Category: Select subject(s)

Follow instructions and complete assignment

I would like to use Apple for the below assignment. This is important as I must keep the same company for all future assignments.

Consider a company you are a part of and the family of products your company offers to the marketplace. If you are not part of a company, choose one to work with. As the marketing manager, you have been tasked with presenting a competitive analysis to your department regarding how competition is driving your product development.

In no more than five sentences, describe the company and what the product offerings are. For example, does your company produce consumer electronics? Perhaps, it is in the clothing industry? Could it be in consumer consumables, e.g., beverages, snack foods, etc? Note that moving forward, when reference is made to “your company”, this is the company you will focus on and work with. Anticipating that you will be pulled into the innovative product development process, conduct a market analysis.

Understanding the competition and the market environment are pivotal to developing an innovative product. Misunderstanding the market or the competition may lead to a lack of product-market fit and the inability to compete. In this assignment, you will:

• Identify your company and its products
• Analyze your competition through SWOT analyses, and
• Apply that knowledge to develop your company strategy.

Identify two of your competitors and name them.

• For each competitor, conduct a SWOT analysis, i.e., determine (i) their strengths, (ii) weaknesses, (iii) opportunities, and (iv) threats, using the template included in this week’s resources.
• Discuss your findings.

In your ongoing effort to gather marketing intelligence on your competitors, include a description of (a) the market size, (b) market segments, and (c) any external factors that can impact the market you three companies compete in (e.g., economic, seasons, etc.)

Note that parts (a) and (b) focus only on your competitors.

• Now consider your own company.
• How many different segments are you targeting with your present product offerings?
• Describe each segment’s demographics, lifestyles, purchasing power, buying patterns, etc.

Requirements

Length: 5 – 7 pages, excluding cover and reference pages.

References: Include a minimum of 5 scholarly references.

Follow instructions and complete assignment

Reflective Critical Analysis

Here are clear instructions for the reflective analysis:

1. Purpose

> Write a reflective analysis that demonstrates your professional growth from RPN to BScN/RN, using placement and work experiences to show development toward entry-to-practice competencies.

2. Experiences to include

>Clinical placements: PACU and biologic infusion clinic & Professional Practice.

>Professional work: Registered Practical Nurse (RPN) experience in the Emergency Department.

>Academic/professional activities: designing a vascular skills day for nursing staff using current evidence and writing an evidencebased policy for nursing practice – TPN.

3. Focus/theme

>Choose a central nursing concept (suggested: connection or caring theory) or another professional aspect (professionalism, collaborative practice, communication, or evidencebased practice).

>Use that concept as the lens to interpret and integrate the listed experiences.

4. Reflection tasks

> Describe specific incidents or activities from each setting (PACU, infusion clinic, ED, skills day, policy writing) that illustrate challenges, decisions, and outcomes.

>Analyze how these experiences influenced your thinking, values, and practice related to the chosen concept.

>Identify skills and behaviours you developed (clinical judgment, communication, leadership, teaching, policy literacy, teamwork, ethical reasoning).

> Explain how these changes show progression toward the BScN RN role.

5. Theory and evidence

>Integrate one relevant nursing theory (e.g., caring/connection theory) and connect theory to concrete examples.

>Use at least 23 contemporary, evidencebased sources to support claims about practice, teaching, or policy decisions (cite in-text and list references).

6. Competency mapping

>Explicitly map your reflections to the College of Nurses of Ontario (CNO) entrytopractice competencies: identify which competencies were demonstrated, developed, or require further growth; give specific examples from your experiences for each mapped competency.

7. Structure and length

>Suggested structure: Introduction (theme + overview), Narrative descriptions (by setting/activity), Theoretical and evidence integration, Competency mapping, Personal development plan (strengths, gaps, actions), Conclusion.

> Length: 1,2001,800 words (or specify your preferred word count).

8. Tone and style

>Reflective, analytical, evidencebased, and professional.

