Category: Social Work

  • Discuss

    This reflection asks you to apply the Strengthening Families Protective Factors Framework to a real-world family scenario. The goal is not to diagnose or judge the family, but to practice strengths-based, prevention-focused thinking that is central to child welfare and human services work. The Five Protective Factors Review the five Protective Factors below. Each factor represents a strength that can help reduce the risk of child abuse and neglect and promote family well-being. Parental Resilience Child Welfare Information Gateway guide Social Connections Child Welfare Information Gateway guide Knowledge of Parenting and Child Development Child Welfare Information Gateway guide Concrete Support in Times of Need Economic and Concrete Supports overview Social and Emotional Competence of Children Child Welfare Information Gateway guide In this reflection, choose one Protective Factor and apply it to the Toussaint family scenario below. Think like a developing practitioner by identifying: how this Protective Factor is already present or emerging in the family, and how it could be strengthened through informal supports or formal services. For example, you might focus on parental resilience and explore how Jean and Marie manage stress related to work, finances, and parenting demands. Or, you might examine social connections by considering the role of their church, extended family, and communityand where additional support may be needed. Your reflection should highlight both strengths and opportunities. What is already helping this family function well? What small, realistic supports or changes could help them thrive? How might this Protective Factor connect their cultural identity, faith community, and child- and family-serving systems? Write your response in your own words (250500 words). This assignment is graded for completion and thoughtful effort, not perfection. Focus on showing that you understand how Protective Factors work in real families. Helpful Resources CSSP Strengthening Families Protective Factors Framework Florida Department of Children and Families Child Welfare Practice Model This reflection aligns with Module 5 objectives (CO 5) and prepares you for applying these concepts more formally in the Nayati Case in Module 6. The Toussaint Family Case Study Background The Toussaint family is a second-generation Haitian American household living in South Florida. Parents Jean (38) and Marie (36) are raising three children: Luc (12), Amara (9), and Jonas (5). Jean works as a delivery driver with unpredictable hours, while Marie works part-time as a CNA and is the primary caregiver for Jonas. Both parents immigrated as children and balance Haitian cultural traditions with U.S. norms. The family is active in their church, which provides emotional and spiritual support but limited financial assistance. They rent a small apartment in a mixed-immigrant neighborhood. Current Situation Family strengths include: A strong commitment to education; Luc attends a STEM afterschool program, and Marie communicates regularly with teachers. Cultural pride and community connection through language, food, and Haitian cultural events. Some extended family support for childcare, even though relatives also experience financial strain. Current challenges include: Ongoing economic stress related to rent and medical expenses for Maries mother. Jeans unpredictable work hours, which increase Maries daily stress managing routines and discipline. Amaras growing anxiety related to family tension and peer relationships. Jonass difficulty with bedtime routines and inconsistent parenting approaches. Family Dynamics As you reflect, pay attention to patterns in relationships, communication, and caregiving that connect directly to the Protective Factors. Ask yourself which factors are being supported by these dynamics and which may need intentional reinforcement. Parental relationship: Jean and Marie are committed to one another but experience tension related to finances, exhaustion, and differing role expectations. Parenting approaches: The parents value respect, education, and obedience. Under stress, they sometimes rely on stricter discipline approaches modeled from their own childhoods. Childrens experiences: Luc (12): Responsible and academically successful, but at times feels pressure to take on adult responsibilities. Amara (9): Creative and socially engaged, with increasing anxiety related to family tension and peer relationships at school. She appears sensitive to conflict and may internalize worries rather than express them directly. Jonas (5): Energetic and affectionate, but struggles with bedtime routines and emotional regulation. Inconsistency in parenting responsesespecially when caregivers are tired or stressedseems to contribute to challenges with sleep and transitions. As you apply the Protective Factors Framework, consider how each childs experience reflects both strengths and vulnerabilities within the family system. Think about how protective factors operate not just at the parent level, but across the whole familysupporting childrens emotional development while also reducing stress on caregivers. Submission Details Length: 250500 words Format: Paragraph form is fine (no headings required). Write in your own words. Grading: Completion and thoughtful effort What to include: Identify one Protective Factor, describe where it shows up in the Toussaint family, and name 12 realistic ways it could be strengthened through informal supports and/or formal services. Tip: Stay strengths-based. Youre not diagnosing the familyyoure practicing prevention-focused thinking: what supports well-being, reduces stress, and helps this family thrive.
  • Grant Writing Proposal Worksheet

