Options for your essay include the following (choose one): Part of Gilmans skill in creating this story was leading the reader back and forth between actual events and the narrators distorted view of reality. What effect does this create, and how does such blurring of lines add to the story? How does Gilman use elaborate description of the wallpaper to create an effect in her story? How would you describe that effect? The narrator of the story is unreliable, and the story is not so much a factual report as it is the account of what is going on around a woman experiencing mental illness from her perspective. How do the narrators rational words in the storys first paragraph contrast with her words in the final paragraph of the story? Youll be using the yellow wallpaper story

Fashion management

Using the template below, develop an annotated bibliography for your informative speech. You should provide the full APA or MLA citation for each source (Links for Citation Style Guides provided below). Source 1 Full Citation: Summary: Evaluation of Source: How can you use this source in your speech? How can you make this source relatable for your audience members? Source 2 Full Citation: Summary: Evaluation of Source: How can you use this source in your speech? How can you make this source relatable for your audience members? Source 3 Full Citation: Summary: Evaluation of Source: How can you use this source in your speech? How can you make this source relatable for your audience members? Citation Resources A bibliography citation refers to the format of your sources in your References or Works Cited list. Please consult with your instructor on the appropriate style guide to use. APA Style Guide: MLA Style Guide: also this is what you’re going to base it on 1. What is the topic of your speech? I am going to discuss the rising demand of skilled trade workers and the transformation of college degree in the current workforce, in my informative speech. I will explain why fewer people are entering trades, what it means for the economy and how college enrollment has shot up even in fields in which a degree may not guarantee employment. I want the audience to become more aware of what is happening in today’s labor market and what opportunities exist with each route. 2. Why did you choose this topic? I chose this topic because there is a strong societal push for students to attend college even when their desired careers may not require a degree. At the same time, skilled trades such as plumbing, electrical work, and welding are experiencing worker shortages. I think many people are unaware of how profitable and stable trade careers can be. This topic is important because it directly impacts career decisions that young adults are making right now. 3. How will you make this topic relevant/relatable to your audience members? I will make this topic relatable by connecting it to the experiences of college students who are devoting their time and money into their education. Many students are concerned about job security, debt, and future income, which makes this topic highly relevant. I can personally relate to both perspectives because I have experience working in a blue-collar field while also pursuing a college education. This allows me to understand the expectations, demands, and perks that are related to each road path. I will provide statistics about job growth, salary comparisons, and shortages of workers. My personal experience combined with fair facts will help the audience comprehend the positive and negative aspects of both job option paths

Please have plag report availavle

must have similarity below 10 percent

please have DOI with apa references attached references must be within the last 5 years

Scholarly Writing

write a paper on the pharmacological management of the disease. The paper should include a review of the:

• Select a disease process that is of interest to you.
• Pathophysiology of the disease state.
• Review of the pharmacological agents used for treatment and important information related to advanced practice nurse.
• title example must be For examples, Pharmacological Effects of Anti-Hypertensive Medications in the Management of Hypertension.

Submission

• The paper should be formatted per the current APA and 5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.
• Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles within your work.

Civic Engagement Project. Volunteering at a Confidential DV shelter.

See attachment for instructions and the rubric, along with the previous assignment for the approved thesis assignment(with professor notes), rubric. and professor comments, “Yaw Adu-Gyamfi at Mon Feb 16, 2026 8:39pm

at Mon Feb 16, 2026 8:39pmPlease see my Box in-line comments for feedback. Overall, your topic/thesis is on target and shows good potential. Watch development. I look forward to reviewing your revised thesis when you submit it together with your outline and bibliography. Best wishes.”

.

Please write an essay of about 600 – 1200 words to answer the following study question:

Question:Describe first-, second-, and third-order organizational change induced by the adoption of new IT. Provide an example, real or imagined, for each of these three levels of change.

Requirements:

Please write your name on the first line of the essay, only submit .doc/.docx files to the system.

Do not use ChatGPT or other AI tools. Violations will be handled as mentioned in Syllabus. You can check with this link (

) before submitting to Canvas (with <= 20% AI is acceptable).

part of a 6 source annotated bibliography

Week 7: Course Project Final Paper

• Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 175 Submitting a file upload Available after Feb 14 at 11:59pm

Instructions

The Course Project Final Paper is due this week.

Review the in the Introduction & Resources Module for details about this project (paper).

Action

Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

Once you have uploaded your file, select Submit Assignment.

Rubric

HRM330 Week 7 Course Project Rubric

HRM330 Week 7 Course Project Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Documentation and Formatting

The paper should follow instructions as outlined under the guidelines. Include a title and reference page. At least three scholarly resources with in-text citations in the paper.

20 to >15.0 pts

Excellent

The paper completely follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are included. At least three scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.

15 to >10.0 pts

Competent

The paper competently follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are included. At least two scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

The paper somewhat follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are included. At least one scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.