> Use first person for reflection but maintain academic rigor.

9. Learning plan

Conclude with 35 SMART learning objectives for continued transition to RN practice, linked to CNO competencies and grounded in the reflections.

10. Referencing and formatting

Use APA (or your programs required style) for references.

Include in-text citations for theory and evidence sources and a reference list.

In this assignment you will write a short 2 page (single spaced 12 pt font) reflection on the Case Study of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant (the debate over California’s energy future). In your reflection please address:

1. Please summarize what is happening with the Diablo Canyon Power Plant.
2. Who are the main stakeholders involved?
3. What variables may affect the decision making process for these key stakeholders?
4. How federalism contributed to the dynamics of the nature of decision making in this context?

Evaluation Criteria

CriterionDescriptionPointsAccuracy of Case SummaryClearly and accurately summarizes what is happening with the Diablo Canyon Power Plant and the core policy debate over Californias energy future.10Stakeholders IdentificationIdentifies the main stakeholders involved (e.g., state and federal actors, utilities, communities, interest groups) and clearly explains their roles.10Analysis of Decision-Making VariablesThoughtfully analyzes key variables shaping stakeholder decision-making (e.g., political, economic, legal, environmental, safety, timing, or public opinion factors).10Federalism and Governance AnalysisClearly explains how federalism contributes to the dynamics of decision-making in this case, including the interaction of federal, state, and other governing authorities.10Clarity, Organization & Writing QualityReflection is well organized, clearly written, and appropriate for a policy audience; ideas flow logically and writing is polished.10Total50

Please make changes to APA formatting and resubmit prior to sending this assessment to a secondary reviewer. update paper with APA changes. Competency 5 Write in accordance with the academic and professional requirements of the discipline, ensuring appropriate structure, grammar, usage, and style. Criterion Writing: Writing uses proper paragraph development, transitions, academic tone with proper grammar, usage, mechanics, and APA formatting. Your Result: NOT DEMONSTRATED No, criterion was not demonstrated. Faculty Comments: Please watch capitalization of words- Many words are capitalized that do not need to be double spacing throughout Indent paragraph per APA one inch margins Reference title of article, words after colon capitalized

Overview: Technology makes vast amounts of information (and misinformation) readily available. The challenge is navigating this sea of information. Our goal for your general science education is to develop your scientific literacy. A critical skill you must develop is the ability to find reputable sources of academically and scientifically credible information. There are many sources of high-quality scientific information on the open web; you just need to learn how to spot them by identifying any “green” or “red” flags.

Instructions: There are two required elements to every weekly discussion:

• Main Post (See Requirements section below for details)
• Weeks 2-8 (due by Wednesday)
• Reply Posts (See Requirements section below for details)
• Weeks 1- 8 (due by Sunday)
• Reply to a minimum of two classmates’ main posts
• Monitor your main post and reply to those who commented within the active discussion week
• Participate throughout the week (on more than one day)

Evaluation: Refer to the for a detailed breakdown of the grading criteria requirements. Meeting the minimum requirements noted above will not result in a score of 100. To understand how to maximize your overall Discussion grade, I suggest you refer to the “Exemplary” criterion column in the grading rubric to learn more about what is expected. NOTE: All listed requirements in a given criterion box must be met to achieve that criterion score. Contact me should you have any questions.

Late posts: Main and reply posts submitted after the scheduled due dates may be assessed a penalty according to the late policy in the syllabus.

