Category: Select subject(s)

Select an infectious disease to explore in detail, by using a descriptive epidemiologic approach. Apply the epidemiologic triangle to the occurrence of infectious or communicable disease (for example, variations in severity of illness, components of the infectious disease process, mechanisms of disease transmission, and common source versus communicable disease outbreaks).

The objectives of this written exercise are as follows: to gain experience in describing and analyzing the distribution of a health disorder in a population; to become familiar with various sources of data for the epidemiologic description of a health disorder; to enhance the ability to make sound epidemiologic judgments related to public health problems.

Requirements: APA-style, use at least five sources of research for data; other data may be obtained from factsheets and info from CDC, NIH, etc. Paper should be at least 7 written pages, have a cover page/running head, references/bibliography (at least five sources from a variety of epidemiological data sources), graphics/illustrations as appendices.

Potential topic choices include: TB, HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis A, HPV, Lyme disease, malaria, measles, West Nile, typhoid fever, tetanus, Legionnaires disease, bacterial meningitis, Ebola, hantavirus, or other infectious or communicable disease.

Section headings of paper to include: Definition of problem; Description of agent and condition; Distribution of health problem; Summary of current hypotheses; Principal gaps in knowledge; Suggestions for further epidemiologic research.

Chosen topic to discuss: Tuberculosis (TB)

This assignment is a compare and contrast between alcohol anonymous and al anonymous group meeting. Write it as if you have sat in on a session. Please follow the rubric exactly to get the most points possible. Paper should be 2-4 pages.

Assessment 1: Digital Marketing Audit – Individual coursework Word count: 1,500-2,000 words strictly (reference list excluded) Aim: You will conduct an individual digital marketing audit of a tourism, hospitality, or events organisation to critically evaluate its digital presence and user engagement strategies. Drawing on concepts and frameworks introduced in Weeks 1-5 of the module, you will analyse how the organisation uses digital channels, how users interact with a key digital asset, and how digital marketing activities create (or limit) value for consumers. This assessment is designed to develop your analytical and evaluative skills, which you will later apply to a different organisation in the group campaign project. This assessment aims to enable you to: Demonstrate a critical understanding of digital marketing in the visitor economy Apply consumer behaviour, UX, and content marketing concepts to a real organisation Evaluate digital marketing performance using appropriate analytical frameworks Develop evidence-based recommendations to improve user engagement and digital effectiveness Tasks: Organisation selection You must select one organisation operating in the tourism, hospitality, or events sector with an active digital presence. The organisation should have sufficient publicly available digital content (e.g. website, social media, video content) to support analysis. Digital marketing audit You will conduct a structured audit of the organisation’s digital marketing presence, focusing on: Key digital channels used (e.g. website, social media, video platforms, others) The role of these channels in the customer journey A digitally focused SWOT analysis A brief competitor comparison (1-2 competitors) limited to digital presence and engagement (e.g., channel use, content themes, engagement approach – not a full corporate strategy analysis) You must apply relevant theory from the module (e.g. digital consumer behaviour, value creation, engagement) to interpret your findings. 3. Persona and customer journey analysis You must develop: one target persona one customer journey map for that persona This analysis should be used analytically to explain how the organisation’s digital marketing supports (or fails to support) user needs, motivations, and decision-making. 4. UX interaction evaluation of a key digital asset You must select one primary digital asset (e.g. a webpage, booking) interface, social media video, email, or campaign landing page) and conduct a UX and interaction evaluation (based on your target persona). Drawing on UX and interaction design principles from the module, you should assess usability, clarity, trust, and engagement. Recommendations on your analysis, you must provide clear, evidence-based recommendations for improving user engagement and digital performance. Recommendations should be realistic, justified, and linked explicitly to your findings and to relevant theory. Structure and indicative word count: Part 1: Digital Marketing Audit (approx. 800-1,000 words) Organisation overview and digital presence Persona and customer journey analysis Digitally focused SWOT analysis Brief competitor comparison Theoretical interpretation Part 2: UX and Digital Asset Evaluation (approx. 700-1,000 words) Description and justification of selected digital asset UX and interaction evaluation using theory Evidence-based recommendations Specific Requirements: The reference list is not included in the word count This is a free report style aimed at an industry audience (your chosen organisation). You should include visuals where appropriate (e.g., at least one persona visual and one journey map, plus UX evidence such as annotated screenshots/wireframes, etc.). You must demonstrate critical analysis, not descriptive reporting. You may include figures, tables, and screenshots where appropriate; these must be clearly labelled and discussed in the text. All sources must be properly referenced using a referencing style. You are expected to consult the marking criteria before submission.

