Category: Technology

  • BEN1 Task 2: Strategic Technology Plan

    BEN1 Task 2: Strategic Technology Plan

    IT Strategic Solutions MMT2

    PRFA BEN1

    PreparationTask OverviewSubmissionsEvaluation Report

    Competencies

    321.1.1 : Technology Strategy

    The graduate develops strategic technology plans that include vision, standards, and direction of technology in line with organizational strategy.

    321.1.2 : Gap Analysis

    The graduate conducts industry standard gap analyses of organizations’ current technology and future needs.

    321.1.3 : Researching New Technology

    The graduate formulates personal research strategies for maintaining awareness of current and emerging technology.

    321.1.4 : Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats

    The graduate evaluates new technology opportunities for alignment with given organizations’ strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

    321.1.9 : Globalization

    The graduate evaluates potential technology solutions for alignment with organizational global strategy.

    Introduction

    You must pass Task 1 before attempting this task.

    In this task, you will develop a strategic technology plan for a real or fictional organization to address its current technology needs and future requirements. You will analyze the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats and evaluate new technology opportunities. You will develop technology policies that ensure ethical actions, create risk mitigation plans, and design security precautions to protect the organization’s data. Additionally, you will develop communication plans for technology initiatives and evaluate potential technology solutions in alignment with the organization’s global strategy.

    Requirements

    Your submission must represent your original work and understanding of the course material. Most performance assessment submissions are automatically scanned through the WGU similarity checker. Students are strongly encouraged to wait for the similarity report to generate after uploading their work and then review it to ensure Academic Authenticity guidelines are met before submitting the file for evaluation. See Understanding Similarity Reports for more information.

    Grammarly Note:

    Professional Communication will be automatically assessed through Grammarly for Education in most performance assessments before a student submits work for evaluation. Students are strongly encouraged to review the Grammarly for Education feedback prior to submitting work for evaluation, as the overall submission will not pass without this aspect passing. See Use Grammarly for Education Effectively for more information.

    Microsoft Files Note:

    Write your paper in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) unless another Microsoft product, or pdf, is specified in the task directions. Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc. All supporting documentation, such as screenshots and proof of experience, should be collected in a pdf file and submitted separately from the main file. For more information, please see Computer System and Technology Requirements.

    You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

    A. Provide the signed “Topic Approval Form” from Task 1 as a separate file.

    B. Conduct a SWOT analysis for the organization from part A that includes the following:

    a discussion of two internal strengths and two weaknesses of the organization

    a discussion of two external opportunities and two threats to the organization

    C. Conduct a gap analysis in the context of implementing emerging or evolving technology that includes the following:

    a discussion of the IT strategy issue, its current state, and relevant background information

    an analysis of the challenge, its underlying causes, and contributing factors that led to its development

    a discussion of the relevance and importance of this challenge, including why it exists

    a discussion of potential negative outcomes if the challenge is not addressed

    D. Propose a solution to the gap from part C that includes the following:

    a description of the proposed emerging or evolving technology solution

    a discussion of how the solution addresses the challenge or need

    a discussion of how your solution optimizes business operations

    E. Provide a summary for each of three other works published within the last two years that have been completed on your topic.

    Note: These other works may include interviews, white papers, research studies, or other types of work by industry professionals.

    1. Explain how each work summarized in part E justifies the proposed emerging or evolving technology solution.

    F. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

    G. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

    File Restrictions

    File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )

    File size limit: 200 MB

    File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

  • One -Week 11 Discussion 1 Societal Factors on System and So…

    By Day 6

    Respond to at least two colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:

    • Ask a probing question.
    • Share an insight from having read your colleagues posting.
    • Offer and support an opinion.
    • Validate an idea with your own experience.
    • Make a suggestion in response to a colleagues posting.
    • Expand on your colleagues postings.

    Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made.

    Be sure to use APA formatting throughout and support your work with specific citations from this weeks Learning Resources and any additional sources.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): One -Week 11 Discussion 1 Societal Factors on System and Software Development-classmate ONEs Post – Threse Marshall – 2526.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • resumen chatgpt

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): chat gpt prompts made simple melanie brecht.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Not Invented Here

    This is a discussion topic about how long engineers should work on any given project and the benefits of engineers communicating with others. The Not-invented-here (NIH) article tries to understand the value of keeping engineers working on long term projects for up to a decade. The article indicates that engineers working on long term projects (5-10 years) have decreased productivity as time goes by.

    The posts for this discussion should attempt to answer the below questions:

    • Why does the performance of engineers decrease over time when working on a long-term project? What factors affect this decrease in productivity?
    • How long should engineers spend on a specific project?
    • Does the age of engineers working on a project matter? Are young engineers more productive than older engineers?
    • How to go about rotating engineers on projects within an organization?
    • How can engineers working on long term projects communicate better within the organization to help increase project productivity (engineers communicating with project managers, engineers communicating with other engineers within the organization)?
    • What kind of external communications (with universities, colleges, or consultants) can be carried out to improve the productivity of a project?
    • Is it worthwhile to provide engineers working on long term projects with on the job training in terms of their engineering project (e.g. reading new research based on their project)?
    • Should organizations intentionally destabilize successful teams to avoid NIH, even if it causes short-term disruption
    • Is NIH more of a danger today, given how much specialization and rapid tech change is a constant for many industries?
    • How can managers/leaders distinguish between NIH-driven rejection and healthy skepticism of external research?
  • Leveraging AI in organizations

    Hello, I have to write a research proposal and literature review. My topic is leveraging AI in organizations. For this assignment, I leveraged 10 articles, these articles are added as attached materials. Also, see below for what the assignment needs you to do.

    Assignment requirement:

    Mini-Research Proposal: Introduction Background information on the research topic Statement of the research problem Research questions Significance of the study

    Literature Review A brief review of existing literature related to your research topic Theoretical framework or key concepts guiding your research Identification of gaps in the literature Research Design and Methodology Qualitative or Quantitative Data collection methods (e.g., surveys, interviews, experiments) Gaps and Limitations References, formatted in APA 7th edition.

    I request and emphasize no plagiarism or AI detection. Please strictly no AI use. Thank you.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Adoption_of_Artificial_Intelli.pdf, The_dark_side_of_artificial_in.pdf, Generative_AI_adoption_and_emp.pdf, Prioritizing_challenges_in_AI_.pdf, A_conceptual_framework_for_AI_.pdf, Exploring_the_challenges_of_AI.pdf, Modeling_the_Drivers_of_Blockc.pdf, AI-Enabled_Strategic_Transform.pdf, The_mental_health_implications.pdf, Stupid_to_Smart_The_Sustainab.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.