Category: Select subject(s)

Page requirement: half a page exactly Submit a brief statement including the name of your business and the type of business it is. Your statement should be concise and clearly outline the core concept of your business. Example: Business Name: Gourmet Grilled Cheese Type of Business: Food Truck Description: A mobile food truck offering a variety of gourmet grilled cheese sandwiches and soups to college students and faculty on campus. Our mission is to provide delicious, affordable, and convenient meal options, using high-quality ingredients and unique flavor combinations. Ensure your submission is no more than half a page in length and follows MLA Format (9th edition). This brief statement is a crucial first step in your business planning process and will help set the foundation for your comprehensive business plan.

do the 3 assigments

Nurses at the baccalaureate level in all practice areas are involved in nursing informatics through interaction with information management and patient care technologies. Nurses must not only demonstrate knowledge of and skills in health information and patient care technologies, but also how to use these tools at the bedside and organizational levels. Moreover, nurses need to recognize how information gathered from various health information sources can impact decision making at the national and state regulatory levels.

Preparation

As you begin to prepare this assessment, you are encouraged to complete the Team Perspectives of the Nurse Informaticist activity. Completion of this will help you succeed with the assessment as you explore the nurse informaticist’s role from the different perspectives of the health care team. Completing activities is also a way to demonstrate engagement.

To successfully prepare for this assessment, you will need to complete these preparatory activities:

• Review assessment resources and activities.
• Review the focus of the new nurse informaticist position you will propose by examining the
• resource.
• Conduct independent research on the nursing knowledge and skills necessary to interact with health information and patient care technology.
• Focus your research on current resources available through peer-reviewed articles, professional websites, government websites, professional blogs, wikis, job boards, and so on.
• Consult the for help in identifying scholarly and authoritative sources.
• Interview peers in your network who are considered information technology experts.
• Ask them about how information technology advances are impacting patient care at the bedside, at the organizational level, and beyond.

Scenario

For this assessment, assume you are a nurse attending a meeting of your states nurses association. A nurse informaticist conducted a presentation on their role and its impact on positive patient and organizational outcomes in their workplace. You realize that your organization is undergoing many technological changes. You believe this type of role could provide many benefits to your organization.

• Review the focus of the new nurse informaticist position you will propose by examining the
• resource.

You decide to pursue proposing a nurse informaticist role in your organization. You speak to your chief nursing officer (CNO) and human resources (HR) manager, who ask you to prepare a 45 page evidence-based proposal to support the new role. In this way, they can make an informed decision as to whether the addition of such a role could justify the return on investment (ROI). They need your proposal before an upcoming fiscal meeting. This is not an essay, but instead, it is a proposal to create a new Nurse Informaticist position.

One important part of this assessment is the justification of the need for a nurse informaticist in a health care organization and references from relevant and timely scholarly or professional resources to support the justification for creating this nurse informaticist position. The term justify means to show or prove that the nurse informaticist position brings value to the organization. This justification must include evidence from the literature to support that this position will provide a return on investment for the organization.

Proposal Format

The chief nursing officer (CNO) and human resources (HR) manager have asked you to include the headings below in your proposal and to be sure to address the bullets following each heading. Remember that you will emphasize the focus of the new nurse informaticist position as described in the

resource.

Nursing Informatics and the Nurse Informaticist

• What is nursing informatics?
• What is the role of the nurse informaticist?
• Highlight one influential nurse informaticist and their contributions to nursing.

Nurse Informaticists and Other Health Care Organizations

• What is the experience of other health care organizations with nurse informaticists?
• How do these nurse informaticists collaborate with the rest of the nursing staff and the interdisciplinary team?

Impact of Full Nurse Engagement in Health Care Technology

• How does fully engaging nurses in health care technology impact:
• Patient care?
• Protected health information (security, privacy, and confidentiality)?
• In this section, you will explain evidence-based strategies that the nurse informaticist and interdisciplinary team can use to effectively manage patients’ protected health information, particularly privacy, security, and confidentiality. Evidence-based means that they are supported by evidence from scholarly sources.
• Workflow?
• Costs and return on investment?

Opportunities and Challenges

• What are the opportunities and challenges for nurses and the interdisciplinary team with the addition of a nurse informaticist role?
• How can the interdisciplinary team collaborate to improve quality care outcomes through technology?

