Category: Social psychology

  • Therianthropy: Identity vs. Mental Illness

    Your proposal must be in proper MLA format (not a numbered list of short answers) with the following elements:

    1. What is your research question?

    2. What is your thesis statement?

    3. What is known? What controversies, questions, of schools of thought are there on your topic? Who is involved, and what do they say? What do you find most interesting and significant?

    4. What is at stake? Provide some background on why your research questions is relevant to others. You may be curious about the topic, but why should the rest of us care about it? How does it affect us?

    5. What is the question, and what is your hunch? What is your opening question for the inquiry project? What do you want to know? Based on what you know now, what are your assumptions about answers to the question you pose?

    6. Works Cited page. (This is a separate page.) Provide a list of sources you have consulted so far. Make sure your sources are credible and whenever possible, scholarly. If you need help identifying credible or scholarly sources, please let me know. You are expected to have a minimum of two (2) for your proposal.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Therianthropy.pdf, An_Ontological_Investigation_o.PDF

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Norm violation

    Task: Your task is to choose a way to violate a norm and pay close attention to the way that people respond to you (what do they do verbally, non-verbally, and behaviorally). Play close attention to the types of responses you get. Also, pay some attention to your emotions during the whole process (right before, during, & after). You may choose to violate a norm in front of people you know or strangers. You may also work with someone else in the class to violate a norm (but you would write separate papers). However, and this is important, the violation cannot have a direct effect on other people (e.g., making someone else embarrassed or hurt/angry), cannot be something that would get you and/or others in trouble (i.e., legally or interpersonally or in any other way) and cannot disrupt a class. It should be enough of a norm violation that people notice and possibly respond (e.g., facing the wrong way in an elevator), but not so much of a norm violation that anyone around you is offended (e.g., public nudity) or could get hurt (e.g., yelling boo as people round a corner), or inspires any overt passion in any way (e.g., wearing an obscenity shirt), or disrupts any class. I cannot stress enough that the norm needs to be some sort of a violation, but not over the top. If I find you have gone too far you will fail the paper. Also, if you find yourself unable to do the norm violation in the end or that you want to abruptly halt your behavior feel free simply refocus your paper around some of those issues. It is not as important here that you get the psychology exactly right (in fact, I dont want you to do any background research on norms or norm violations). Your grade will be based upon evidence that you thought about the issues involved and whether you responded to each of the questions imbedded in the prompt. Obviously, papers with depth of analysis on the issue will do better than superficial accounts. The paper should be roughly 3-4 double-spaced pages in length. Please do not use any personally identifying information about other people in your paper. If you feel uncomfortable completing the task (or feel that youre making others too uncomfortable), you may stop at any time. If anyone asks you are free to tell them about the assignment that they can contact me at drigotas@jhu.edu with any questions or concerns. Paper Sections: Introduction: I want you to write about the formation of norms (e.g., how do they come about?), their power and purpose (e.g., why do we follow them?), their maintenance (e.g., what happens to norm violators vs. those who follow the norms?), and the general emotional nature of norm-violation in general. Your norm violation: I want you to give details about what you did for a norm violation (e.g., setting, behavior, audience, duration). Again, no personal details of anyone involved. Peoples responses: You also need to give the responses of people witnessing the violation looking for categories of response (behavioral or non-verbal patterns, etc.). Your response to the task: How did you feel about having to do the task while planning it, right before doing it, during, and what did you feel when you finally were able to end it? Explain how these emotions may be linked to norms and norm violations in general. Conclusions: What does your specific experience in norm violation say about the norms in general? the norm is eating without utensils…i got to johns hopkins so like just use dining places with campus and just make stuff up for methodology…follow all the instructions.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): social norms paper.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Journal 5

    Journal rules:

    1. In ONE paragraph, explain what you are going to talk about.
    2. Sometimes this means you simply need to define of the social psychological concept. It must be RELEVANT to the module the book covers.
    3. Sometimes, instead, you need to explain the social psychological concept you are about to discuss in the next paragraph (e.g., if you are discussing the importance of knowing the difference between correlational information compared to experimental information).
    4. In a 2nd (new) paragraph, detail a PERSONAL experience with the social psychological concept. Either explain how YOU demonstrated the social psychological concept, or saw something happen, or saw someone else demonstrate the social psychological concept. Do NOT simply paraphrase a lesson or example about the concept. You had to have viewed or experienced it personally (not in our class).
    5. When in doubt, email your journal to the instructor at least a day in advance (or call her and let her know you are emailing it to her to review).

    Only provide ONE idea/concept (with associated personal example) in each “journal.”

