Category: Social Work

  • 584: Module 6 Discussion: Policy Evolution and Social Work

    After you have completed the readings and watched the lectures for this module, respond to the questions below.

    • What have you learned that surprised you or that you didnt know?
    • Why do you think you didnt know these things or why did they surprise you?
    • Why is it important for social workers to know about the rule of thumb, the myths about real rape and the private vs. public issue debate surrounding interpersonal violence?

    Responses: (once the writing part is done, I will send the 2 peer posts so you can respond to each)

    Comment on these two peers responses to the same questions, separately.

    In your replies, please address the following:

    What does your peer’s discussion show you about how people learn about bills? What is the importance for learning about how bills are made into laws for non-social workers?

    Please remember:

    • Writing should be thoughtful, reflective, and should make connections with the assigned topic. You are expected to think critically and cite information from the readings including those found in the module and those assigned for the discussion.
    • Writing must be supported by your readings and properly cited (authors last name and year of article). Do not use any direct quotes.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Women race and class ch11.pdf, Rape on the Public Agenda ch3.pdf, Davis-ProblemWifeAbuse-1992.pdf, Battered Women the transformation of a social problem.pdf, Gender Violence – Interdisciplinary Perspectives ch11.pdf, 10342875.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion Prompt

    This discussion encourages you to reflect critically on the idea of holding parents legally responsible for their childs bullying behavior. After watching the short video Should the Parents of Bullies Be Fined?, you will consider your own views and connect them with concepts from our Parenting course.

    Reply to Prompt (24 points toward the final grade)

    • After watching the short video clip “Should the parents of bullies be fined (at the bottom of this page), please respond to all three prompts in your original post (at least 250 words):
    • Prompt 1:
    • In your opinion, should the parents of bullies be fined? Why or why not?
    • Prompt 2:
    • If your child were being bulliedor bullying someone elsehow would you respond? What parenting strategies would you use?
    • Prompt 3:
    • What might be some unintended consequences (positive or negative) of fining parents for their childs bullying behavior? How might such policies affect families, schools, or communities?
    • Requirements for Your Original Post
    • Minimum of 250 words (excluding references)
    • making connections to course materials (e.g., Holden textbook with page numbers, module videos, or readings)
    • Use APA-style in-text citations and include a reference list at the bottom of your post. Please use the following format for in-text citations from Holden’s book: (Author, Year, Page Number). If you are using a digital copy of the textbook, include a screenshot of the page in your post is required. If you’re unsure how to cite module videos or readings in APA style, refer to the
    • linked in the module.
    • Address all three prompts fully

    Youtube video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oaXGYZ8_WI

  • Preparing and Beginning for simulation lab

    Please read the instructions and follow them, check the Rubric too and I sent you the chapter 7 cournoyer(2017) please fir shabib you us the choice and no source out side or Ai and for the senior I sent my client is the father Curtis please read the instructions carefully and no outside source. Thank you

  • Admission Essay

    Please make sure it’s not AI-generated or plagiarized

  • Admission Essay

    Please make sure it’s not AI-generated or plagiarized.

  • Admission Essay

    Please make sure it’s not AI-generated or plagiarized.

