Category: uncategorised

  • Computer Science Question

    Important Questions & Answers

  • Fire Evacuation Analysis and RSET for One Floor

    DELIVERABLES:

    • Completed report (8 pages)
    • Title and names
    • Occupant justification
    • Agent assumptions
    • Computational domain
    • Scenario results
    • RSET values
    • Figures
    • Evacuation comparison
    • Critical exit identification
    • Flow behaviour
    • Engineering explanation
    • RSET definition
    • Uncertainty and limitations
    • Final conclusion

    NOTE:

    • All inputs and simulation outputs will be provided later
  • Computer Science Question

    Important Questions & Answers

  • Studypool Professional

    Proyek sya adalah membuat sestem pembeljaran yg mudah di mengerti

  • case study 3

    ATI Nurse’s Touch: The Leader Case 3 Interprofessional Communication

    Submit before completing this activity if you have not already done so.

    Instructions

    Once logged in, go to My ATI, select the Learn tab and select ATI Nurse’s Touch: The Leader Case 3 Interprofessional Communication. Watch the video in each stage and answer the multiple-choice questions that follow the video to move through the stages. The questions following the videos are not graded and will provide a rationale for the answer provided.

    • Overview (0:31)
    • Stage 1 (0:30)
    • Stage 2 (0:38)
    • Stage 3 (0:45)
    • Stage 4 (0:30)
    • Stage 5 (0:41)

    Clinical Reflective Questions

    After watching the videos, answer the following questions in a Microsoft Word document. Refer to the learning material presented in this module for guidance.

    1. What tool could the nurse have used when reporting to help her give Dr. Craig the information he needed to determine what actions he needed to take?
    2. Why did Beverly ask Dr. Craig to go to the conference room with her?
    3. How well do you think Beverly addressed the providers concerns? Anything she might have added?
    4. Do you think Beverly should have addressed the providers negative comments to the nurse (I dont want to waste any more time talking to you.)?
    5. What do you think about the way Beverly is introducing SBAR to her unit and hospital?
    6. What are your impressions of Beverly as a leader? Would you like to work with her?
    7. What might be some of the downfalls of a transformational leadership style?

    Submission and Assessment Guidelines

    • Create a document with your name, date, and course number. Number your response for each question. Respond to all prompts in 3-5 sentences.
    • Include a minimum of 2 scholarly references in APA format (with in-text citations) dated within the past 5 years.
      • Scholarly References:A scholarly reference refers to a source of information that is considered reliable and credible, has been vetted by experts, and contributes to the body of knowledge in a particular discipline. Examples of scholarly references include peer-reviewed journal articles, dissertations and theses, academic books published by university press, .gov or .org websites, and textbooks. Scholarly references need to be current within the past five years unless it is seminal work. Seminal work refers to a publication that has had a profound and lasting impact on a particular field of study. For example: Benner, P. (1984). Novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Addison-Wesley.
    • Be sure to connect your responses to the course content and previous learning experiences.
    • Upload the completed document in one of the following formats: .DOCX, .PDF.
    • Review the assignment Rubric for grading criteria.

    Rubric

    NUR 338 The Leader Cases Activity Rubric

    NUR 338 The Leader Cases Activity Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse Content & Critical Thinking

    50 ptsExemplaryLearner responds to all prompts with no more than 5 sentences each. Responses are detailed and show a deep understanding of the topic. No key details are missing.45 ptsProficientLearner responds to all prompts in 3-5 sentences. Responses show good understanding and accuracy but may lack one key detail for completeness.

    40 ptsCompetentLearner responds to all prompts in at least 3 sentences. Responses show basic understanding and clarity but are missing up to two key details for completeness.35 ptsNeeds ImprovementLearner provides limited responses. Responses are under 3 sentences or incomplete or missing three or more key details.0 ptsNot EvidentLearners responses are missing, unclear, or inaccurate.