    See example in attachment.

    only module 9

  • Cognitive Dissonance & Justification of Effort Discussion

    How do fraternities and sororities make use of the principle of justification of effort? How does the military? How do sports teams in high school or college? Can you think of any other examples of making people suffer so that they will come to love a group with which they are affiliated? Also, what is an personal example of cognitive dissonance in your own life?

  • Mid term

    Answers need to be in essay format fully explaining the answer with complete responses with at least 300 words of thoughtful, detailed analysis for each answer. References are used to support the answers but do not count in the word count. Quotes are not permitted.

  • Lived experiences of gender and social psychology research

    Part 1: Essay Lived experiences of gender have changed radically in the last two decades. Discuss this statement by critically evaluating how social psychology research can best take account of such changes. In writing your answer, your essay must, a) make use of module theme 6 (a contemporary subject, specific to contemporary contexts), and b) include and discuss one academic source you have independently found that is relevant to the essay (mark this with an asterisk in the references section). Word limit: 1,500 words (excluding the assignment title and references).Student notes: Step-by-Step Guide to writing the TMA 04 essay Step 1: Understanding the task and the question For Part 1 of this assignment, you are asked to draw on module material from Block 4, to discuss the statement that lived experiences of gender have changed radically over the past two decades. Just as for TMA 02, you do need an element of description and explanation to set up your essay, but critical evaluation is the key task. This is explained in Chapter 3, Part 5 of Book 1 and the related VLE material. Another requirement of TMA 04 is that you need to make use of at least one of the module themes in your essay. Reflecting on module theme 6 helps you form your ideas for critical discussion. From the very beginning of DD317 you have encountered the module themes. They are the main critical ideas running throughout the module, and they crop up recurrently. Because of this they can also serve as structuring devices that help you develop your critical thinking. Theme 6 draws attention to the idea that peoples subjectivity can take particular forms associated with specific societal contexts. So, in light of Theme 6 you might explore how social psychology research has responded to changes in lived experiences of gender? To see what such changes are you might ask yourself questions like: To what extent are experiences of gender shaped by societal context? How might that context (or those contexts) have changed over the last two decades? What aspects of the context may have changed (think of e.g. use of social media? Commonly used terms? How we talk about gender? Wider political issues?). Have the constraints on gender changed? There is much scope here to critically evaluate how social psychology theory and research in this area relates to and helps us understand these more recent developments. For example, how has past research (e.g. that presented in the module material, which was authored nearly a decade ago) responded to changes in the past, and does it still provide good theories and approaches to engage with more recent developments? And looking at more recent research literature (which you are required to do for TMA 04), do psychologists pay enough attention to these changes in contemporary context when they set out to study gender? Recently, questions of gender have become intensely political and personal for some. Please approach the topic with sensitivity and respect. Importantly, and as for all TMA essays, you are required to write an academic essay, explicitly drawing on, weighing up and critically evaluating research evidence (from module material and independently sourced). This means there is no room for personal opinion, polarisation or speculation. TMA 04 also requires that you conduct your own literature search to select one academic source from beyond the module materials (e.g. a journal article or other academic output; see below). You must explicitly draw on and critically evaluate this independently found academic source within your essay (and flag it with an asterisk in your reference section). So, merely adding an in-text reference to an independently sourced research paper is not sufficient. Step 2: Reviewing relevant module material The essay in TMA 04 has a focus on module material in Block 4, which is entitled Contemporary Social Psychological Subjects. You need to review this material carefully. The question opens up a number of different possible topics, discussions and arguments. You have only 1,500 words for your answer, so you will need to be focused and selective when choosing what material/examples to draw on. Material to draw on: The Section Introduction of Book 2 is a good starting point. The entire block is relevant, but particularly important is Chapter 11 (New femininities and masculinities). This chapter and the related VLE material deal directly with the social psychology of gender as it stood about 10 years ago. You should start by familiarising yourself with this material before you search for your external source (see below), because this will give you a clear sense of the kind of issue or topic you may want to focus on to answer the essay question; and this in turn will inform your search for recent research on the topic you decide to focus on to construct your argument. You will notice that Chapter 11 places its emphasis on changing and new ways of making sense of gender, taking account of changed that happened 1520 years ago. So, you can reflect on how it accounts for those long-past changes, but engaging with it now, you can also view it in the context of more recent changed in the lived experience of gender (i.e. over the past 5 years), and consider whether this older research from the module material might still apply to those very recent changes, or whether much more recent research does this better. You might construct your essay around discussing how well past approaches are able to engage with and explain these more recent developments, or what alternative research has emerged and in how far this is more apt in engaging with issues around gender today. There might be a continuum, with past approaches still being useful or having evolved to help explain more recent issues, or you might argue that some of the past approaches are not useful anymore and point to new research. The introduction of Chapter 11 sets the theme that understandings of gender can change (hence the chapter title new femininities and masculinities) and sets up key concepts like essentialism and hegemony (hegemony is further discussed in section 3), which remain important. Further, Chapter 11 Section 2 introduces the concept of common-sense ideas about gender. Likewise, Section 4 develops the theory that gender is something that is enacted or done as distinct from something a person is. Exploring these concepts and approaches within the module material, will allow you to develop a sense of how you want to answer the essay question and what additional recent research you might want to look for. Section 5 of