  • Case Study 3

    Integrated Behavioral Health Cultural Competency and Systems of Care Case Study Ana Carter is a 44-year-old African American woman who lives in a small rural town in North Carolina. She works part-time and cares for her two teenage sons and her elderly mother, who has early-stage dementia. Ana has a long-standing relationship with the local community health center, which recently transitioned to an integrated behavioral health (IBH) model that includes a nurse practitioner (NP), a behavioral health consultant (BHC a licensed clinical social worker), and an occupational therapist (OT) who supports patients experiencing functional barriers related to health, stress, and daily routines. During a routine primary care visit for persistent fatigue, tension headaches, and trouble sleeping, Ana briefly mentioned feeling worn down and not herself. The NP told her that her symptoms might be related to stress or depression and said shed like Ana to talk to someone real quick before leaving. Without much explanation, the NP walked Ana down the hall and introduced her to the BHC. Ana met with the BHC for about 15 minutes. The BHC asked about her mood, energy, and stress, and introduced a simple breathing technique. Ana was polite but reserved. She nodded during the session but gave short answers. No written information or explanation about behavioral health services was provided, and Ana was not asked whether she wanted to meet with the BHC or given a chance to ask questions. At checkout, the medical assistant briefly mentioned that Ana might also meet with OT next time to help with routines and stress. Ana did not understand what that meant and did not ask for clarification. Later that week, Ana called the clinic to ask if she was now in counseling, whether it would affect her medical record, and what occupational therapy for stress meant. She said she wasnt sure what that visit was for and felt uncomfortable not knowing what was happening. She also said she didnt want anyone thinking she was crazy or being sent for mental health without her agreeing to it. The idea of seeing another provider felt overwhelming when she was already stretched thin caring for her family. After hearing this feedback, the NP, BHC, and OT reflected on their assumptions and workflow. They realized they had not clearly explained what integrated behavioral health is, what each team members role involves, or that Ana had a choice in whether to participate. They also recognized that the language they used – talk to someone, meet with OT for stress – assumed familiarity with healthcare systems and professional roles that many patients do not have. The team developed: 1. A short verbal script in plain, welcoming language explaining IBH 2. A one-page handout describing the roles of the NP, BHC, and OT 3. A new workflow step that explicitly asks patients whether they would like to meet with any IBH team member Ana was contacted and invited to return for a follow-up visit. At that visit: * The NP explained that IBH means having a small team in one place to help with stress, health, and daily life. * The BHC clarified that behavioral health visits are optional and focused on practical support. * The OT explained, My role is to help people figure out how stress and health are affecting their day-to-day life like sleep, energy, routines, and caring for others. Ana asked questions about privacy, time commitment, and whether she had to continue. The team emphasized that she was in control of whether and how she engaged. Ana chose to return for another visit and agreed to meet briefly with both the BHC and OT. Afterward, she said, I appreciate being asked. It helps to know Im not just being told what to do. Submit a narrative addressing the following: 1. What assumptions did the care team make during Anas initial visit? 2. How did the lack of clear explanation and informed choice impact Anas experience and trust? 3. In what ways did the care team demonstrate cultural humility in their response? 4. How might OT, social work, and medical providers work together to support Anas daily functioning, stress, and caregiving responsibilities in culturally responsive ways? hi
  • Case assessment “private, dismissed”

    Assignment Overview For this assignment, you have been provided with a case history to review. You may choose to watch the illustrated version of this case below and/or read the case transcript. This assignment asks that you use course concepts to understand a case. You will be evaluated on your ability to critically analyze practice situations and articulate information. A detailed rubric is included. You may use your notes and materials to complete this assignment. However, this is individual work and you should not discuss the case or assignment with anyone. This assignment should be submitted in Canvas. Guidelines For Private, Dismissed you may choose to write a traditional paper, record a case presentation, OR create a digital poster that displays your response in addressing these questions. Paper directions: develop a 3 page (double-spaced) paper that answers the case-specific questions. Please use 7th ed. APA guidelines. Include a cover and reference pages (no abstract). Case presentation directions: Submit a video of your presentation addressing the question prompts. Your presentation should include visual elements (slides, etc) and be 5-7 minutes. Digital poster directions: include a section that addresses each question AND a section listing any references. You must fully address each question, however, you may choose to present your responses in bulleted format rather than a narrative paragraph. The digital poster is not printed or presented in class, but uploaded to Canvas. Canva works well for this assignment, though you are not required to use it. Case questions for “Private, Dismissed” Briefly summarize this case. Make sure you identify key information about Sharease and provide a clear statement regarding her strengths and the primary challenges that she is facing. Remember, there are a lot of facts associated with this case. Think about what information is critical to understanding Sharease. How might Shareases social identities be considered in this case? What steps has Patty taken to build rapport and meet Sharease where she is? What does Shareases treatment plan look like? What is missing? What would you do differently? Describe how you will ensure the treatment plan goals align with Shareases personally identified goals. Has Patty ensured this and if so, how? How would you ensure that alignment? Do you believe that Patty is practicing effective/ethical/culturally responsive social work? Why or why not? Please use examples to support your thoughts. Was Pattys intervention with Sharease successful? Why or why not? What would you have done differently? What may have been the most challenging aspect of this case for you? What parts do you feel confident about? If you were Patty, how might the outcomes of Shareases case impact how you work with a family/individual in the first place? *Note: The following rubric evaluates your ability to thoroughly address each of the question prompts. Your responses should demonstrate how you thought critically about the case and related questions. Use any sources necessary to support your assessment.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Case March 8.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Organization Paper- The Salvation Army

