Instructions: Students are invited to submit an approximately 2000-word research paper that asserts an argumentative thesis statement in response to an empirical research question in Canadian political science. Submissions should include engagement with at least 5 scholarly sources.

Argumentation: The goal is to provide a clear and concise response to one of the chosen research questions posted below, backed by rational consideration of available evidence. This exercise is designed to help develop research and writing skills that requires consulting the scientific literature to support an argument. A counterargument and/or limitation to the thesis statement should be considered. At least one of the scholarly sources cited should be used to explain the counterargument.

Essay Format & Citations: Include a substantive title and a complete bibliography/works cited page. The Works Cited page should include a complete list of all resources that were used to develop the essay. All pages should be numbered. Chicago Author-Date Citation (with page numbers) style is preferred. Regardless of the selected citation format, submissions must include page numbers for in-text citations, i.e., (Cairns, 1971: 302). Use numbered paragraphs for online documents that do not have page numbers.

Topic: How have social media platforms and digital communication reshaped political participation, grassroots mobilization, or public trust in democratic institutions in Canada? Use empirical evidence to support your analysis. Students may focus on a specific platform, issue, or time period.

Strictly follow this Structure:

• Introduction: 200 words max
• Conceptual definitions: 400 words
• Argument 1: 300 words
• Argument 2: 300 words
• Argument 3: 300 words
• Limits / counterarguments: 250 words
• Conclusion: 250 words
• Total: about 2000 words, with 10%

1. List of sources you used with pdf files + highlight the part of the texts you used for in-text citations
2. Outline for the research paper
3. If generate the paper using AI tools and sentences you used are vague, order will be cancelled.

By drawing upon the concept of intersectionality, discuss how multiple aspects of identity can combine and impact upon childhood inequalities. (1500 words)

Part A guidance

This TMA question asks you to draw on the concept of intersectionality to discuss how multiple aspects of identity can combine and impact upon childhood inequalities. The process word discuss in the title prompts you to pick the most important aspects, pointing out the strengths and limitations of different arguments.

You must highlight intersectionality, discussed in , and the ways that different aspects of identity (e.g. gender, race and disability) combine to impact inequalities.

When discussing how inequalities result from the combination of multiple aspects of children and young peoples identities, you may find it useful to consider different types of research evidence that contribute to knowledge about inequalities. For example, you may want to make links to how different forms of inequality and their impact can be studied using statistical measures (a form of quantitative research) of income and/or poverty indicators, in contrast to evidence that draws on interviews, personal reflections and children and young peoples voices (forms of qualitative research).

As this is a more extended essay question, you should take time to plan your answer, as this will help you to develop an introduction, conclusion and logical argument, which keep the focus on the question. You may find the workbook as well as the pre-recorded tutorial helpful in planning your answer.

We recommend that you attend an online tutorial, where tutors will cover key themes of the block, including advice on planning and writing assignments, and you will have the opportunity to ask questions. If you are unable to attend a tutorial, you can watch a recording that will cover the content of the tutorial. You can view and book onto tutorials, and view recordings, in the area.

In addition, if you have specific questions about your assignment, you can also book to attend an optional E232 TMA Surgery (book via the area). This session allows you to ask specific questions that you have about the TMA. It will have a flexible format, led by the queries and questions that you raise rather than delivering a presentation about the TMA. This question-and-answer style surgery session does not replace tutorials, nor does it cover study skills such as referencing. Instead, it aims to provide an additional space to raise and discuss any prepared questions that you may have about the TMA. TMA surgery sessions will not be recorded.

Use the attached document and follow the instructions carefully. To complement your essay, include at least one image (a photo you personally take, a image you draw, or an image found online). The image can be included at the start of the essay or after the conclusion.

Watch short film and read 2 article then answer questions

As noted in the remediation assignment posted to CANVAS. You will be assigned a disease process or course concept (based on content leading up to the exam). You will be responsible for writing a paper to be submitted in APA format a minimum of 6 pages in length with a maximum of 8 pages in length including title and reference pages. This paper will include an explanation of the pathophysiology of the assigned disease process, signs and symptoms, three differential diagnosis and treatment implications and must reflect current standards of practice.

A grading rubric will be available on canvas for students requiring this remediation assignment.

The paper will be a maximum of 8 pages, must be in APA format, with title and reference page required.

The assigned disease process is: Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)

Additional details:

You are to describe the pathophysiology of this disease process using your text and two evidence-based resources. Resources may include but are not limited to journal articles or an evidence-based resource such as Merck manuals professional edition, or up to date.

From this above pathophysiology you are to identify and summarize a minimum of 5 components which includes signs and/or symptoms that are relevant to the disease process that would help you diagnose the patient. Within the identification of these 5 components, you must include and summarize the contributing pathophysiology.

Identify a minimum of 3 risk factors for the development of the assigned disease.

List the most relevant treatment of the disease and corollate it to a summary of the pathophysiology. The identification of treatment can be generalized as it relates to medication interventions.