Chapter 11 New femininities and masculinities deals with empowerment and consumption, also examining issues of sexuality, and these may also have been influenced by changing contexts. Of course you may find that there are continuities with the past. For example, for contexts it may also be useful to look back to the Block 4 introduction in the textbook. You will also find relevant material in the Block 4 study weeks in the online study guide. Most directly relevant is the material in Week 19. Doing the activities in Section 2 New femininities and masculinities will help you make sense of your own position on the question and to reflect upon the key concepts. The interview with Ros Gill in Section 3 of study week 19 encourages thinking about the complexity of gender as well as its changing nature. You may consider following up the work Ros Gill has done more recently, or that of Meg-Jon Barker who is mentioned in Section 4. At the end of Book 2 you will find a number of relevant glossary entries, including an entry on Gender (but also potentially relevant entries on Subjectivity, Hegemony, The Other, Power/knowledge etc.). Module themes are first introduced in Section 2 of Chapter 1 and they feature in various activities throughout the module. By the end of step 2, you should have a set of notes marking out which topics and examples to include as relevant to the question, and where in the module material you can find them. Step 3: Searching for academic sources For TMA 04 Part 1 you need to do your own literature search to independently find, select and critically evaluate one academic source relevant to the argument you chose to make in your essay. That academic source must be: relevant to the argument you make in your answer explicitly reviewed and critically evaluated as part of your essay (alongside module material you decide to include) referenced appropriately within text and in your reference section (marked with an asterisk) published within the last 10 years (counting back from your deadline) it must not be a reference cited within the module materials. You were introduced to searching for relevant academic sources as part of your independent study in Week 2 Section 4, and for TMA 02 you were required to find two sources. For your search for TMA 04 you should ideally use the Open University library. Search terms can include concepts you want to focus on, names of authors you have encountered in the Block 4 module material or other work by authors who are cited. Collate and review a number of papers by first reading the abstracts. You can then draw up a short list of the most promising ones and read those in full. Try and settle for the paper you want to include before starting to write the essay as it will guide how your argument is set up. Step 4: Deciding the focus of your essay To shape your focus and argument you need to think about what your position is on the stated question. There is no one correct position or way of approaching this essay but, to reiterate a point made above, working with theme 6 should allow you to step back and see the bigger picture of changing sense-making about gender. In deciding your focus, you should carefully consider how best to use your independently selected academic source and what it adds to the relevant module materials. For example, is it a journal article that grapples with contemporary debates about gender in a way past approaches cannot? Is it an example of an approach to gender that draws your criticism because it ignores something you think past research did include, or that is entirely new? Or is it an approach that continues a past approach, further developing a method/topic that has been looked at in the past? Research and phenomena in this field are very complex, so there is no one correct conclusion and position to the question. Still, it is important that you critically evaluate the research and arrive at a clear sense of what your position is, during the planning process. Then you can plan your essay to coherently argue your position, making sure you draw on your critical evaluation of the research evidence to support your conclusion. By the end of this process of reflection, you will be ready to bring together your ideas about the best focus for your essay. Step 5: Planning the structure of your essay Once you have settled for your position and argument, you can create a brief sketch of your essay, setting out the structure (e.g. one short bullet-point describing the content of each paragraph, the point it makes and the material it draws on). As ever, your essay needs to be well organised into paragraphs, with a separate introduction and conclusion. Furthermore, the structure of your essay needs to be coherent: the paragraphs should follow logically one from another, so as to clearly express the core argument you are building. Decide on what research evidence you want to draw on, how you evaluate it, and how you are going to use it to create a clear argument around your position. Step 6: Writing your essay Based on the sketch you created in step 5 you can now write the essay. If you found this approach helpful in previous essays, you can again start by writing an introduction to guide your further progress and to make sure you keep a good focus on the question as set. As ever, make sure that you write in your own words and that you do not copy phrases and explanations verbatim from the module material or other literature. Also, you need to reference correctly where you refer to module material or externally sourced research papers. This is a good time to reread the feedback you received from your tutor for the TMA 01 and the TMA 02 essay. Step 7: Checking and polishing After you have finished writing we recommend that you put the essay aside for a bit rather than submit it immediately. Before submitting TMA 04, you might find it helpful to have a go at editing your essay by using the guidelines provided in Section 3 of Study Week 20, entitled Editing your own work Part 2: Collaborative independent study Part 2 evaluates your collaborative independent study. In Block 1 you were asked to keep an Independent Study Notebook, including definitions of new terms and any useful new sources (articles, websites etc.) that you have independently identified. In TMA 02 you were asked to independently find two sources, and from Block 2 onwards you have engaged in a collaborative activity that involved: sharing some of these sources and glossary definitions with other students in the forum and commenting on other students posts of sources and glossary definitions. For Part 2 of TMA 04 you are asked to provide evidence of your engagement in these tasks by producing a short document which includes: copies of three of the sources and two of the glossary definitions you have posted as evidence of your engagement in the collaborative activity. You can for example add a screenshot that clearly displays your contributions (worth 5% of the total mark for this TMA) copies of some of your own feedback on other students posts; again, adding a screenshot is fine (worth 10% of the total mark) a brief discussion of how your engagement with the posts, including giving and receiving feedback, has contributed to your understanding of the module material (worth 15% of the total mark). Word limit: 500 words (note that only the third part, the discussion, is counted in the word count).

