Category: Select subject(s)

  • TLMT200 ASSIGNMENT- Taimatuia

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): TLMT200 ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTION.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Trauma discussion

    1. form of trauma:
    • Violent or sexual assault
    1. Provide an overview of the form of trauma, symptoms, and similarities/differences regarding symptomatology across Historically Marginalized populations
    2. Identify at least two factors that contribute to resilience when coping with trauma. What role does culture play when overcoming trauma?
    3. Identify and provide an overview of one intervention social workers use to address trauma. What are the strengths and limitations of this intervention? Does this intervention address the needs of Historically Marginalized populations?

    Guidelines

    • 500 Word discussion (Maximum)
    • Cite a minimum of 3 scholarly sources (You can use required course readings).
    • Follow APA formatting. Support your arguments with research. Remember to properly cite the sources used to support your arguments and to define concepts and theorie
    • Chapter 2. Human Development, Systems, Neuroscience, and Social Justice

    Journal Articles and Web Resources

  • Trauma discussion

    1. form of trauma:
    • Violent or sexual assault
    1. Provide an overview of the form of trauma, symptoms, and similarities/differences regarding symptomatology across Historically Marginalized populations
    2. Identify at least two factors that contribute to resilience when coping with trauma. What role does culture play when overcoming trauma?
    3. Identify and provide an overview of one intervention social workers use to address trauma. What are the strengths and limitations of this intervention? Does this intervention address the needs of Historically Marginalized populations?

    Guidelines

    • 500 Word discussion (Maximum)
    • Cite a minimum of 3 scholarly sources (You can use required course readings).
    • Follow APA formatting. Support your arguments with research. Remember to properly cite the sources used to support your arguments and to define concepts and theorie
    • Chapter 2. Human Development, Systems, Neuroscience, and Social Justice

    Journal Articles and Web Resources

  • Annotated bibliography for ethics

    First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate? Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment). Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. Include the following: Publication details Annotation (a detailed reading of the source) Each annotation section should include the following: Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses). Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles. State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons. Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project. Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding. Use the following as a model: APA Reference Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63. Annotation Example In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between “instrumental” and “communicative” learning. “Instrumental learning” refers to those processes which measure and gauge learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. “Communicative learning,” on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls “critical-dialectical-discourse,” (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is “transformative learning,” (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that “hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse” (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don’t think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we’d see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school. Requirements Length: 4-7 pages (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page

  • Annotated bibliography for ethics

    First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate? Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment). Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. Include the following: Publication details Annotation (a detailed reading of the source) Each annotation section should include the following: Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses). Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles. State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons. Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project. Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding. Use the following as a model: APA Reference Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63. Annotation Example In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between “instrumental” and “communicative” learning. “Instrumental learning” refers to those processes which measure and gauge learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. “Communicative learning,” on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls “critical-dialectical-discourse,” (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is “transformative learning,” (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that “hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse” (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don’t think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we’d see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school. Requirements Length: 4-7 pages (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page

  • Annotated bibliography for ethics

    First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate? Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment). Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. Include the following: Publication details Annotation (a detailed reading of the source) Each annotation section should include the following: Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses). Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles. State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons. Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project. Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding. Use the following as a model: APA Reference Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63. Annotation Example In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between “instrumental” and “communicative” learning. “Instrumental learning” refers to those processes which measure and gauge learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. “Communicative learning,” on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls “critical-dialectical-discourse,” (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is “transformative learning,” (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that “hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse” (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don’t think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we’d see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school. Requirements Length: 4-7 pages (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page

  • Assignment 3

    In week 4, we look into the future of how clinical work will change. Of course, the nurse must be clear about the changing aspects of their practice environment. The section on “Transforming the Nature of Clinical Work” (p.341) is fascinating! There are also great ideas about YOU as a member of your organization.

    The assignment asks you to identify changes that you believe will be the future of the health care system and how those changes will impact nurses.

    How do you get people to change their behavior in a changing clinical environment? Interesting stuff!

    Textbook is Weberg, D., Mangold, K., Porter-OGrady, T., Malloch, K. (2019). Leadership in Nursing Practice, 3th ed., Jones and Bartlett Learning.

  • Assignment 3

    In week 4, we look into the future of how clinical work will change. Of course, the nurse must be clear about the changing aspects of their practice environment. The section on “Transforming the Nature of Clinical Work” (p.341) is fascinating! There are also great ideas about YOU as a member of your organization.

    The assignment asks you to identify changes that you believe will be the future of the health care system and how those changes will impact nurses.

    How do you get people to change their behavior in a changing clinical environment? Interesting stuff!

    Textbook is Weberg, D., Mangold, K., Porter-OGrady, T., Malloch, K. (2019). Leadership in Nursing Practice, 3th ed., Jones and Bartlett Learning.