Main Post Requirements:

• First, decide which species of organism you will choose for your Course Project topic. (Only one species!) Share your species’ correct scientific name.
• This species will be the SAME TOPIC you will research throughout all your Course Project assignment steps through Week 8.
• Next, select only ONE article from a source of information relevant to any of the topics and subtopics of your species (Physical Description, Life Cycle/Reproduction, Structure/Function, Energy Ecology, and Habitat) from the open web or the Trefry Library.
• Note: Our Week 2 Discussion helps students kick off researching their selected species. I strongly advise you to review the Outline assignment instructions for more details.
• Use the name of your article and its source as the title of your initial post (e.g., “Bare-nosed Wombat – Australian Museum.”) You cannot use a source that one of your classmates has already used, or you will not receive credit.
• Recall that Wikipedia is not considered a credible source for our purposes and should not be used in class.
• Evaluate your selected source and write it in APA reference list format:

1. Evaluate the source by explaining why it is or is not an academically and scientifically credible source of information. Do not summarize the article or focus your post on details about your organism! The focus of your post should be on identifying three pieces of evidence and explaining your rationale as to why each is evidence for or against credibility.

A. Provide a minimum of three pieces of evidence to support your thoughts and state if they are green or red flag examples.

Some evidence to consider is the credibility of the author as a subject matter expert, the quality of the reference sources included in the article or lack thereof, the credibility of the publisher or website, etc. Review the and (Criteria to Determine Credibility).

Green-Flag evidence example:

• Author is a subject-matter expert (e.g., “Dr. Mary Smith holds a Ph.D. in zoology.”)

Red-Flag evidence example:

• Author is not a subject-matter expert and does not provide academically and scientifically credible reference sources. (e.g., “John Jones is a freelance writer with a journalism degree and did not include any credible reference sources.”)

B. Based on the evidence you have provided, state if you feel this source is an overall credible source.

Examples:

• “All three pieces of evidence I found were green flags; therefore, I feel this is a credible source overall.”
• “All three pieces of evidence I found were red flags; therefore, I feel this is not a credible source overall.”
• “The evidence I found was a mix of red and green flags. Because Wikipedia was one of the sources noted in the article, I believe this is not a credible source overall.”

2. Provide attribution for your source, including a functioning URL for classmates and your instructor to reach it for review.

• You can opt to practice your APA formatting if you’d like, considering you will be required to use it in your upcoming assignments.
• Use our Trefry Library APA Style resource:
• And/or use the Owl at Purdue site for assistance with APA format:
• Additional Resources: Access the Natural Sciences Program Guide from the Trefry Online Library at. Select the “Websites” tab. Review the links in the “Internet Research: Tips for Science Students” box.

Reply Posts Requirements: Replies should be focused on the week’s topic and biology. They should be substantive* and demonstrate understanding to be eligible for maximum credit. Respectful and professional discussion is expected.

Important! Your replies should address the following for Week 2:

• When substantively replying to your classmates’ main posts, review their source critically, explain whether you agree or disagree with their assessment, and explain why. It is not sufficient to simply agree and reiterate their points.

*”Substantive” means comments that contribute something new and relevant to the discussion. Thus, a reply that simply conveys agreement or reiterates the original poster’s thoughts is not substantive. Rather, a best-practice reply:

• contributes a new idea or perspective
• asks good follow-up questions to points made
• provides examples or illustrations of a key point
• points out inconsistencies in an argument
• shares a new and relevant resource to further the discussion

Attribution Requirements and Academic Honesty: It is expected that most discussion topics will require the use of course materials or other outside sources. Those must be properly attributed so that the reader understands the source of the information (e.g., source URL). Cutting-and-pasting text from any source is unacceptable unless properly displayed as an attributed direct quote; however, the use of direct quotes should be very limited (less than 10%). It is expected that the bulk of any post will be in your own words (paraphrase). Please review the sections on in the Student Handbook, as you are required to comply with the standards described therein.

Please remember that, per the Student Handbook, “…content generated by an Artificial Intelligence provider and representing them to be one’s own” is considered cheating. Per the APUS Gen-AI Policy, “When requested, students must reveal how and to what extent Gen-AI tools were used. Failure to adhere to this Gen-AI Policy or any other policies and guidelines may result in disciplinary action up to and including dismissal from the University.”