    The worksheet to be completed with instructions and the grading rubric are attached.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): GRANT WORKSHEET ASSIGNMENT – 2026.docx, Grant Worksheet Grading Rubric -2026.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Literature research

    I have the exact research questions that I have to address written down in my computer, as soon as i have access to it I will send the question, but in the mean time you can start with the grid. if any question let me know

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): APPENDIX A.docx, Assignment 1 for Yamel Notes.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • multidisciplinary healthcare

    Write and submit a critique of a research article, applying what you have learned about research in this course so far. Since you will be designing your own research later in this course, it is also useful to read and critique another article to identify strengths and challenges of a research design.

    First, read

    . Then, write an original post in which you address the questions listed below.

    • What other research design could have been used to investigate the research question from this article?
    • What were the limitations of the study in the article?
    • Based on the findings in the article, what changes would you recommend to an agency that provides services to clients with SLE/lupus?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Psychosocial dimensions of SLE implications for the health care team-1.pdf, Psychosocial dimensions of SLE implications for the health care team-1.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Multi-dimensional Assessment Case Example

    You will be provided a completed Multi-dimensional Assessment Case Example – David Cruz and you are to explore the information to identify the correct DSM-5-TR diagnosis(es) and treatment plan interventions.

    Watch video

    Before beginning the assignment, review the following video for clarification on how to complete the multi-dimensional assessment:

    – i will drop the file

    Review the case example of David Cruz and submit the completed assignment by the Due Date

    1. Before starting this assignment, please review the above audio instructions and the example assessment of Joe, which was reviewed in Module 2

    2. Then work on either the word or PDF version for this assignment; the case is the same, I included both since students use different software and electronics.

    – i will drop file

    – i will drop file

    3. You will explore the entire case example on David Cruz and complete the DSM-5-TR section and the Treatment Recommendation section. If you have any questions, please email Dr. Bruno.

    Identify and write diagnosis(es) and treatment plan interventions

    • Identify the correct DSM-5- TR diagnosis(es) and treatment plan interventions.
    • Be sure to include justifications for your diagnosis(es) as you explore the information provided.
    • For further guidance on how to write the DSM-5 – TR Dx & recommended treatment review the .
    • i will drop file

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): JOE-CASE EXAMPLES -2021 (1).docx, 606-CaseExampleAssignment-O-S-26 (1) (1).pdf, 606-CaseExampleAssignment-O-S-26 (1) (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 1

    Purpose:

    This assignment helps you practice diagnostic reasoning by applying DSM-5-TR criteria to real client presentations. You will watch pre-recorded interviews, identify a diagnosis, connect symptoms to each criterion, consider differentials, highlight client strengths, and propose treatment goals.

    Link to Diagnostic Assessment 1: https://youtu.be/d6E8CiApCzQ

    Instructions:

    You will be given access to four recorded client interviews. Each recording presents a different client scenario. For each case, write a diagnostic assessment paper (12 single-space pages) that includes the following sections:

    1. Identifying Information and Diagnosis
    • Situate the clients intersectional identity and summarize their history.
    • Identify the most accurate DSM-5-TR diagnosis for the client.
    • Clearly connect the clients reported symptoms to each diagnostic criterion.
    • Example: The client meets Criterion A because she reports a depressed mood nearly every day for four months and has experienced a loss of appetite and hypersomnia nearly every day. She meets Criterion B because she has missed the last week of work and canceled appointments with friends.
    1. Client Strengths
    • Identify at least five specific strengths (e.g., coping skills, supports, values, resilience factors).
    1. Differential Diagnosis
    • Identify at least one differential diagnosis.
    • Describe which criteria fit the clients presentation, which did not, and why you ruled this diagnosis out.
    1. Treatment Goals
    • Identify at least one broad treatment goal for the client.
    • Write at least two SMART objectives (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound).