Summary of Recommendations

• What are 34 key takeaways from your proposal about the recommended nurse informaticist role that you want the CNO and the HR manager to remember?
• This is the section where the justification for the implementation of the nursing informaticist role is addressed. Remember to include evidence from the literature to support your recommendation.

Additional Requirements

• Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
• Submission length: 45 double-spaced pages, in addition to title and references pages.
• Font: Times New Roman, 12 point.
• Citations and References: Cite a minimum of three current scholarly and/or authoritative sources to support your ideas. In addition, cite a minimum of one current professional blog or website to support your central ideas. Current means no more than five years old.
• APA formatting: Be sure to follow APA formatting and style guidelines for citations and references. For an APA refresher, consult the page on Campus.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

• Competency 1: Describe nurses’ and the interdisciplinary team’s role in informatics with a focus on electronic health information and patient care technology to support decision making.
• Define nursing informatics and the role of the nurse informaticist, highlighting the contributions of an influential nurse informaticist.
• Explain how the nurse collaborates with the interdisciplinary team, including technologists, to improve the quality of patient care.
• Justify the need for a nurse informaticist in a health care organization.
• Competency 2: Implement evidence-based strategies to effectively manage protected health information.
• Explain evidence-based strategies that the nurse informaticist and interdisciplinary team can use to effectively manage patients protected health information (privacy, security, and confidentiality).
• Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired outcomes.
• Explain the impact of full nurse engagement in health care technology, including the opportunities and challenges.
• Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.
• Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.
• Create a clear, well-organized, and professional proposal that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

it should contain all the words that were giving. it should have no abbreviations and it should look like it was done by a high schooler. thank you

Assignment Instructions

Conduct a case analysis, two to four pages in length, of a fictional student detailed below, and evaluate the benefits and impact of exercise on his mental health. Your analysis should include the following critical elements:

• Psychological Issues and Symptoms: What issues and symptoms does the student exhibit that might be helped by exercise?
• Skills Training: Identify how skills training could improve the students performance and mental health.
• Conclusions: Cite specific theories that explain the links between exercise and improved mental health to substantiate your analysis. Make final recommendations.

Jim is 6 tall and weighs 185 lbs. Although he has an athletic build, he has never played sports because he believes himself to be awkward, non-athletic. He is more interested in video games than in sports games. The patient has a number of friends and is in a long-term relationship. While Jim reports that he feels pretty good about himself, he has lately been noticingparticularly in social situationsthat his heart sometimes races, his hands sweat profusely, and he gets a little dizzy. A friend of his, who runs half-marathons, has been trying to get him to join him, but Jim is worried that running will only make his physical problems worse. He has had a clean physical exam and has now come to you to discuss the possibility of training for a half-marathon.

Identify any psychological issues that Jim has revealed and identify the symptoms he is exhibiting. Discuss one or two skills training activities you might suggest, and analyze how you think that might help Jim, followed by a conclusion that cites specific supporting theories.

Purpose: To show that you understand your topic from more than one perspective and can explain how different sources contribute to a complex, ongoing conversation. Instead of taking sides, your goal is to highlight areas of agreement, disagreement, and uncertaintyand to reflect on what this complexity means for your own research.

Audience: Your instructor and classmates

Genre: Research log (academic reflection and analysis)

Step 1: Find and summarize sources

Find two sources on your topic that take different positions or perspectives. These should not be polar opposites, but they should reflect meaningful differences in values, priorities, or conclusions. (For example, two sources that support healthcare reform but disagree on how to achieve it.) At least one of these should be by a reputable publication or outlet (academic journal, major newspaper, policy report, etc). The other can be from a reputable publication or from an advocacy group, blog, or a smaller media outlet.

Once youve chosen two sources, write a short rhetorical summary that includes:

• Title, author, and publication
• Purpose and intended audience of the source
• Summary of the main claims and supporting evidence
• A brief analysis of the tone and stance

Remember that you can find these terms defined on page ### of your textbook.

Write at least 75 words for each source.

Step 2: Compare the sources

This is where youll begin to explore nuance. Many conversations in the public sphere are more complex than they first appear. Your job here is to find points of agreement, identify subtle differences, and reflect on how each source contributes to a deeper understanding of your topic.

