Category: Select subject(s)

Choose one of the two civil rights video assignments below

Civil Rights Movement (1954-56) Awakenings

Civil Rights Movement (1957-1962) Fighting Back

For this assessment, you must use the supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be the template, focusing on the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment.

The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a healthcare setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the safety quality issue presented in your Assessment Supplement PDF in Assessment 1. Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen healthcare setting, provide a rationale for your plan.

Use the template to complete the assessment.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

• Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event in an organization.
• Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event.;
• Create a viable, evidence-based safety improvement plan.
• Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
• Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

• Length of submission: Use the provided template to create a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan. There is no page limit. A title page is not required but you must include a reference list as per the template.
• Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. Use the as needed.
• APA formatting: Format references and citations according to current APA style. See the .

demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

• Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.
• Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.
• Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.
• Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.
• Analyze the root cause of a specific sentinel event or a patient safety issue in an organization.
• Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.
• Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.
• Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.
• Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
• Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

one of the three randomised controlled trials (RCT) provided on Canvas and critique it using the 13 short-answer questions from the revised JBI critical appraisal tool for RCTs (Barker et al., 2023). Your answers must demonstrate understanding of RCT methods and be supported by evidence and references.

Assignment in screenshot. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English

Any URLs included in this page. PDF is chapters 1-5

I need direct quotes from the book and the exact page numbers for table data. All the other instructions are pretty much in the pics i sent I also sent student example but thats an old concept. I sent the rubric as well and my name is Colin Rayborn to put on the paper.

Slavery and The Making of America Vol 4 &pp=ygUqU2xhdmVyeSBhbmQgdGhlIG1ha2luZyBvZiBhbWVyaWNhIHZvbHVtZSA0 Students are required to submit a typed narrative essay (2pg. minimum) for each documentary film that is posted under course assignments. Students will find guided questions for each documentary film in the course syllabus. While you are not required to respond to the specific questions listed, thinking about the questions as you are viewing each video may be useful. However, in preparation for your typed documentary reaction papers, students are required to think critically about each film and to submit written critiques that reflect their analysis.

Semester-class, 3 assignments, attend class, 1 exam, and group project. Subjevt Operation Analysis (Supply Chain)

choose a topic , conduct research, write your analysis

Unit 9 Drug Reference Guide: Alcohol/Opioid/Nicotine Introduction This weeks assignment focuses on exploring key pharmacologic treatments used in managing substance use disorders across several categories, including alcohol, stimulants, opioids, and nicotine. A solid understanding of these medicationshow they work, their indications, contraindications, side effects, and clinical considerationsis essential for providing safe, effective, and evidence-based care. Instructions Follow the instructions below to complete this assignment: Download the Template: Drug Reference Chart Template Download Drug Reference Chart Template[Word] Complete all required information listed in the chart for the following: Alcohol: Naltrexone injection, Naltrexone oral, Acamprosate, Disulfiram, and Acamprosate. Opioids: Methadone, Buprenorphine, and Naltrexone oral. Nicotine: varenicline, and sustained-release bupropion Ensure you reference Stahls Essential Psychopharmacology Prescribers Guide for accuracy and completeness. Please review the provided rubric prior to submission to confirm that all criteria are met. Assignment Resources Use the following resource to help with this assignment (optional): Drug Reference Chart Template Download Drug Reference Chart Template[Word] Submit Submission Format Use the Drug Reference Chart Template and keep the assignment in a Word format Please review the provided rubric prior to submission to confirm that all criteria are met Due Sunday by 11:59 p.m. CT Estimated time to complete: 3 hours Rubric NU670: Unit 9 Assignment – Drug Reference Guide NU670: Unit 9 Assignment – Drug Reference Guide Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication Selection 2 pts Exemplary Accurately completes medications assigned by faculty; demonstrates clear understanding of each medications purpose and relevance to PMHNP practice. 1.5 pts Proficient Completes most assigned medications with generally accurate information; minor omissions noted. 1 pts Needs Improvement Missing several assigned medications or lacks clarity and completeness. 0 pts Absent No Submission 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFDA Indications 2 pts Exemplary Clearly and accurately lists FDA-approved indications using proper terminology; includes age/population specifics when applicable. 1.33 pts Proficient Includes most FDA indications but lacks specificity or omits minor details. 1 pts Needs Improvement Indications incomplete, unclear, or inaccurate. 0 pts Absent No Submission 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanism of Action 2 pts Exemplary Provides clear, concise, and accurate explanation demonstrating advanced understanding of pharmacodynamics and neurotransmitter activity. 1.5 pts Proficient Adequate explanation with minor gaps in accuracy or clarity. 0.67 pts Needs Improvement Limited or incorrect explanation of mechanism. 0 pts Absent No Submission 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSide & Adverse Effects 2 pts Exemplary Comprehensive and clinically prioritized list; identifies major risks and black box warnings where relevant. 1.5 pts Proficient Includes most effects with reasonable accuracy. 1 pts Needs Improvement Incomplete or inaccurate listing of effects. 0 pts Absent No Submission 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Tests / Labs 2 pts Exemplary Accurately identifies baseline and ongoing lab requirements with rationale for monitoring. 1.5 pts Proficient Includes key labs but lacks rationale or detail. 1 pts Needs Improvement Missing or incorrect lab information. 0 pts Absent No Submission 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrecautions & Contraindications 2 pts Exemplary Accurately lists major contraindications, precautions, and drug interactions; includes relevant population considerations. 1.5 pts Proficient Addresses most precautions and contraindications with minor omissions. 1 pts Needs Improvement Incomplete or inaccurate information. 0 pts Absent No Submission 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDosage Range / Dosage 2 pts Exemplary Provides accurate dosage ranges, available dosage forms (tablet, capsule, liquid, IM, etc.), and routes of administration; includes titration or adjustment parameters where applicable. 1.5 pts Proficient Includes general dosing information or partial list of dosage forms with minor gaps. 1 pts Needs Improvement Incomplete, inaccurate, or missing dosage details. 0 pts Absent No Submission 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy & Use of Evidence 2 pts Exemplary All information is accurate, current, and evidence-based using Stahls Essential Psychopharmacology/Prescribers Guide or other scholarly psychopharmacology sources. 1.5 pts Proficient Mostly accurate with minor unsupported details. 1 pts Needs Improvement Contains multiple inaccuracies or lacks credible evidence. 0 pts Absent No Submission 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Professionalism 2 pts Exemplary Clear, well-organized, grammatically correct, and professionally formatted; easy to follow and visually clean. 1.5 pts Proficient Mostly organized and clear with few grammar or formatting errors. 1 pts Needs Improvement Disorganized, unclear, or unprofessional in presentation. 0 pts Absent No Submission 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompleteness & Submission Quality 2 pts Exemplary All sections of the template are completed thoroughly and thoughtfully; demonstrates attention to detail. 1.5 pts Proficient Most sections complete but lacking in depth or thoroughness. 1 pts Needs Improvement Several sections incomplete or missing required information. 0 pts Absent No Submission 2 pts Total Points: 20