5 to >1.0 pts

Poor

The paper poorly follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are not both included. At least one scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization and Cohesiveness

The paper should have topical flow with like subjects in each paragraph. Paragraphs should flow and link from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session should be integrated. Paragraph transitions should be present and logical. Page count should follow guidelines.

20 to >15.0 pts

Excellent

The paper clearly had topical flow with like subjects in each paragraph. Paragraphs flowed and linked from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was integrated. Paragraph transitions were present and logical. Page count followed the guidelines.

15 to >10.0 pts

Competent

The paper competently had topical flow with like subjects in most paragraphs. Paragraphs flowed and linked from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was integrated. Paragraph transitions were present and logical. Page count mostly followed the guidelines.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

The paper somewhat had topical flow with like subjects in a few paragraphs. Paragraphs somewhat flowed and linked from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was somewhat integrated. Paragraph transitions mostly present and logical. Page count somewhat followed the guidelines.

5 to >1.0 pts

Poor

The paper had poor topical flow with few subjects in some paragraphs. Paragraphs did not flow and link from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was not completely integrated. Paragraph transitions were not clearly present and logical. Page count did not follow the guidelines.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Introduction

The introduction provided sufficient background on the topic and previews the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.

25 to >20.0 pts

Excellent

The introduction clearly provided sufficient background on the topic and previews the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.

20 to >10.0 pts

Competent

The introduction competently provided background on the topic and previews most of the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

The introduction somewhat provided background on the topic and previews some of the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.

5 to >1.0 pts

Poor

The introduction did not provide sufficient background on the topic and previews very few points to be defined in the body of the paper.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Content

The paper content should be thorough, yet concise. Information included should be relevant to the topic and provide depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. All key elements of the assignment should be covered in a substantive way. Concepts should be reviewed clearly, supported by specific details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper should link theory to relevant examples of current concepts and industry practice. There should be correct use of vocabulary and theory.

65 to >45.0 pts

Excellent

The paper content was very thorough and concise. Information included was relevant to the topic and provided depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. All key elements of the assignment were covered in a substantive way. Concepts were reviewed clearly, supported by specific details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper linked theory to relevant examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper had the correct use of vocabulary and theory.

45 to >25.0 pts

Competent

The paper content was thorough and concise. Information included was relevant to the topic and provided depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. Most key elements of the assignment were covered in a competent way. Concepts were reviewed, supported by adequate details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper linked theory to some examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper had the correct use of vocabulary and theory.

25 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The paper content was somewhat thorough and concise. Information included was somewhat relevant to the topic and mostly provided depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. Some key elements of the assignment were covered in an adequate way. Concepts were somewhat reviewed, supported by some details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper somewhat linked theory to a few examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper mostly had the correct use of vocabulary and theory.

10 to >1.0 pts

Poor

The paper content was not thorough and concise. Information included was not completely relevant to the topic and did not provide depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. Few key elements of the assignment were covered. Concepts were not clearly reviewed, supported by details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper did not clearly link theory to examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper did not have the correct use of vocabulary and theory.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

65 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Conclusion

The conclusion is restating the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points, include final thoughts of what is next, and state the significance of any findings. Conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper.

25 to >20.0 pts

Excellent

The conclusion thoroughly restated the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points and included clear final thoughts of what was next, and stated the significance of any findings. Conclusion was very logical, flowed from the body of the paper.

20 to >10.0 pts

Competent

The conclusion competently restated the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points and included final thoughts of what was next, and stated the significance of any findings. Conclusion was mostly logical, flowed from the body of the paper.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

The conclusion somewhat restated the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points, included a few thoughts of what was next, and stated the significance of any findings. Conclusion was somewhat logical, flowed from the body of the paper.

5 to >1.0 pts

Poor

The conclusion did not completely restate the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points, include final thoughts of what was next, and state the significance of any findings. Conclusion was not logical, flowed from the body of the paper.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Editing

Sentences should be complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions should be present and maintain the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation should be followed. Spelling should be correct. Sentence structure to be clean and clear. The writing style should follow appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.

20 to >15.0 pts

Excellent

Sentences were complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were be present and maintained the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were followed. Spelling was correct. Sentence structure was clean and clear. The writing style completely followed appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.

15 to >10.0 pts

Competent

Sentences were competently complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were be present and competently maintained the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were followed. Minimal spelling errors were present. Sentence structure was clean and clear. The writing style followed appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

Sentences were somewhat complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were be present and somewhat maintained the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were followed. Several spelling errors were present. Sentence structure was somewhat clean and clear. The writing style somewhat followed appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.

5 to >1.0 pts

Poor

Sentences were not complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were not clearly present to maintain the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were not completely followed. Spelling errors were present. Sentence structure was not clean and clear. The writing style did not follow the appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The student did not meet the requirements.

20 pts

Total Points: 175

My Topic is The Future Viability of the United Auto Workers (UAW) with some information coming from the 2024 strike.