    Format:

    • 1-2 pages, single-spaced.
    • Write in clear, professional prose (not bullet points only).
    • APA format is not required.
    • Use the Diagnostic Assessment Example provided as a model.
    • Please submit as a Word file (.doc or .docx). Other file types will not be accepted.

    Diagnostic Assessment Example

    Primary Psychiatric Disorder(s): F50.01 Anorexia nervosa, restricting type, severe

    Rationale (what did you see that supports the diagnosis?)

    Client is a 54 17-year-old heterosexual cisgender White female who reports that she weighed 115 pounds two years ago when she was on a competitive gymnastics team and was pressured by her coach to lose weight. She then decided to go on a diet that got a little out of control. She has steadily lost weight over the past two years, and now she is at her lowest weight at 87 lbs. She is currently not participating in sports and is on medical homeschooling due to her frailty and low body weight. She was hospitalized last month for medical re-feeding and gained eight pounds in the hospital, but has since lost six pounds. Although markedly underweight, she says that she feels fatter than ever and perceives herself to be obese. She confided during the interview that her parents give her high-calorie supplemental nutrition shakes when she does not eat at family meals, and she pretends to drink them but secretly pours them out whenever she can. She also reports that she exercises frantically by running around her room and doing jumping jacks. She reports that she must exercise secretly because her doctor forbade her to exercise.

    She meets criteria A for anorexia nervosa, restricting type, because she reports restrictive food intake and dangerously low body weight. She meets criteria B because she reports intense fear of gaining weight, being fat, and behavior that interferes with weight gain, such as pouring out her nutritional shakes. She meets criteria C because she lacks insight into her underweight condition, reporting herself to be fatter than ever despite her awareness of her current weight. She meets the criteria for restricting type because she denies any purging behavior. Her weight loss is accomplished through fasting and excessive exercise.

    Client Strengths:

    1. Client is a bright young woman who aspires to be a doctor.
    2. Client is fearful of gaining weight but reports a high degree of motivation for treatment.
    3. Clients parents are supportive, and the home/family environment is stable.
    4. Client has health insurance, so she has good access to care.
    5. Client reports having some strong friendships.
    6. Client denies any complicating legal history that might interfere with treatment.
    7. Although her physical condition is fragile, the client is alert and responsive and can engage in change-focused psychotherapy.
    8. Other than her eating disorder, cthe lient has no complicating psychiatric illnesses.
    9. Client is not suicidal or homicidal.

    Differential Diagnosis

    I considered a diagnosis of bulimia nervosa (BN) because she reported that she secretly binges at least twice a week. However, on further questioning, she reported that her typical binge includes exactly 25 Cheerios and an eighth of a cup of skim milk. Although this seems like binge behavior to her, given her distorted thoughts about food intake, this does not meet criteria for a BN binge, described in the DSM as an amount of food definitely larger than what most individuals would eat in a similar period of time.

    Treatment Goal:

    • Challenge and reduce distorted beliefs about food intake and body size to support healthier self-perceptions.

    SMART Objectives:

    1. Cognitive Reframing: Within the next 4 therapy sessions, client will identify at least 3 distorted thoughts related to body size or food (e.g., I am fat even though I am underweight) and practice reframing each thought into a more balanced statement, as documented in session notes.
    2. Behavioral Experiment: By the end of 6 weeks, client will participate in at least 2 therapist-guided exposure exercises (e.g., eating a forbidden food item in session or challenging mirror-checking behavior) and record her emotional response, demonstrating reduced distress over time.
  • Social Program Development Project (SPDP)

    This is a semester long project but this assignment is just the first part “Population and problem”

    The professor strongly encourages using the US census data, “https://www.census.gov/en.html” The population I chose is Veterans in the state of Arkansas and the problem is substance use disorders. If you have any questions please let me know.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): SPDP-Part 1-rubric2026.docx, SPDP-Assignment overview-in-class final.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Brief therapies and tactile/sensorial approaches

    brief 2-page summary and critique of at least two of the assigned or student – 2 summaries