Read the instructions. And do the paper. Pediatric disease is Asthma for a child under 1.

You can do Part A first. I will then extend the time for Part B to be completed

You are the project manager for a construction initiative titled the Tiny House Project. You have been given the project charter. Your next steps are to identify the project stakeholders and develop the Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Management Plans.

The purpose of this assignment is to apply theory to practice by creating both plans for the Tiny House Project.

Your Tasks

Create the following.

• The Tiny House Stakeholder Engagement Plan
• The Tiny House Communications Management Plan

Instructions

1. Read these instructions thoroughly and review the Tiny House Project Charter provided (see Appendix A) to identify stakeholders mentioned in the document.
2. Brainstorm additional stakeholders who may be affected by or have influence over the project but are not listed in the charter.
3. Create a Stakeholder Engagement Plan by completing Table 1 and following the instructions in Appendix B.

• Engagement Strategy
• Strategic Approach
• Strategy Owner
• Identify six stakeholders, including their roles and categories.
• Analyze each stakeholders influence, interest, needs, and requirements.

1. Create a Communications Management Plan by completing Table 2 and following the instructions in Appendix C.

• Identify the target audience.
• State the communication purpose.
• Define the communication vehicle and method.
• Specify the communication frequency.
• Assign an owner.
• Classify as internal or external.

1. Formatting Requirements: Ensure correct grammar, spelling, and professional tone.
2. Sources Page: Include at least five sources (e.g., textbook, live lessons, class materials, or credible external references).
3. Submission: Submit one document containing the following.

• A cover page with your name, professors name, course number, and session
• Stakeholder Engagement Plan
• Communications Management Plan
• Sources

Use this final draft and fix it

Specifics: about 5 pages (not more than 6 full pages), double spaced, 12-point normal font,

regular margins, pages numbered, your name on the front page.

Before writing, read How to Write a Philosophy Paper:

http://www.sfu.ca/philosophy/resources/writing.html

Some things to focus on:

1. Have a clear thesis that you argue for.
2. Explain and use arguments, reasons, examples, etc. to support your view.
3. You should also consider possible objections and defend your view against them.
4. Write clearly.
5. Make the structure of your paper clear to your reader.
6. Make sure all of your claims are justified.
7. You can use I must you must support your claims with reasons, not just opinions.

Plagiarism Policy: If you plagiarize by including material that is not in your own words

without quotation marks and a source, you will fail the assignment, it will be reported and

there may be other penalties. This includes using ChatGPT. If something is not your own

idea, include a citation saying where you found it. Cite in MLA, Chicago, or APA style

PAPER PROMPT:

1. Suppose Pat agreed to take care of your plants while you were out of town. Instead of caring for them, Pat dumps poison on the plants and they die. Is Pat responsible? Justify your conclusion based on views of freedom, determinism, and moral responsibility. Next, suppose Pat agreed to water your plants while you were out of town, Pat forgot to, and your plants died. Is Pat responsible for your plants death? Justify your conclusions by considering the potential difference between action and inaction as well as views of freedom, determinism and moral responsibility.

Note:

Write according to the outline already made in the screenshot

This journal measures ULOs 3.5 and 4.1.