  • Data Sources

    Description

    Data Sources

    Your research is as good as the data you collect. In your view, how should one go about collecting data for qualitative studies where you will be interviewing subjects and/or collecting survey/questionnaire data? What are some of the sources for the same?

    How does one check the authenticity of the data being collected?

    For this particular Research paper, data will be collected via in-person and zoom interviews.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): the Revised Draft Phenomenology of Playfulness in Multicultural Romantic Partnerships.docx, 10329228 Revised lR.docx, Informed Consent Templates.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Persuasion Experiential Reflective Paper

    The textbook can be access for a free trial per this link

  • Cultural Diversity Movie Review

    Choose a movie (no TV shows or series) with significant diversity content and then provide a short report on the experience of watching that movie. Be sure to apply course material as you review the movie. For example, “According to Matsumoto and Juang etc…)

    Here are a few examples of movies that focus on diversity. You may select one of these movies or another movie of your choice.

    The Joy Luck Club (1993)

    Focus: Asian American identity, generational and cultural differences

    Family, immigration, cultural values, identity conflict

    Crash (2004)

    Focus: Racial and social tensions in Los Angeles

    Implicit bias, systemic racism, interconnected stories

    Moonlight (2016)

    Focus: Black identity, masculinity, and sexuality

    Intersectionality, LGBTQ+ identity, societal pressures

    Coco (2017)

    Focus: Mexican culture, family traditions, and identity

    Cultural heritage, generational values, death and remembrance

    Bend It Like Beckham (2002)

    Focus: A British Indian girl pursuing soccer against cultural expectations

    Use it to discuss: Gender roles, assimilation, bicultural identity

    The Farewell (2019)

    Focus: Chinese American family navigating a cultural clash over a family members illness

    East vs. West values, family, truth vs. cultural norms

    Hidden Figures (2016)

    Focus: African American women working at NASA during the space race

    Race, gender, access to education and STEM fields

    Topics that were learned in this course Cultural, Cross cultural, Enculturation and developmental, Culture and Gender, and physical health and emotion, and Cultural Communication and personality.

    Follow basic APA 7 style (Times New Roman Font 12, double-spaced, 1″ margins) Also, have a separate cover page that will include your name, class name, assignment title, and date. This is expected of every writing assignment. Make sure to cite any references used for this assignment (you have to list the movie and textbook) and include a separate reference page. Do not use images, charts, large fonts, and colors on the cover page or in the body of your paper.

  • Module 6 Assignment

    Advertisers often use phrases like limited supply available, limited time offer, hurry before supplies run out, once-in-a-lifetime offer, or this offer will not be repeated, all of which are meant to persuade through the use of the scarcity principle. Research has shown that the scarcer an item or opportunity becomes, the more valuable it seems and the more we desire it. For this paper recount instances where scarcity made an item seem more desirable to You. What makes a scarce or hard-to-get item so desirable? Discuss other times when scarcity of information makes it seem more desirable. Are there times when scarce information is more valuable than widely available information? MUSH BE 1,000 Words & References