Rubrics

• GE-EVSP Discussion Rubric (JAN 2024)
• reply to:
• Sokoya Godfrey posted Mar 9, 2026 5:17 PM
• Hello all,
• For my Course Project, I was between the Common Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and the Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi). I couldnt decide, so I had my nephew pick for me without knowing what for. So my Course Project will be about the Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi)! I found a source that didnt seem credible right away, and although I could have listed all the red flags of that source, I decided to hunt for a credible source that I could actually use towards the progression of my research, as well as fulfill the needs of this weeks discussion.
• The source Ive chosen for this evaluation is the Smithsonians National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute. The first green-flag evidence example Id like to address is that the Smithsonian name is well-known in hosting fact-based historical and scientific museums, zoos, and even television broadcasting, making it trustworthy. Another green flag Id like to point out is that this is an educational institute website. This being a .edu site shows that it isnt just something someone out there was able to throw on the internet without peer reviews and detail-oriented, factual information. Thirdly, I did a general Google search of Smithsonian. I came across a government site () providing more backing to its credibility by stating, The Smithsonian is the worlds largest museum, education, and research complex,… Lastly, my chosen source has a Cite this page section directly after the information provided. It may not be a 100% green flag, but, in my experience, this is something I often find within peer-reviewed articles, books, and journals. Overall, I feel this is a credible source based on the three (and a possible) green flags found looking only at the external factors as mentioned by Dr. Carter in her READ ME FIRST thread in this weeks discussion. I am quite sure I will be using this as a starting point for my research on my chosen organism.
• -Koya
• Resources
• Eastern Indigo snake. Smithsonians National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute. (2016, April 25).
• Smithsonian Institution. USAGov. (n.d.).
• 1 Unread
• 1
• Unread
• 1 Replies
• 1
• Replies
• 2 Views
• 2
• Views
• View profile card for Alisha Beertzer
• Last post 7 hours ago by Alisha Beertzer

Week two discussion

• Contains unread posts
• Elizabeth Ward posted Mar 9, 2026 7:24 PM
• Hello Everyone,
• The spieces I will be researching will be Macrochelys temminckii better known as an alligator snapping turtle. The first time I saw the back sticking up out of the water ,I thought it was a dinosaur. The key physical trait are the shell have three large raised ridges that run down the back, its head is large shaped like a triangular with a hooked beak, tongue is pink worm like lure, tail is long heavily armored with saw like scales, eyes are small in a side like position, it is much larger and heavier than other turtles. They have muscular legs and webbed toes. The female lenght can reach up to 22 inches and weight up to 62 pounds and the male can be 29 inches long and weight 249.
• (231.07 KB)

Company: 3M (MMM)

Identify a Potential Research Topic

NOTE: Your topic needs to be something you can research from sources you find in the library – you will NOT be running a research study.

Write a one-page proposal that includes the following:

A brief overview of the topic.

The relevance of the topic to current trends in healthcare administration.

A clear and concise problem statement, purpose statement, and research question or hypothesis.

Explain why you believe this topic is feasible for a research paper, considering the availability of secondary data and resources.

NO USE OF AI – No AI-Generated Content

Submit your proposal as a DOC or PDF file.

IDEALLY – Your Research Paper should be in excess of 2500 words – the body of the paper should be at least 2,000 words to treat your subject and research fully.

Getting Started with Your Capstone Project

This week marks the beginning of your capstone experience, the final opportunity to demonstrate what you have learned throughout your undergraduate studies in healthcare administration. The assignment is to write a one page proposal that introduces your chosen research topic and lays the groundwork for the project you will develop over the next several weeks. Although the assignment may appear brief, the decisions you make now will influence the direction and success of your entire paper. This is your opportunity to show initiative, define a clear focus, and begin thinking like a healthcare professional engaged in evidence based problem solving.

Choosing a Topic You Can Grow With

Begin by selecting a topic that truly matters to you. This topic will remain with you throughout the course, so choose something meaningful and personally engaging. Your topic must fall within the field of healthcare administration and might include issues related to policy, finance, workforce management, technology, quality improvement, access to care, or organizational leadership.

