Category: Research & Summaries

I have uploaded 2 literature review docs that whose articles should be used for the 25pages lit review. I have also uploaded the methods doc. You will use same methods for the 25page. Add more articles from JSTOR for reference(You will use the articles in the 2 lit review and add more articles from JSTOR). STRICTLY ALL ARTICLES TO BE FROM JSTOR.

Using the material we’ve studied and your own research, your task is to prepare a briefing on this week’s topic for your management team. Your briefing should be submitted as a Word doc of approximately 3-5 pages. Your briefing should describe the technology, benefits, and rationale for use, current or future risks associated with the technology, strategies to mitigate these risks, implementation strategies, and any other pertinent information that you believe your team should know.

Alos Submit 3-5 PowerPoint slides that you would use to present the content of your written briefing to your management team. Consider these your guide or talking points that you would use when making a presentation to your team.

More On Defining LLMs:

Are LLMs Risky:

More on the Risks of LLMs: https://www.malwarebytes.com/cybersecurity/basics/chatgpt-ai-security#:~:text=Is%20ChatGPT%20a%20risk%3F,create%20components%20of%20malicious%20software.

OWASP List10 Most Critical Large Language:

Create a research paper for the topic, ” Wearable Respiratory Sensors: Can Smart Tech Prevent Exacerbations?”……Use the basic structure of a research article to formulate the paper. Abstract should be 300 words and the rest of the body should be at least 2000 words. Please try to get at least 5 references and include some in-text citations. Let me know if you have any questions please.

ABSTRACT/SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

MATERIAL and METHODS

RESULTS

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

REFERENCES

With your Research Partner select an article related to your area of clinical/programmatic study (FNP, ACUTE CARE GERO, NURSING ED, ETC) of a primary research study published in the past 5 years that uses one of the following qualitative research designs (phenomenology, ethnography, grounded theory, qualitative description). One way to select a topic that all research partners can relate to their practice area is to select a patient symptom (fatigue, pain, nausea, etc). Take Notice: if the authors used one of these research designs they will say so in the paper. Complete and submit the appropriate Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist.

Use the eLibrary to find at least two references about this research design/method not in your assigned reading to include in your summary statement on the Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist. Use the Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist directions and the Grading Rubric for this assignment to help you complete the checklist with the required information and level of needed detail. Your response to each question should clearly indicate the name of the research partner taking lead on the response. Your paper should reflect an integration of the combined efforts of research partners and include a statement indicating the specific contribution of each research partner to this group assignment. The reference list should demonstrate the ability of each research partner to use APA formatting, for example each group member should indicate which source on the reference list they formatted in APA and which group member was responsible for constructing the reference list in APA format.

Hi, I need Chapter Three to be revised so it matches the sample I actually collected. Please adjust the methodology accordingly and remove any AI or plagiarism content so it is fully original.

Also, please generate Chapter Four with two main sections. The first section should include descriptive analysis (demographics, mean, and standard deviation), and start with validity and reliability tests such as Cronbachs Alpha.

The second section should include correlation and regression analysis for hypothesis testing, with full discussion of the results. It is also recommended to use SmartPLS (PLS-SEM).please file not tp be shared or used as its my orginal work and part of my academic work.

ahare ai and plagiarism report once finish

Using the material we’ve studied and your own research, your task is to prepare a briefing on this week’s topic for your management team. Your briefing should be submitted as a Word doc of approximately 3-5 pages. Your briefing should describe the technology, benefits, and rationale for use, current or future risks associated with the technology, strategies to mitigate these risks, implementation strategies, and any other pertinent information that you believe your team should know.

Alos Submit 3-5 PowerPoint slides that you would use to present the content of your written briefing to your management team. Consider these your guide or talking points that you would use when making a presentation to your team.

More On Defining LLMs:

Are LLMs Risky:

More on the Risks of LLMs: https://www.malwarebytes.com/cybersecurity/basics/chatgpt-ai-security#:~:text=Is%20ChatGPT%20a%20risk%3F,create%20components%20of%20malicious%20software.

OWASP List10 Most Critical Large Language:

The authors of Extreme Ownership (Chapter 9, page 207) provide a planning checklist. Would you support this type of checklist for leaders in a crisis?

Could this be included in an Incident Action plan referenced on page 48 in the Decision Making for Emergency Managers?

Write a 5-7 sentence paragraph persuading a classmate to adopt a habit.

Using the Ad from the PowerPoint (slides 8 and 9) identify at least 9 persuasive features used in the ad; remember to provide an example for each feature you identify. Do not attach a file. Please type directly into the text box.

In 150 words, please explain what makes persuasion effective. Use information from the notes you took in class, the text book and class discussions.

Chose one of the two case studies from Chapter 9

Transportation Crises to discuss. Given a brief overview of the issue the case upon which the case focuses. Then, provide your thoughts on the case. What was done well? What was done poorly? What would you change if you were in control of communications? What lessons can be learned from this case study?