Identify the desired outcomes when treating the assigned disease process

As noted in the remediation assignment posted to CANVAS. You will be assigned a disease process or course concept (based on content leading up to the exam). You will be responsible for writing a paper to be submitted in APA format a minimum of 6 pages in length with a maximum of 8 pages in length including title and reference pages. This paper will include an explanation of the pathophysiology of the assigned disease process, signs and symptoms, three differential diagnosis and treatment implications and must reflect current standards of practice.

A grading rubric will be available on canvas for students requiring this remediation assignment.

The paper will be a maximum of 8 pages, must be in APA format, with title and reference page required.

The assigned disease process is: Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)

Additional details:

You are to describe the pathophysiology of this disease process using your text and two evidence-based resources. Resources may include but are not limited to journal articles or an evidence-based resource such as Merck manuals professional edition, or up to date.

From this above pathophysiology you are to identify and summarize a minimum of 5 components which includes signs and/or symptoms that are relevant to the disease process that would help you diagnose the patient. Within the identification of these 5 components, you must include and summarize the contributing pathophysiology.

Identify a minimum of 3 risk factors for the development of the assigned disease.

List the most relevant treatment of the disease and corollate it to a summary of the pathophysiology. The identification of treatment can be generalized as it relates to medication interventions.

Identify the desired outcomes when treating the assigned disease process

Professor feedabout of my prospectus: I’d like for you to be more specific about the project that you intend to complete. What is the nature of the case study that you plan to use? What other sources do you plan to use? Is there a particular industry that you will focus on? Have leaders not always been faced with the challenge of navigating through complex changes?

just need rewriting to make it AI and plag free i can attach a sample of my work so u know my writing structure

What is your personal perception of hospital accreditation? Do you see it as a valuable tool for improving healthcare quality or do you think it imposes unnecessary burdens on healthcare organizations?

Miller, Krosnick, and Fabrigar (2017) discuss issue salience in terms of the issue’s importance to individuals. “If an issue is salient to a person, he or she thinks frequently and deeply about it, gathers information about it to accumulate in long-term memory, and uses the issue as a basis for making voting decisions and charting other courses of political action.” This begs a few questions: When looking at politics and policy making, which is more consequential to people’s political behavior – personal importance of an issue or national importance of an issue? Why do you say this? Similarly, will a voter choose a candidate based on their assessment of the candidate’s ability on a national level or on their assessment of the candidate as a person? Why do you say this? Instructions Each of the questions above should result in a response that is at least one paragraph. Describe in your answers the basis for your response using this week’s instructional materials and video(s) to support your position. Cite and reference your sources in APA style. Miller, J.M., Krosnick, J.A., Lenadre, & Fabrigar, L.R. (2017). The origins of policy salience: Personal and national importance impact on behavioral, cognitive, and emotional issue engagement. In J. Krsonick, I.C. Chiang, & T. Stark (Eds.), Political psychology. New York. Psychology Press.

PechaKucha Presentation: A Journey Through the Human Lifespan

Objective– For this assignment, you will step into the role of a TED-Style Speaker on Human Behavior. Your goal is to design and deliver an engaging, fast-paced presentation that introduces a key topic in lifespan psychology to a general audiencesuch as parents, students, or community members interested in human development. Delivering a big-picture, thought-provoking perspective on a single lifespan psychology concept.

Examples of Single Lifespan Psychology Concepts:

• Attachment Theory: How early bonds shape relationships across the entire lifespan
• Identity Development: The journey of “Who am I?” from adolescence through late adulthood
• Cognitive Development: How thinking and reasoning evolve from infancy to old age
• Physical Development and Aging: The body’s changes and adaptations throughout life
• Social Development: How relationships and social skills change across life stages
• Emotional Regulation: How people learn to manage emotions from childhood to late adulthood
• Memory and Learning: How memory systems develop, peak, and change with age
• Moral Development: How ethical thinking evolves from childhood through adulthood
• Career and Work Identity: The role of work in development from emerging adulthood onward
• Family Dynamics Across the Lifespan: How family relationships evolve and change over time

Instructions:

Traditionally, a PechaKucha is a presentation style where you show 20 slides, each shown for 20 seconds. For this assignment, you will still create 20 slides in PowerPoint but instead of recording or timing yourself, you will provide a written explanation for each slide.

1. Create Your Slides:

• Prepare 20 slides using images, charts, diagrams, or visuals related to your topic.
• Keep text on slides minimal use keywords or brief phrases to highlight important points.

1. Write Your Slide Notes:

• For each slide, write a short paragraph (35 sentences) explaining the main idea or key information of that slide.
• Imagine this is your script or what you would say if you were presenting live.

Formatting and Submission:

• Upload your PowerPoint to the assignment Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
• Use APA format for the citation and any references included.
• Proofread your assignment for spelling, grammar, and clarity.

Resources:

APA Citation Guide:

Google Scholar: