Category: Statistics

  • Statistics Question

    Required Resources

    Read/review the following resources for this activity:

    • OpenStax Textbook: Chapter 2
    • Week 2 Lesson
    • Chamberlain University Library
    • Article:

    Step 1: Download the Lab Template

    • Open thelab template from theRequired Resources link above.

    Step 2: Complete Part 1 in the Lab template.

    • Read the article supplied by your instructor in the Required Resources link above.
    • In the article provided, you will find a graph OR table, and then draw conclusions about the table or chart you chose and describe other ways that the same data could be presented.
    • Fill in the name of the assigned article on the template: Review of [Type out name of Article].
    • Fill in the names of the author(s) on the template: “[Type out ALL names of Author(s) of the Article]”

    Step 3: Complete Part 2 in the Lab Template.

    • Find ONE graph, table,or chart within the article.
    • Post a screenshot of the graph, table, or chartyou chose in your Word document. See the examples below:
    Frequency Distribution Graph-1.png
    Frequency Distribution Bar Graph

    Step 4: Complete Part 3 in the Lab Template

    • Answer the questions in your template about the table, graph, or chart in the article.

    Step 5: Submit Your Completed Lab Template

    • After completing your assignment, be sure yournameis on the Word document and save it. In the assignment module, click start assignment, then upload file, and submit assignment.

    Requirements

    The deliverable is a Word document with your answers to the questions posed above based on the article assigned for use with this lab.

    Grading

    This activity will be graded based on the Week 3 Lab Rubric.

    Learning Outcomes

    This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

    • CO 2: Compare types of data found in statistical studies.
    • CO 3: Interpret the components of graphs generated with the use of technology.

    Rubric

    Week 3: Lab Assignment Rubric (1)

    Week 3: Lab Assignment Rubric (1)

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarizing an article.

    8 ptsSummarizes article effectively and highlights mathematical components in the article. The student quotes and interprets at least one statistic It is evident that the student read the article.7 ptsProvides an underdeveloped summary however the student highlights mathematical components in the article.

    6 ptsSummarizes article effectively but does not highlight mathematical components in the article. It is evident that the student read the article.5 ptsProvides an underdeveloped summary and does not highlight mathematical components in the article.0 ptsNo effort or effort is not based on the assigned article

    8 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProviding a screenshot of a graph/chart from the article.

    4 ptsProvides a screenshot of one graph, chart or table from the assigned article.0 ptsDoes NOT provide a screenshot of one graph, chart or table from the assigned article.

    4 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFrequency Distribution/Graphs

    15 ptsAddresses all of the elements: 1. Type of data displayed in selected graph/chart/table; 2. Type of graph/chart/table, and lists identifying characteristics of that graph/table/chart; 3. Description of data in graph/table/chart; 4. Conclusion about data in graph/table/chart.13 ptsAddresses three of the elements: 1. Type of data displayed in selected graph/chart/table; 2. Type of graph/chart/table, and lists identifying characteristics of that graph/table/chart; 3. Description of data in graph/table/chart; 4. Conclusion about data in graph/table/chart.

    10 ptsAddresses two of the elements: 1. Type of data displayed in selected graph/chart/table; 2. Type of graph/chart/table, and lists identifying characteristics of that graph/table/chart; 3. Description of data in graph/table/chart; 4. Conclusion about data in graph/table/chart.9 ptsAddresses one of the elements: 1. Type of data displayed in selected graph/chart/table; 2. Type of graph/chart/table, and lists identifying characteristics of that graph/table/chart; 3. Description of data in graph/table/chart; 4. Conclusion about data in graph/table/chart.0 ptsNo effort or effort is not based on the assigned article

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePros, Cons, and Construction of Alternative Displays:

    15 ptsAddress all the following components:1. Discusses PROS of two alternative methods to display data. 2. AND discusses CONS of two alternative methods to display data. 3. AND discusses how BOTH alternative graphs would be constructed.13 ptsCompletes all three components below but only is missing components. 1.Discusses PROS of two alternative methods to display data. 2. AND discusses CONS of two alternative methods to display data. 3. AND discusses how BOTH alternative graphs would be constructed.

    10 ptsCorrectly does two of the following: 1.Discusses PROS of two alternative methods to display data. 2. AND discusses CONS of two alternative methods to display data. 3. AND discusses how BOTH alternative graphs would be constructed.9 ptsCorrectly does one of the following 1.Discusses PROS of two alternative methods to display data. 2. AND discusses CONS of two alternative methods to display data. 3. AND discusses how BOTH alternative graphs would be constructed.0 ptsNo effort or effort is not based on the assigned article

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and APA Formatting

    8 ptsLab is easy to read and presents material in a logical order with no grammatical errors. AND Gives reference in proper APA style for chosen article.6 ptsLab is easy to read and presents material in a logical order. There are a few grammatical errors but they do not distract from readability. AND Gives reference in proper APA style for chosen article.

    5 ptsLab is easy to read and has few grammatical errors, but it is not logically organized. AND Gives reference in proper APA style for chosen article.3 ptsThere are significant grammatical errors and organizational issues that distract from readability. AND Gives reference in proper APA style for chosen article.0 ptsNo effort or effort is not based on the assigned article

    8 pts

    Total Points: 50

  • Statistics Question

    2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    MAT-274 Caffeine and Reaction Time ProjectProject Instructions:

    You are investigating whether caffeine affects reaction time in college students. Each participant was tested before and after consuming caffeine. Data is uniquely generated from your name (entered in cell B1) and cannot be modified. Answer the following questions using your Excel analysis.

    Additionally, as part of this assignment, reflect on how a Christian worldview might influence the interpretation of this research, ethical considerations in experimentation, and the stewardship of health

  • Statistics

    Meaning – The English word statistics is used in the three sense:

    1). Statistics is the numerical figures or data 2). Statistics as a science. 3). Statistics as a major based on sample.

  • Statistics Question

    Just follow the instructions in the images

  • Hi pleas I need help for my homework

    Progress Check

    Use this activity to assess whether you and your peers can:

    • Use an applet to generate random samples along with their 95% confidence intervals. Interpret the results.

    Directions

    Use the drop-down menu to learn about the three steps needed to complete this assignment.

    Three steps to complete the assignment

    Step 1: Review the Rubric

    • Before you submit your work, review the rubric at the bottom of this assignment.
    • Use the rubric as a checklist to determine whether you are ready to submit your work.

    Step 2: First Draft

    • Commit a good-faith effort to address each item in the Prompt section below.
    • Please be sure to number your responses and include “white space” between problem numbers. This improves the readability and flow of your work. I cannot give feedback and grade jumbled work.
    • Use either of the following options to submit your work.
      OPTION 1: You can submit a text-entry assignment (i.e. typing your answers in Canvas). To learn how to submit a text-entry assignment, use these (opens in a new tab).
      OPTION 2: You can upload your paper-and-pencil work (or the digital equivalent). To learn how to upload your paper-and-pencil work, use these (opens in a new tab). WARNING – some file types may not be visible on my end. So to learn which files you can upload, be sure to use the directions link I provided for this option.
    • Not ready to submit a good-faith effort yet? Avoid frustration – use the link to the Questions, Answers, & Tips discussion board (at the bottom of this page) to post questions about this assignment (or visit the discussion board to answer your classmates’ questions). You can also contact me directly (see the homepage for my contact information).

    Step 3: Optional Final Draft

    • After you submit your good-faith attempt to fully respond to the questions in the Prompt section below, advance to the ANSWER(S) page.
    • You can use the ANSWER(S) page to correct your work and resubmit this assignment any time before I begin grading the problems. However, to earn full credit, you are not required to submit a final draft for this assignment. But if you do submit a final draft, I will only grade it if you submitted a good-faith effort on your first draft.
    • Warning – I will only grade your most recent submission. So if you choose to submit a final draft, please do not leave anything out, and please do not direct me to read an earlier submission. To maximize your score, your most recent submission (at the time I begin grading) must be complete.