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Chongo LSB.pdf, Christinas article_Kids Skills.pdf, Lee 2003 Solution-focused cross cultural SW practice.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Assessment

    Learning to complete biopsychosocial assessments and genograms is essential for social workers during the assessment stage of the Planned Change Process, helping them gain a comprehensive understanding of the client’s life and the factors influencing their wellbeing. These tools allow social workers to assess biological, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions while identifying family patterns and dynamics that impact clients. This assignment provides students the opportunity to practice and demonstrate their ability to use these tools effectively, which is critical for creating informed intervention plans. By mastering these skills, social workers enhance their ability to engage clients and address complex, interconnected challenges. For this assignment, you are a social worker tasked with completing a biopsychosocial assessment on a mock client. You may use the mock client from Topic 4 assignment if you would like. Review the Appendix A: An Outline for a Biopsychosocial Assessment and Intervention Plan located in the Topic Resources. Create a Word document using sections I-V headers for your biopsychosocial assessment. Written biopsychosocial assessments are narrative documents and not question and answer. Genogram: Using the same mock client from the Biopsychosocial assessment, create a detailed three-generation genogram. You may use free websites such as Genopro, Creately, or Venngage, or software like Word or PowerPoint. No purchases or software downloads are required. Include the following in your Genogram: Three Generations: Include the client, their parents’ generation, and their grandparents’ generation or their children. If relevant, you may add additional family members (e.g., extended family). Five Descriptive Details per Family Member: In addition to name and gender, each family member must include at least four additional pieces of information. These could include: Date of birth/age Occupation or education level Marital status or significant relationships Health conditions (physical or mental) Substance use or abuse history Significant life events (e.g., divorce, death, trauma) Cultural background or religious affiliations Family Dynamics: Use standardized genogram symbols to depict relationships (e.g., close, distant, conflicted, abusive, etc.). Show key family patterns such as divorces, separations, cohabitations, or remarriages. Legend/Key: Provide a legend that clearly explains all symbols and relationship lines used (e.g., solid line for close relationships, dashed line for distant relationships). Submission: You will submit two items to your GCU instructor the biopsychosocial and the genogram on the same mock client.
  • Assessment

    Learning to complete biopsychosocial assessments and genograms is essential for social workers during the assessment stage of the Planned Change Process, helping them gain a comprehensive understanding of the client’s life and the factors influencing their wellbeing. These tools allow social workers to assess biological, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions while identifying family patterns and dynamics that impact clients. This assignment provides students the opportunity to practice and demonstrate their ability to use these tools effectively, which is critical for creating informed intervention plans. By mastering these skills, social workers enhance their ability to engage clients and address complex, interconnected challenges. For this assignment, you are a social worker tasked with completing a biopsychosocial assessment on a mock client. You may use the mock client from Topic 4 assignment if you would like. Review the Appendix A: An Outline for a Biopsychosocial Assessment and Intervention Plan located in the Topic Resources. Create a Word document using sections I-V headers for your biopsychosocial assessment. Written biopsychosocial assessments are narrative documents and not question and answer. Genogram: Using the same mock client from the Biopsychosocial assessment, create a detailed three-generation genogram. You may use free websites such as Genopro, Creately, or Venngage, or software like Word or PowerPoint. No purchases or software downloads are required. Include the following in your Genogram: Three Generations: Include the client, their parents’ generation, and their grandparents’ generation or their children. If relevant, you may add additional family members (e.g., extended family). Five Descriptive Details per Family Member: In addition to name and gender, each family member must include at least four additional pieces of information. These could include: Date of birth/age Occupation or education level Marital status or significant relationships Health conditions (physical or mental) Substance use or abuse history Significant life events (e.g., divorce, death, trauma) Cultural background or religious affiliations Family Dynamics: Use standardized genogram symbols to depict relationships (e.g., close, distant, conflicted, abusive, etc.). Show key family patterns such as divorces, separations, cohabitations, or remarriages. Legend/Key: Provide a legend that clearly explains all symbols and relationship lines used (e.g., solid line for close relationships, dashed line for distant relationships). Submission: You will submit two items to your GCU instructor the biopsychosocial and the genogram on the same mock client.