Category: Select subject(s)

1. How does the cultural deviant perspective view white middle class families? 2. Why are there gender differences in life span? 3. According to the triangular theory of love, what are the three components of consummate love? make sure it is not AI or plagrism please.

see attached file…. Read pages 832-837….https://prodk12.kitaboo.com/index.html

Being able to conduct a root cause analysis (RCA) of a problem you are facing and determine potential solutions is a skill you will use often as a criminal justice professional. A very common issue, and one that is paramount to solving crimes, is witness cooperation. This issue can occur in any of the following criminal justice subdomains: law enforcement, courts, and corrections.

In this assignment, you will use concepts you learned this week to analyze response strategies for addressing an issue with a witness in a criminal case.

Preparation

Select and research 1 criminal case where witness cooperation was an issue for investigators.

Assessment Deliverables

This summative assessment has 2 deliverables in which you will conduct a root cause analysis (RCA) and convey it through:

• Part 1: 10 -slide presentation
• Part 2: 200 word executive summary

Using the prompts within Parts 1 and 2, develop your presentation and executive summary deliverables from the perspective of a criminal justice professional who has been asked to conduct the analysis of your selected criminal case for your police chief as part of the agencys quality-control procedures.

Part 1: RCA Presentation

Create a 10 slide presentation in which you examine how RCA can be used to address the issue with the witness.

Include the following in your presentation:

• Summarize the facts of the selected criminal case.
• Describe the challenges investigators faced in dealing with witnesses to the crime.
• Conduct an RCA using the 5 whys approach to analyze the root cause of a witness cooperation issue.
• Summarize your analysis and conclusions to identify issues with witness cooperation in a criminal case.
• Propose 2 appropriate criminal justice responses to the witness cooperation issue and explain how they can be used to improve communication and cooperation with witnesses during future criminal investigations. Support your ideas by explaining why your proposed improvements would be successful.

Include a references slide.

Cite at least 3 scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook, to support your presentation.

Format citations and references according to APA guidelines.

Part 2: RCA Executive Summary

Write a 200 word executive summary in which you summarize your RCA and provide 1 or 2 action steps your police chief should take to implement your suggestions in future criminal investigations.

Format your summary according to APA guidelines.

Submit your presentation and summary.

I just need my work to be revised/rewritten. I need the information to stay the same, I just need it to not be showing as AI generated.

How do villains in film, television, and literature function as mirrors or foils to the hero? How

do rhetorical strategies (character dialogue, symbolism, visual contrast) emphasize these

relationships? Examine iconic hero-villain duos such as Sherlock Holmes vs. Moriarty, Harry

Potter vs. Voldemort, or The Doctor vs. The Master (Doctor Who). Identify rhetorical techniques

such as juxtaposition, irony, and color symbolism in costume and cinematography. Explore how

villains test or reshape the moral compass of heroes through their interactions.

Purpose: The purpose of this discussion is to re-evaluate the students’ understanding of God as the Creator.

Initial Post : This is a two part initial post, with each part being a separate paragraph of 150 words:

• Paragraph 1 (150 words): In the Appendix of God Behaving Badly, Lamb offers four actions that God does in his chapter on Noah and the Flood. What picture does he paint about God and His relationship with humanity? According to Lambs first chapter, in what ways has humanity misunderstood God?
• Paragraph 2 (150 words): Lamb is also striving to overcome the belief that God is harsh and vindictive. If you were to perceive God as fascinating, relational, and good, how would that affect your life? What would you do differently?

Be sure to cite and reference both scripture and your textbook(s) in your posts.

Rubric: Quality of Post: Student referenced the readings and resources for the week in an integrated, thoughtful response.

References:

Book: Lamb, D. T. (2022). God behaving badly: Is the God of the Old Testament angry, sexist and racist? InterVarsity Press. ISBN: 9781514003503

Book: Pemberton, G. (2015). The God who saves. Leafwood Publishers & ACU Press. ISBN: 9780891124825

Bible: Coogan, M. D. (2010). The New Oxford Annotated Bible: New Revised Standard Version with the Apocrypha (4th ed). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199370504

. Introduction You are required to produce a 6,000-word dissertation of academic quality, based on independent research that includes an artefact of up to 5,000 words or the equivalent of efforts (please see Project Handbook). In the dissertation, you will demonstrate your ability to identify and systematically study a problem as well as select, implement, and evaluate an appropriate approach to solving the problem. The subject of your project must be related to your degree title, and to the outcomes of that title. More information is provided in the Project Handbook. 2. Valid Artefact All projects are expected to produce an artefact. An artefact is defined as a self-existing product of the project with a view to subsequent use. Your project involves the research, design, implementation, and evaluation of an artefact that solves a particular problem and answers novel research questions relevant to your course of study. In other words, a project should have an artefact as a technical solution to the related problem. You may build an artefact or write an artefact based on the valid project definition for your degree title. If you write an artefact, you must make sure the artefact is actionable, which means the artefact can be exploited technically. For more details on artefacts related to your degree

No instructions provided

Extra Credit article Due Mar 13 by 11:59pm Points 0 Submitting a file upload Available Feb 16 at 12am – Mar 13 at 11:59pm Extra Credit assignment – this is optional, it can only help your grade Worth up to 20 points You will need to write a 2 page paper about a SCIENCE article written within the last year or 2 if possible. Find an article that relates to any content covered in the course. Your sources may include scientific journals, news magazines, or general science magazines. Articles from newspapers such as the New York Times or USA Today will also be allowed (must be a MAJOR newspaper). Articles may come from websites associated with the magazines or papers.( to an external site. or to an external site.) Assignments need to contain the following information: Cover page, First page is a summary of the article and the second page is your reflection/opinion on the matter and how it relates to the content in the course. Also include a reference page at the end. The information needs to be a minimum of 2 pages, typed, double spaced, 12 point font. This will be due by Mar 13th through canvas. This is optional and will not hurt your grade if you do not complete it, but will help you. Especially if you have missed a quiz or assignment. You can only do this once for extra credit.

add images too and wrap the text around them