    Prompt

    Each time you select the Click to generate a random sample of 100 students button below, the applet

    • generates a random sample of 100 part-time students,
    • calculates the proportion of the sample that are female, and
    • calculates the 95% confidence interval for the sample.

    Use the applet to select 20 different random samples of 100 part-time college students. For each sample, note whether the population proportion is contained within the sample’s 95% confidence interval. How many of the 20 confidence intervals do not contain the population proportion? Is this what you expected? Explain.


    Module 16 Discussion Board

    Use the Module 16 (opens in a new tab) to ask questions or provide feedback about the problems in any Module 16 activity – including this peer-reviewed assignment.


    Review Feedback

    • Instructor feedback is only available after an assignment is graded.
    • Use these (opens in a new tab) to learn how to review feedback.

    Click the “Next” or > button to continue.

    Content by the and licensed under .

    Rubric

    Formative Assessments

    Formative Assessments

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswering the Prompt

    10 ptsFull CreditThe first submission demonstrates a good-faith effort to address each part of the Prompt. Either in the first draft or the optional final draft, all parts of the “Prompt” are addressed and the responses demonstrate attainment of the learning objectives in the “Progress Check” section of the assignment. The answers are correct. The writing/work is clear. The explanation/work is reasonable, well-organized, and easy to follow.8.5 ptsMostly CorrectThe first submission demonstrates a good-faith effort to address most of the Prompt. In the optional final draft all parts of the “Prompt” are addressed, and the responses demonstrate attainment of the learning objectives in the “Progress Check” section of the assignment. The answers are mostly correct. The writing/work is clear. The explanation/work is reasonable, well-organized, and easy to follow.

    6 ptsOne or more incorrectThe first submission demonstrates a good-faith effort to respond to a smaller portion of the Prompt. In the first draft or the optional final draft, one or more parts of the “Prompt” are not addressed or are incorrect. Or, answers do not demonstrate attainment of the learning objectives in the “Progress Check” section of the assignment. Or, answers are correct, but the writing/work is unclear, incorrect, or difficult to follow.0 ptsNo MarksThe first submission does not demonstrate a good-faith effort to address the Prompt.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 10

  • Hi pleas I need help for my homework

    Progress Check

    Use this activity to assess whether you and your peers can:

    • Based on information about a sampling distribution of sample proportions, use the Normal Distribution Calculator to find a two-tailed probability.

    Directions

    Use the drop-down menu to learn about the three steps needed to complete this assignment.

    Three steps to complete the assignment

    Step 1: Review the Rubric

    • Before you submit your work, review the rubric at the bottom of this assignment.
    • Use the rubric as a checklist to determine whether you are ready to submit your work.

    Step 2: First Draft

    • Commit a good-faith effort to address each item in the Prompt section below.
    • Please be sure to number your responses and include “white space” between problem numbers. This improves the readability and flow of your work. I cannot give feedback and grade jumbled work.
    • Use either of the following options to submit your work.
      OPTION 1: You can submit a text-entry assignment (i.e. typing your answers in Canvas). To learn how to submit a text-entry assignment, use these (opens in a new tab).
      OPTION 2: You can upload your paper-and-pencil work (or the digital equivalent). To learn how to upload your paper-and-pencil work, use these (opens in a new tab). WARNING – some file types may not be visible on my end. So to learn which files you can upload, be sure to use the directions link I provided for this option.
    • Not ready to submit a good-faith effort yet? Avoid frustration – use the link to the Questions, Answers, & Tips discussion board (at the bottom of this page) to post questions about this assignment (or visit the discussion board to answer your classmates’ questions). You can also contact me directly (see the homepage for my contact information).

