Category: Select subject(s)

Discussion Thread: Article Peer Review & Legal/Ethical Discussion

In the previous module you submitted a draft manuscript along with a copy of the manuscript guidelines/requirements in a student-paired group.

In this module you will review each others draft manuscript from the group room against the submitted manuscript submission guidelines, which is also submitted to the group room. Based on this review, each student will post the initial post including the following:

• Name of student author of the draft manuscript reviewed
• Title of the manuscript/ Type of manuscript editorial, research brief, narrative, reflective article, etc.
• Journal manuscript will be submitted to, along with submission guidelines.

You should post a professionally written peer review of the manuscript including a brief overview of the manuscript, areas of strength for the manuscript, clarity, and areas that could be strengthened. All feedback must be written in a supportive manner to enhance the work of the student. Also provide thoughts about the value of a peer review for professional manuscripts for publication.

As professional nurses contributing the body of literature also provide your thoughts on legal and ethical consideration topics such as transference of copyright, open access journals and avoiding predatory journals and how you will protect professional expectations.

You will create a PowerPoint presentation with a realistic case study and include appropriate and pertinent clinical information based on the DSM5-TR and current US clinical guidelines to support the case:

1. Subjective data:

• Chief Complaint
• Demographics
• History of the Present Illness (HPI) includes the presenting problem and the 8 dimensions of the problem. See an example of the correct way to document the psychiatric HPI
• Review of Systems (ROS)

1. Objective data:

• Current Medications
• Allergies
• Past medical history
• Family psychiatric history
• Social history
• Labs and screening tools
• Vital signs
• Mental status exam

1. Assessment:

• Primary Diagnosis – DSM5 only
• Differential diagnosis – DSM5 only

1. Plan:

• Pharmacologic treatment plan
• Non-pharmacologic treatment plan
• Follow up plan

1. Other:

• Incorporation of current US clinical guidelines
• Integration of research articles
• Role of the nurse practitioner

Submission Instructions:

• The presentation is original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citation of references.
• The presentation should consist of 10-15 slides. There should be no narration recorded for this submission. Submit the slides only.
• Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).
• Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism through Turnitin.

Although the 6th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right to a trial by jury, trials are becoming increasingly rare. Plea bargaining has become a dominant fixture in courtrooms across the country, and it is used to help ensure that cases are processed and disposed efficiently. By most estimates, fewer than 5% of criminal defendants are currently convicted at trial–the rest plead guilty.

Is this a good thing or a bad thing? Proponents of plea bargaining argue that this system benefits everyone involved, including prosecutors, defendants, defense attorneys, judges, and crime victims. Critics of plea bargaining, however, argue that plea bargaining undermines due process and is a tool used by prosecutors to secure convictions, even among defendants who are innocent.

For this assignment, students will write a short paper (2-3 double-spaced pages, 500-700 words) that outlines the pros and cons of plea bargaining. To help orient yourself to this topic, you should begin by reading the three articles attached below, which provide some background information on the state of plea bargaining. For your paper, you also will need locate at least TWO additional research studies published in peer-reviewed academic journals that discuss issue(s) related to plea bargains and courts heavy reliance on them.

Your paper should include four components:

1. A discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of plea bargaining
2. An overview of the specific arguments or findings from the academic sources you located
3. A summary of your own opinions on whether plea bargaining is a good thing or a bad thing
4. A “References” page with proper APA-style citations of your two additional articles

Science Inquiry Lesson Part 2 – (NAEYC 1c, 3c, 3d, 4c, 5a, 5b, 5c; CAEP 1, 2, 3, 4; NYSTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; Mercy ILO 2, 4; NSTA 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8; SLO 1-5) Remember to upload Inquiry Lessons 1 and 2 to Chalk & Wire after 3/10/2026 Assignment: Candidates will plan a 2nd inquiry-based science lesson, as part of their intermediate-level field work requirements. This lesson must be a different lesson but connected to the same unit topic you selected for Inquiry Lesson Part One. What would be a next logical lesson in this sequence? This will allow you to consider how lessons can be scaffolded or sequenced. ****For fully online courses: In lieu of acting out this lesson, the candidates should include more details than a typical lesson plan. Candidates should include scripts of what the teacher will ask, how s/he will respond, etc. Think of this assignment as a lesson plan “screen play.” It should describe the lesson in enough detail that one could visualize being there and watching it happen and with evidence of rich academic language used throughout (use Academic Language supports provided by your Instructor). In your script, please include a minimum of two guiding questions you would ask during the: Engage, Explore, Explain and Extend, (minimum of 8 questions total). Additionally, please describe how this dialogue you will cultivate connects to prior knowledge and aims to create a deeper understanding of the lesson objective(s). Attached Below is Part 1 of Lesson Plan to go from.

Hi i just need my paper reworded in own words to sound natural no plagerism or Ai the words in bold black can stay the same everything else needs to be reword

READ WATCH Record a 5-10 minute video summarizing and evaluating the Derek Thompson reading above. Organize your presentation into 4 parts: Introduction- what is your presentation about? will you be agreeing or disagreeing with the author? Summary- provide concise overview quote the reading several times cite relevant statistics from the reading define important concepts Evaluation- explain why you agree or disagree with the author use evidence to support your argument evidence could be from personal experience, family history/stories, news articles, statistics, other relevant academic research etc. Conclusion- Recap main points from your presentation Discuss questions that could be explored at another time or connect topic to other things you’ve learned in the course

Our focus this week is on domestic violence and the effect on children and families. Patrick Stewart talks about his childhood experiences. (Amnesty International UK, 2009). The transcript of the video is attached below. Provide a detailed comment on what struck you personally as important in the video. Incorporate material from our readings and outside sources that would support and align with your views on this topic. Align your posting to the discussion rubric and make sure you support your writing with facts. Your writing cannot be solely opinion. Do not copy the question back into your reply. References Amnesty International UK ( 2009, October 9) Patrick Stewart on violence against women. Retrieved from

I feel good in this works

Choose a kind of childhood trauma and address; How common is it for children to experience this kind of trauma? Are there specific effects that result from this kind of childhood trauma? What kinds of behaviors do children who have undergone this kind of trauma demonstrate? Give at least one example of an intervention that is based on science and has been used to address the issues found in children as a result of the trauma. Briefly discuss the overall results of this intervention. Natural disasters Terrorism Illness Abuse Divorce Economic stress Military family stress, PTSD Please review the grading rubric carefully to see the requirements of the assignment. Important: MS word or RTF format only. Double spaced. APA format. (Use the APA template)

Assignment Details:

For this assignment, you will write a historical review of a disorder of childhood (see pp. 3599 of your DSM-5-TR). The disorder you choose must be one of the neurodevelopment disorders discussed in this module.

• CHILDHOOD DISORDER: Autism spectrum disorder

You will review how the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of your chosen disorder has changed over time. Be sure to address the following questions in your paper:

What changes have been made to the disorder, as published in previous and current versions of the DSM? Focus on changes for diagnostic symptoms in your paper. What was added, deleted, or modified?

What assessment tools have been utilized for this disorder, and what changes have been made to assessment for this disorder over time? What is the current gold standard for assessment of this disorder?

What therapeutic interventions have been used to treat this disorder, and what changes have been over time in terms of treatment options? What is the current gold standard for treatment of this disorder?

Your paper should be formatted in APA 7th edition and must be a minimum of 5 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages. No abstract is required for this assignment. You should have at least 5 peer-reviewed references. Your DSM-5-TR can be a starting point for your research but cannot be used as the sole resource for your paper.