Narrow your focus as early as possible. Rather than selecting a broad concept like healthcare reform, consider something more specific such as the effect of value based reimbursement on community hospital budgets or the impact of Medicaid expansion in rural areas. A focused topic is more manageable within the course timeline and is easier to support with academic research.

Writing a Clear Overview

The first paragraph of your proposal should provide a brief overview of the topic. Explain what the topic is, why it interests you, and how it connects to the broader field of healthcare administration. Keep your writing clear and accessible, using plain language that demonstrates understanding. Avoid unnecessary technical terms unless they are essential and clearly defined.

Explaining Why the Topic Matters

Next, describe why your topic is relevant to current issues in healthcare administration. Relevance can come from recent changes in policy, evolving trends in care delivery, emerging technologies, or ongoing challenges within healthcare systems. This is your opportunity to connect personal interest to professional importance. A reader should come away from this section understanding why your topic deserves serious academic attention.

Defining Your Focus with Clarity

Once you have introduced the topic and its relevance, define the direction of your research using three components: a problem statement, a purpose statement, and either a research question or a hypothesis.

The problem statement describes a specific issue or challenge in the healthcare system that you intend to explore. This could involve gaps in care, inefficiencies in management, or barriers to patient access. The goal is to clearly outline what is not working and why it requires further investigation.

The purpose statement explains the intention behind your paper. Common purposes include analyzing a process, evaluating an intervention, reviewing best practices, or comparing policy alternatives. This statement signals your goal and gives shape to your research efforts.

The research question or hypothesis then provides structure to your inquiry. A research question is open ended and invites exploration, such as how hospital staffing levels influence patient safety outcomes. A hypothesis is more predictive, such as increased nurse staffing reduces patient falls in medical surgical units. Both forms are acceptable, but your focus must be specific, measurable, and rooted in scholarly literature.

Considering Practicality and Feasibility

Feasibility plays a crucial role in selecting your topic. A topic that seems interesting may still present problems if there are not enough high quality sources available. Since this is a secondary research paper, you will work with published materials such as peer reviewed journal articles, government reports, white papers, and academic books. You are not expected to gather new data or conduct original interviews.

Think carefully about whether your topic can be supported with existing research. Test your topic by searching the college library and academic databases. If relevant and recent sources are easy to locate, you are likely on the right track. If sources are too scarce, outdated, or unrelated, you may need to adjust your approach.

Strategies for Success

Start this assignment by reflecting on what matters to you in healthcare. Review recent news, revisit your course readings, or scan academic journals for inspiration. Once you have a topic in mind, test its viability by doing some preliminary research. This will help you avoid problems later in the course.

Keep your proposal tightly focused and clearly organized. Each paragraph should serve a specific purpose and contribute to a deeper understanding of your topic. Avoid vague language or filler content. Clarity, purpose, and feasibility are more valuable than length.

Looking Ahead

This proposal forms the foundation for your capstone project. In the coming weeks, you will build an annotated bibliography, synthesize themes, draft and revise body sections, and produce a complete secondary research paper. The choices you make in this first week will shape the ease and quality of that journey.

Questions or uncertainties should be addressed early. Reach out for support if you feel unsure about your topic or approach. A strong and thoughtful proposal is the first step toward a successful and rewarding capstone experience. Commit to the work with care, curiosity, and confidence in your ability to grow through the research process.

EXAMPLES:

Example 1: Nurse Staffing and Patient Safety

Hospitals across the country face ongoing challenges in maintaining adequate nurse staffing levels. As workforce shortages continue to affect health systems, especially in urban emergency departments and rural critical access hospitals, many facilities struggle to balance cost containment with patient care quality. This topic is especially timely as hospitals attempt to recover from the impacts of the COVID pandemic, which accelerated nurse turnover and increased demand for contract labor. The intersection of staffing and patient safety is a widely discussed issue in healthcare administration, policy, and workforce planning.