    Step 3: Optional Final Draft

    • After you submit your good-faith attempt to fully respond to the questions in the Prompt section below, advance to the ANSWER(S) page.
    • You can use the ANSWER(S) page to correct your work and resubmit this assignment any time before I begin grading the problems. However, to earn full credit, you are not required to submit a final draft for this assignment. But if you do submit a final draft, I will only grade it if you submitted a good-faith effort on your first draft.
    • Warning – I will only grade your most recent submission. So if you choose to submit a final draft, please do not leave anything out, and please do not direct me to read an earlier submission. To maximize your score, your most recent submission (at the time I begin grading) must be complete.

    Prompt

    Recall the use of data from the National Health Survey to estimate behaviors such as alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and hours of sleep for all U.S. adults. In the 2005-2007 report, they estimated that 30% of all current smokers started smoking before the age of 16.

    Suppose that we randomly select 100 U.S. adults who are smokers and find that 25% of this sample started smoking before the age of 16 (an error of 5% compared to the 2005-2007 report).

    Is this much error surprising? Find the probability that a sample proportion will be an over- or underestimate of the parameter by more than 5%.


    Module 15 Discussion Board

    Use the Module 15 (opens in a new tab) to ask questions or provide feedback about the problems in any Module 15 activity – including this peer-reviewed assignment.


    Review Feedback

    • Instructor feedback is only available after an assignment is graded.
    • Use these (opens in a new tab) to learn how to review feedback.

    Click the “Next” or > button to continue.

    Content by the and licensed under .

    Rubric

    Formative Assessments

    Formative Assessments

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswering the Prompt

    10 ptsFull CreditThe first submission demonstrates a good-faith effort to address each part of the Prompt. Either in the first draft or the optional final draft, all parts of the “Prompt” are addressed and the responses demonstrate attainment of the learning objectives in the “Progress Check” section of the assignment. The answers are correct. The writing/work is clear. The explanation/work is reasonable, well-organized, and easy to follow.8.5 ptsMostly CorrectThe first submission demonstrates a good-faith effort to address most of the Prompt. In the optional final draft all parts of the “Prompt” are addressed, and the responses demonstrate attainment of the learning objectives in the “Progress Check” section of the assignment. The answers are mostly correct. The writing/work is clear. The explanation/work is reasonable, well-organized, and easy to follow.

    6 ptsOne or more incorrectThe first submission demonstrates a good-faith effort to respond to a smaller portion of the Prompt. In the first draft or the optional final draft, one or more parts of the “Prompt” are not addressed or are incorrect. Or, answers do not demonstrate attainment of the learning objectives in the “Progress Check” section of the assignment. Or, answers are correct, but the writing/work is unclear, incorrect, or difficult to follow.0 ptsNo MarksThe first submission does not demonstrate a good-faith effort to address the Prompt.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 10

  • Practice in Statistical Data Science

    resultsdiscussion and conclusion

  • Big Data & High Performance Statistical Computing

    finish final report part 567. we are doing the report.

  • R COLAB –

    I HAVE SOLVED THIS ASSIGMENT I JUST NEED SOMEONE TO CHECK IT OUT

    he data contained in lake.csv will now be used to create an OLS model with two predictors. Recall that the outcome the research was interested in was TN.

    Remove outliers from the data. List the outliers (i.e., data rows) that have been removed for the predictors and use the outlier-free data for the remaining questions.


    Question 2

    Fit two linear regression models to predict TN with the new outlier-free data set.

    • One model should use NIN as a predictor.
    • The other model should use both NIN and TW as predictors.

    Report the formula (i.e., with calculated b values) for both models you create.

    Please ensure clarity when referencing predictors within the formulas (i.e., dont just write x, provide clear labels).


    Question 3

    As we learned in class, the summary() function can be used to extract various information about a linear model, such as whether the coefficients are significantly different than 0.

    Find a way to extract only the Std. Error statistic that the summary() function displays for the TW predictor.


    Question 4

    Does the model with only a single predictor have a slope significantly different than 0?