    Organization Paper- “The Salvation Army”

    Instructions

    The purpose of the Organization Paper is to develop your analytical and critical thinking skills by examining and evaluating the structure, functions, and practices of an organization through the lens of organizational theories and critical perspectives discussed in the course. This assignment aims to deepen your understanding of how theoretical frameworks can be applied to real-world organizational contexts, enhancing your ability to critically assess and articulate the effectiveness and ethical implications of organizational practices.

    In this assignment, you will explore and analyze an organization of your choice using organizational theories and critical perspectives discussed in the course. Your paper will demonstrate your ability to apply theoretical frameworks to real-world organizational contexts, critically assess the organization’s practices, and communicate your findings effectively using academic standards.

    Instructions

    1. Choose an Organization:

    Select an organization that interests you. It can be a non-profit, governmental agency, private company, or any other type of organization. Ensure you can access sufficient information about its functions, goals, and operations.

    2. Describe the Organization (5 points):

    Provide a thorough description of the organization, including its primary functions and goals. Your description should give a clear and detailed overview of what the organization does and aims to achieve.

    3. Choose and Describe Two Organizational Theories (8 points):

    Select two organizational theories from your textbook that help explain the work environment, policies, procedures, and operations of the chosen organization.

    Describe each theory separately, providing a comprehensive explanation supported by at least four additional sources besides your textbook. Ensure these sources deepen your understanding of the theory and its key terms.

    4. Apply Theories to the Organization (8 points):

    Explain how each theory helps to understand, explain, and predict the organizations work environment, policies, procedures, and operations.

    Provide concrete examples from the organization to illustrate your points, using the terms and concepts from each theory accurately.

    5. Critical Perspective Analysis (7 points):

    Using the Critical Perspective (refer to Chapter 12), analyze how the organization may act or has acted as an oppressor to its employees and/or customers/clients.

    Provide detailed analysis with clear examples and critical insights, demonstrating your ability to critically assess organizational practices.

    6. Spelling, Grammar, Structure, and APA 7th edition (2 points):

    Ensure your paper is well-written, free from spelling and grammatical errors, and well-structured.

    Use APA 7th edition for in-text citations and the reference page. Include at least five different sources to support your analysis.

    Submission Requirements

    Your paper should be typed, double-spaced, and use a standard 12-point font (e.g., Times New Roman).

    The paper should be between 5-7 pages, excluding the reference page.

    Properly cite all sources in APA 7th edition, both in-text and on the reference page.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Chapter 12.pdf, Learning Check Organization Paper – Example-4.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Critical Thinking Essay

    Based on the research question, How does healthcare spending in the United States impact health outcomes, specifically life expectancy and chronic disease prevalence, when compared to other developed countries? I have identified the following problem: Even though the United States spends more money on healthcare per person than other developed countries, it still has lower life expectancy and higher rates of chronic disease. This gap suggests that there may be problems in how healthcare funds are used, how much focus is placed on prevention, and how social and structural factors affect health outcomes. These concerns raise questions about whether U.S. healthcare spending is truly effective.

    To explore this issue, I am required to write a critical thinking essay that is at least three double-spaced pages in APA format, supported by scholarly sources, and written in my own words to ensure it is plagiarism-free. The paper must show my understanding of Paul and Elders Framework for Critical Thinking by including the eight elements of thought: Purpose, Key Questions, Information, Concepts, Assumptions, Implications and Consequences, Point of View, and Interpretation and Conclusion. Using this framework, I will examine the problem carefully, question underlying assumptions, and analyze the broader impact of healthcare spending on health outcomes.

    This assignment will serve as the foundation for the research I will continue to develop throughout this course.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Critical-Thinking-Template.pdf, Critical Thinking_ Paul and Elder Concepts_Tools (1).pdf, MEAL Plan.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.