Use the guiding questions below to help structure your response. You dont need to answer every question in order, but your response should address most of the questions. Write at least 150 words total.

• Where do the authors agree or overlap?
• Do they agree on the core problem or issue?
• Do they use similar types of evidence?
• Do they both support action?
• Where do the authors diverge- and why?
• Do they disagree on the cause or source of the current situation?
• Do they disagree on what matters most (example: the key source of the problem or the key aspect of the solution)?
• Are they using different kinds of evidence to reach their conclusions (does one use statistics while one relies on personal testimony)?
• Are they addressing different audiences (average voters vs policy makers; young voters vs older generation)?
• What uncertainties, nuances, gray areas emerge between the two?
• Does one source acknowledge a limitation or counterpoint?
• Is there a tension in the conversation between the ideal solution and barriers to that solution?
• Is there a tension or uncertainty around the exact cause of the problem or the publics perception of the problem?
• Do both sources seem partially right, but in different ways?
• How does this comparison affect your own thinking?
• Have your views shifted or become more complex?
• What questions do you have now that you didnt have before? Or what questions seem less/more important now?
• How might this new complexity reshape how you approach your topic? What aspects of your research question might need to change, narrow, or be reframed?

Examples to help you think through the questions above:

• An example of an overlap would be two sources on climate change that agree that its both human-caused and urgent.
• An example of a divergence would be one source emphasizing individual responsibility for reducing waste, while another source argues that the problem requires large-scale corporate reform.
• An example of nuance could be one source acknowledging the limits of individual responsibility while still arguing for its potential contributions to a prolonged response.
• An example of nuance is one source showing that standardized tests are harmful due to stress caused to students, while another source shows that these tests are crucial to identifying learning gaps. Therefore, maybe the answer isnt that tests are all good or all bad, but the issue depends on how tests are used.
• An example of a change in thinking after identifying complexity is realizing there is more than one potential way to solve the problem but the different solutions each represent competing values/priorities.

*My topic is how shark finning has been increasing the risks of climate change through the years.

Purpose: To show that you understand your topic from more than one perspective and can explain how different sources contribute to a complex, ongoing conversation. Instead of taking sides, your goal is to highlight areas of agreement, disagreement, and uncertaintyand to reflect on what this complexity means for your own research.

Audience: Your instructor and classmates

Genre: Research log (academic reflection and analysis)

Step 1: Find and summarize sources

Find two sources on your topic that take different positions or perspectives. These should not be polar opposites, but they should reflect meaningful differences in values, priorities, or conclusions. (For example, two sources that support healthcare reform but disagree on how to achieve it.) At least one of these should be by a reputable publication or outlet (academic journal, major newspaper, policy report, etc). The other can be from a reputable publication or from an advocacy group, blog, or a smaller media outlet.

Once youve chosen two sources, write a short rhetorical summary that includes:

• Title, author, and publication
• Purpose and intended audience of the source
• Summary of the main claims and supporting evidence
• A brief analysis of the tone and stance

Remember that you can find these terms defined on page ### of your textbook.

Write at least 75 words for each source.

Step 2: Compare the sources

This is where youll begin to explore nuance. Many conversations in the public sphere are more complex than they first appear. Your job here is to find points of agreement, identify subtle differences, and reflect on how each source contributes to a deeper understanding of your topic.

Use the guiding questions below to help structure your response. You dont need to answer every question in order, but your response should address most of the questions. Write at least 150 words total.

• Where do the authors agree or overlap?
• Do they agree on the core problem or issue?
• Do they use similar types of evidence?
• Do they both support action?
• Where do the authors diverge- and why?
• Do they disagree on the cause or source of the current situation?
• Do they disagree on what matters most (example: the key source of the problem or the key aspect of the solution)?
• Are they using different kinds of evidence to reach their conclusions (does one use statistics while one relies on personal testimony)?
• Are they addressing different audiences (average voters vs policy makers; young voters vs older generation)?
• What uncertainties, nuances, gray areas emerge between the two?
• Does one source acknowledge a limitation or counterpoint?
• Is there a tension in the conversation between the ideal solution and barriers to that solution?
• Is there a tension or uncertainty around the exact cause of the problem or the publics perception of the problem?
• Do both sources seem partially right, but in different ways?
• How does this comparison affect your own thinking?
• Have your views shifted or become more complex?
• What questions do you have now that you didnt have before? Or what questions seem less/more important now?
• How might this new complexity reshape how you approach your topic? What aspects of your research question might need to change, narrow, or be reframed?