    • Write R code to extract the p-value for the slope.
    • Report the 95% confidence interval around the slope.
    • Use of the function confint() is prohibited.

    Question 5

    Does the model with two predictors contain slopes significantly different than 0?

    • Write R code to extract the p-value for each predictors slope.
    • Report the 95% confidence interval around each predictors slope.
    • Use of the function confint() is prohibited.

    Question 6

    Conduct a test to determine whether the additional predictor in the second model significantly improves the fit relative to the single-predictor model.

    • Does the second predictor significantly improve the model?
    • Report the test-statistic, degrees of freedom, and p-value.
    • Use of anova() is prohibited.

    Question 7

    Assume that a lake has an average influent nitrogen concentration of 5.7 and a water retention time of 0.98.

    Use the preferred model, as determined from the previous question, to predict the annual nitrogen concentration of that lake.


    Question 8

    A psychologist studying perceived quality of life in a large number of cities came up with the following equation using mean temperature (F) and median income in $1,000 as predictors:

    = 5.37 0.01 Temp + 0.05 Income

    Interpret the regression equation in terms of the coefficients.
    (i.e., state what each predictor of the model means in plain English)


    Question 9

    Using the model from the previous question, assume a city has a mean temperature of 55 degrees and a median income of $12,000.

    What is its predicted Quality of Life score?


    Question 10

    You are a highfalutin marketing guru who wants to predict the sales of your brand using the data set DataDrivenMarketing.csv.

    However, there are a number of missing (NA) values in this data set.

    Using what you know about R, report how many NA values are in each of the datasets columns.

    (Note that there are many different ways to achieve this.)


    Question 11

    Recall that base-R has a function read.csv() that can be used to load a CSV file. The tidyverse has the function read_csv().

    Compare how both functions load the DataDrivenMarketing.csv data.

    There is a subtle difference, explain what it is.

    Tip: Look at the amount of NAs.


    Question 12

    Using the DataDrivenMarketing.csv data, create a dataframe that removes any row which has a NA value.

    Report how many rows this new data frame has.

    Use this cleaned up data set for all subsequent questions.


    Question 13

    Plot a correlation matrix of the possible (quantitative) predictors you could include in your model that predicts sales.

    • Do not use default colours
    • Make the category labels black

    Question 14

    Because the predictors are somewhat correlated, you suspect that multicollinearity may be affecting the regression estimates.

    Investigate this possibility by comparing two models:

    Sales = b + b(TV) + b(Radio) + b(Social Media)

    to a model with just TV and Social Media:

    Sales = b + b(TV) + b(Social Media)

    Use an appropriate diagnostic to assess the extent of collinearity among the predictors in each model.

    Summarize your findings and explain which model is more affected.


    Question 15

    Search for outliers in the $TV and $Social.Media columns.

    Report how many you find in each and remove them from the data set for subsequent questions.


    Question 16

    Using the data set with outliers removed, begin a hierarchical regression by creating a model with just TV as a predictor.

    Report the models formula (with coefficients) and R statistic.


    Question 17

    Repeat the previous question, but include Social Media as a predictor.


    Question 18

    Conduct a test to evaluate whether social media significantly improves the fit of the model.

    • Use of anova() is prohibited
    • Report the F-statistic, degrees of freedom, p-value, and conclusion

    Question 19

    Build an ordinary least-squares regression model with both TV and Influencer as predictors of Sales.

    • Are each of its coefficients significantly different than 0?
    • What is the multiple R of this model?

    Question 20

    Conduct an F-test to evaluate whether influencer significantly improved the fit to the model over one with just TV as a predictor.

    • Which is the preferred model?
    • Use of anova() is prohibited
    • Report the F-statistic, degrees of freedom, and p-value

    Question 21

    Using the preferred model from the previous question, create a plot of the residuals to evaluate homogeneity of variance.

    Is the assumption reasonable?


    Question 22

    Using the preferred model, evaluate whether the residuals are normally distributed.

    Is the assumption reasonable?