The objective of this journal is to analyze how the 4Ps (product, price, place, and promotion) influence the strategic decisions of a global customer brand. Additionally, you will apply the consumer buying decision process to a new product launch, providing a concise yet comprehensive understanding of both theoretical and practical marketing applications.

Select a well-known global brand (e.g., Apple, Coca-Cola, Nike, Samsung) that operates in multiple international markets. Remember, not every global company is a brand. For example, Proctor and Gamble owns over 80 brands.

4Ps Analysis:

• Briefly discuss how the brand tailors its product offerings to meet the needs and preferences of different international markets. Focus on key aspects such as product design, features, and quality.
• Provide an overview of the pricing strategy. Discuss how pricing varies across different markets and the factors influencing these decisions.
• Evaluate the distribution strategy. Highlight the main distribution channels and logistical considerations for ensuring product availability.
• Assess the promotional strategies used by the brand. Discuss how promotional tactics are adapted to fit cultural norms and media consumption habits of different countries.

New Product Launch:

• Identify the consumer needs or problems the new product aims to address.
• Discuss how consumers might seek information about the new product.
• Analyze how consumers evaluate the new product against competing products.
• Examine the factors influencing the consumers decision to purchase the new product.
• Explore how the brand plans to ensure customer satisfaction and foster loyalty after the purchase.

Begin with an introduction. Support your journal with at least one source. Your journal must be at least two pages in length, not counting the required references page. Follow APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment.

Hopefully, you have done some preliminary reading about your person (from secondary sources) in addition to the images about your person. Try to read more. See what basic informational articles that the CCP Databases (such as EBSCOhost and ProQuest) have your person or topic. Next you will start gathering primary sources by your person or topic. Remember that your research paper should not be a report on your person or your topic. You need to take a position on your person or topic. For example, what was he or she most passionate about? How do you know that? What documents should this and how do they show it?

Discussion Section Literature Review Paper

Purpose:

The discussion section is where you bring together and interpret your findings from the literature review. You’ll explore what the research says about your topic, highlight patterns, strengths, and gaps in the evidence, and talk about the implications for nursing practice, education, or policy.

Assignment Instructions:

Write a 23 page Discussion Section (not including title or reference page) that addresses the following:

1. Summary of Findings:

• Summarize the major themes or findings from your reviewed studies.
• Highlight similarities and differences across the research.

1. Interpretation and Analysis:

• Explain what these findings mean in the context of your research question or topic.
• Discuss any patterns, inconsistencies, or emerging trends.
• Address the overall strength and quality of the evidence.

1. Implications for Nursing Practice:

• Explain how the evidence can be applied to nursing practice, patient outcomes, education, or policy.
• Discuss how nurses can integrate these findings into evidence-based care.

1. Limitations and Gaps:

• Identify limitations of the studies or gaps in the existing literature.
• Suggest areas for future research.

Formatting Requirements:

• Recommended length: 2-3 pages (excluding title and references).
• Use APA 7th edition format (Times New Roman, 12 pt, double-spaced, with title and reference pages).
• Include in-text citations and a reference list for all sources cited.
• Resources need to citated appropriately
• AI usage will be monitored by faculty via Turnitin
• The similarity and AI report for this assignment will be reviewed, and points may be deducted if needed for excessive elevations.
• Individuals over 90% AI usage are subject to Academic Integrity violations
• Tone: Formal academic tone, written in third person (avoid I or we)
• Assignment will be accepted and graded via Turnitin. Submitting your assignment through other methods will not be accepted (email, in-person delivery, Canvas Messenger, etc.).

The PICO question that drives this annotated bibliography is: In healthcare

professionals (P), does the use of artificial intelligence-based decision support systems (I)

• compared to traditional clinical methods (C) improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce

TURNIT-IN REPORT REQUIRED FOR AI PLAGARISM PLEASE THIS IS WHAT MY PROFESSOR USES AND IS REQUIRED TO BE UNDER 15% NO EXCEPTIONS