Examples to help you think through the questions above:

• An example of an overlap would be two sources on climate change that agree that its both human-caused and urgent.
• An example of a divergence would be one source emphasizing individual responsibility for reducing waste, while another source argues that the problem requires large-scale corporate reform.
• An example of nuance could be one source acknowledging the limits of individual responsibility while still arguing for its potential contributions to a prolonged response.
• An example of nuance is one source showing that standardized tests are harmful due to stress caused to students, while another source shows that these tests are crucial to identifying learning gaps. Therefore, maybe the answer isnt that tests are all good or all bad, but the issue depends on how tests are used.
• An example of a change in thinking after identifying complexity is realizing there is more than one potential way to solve the problem but the different solutions each represent competing values/priorities.

*My topic is how shark finning has been increasing the risks of climate change through the years.

Purpose: To show that you understand your topic from more than one perspective and can explain how different sources contribute to a complex, ongoing conversation. Instead of taking sides, your goal is to highlight areas of agreement, disagreement, and uncertaintyand to reflect on what this complexity means for your own research.

Audience: Your instructor and classmates

Genre: Research log (academic reflection and analysis)

Step 1: Find and summarize sources

Find two sources on your topic that take different positions or perspectives. These should not be polar opposites, but they should reflect meaningful differences in values, priorities, or conclusions. (For example, two sources that support healthcare reform but disagree on how to achieve it.) At least one of these should be by a reputable publication or outlet (academic journal, major newspaper, policy report, etc). The other can be from a reputable publication or from an advocacy group, blog, or a smaller media outlet.

Once youve chosen two sources, write a short rhetorical summary that includes:

• Title, author, and publication
• Purpose and intended audience of the source
• Summary of the main claims and supporting evidence
• A brief analysis of the tone and stance

Remember that you can find these terms defined on page ### of your textbook.

Write at least 75 words for each source.

Step 2: Compare the sources

This is where youll begin to explore nuance. Many conversations in the public sphere are more complex than they first appear. Your job here is to find points of agreement, identify subtle differences, and reflect on how each source contributes to a deeper understanding of your topic.

Use the guiding questions below to help structure your response. You dont need to answer every question in order, but your response should address most of the questions. Write at least 150 words total.

• Where do the authors agree or overlap?
• Do they agree on the core problem or issue?
• Do they use similar types of evidence?
• Do they both support action?
• Where do the authors diverge- and why?
• Do they disagree on the cause or source of the current situation?
• Do they disagree on what matters most (example: the key source of the problem or the key aspect of the solution)?
• Are they using different kinds of evidence to reach their conclusions (does one use statistics while one relies on personal testimony)?
• Are they addressing different audiences (average voters vs policy makers; young voters vs older generation)?
• What uncertainties, nuances, gray areas emerge between the two?
• Does one source acknowledge a limitation or counterpoint?
• Is there a tension in the conversation between the ideal solution and barriers to that solution?
• Is there a tension or uncertainty around the exact cause of the problem or the publics perception of the problem?
• Do both sources seem partially right, but in different ways?
• How does this comparison affect your own thinking?
• Have your views shifted or become more complex?
• What questions do you have now that you didnt have before? Or what questions seem less/more important now?
• How might this new complexity reshape how you approach your topic? What aspects of your research question might need to change, narrow, or be reframed?

Examples to help you think through the questions above:

• An example of an overlap would be two sources on climate change that agree that its both human-caused and urgent.
• An example of a divergence would be one source emphasizing individual responsibility for reducing waste, while another source argues that the problem requires large-scale corporate reform.
• An example of nuance could be one source acknowledging the limits of individual responsibility while still arguing for its potential contributions to a prolonged response.
• An example of nuance is one source showing that standardized tests are harmful due to stress caused to students, while another source shows that these tests are crucial to identifying learning gaps. Therefore, maybe the answer isnt that tests are all good or all bad, but the issue depends on how tests are used.
• An example of a change in thinking after identifying complexity is realizing there is more than one potential way to solve the problem but the different solutions each represent competing values/priorities.

*My topic is how shark finning has been increasing the risks of climate change through the years.