    50 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Evidence

    20 ptsExemplaryLearner supports the responses with seamlessly integrated, relevant, and current evidence that enhances the credibility and strength of the work without interrupting the flow of writing. Uses more than 2 scholarly sources that are published within the past five years.18 ptsProficientLearner supports the responses with well-integrated, relevant and current evidence that provides support, is cited clearly, and contributes to the credibility of the work. Citations may cause minor interruptions to the flow of writing. Uses at least 2 scholarly sources that are published within the past five years.

    16 ptsCompetentLearner supports the responses with integrated, relevant, and current evidence that mostly supports the work, with occasional disruptions to the flow of writing. Uses at least 2 scholarly sources that are published within the past five years.14 ptsNeeds ImprovementLearners evidence is poorly integrated into the responses, causing significant disruptions to the flow of writing. Evidence is not relevant or current. Scholarly resources provided do not meet requirements.0 ptsNot EvidentLearners presentation lacks support and evidence.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Professional Voice

    20 ptsExemplaryLearners assignment is well-organized and fully adheres to submission guidelines. Formatting is professional and enhances readability. Tone is professional, considerate of differing viewpoints, and engaging.18 ptsProficientLearners assignment is organized, and formatting follows submission guidelines. Tone is generally professional and considerate of other viewpoints, with minor lapses.

    16 ptsCompetentLearners assignment is adequately structured but has some organizational weaknesses. Formatting meets basic submission requirements. Tone contains occasional lapses in professionalism or limited engagement with different viewpoints.14 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe document has noticeable organizational issues, making it difficult to follow. Formatting is inconsistent or does not fully meet submission guidelines. Tone is inconsistent in professionalism and engagement or lacks respect for differing viewpoints.0 ptsNot EvidentThe document lacks clear structure and organization. Formatting is missing or does not follow submission guidelines. Tone is unprofessional and lacks respect for differing viewpoints.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and Style

    10 ptsExemplaryLearners responses include in-text citations with corresponding references in APA format listed at the end of the document. Responses are free from grammatical, spelling, and APA formatting errors.9 ptsProficientLearners responses include in-text citations with corresponding references in APA format listed at the end of the document. Responses have 1-3 differing grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.

    8 ptsCompetentLearners responses include in-text citations with corresponding references listed in APA format at the end of the document. Responses have 4-6 different grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.7 ptsNeeds ImprovementLearners responses are missing in-text citations. References may be listed at the end of the document in APA format. Responses have 7 different grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.0 ptsNot EvidentLearners responses are missing in-text citations and corresponding references at the end of the paper. Responses have more than 7 different grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

  • case study 1

    Overview

    The purpose of this assignment is to explore the importance of effective communication and teamwork in healthcare settings. Watch the two videos below and respond to the four questions.

    Instructions

    Watch (6:47).

    Watch (4:34).

    Citation: QSEN Institute. (2012, November 1). QSEN: The Lewis Blackman story (Part two) & (Part three) [Video]. YouTube.

    Respond to the following in 3-5 sentences each. Include a minimum of 2 scholarly references in APA format (with in-text citations) dated within the past 5 years. See submission guidelines below.

    1. Discuss the role of communication and teamwork in Lewis Blackmans case.
    2. Identify specific instances where communication breakdowns occurred.
    3. Propose strategies to improve communication and teamwork among healthcare professionals to prevent similar incidents.
    4. Describe misplaced professionalism and its impact of patient outcomes.

    Submission and Assessment Guidelines

    • Create a document with your name, date, and course number. Number your response for each question. Respond to all prompts in 3-5 sentences.
    • Include a minimum of 2 scholarly references in APA format (with in-text citations) dated within the past 5 years.
      • Scholarly References:A scholarly reference refers to a source of information that is considered reliable and credible, has been vetted by experts, and contributes to the body of knowledge in a particular discipline.
  • CEO favourite workplace topic selection

    For your final project, you will be an I/O consultant preparing to advise a manager or CEO on a topic directly relevant to their organization.

    You will be researching a specific topic related to I/O Psychology that would be useful and informative for a company’s manager or CEO. You will synthesize your findings from the research literature and present them as if you were advising that manager or CEO on the topic.

    First, you will need to find at least four journal articles on your chosen topic and write an annotated bibliography summarizing each article. Finally, you will synthesize your findings in a 3- to 4-page APA abstract outlining what you found, the pros and cons of your research, and your recommendation to the manager or CEO regarding this topic within their organization.

    For example, you might select several articles on workplace violence and write an annotated bibliography for each, summarizing their main points in non-research-based language, including agreements and disagreements about particular findings. Next, the summary document should explain why this particular topic is important to the workplace and how the organization’s leaders and employees can use the information. It will also make suggestions for the organization based on the results of your research. The document should be presented professionally, with a clear and well-formatted layout, free of spelling and grammatical errors, and presented in a clear and structured manner.

    Annotated Bibliography:

    This bibliography should include the four research articles you will use for your work. These articles must be on the topic previously approved for the research summary. For each article, you must provide:

    The APA-style citation

    Click here for more instructions on the annotated bibliography

    A brief summary (no more than one page) of each article. The summary should include:

    The basic premise and research question of the study.

    The methodology

    Results

    Conclusions

    Second: Summary Document

    Your work should not simply be a summary of your articles (as you did in the annotated bibliography). Rather, it should be geared toward professionals who don’t have in-depth research knowledge but do have some understanding of management and organizations. You could pretend you’re the human resources director of a company and are presenting to a group of managers. Your summary paper should convey the information gleaned from the research literature in an organized manner and present an argument for why it’s important for managers to pay attention to this topic. I’d also like to see you make some recommendations for action.

    APA Style: All presentations must be written in APA format. This basically means that references must be in APA style, all assignments must be written in 12-point font, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins.

    Final Project Evaluation

    The annotated bibliography provided at least 4 articles with substantial abstracts (without direct quotations): 30 points

    Abstract/Reaction Paper: minimum of 3 full pages (without direct quotations): 30 points

    Grammar and spelling at a college level: 10 points

    References/Citations: 20 points

    APA Format: 10 points

    Total: 100 points

    It will be beneficial for you to read all the tips below:

    *What is a parenthetical citation immediately after the quoted material?

    It is when you place the source in parentheses ( ) immediately after the quoted sentence instead of waiting until the end of the article. It helps the reader know exactly which sentences and paragraphs are taken from particular sources.

    Place the author’s name and the publication date of the source in parentheses immediately after the quoted material. If it is a direct quotation, also include the page number. For example:

    Psychology is defined as the science of behavior and mental processes (Coon 2012, p. 12).

    Helpful tips:

    * Always use spell check and grammar check.

    * Be sure to indent paragraphs (5 spaces).

    * Balance: Each paragraph should be of a similar length.

    * Review the video and the APA resource in Student Resources at the beginning of the course.

    * You can submit your work to the university’s Writing Center for review and any formatting assistance you may need.

    When working on this week’s assignment, please keep the following in mind:

    This week’s assignment must be completed and submitted by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. (Miami time). Your work will be graded, and your grade will be awarded no later than Tuesday of the following week at 5:00 p.m. (Miami time). To view your grades and feedback on your assignment, go to your gradebook.

    Summary Paper:

    Your paper should not simply be a summary of your articles (as you did in the annotated bibliography). Rather, it should be geared toward professionals who don’t have in-depth research knowledge but do know something about management and organizations. You could pretend you are the human resources director of a company and are presenting to a group of managers. Your summary paper should convey the information obtained from the research literature in an organized manner and should present an argument for why it is important for managers to pay attention to this topic. I would also like you to make some recommendations for action.

    APA Style: All presentations must be written in APA format. Basically, this means that references must be written in APA style, all assignments written in 12-point font, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins.

    Due Dates:

    Your Word document summary, including your annotated bibliography, must be uploaded to the Final Project link during week three (3).

    Remember to use the annotated bibliography within the text and include it on the last page of your document (references page).

    All original written work must include a cover page. The assignment must be presented according to the guidelines and principles of content, form, and style of the American Psychological Association (APA), latest edition. Remember that APA style requires double spacing, not extra double spacing between paragraphs, a font size of #12, Times New Roman or Arial font only, and 1-inch margins on all four sides. Do not copy directly from the internet; all citations must conform to APA style. Remember to include bibliographic citations within the text. You must also include the bibliography at the end of your discussion. Please do not consult sources such as Wikipedia, Monographs, or Gestipolis. Use professional sources that include the author’s name(s) and publication date. The evaluation of submitted work will be based on the following criteria: content, clarity, quality of sources used, grammar, citation of authors, and others.

    NOTE: SafeAssignment:

    Before submitting your assignment in the Assignment Box, you must review it using SafeAssignment, located in the left-hand column of your webpage. In the Cover Page section, once you obtain the similarity score for your work, click on “Originality” in the upper left corner. This page will show you the similarity score and the sources from which you copied and pasted the information. You must copy and paste this entire report (which is your own report) into a Word document, which you will submit in the Assignment Box along with your Weekly Assignment.

    If the similarity score is greater than 20%, you will have to redo the work without copying and pasting direct concepts from the author(s), even if you have formatted your citations according to APA style. You must make an effort to use your own words and ideas based on your understanding of the book or articles consulted after reading them, and cite the original sources from which you obtained the information perfectly in APA format, so that the similarity score is less than 20%.

    If the similarity score is less than 20%, it is an acceptable limit, and the work will be ready to be submitted to the instructor.

    Remember that a large percentage of your The quality of your work reflects the implementation and adherence to the APA style guidelines used.

    For any questions about APA style, you can also contact Professor Judith Monrouzeau: jmonrouzeau@keiseruniversity.edu

    Phone: (939) 645-3004

    Professor Monrouzeau can guide you on APA style, writing your papers, and using SafeAssignment.

    It will be beneficial for you to read all the tips below:

    What is a parenthetical citation immediately after the quoted material?

    It is when you place the source in parentheses ( ) immediately after the quoted sentence instead of waiting until the end of the article. This helps the reader know exactly which sentences and paragraphs are taken from particular sources.

    Place the author’s name and the publication date of the source in parentheses immediately after the quoted material. If it is a direct quote, also include the page number. For example:

    “Psychology is defined as the science of behavior and processes mental” (Coon 2012, p. 12).

    Very Important. To see the general instructions for the assignment, click here.

    Write three full pages, but no more than five pages. Your work must include two additional pages: a title page and a references page.

    Please cite all your sources.

    If you are unfamiliar with this, visit the general documents area at Start here to read about APA guidelines for submitting papers.

    Remember to place commas in quotation marks. Use quotation marks (“`) when citing your sources. No more than 20% of your work will be direct quotes. I want your ANALYSIS, not something copied from the internet.

    Instructions for submitting the assignment. To watch an instructional video on how to submit an assignment to your professor, click here.

  • Computer Science Question

    help full question for you

  • teatro

    1. Cul es tu interpretacin del machismo de acuerdo con lo que Canales presenta en el ensayo? (Prrafo de cinco a ocho oraciones)
    2. Redacta en una oracin la idea central del ensayo.
    3. Segn tu opinin, existe el machismo en la sociedad puertorriquea? Explica cmo se manifiesta. (Prrafo de cinco a ocho oraciones)
    4. Identifica dos causas y dos efectos sobre el machismo que expone el autor.
    5. Identifica dos opiniones y dos hechos del autor.
  • Answer two questions

    1. how does bureaucracy represent a crystallized form of social order?

    2.Where do tensions between bureaucracy and lived experience emerge, according to Weber?

    Reading:

    requirements:

    use at least 100 words per question

    Spell check your work

    Use the required reading to answer this set of questions