The problem addressed in this proposal is that nurse staffing shortages may directly contribute to negative patient outcomes such as falls, medication errors, hospital acquired infections, and longer lengths of stay. The literature suggests that as nurse to patient ratios rise, the risk to patient safety also increases. Yet many hospitals continue to operate with minimum staffing levels due to financial constraints and workforce shortages.

The purpose of this research paper is to examine how nurse staffing levels affect patient safety outcomes in acute care hospitals. This paper will focus specifically on studies that evaluate the relationship between nurse to patient ratios and adverse events, using evidence from peer reviewed journals and hospital reports.

The central research question guiding this inquiry is: How do varying nurse to patient ratios affect the rate of adverse events in hospital settings?

This topic is feasible for a secondary research paper because there is a large body of literature available on both staffing models and patient safety indicators. Multiple government and academic sources offer current data, including reports from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators, and peer reviewed nursing journals. The topic is also well supported by policy research related to nurse staffing laws in states such as California.

Example 2: Telehealth and Access to Care in Rural Communities

The use of telehealth has grown dramatically in recent years, particularly as a response to the COVID pandemic. While initially used to manage safety and reduce exposure, many providers have continued offering telehealth services as a way to improve access, convenience, and efficiency. In rural communities where healthcare access has always been a challenge, telehealth presents a potentially transformative solution for reaching patients who would otherwise face significant barriers to care.

This topic is relevant to healthcare administration because access to care remains one of the core challenges in healthcare delivery. Administrators must navigate issues of reimbursement, licensure, broadband infrastructure, and patient engagement when implementing telehealth services. The problem explored in this paper is that many rural residents still face difficulty accessing specialty care due to geographic distance and limited provider availability. Without creative solutions such as telehealth, these communities remain underserved and at risk for poorer health outcomes.

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the role of telehealth in improving access to specialty care in rural communities. The focus will be on determining whether telehealth has helped close the gap in service availability and whether it has had a measurable impact on patient access.

The central research question is: In what ways has the implementation of telehealth improved access to specialty care in rural areas?

This topic is well suited to a secondary research approach. A wide range of government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and academic researchers have produced studies on rural healthcare access and the expansion of telehealth. Sources such as the Rural Health Research Gateway, Health Resources and Services Administration, and peer reviewed journals on rural health policy provide a strong foundation for this project. Multiple case studies and evaluations of telehealth pilot programs also offer detailed data and analysis.

Example 3: Financial Strain and Nonprofit Hospitals

Nonprofit hospitals play a central role in the American healthcare system, especially in serving vulnerable populations. These hospitals are expected to balance fiscal responsibility with their mission to provide community benefit. Over the past decade, many nonprofit hospitals have struggled to maintain financial sustainability due to declining reimbursement rates, the rise in uncompensated care, and increasing operational costs. As margins narrow, administrators must make difficult choices about staffing, capital investment, and charity care.

This topic is timely and relevant for healthcare administration because financial performance, especially in nonprofit settings, affects an organizations ability to invest in care delivery and fulfill its mission. The problem at the heart of this paper is that many nonprofit hospitals are caught between their legal and ethical responsibilities to provide community benefit and the economic pressures that threaten their long term viability.

The purpose of this paper is to explore how nonprofit hospitals are managing financial sustainability while continuing to meet their obligations for charity care and other community benefit programs. The research will look at financial strategies, leadership decisions, and policy supports that allow these hospitals to balance mission with solvency.

The guiding research question is: How are nonprofit hospitals balancing financial stability with the delivery of uncompensated care in underserved communities?

This topic is appropriate for secondary research and is supported by a rich collection of articles, policy briefs, IRS filings, and healthcare finance journals. Sources such as the American Hospital Association, Kaiser Family Foundation, and the Healthcare Financial Management Association offer valuable data and analysis. Because this issue affects hospitals nationwide, the research base includes case studies, national surveys, and public data that make it possible to examine both broad trends and specific examples.