-12 peer-reviewed journal articles you identified and well as 1 to 2 paragraphs outlining your proposed inquiry methods References listing of all peer-reviewed research articles Abstract not needed Literature Review Process: Read your 10-12 peer-reviewed research articles and highlight content that resonates with your problem of practice. Stop and reflect on the 10-12 research articles collectively. What themes have emerged from your highlighted material? Identify 3 to 4 themes to focus your literature review on. Organize your articles by theme. In some cases, an article could be applicable to multiple themes. A Matrix template is provided below. Begin writing your first theme using the various articles that support that theme. This is the synthesizing process. You are not summarizing your articles one-by-one but rather developing a collective summary of those related to the theme. Do this for each theme. Once you have your themes drafted, go back and write 1-2 intro paragraphs introducing your industry, problem of practice and research question. Next, discuss your themes and their connectivity to your topic. Be sure you add subheadings for each theme as seen in APA checklist. After your themes include a conclusion that summarizes the themes and what explains what past literature says about your problem of practice. Include any identified gaps in the past literature here. Suggest opportunities for relevant future research. After your literature review conclusion began a new section called Methods. Write 2-3 paragraphs on the methodology approach you would take if you were conducting your research study. After your Methods section, begin a new section for References using APA standards. Format your entire paper using APA standards including the cover page, the heading head, page numbers, headings, subheadings, in-text citations, and your reference list. Proofread your paper and have someone else proofread it as well before submitting.