Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • computer ethics

    please respond to tyler with 150 words please no plagerism,no a i no chat bots

    I am choosing to use Cybersecurity, Hacking, and Digital Identity as my resource, as it is becoming increasingly important as technology progresses to get a good understanding of these topics. The key ideas of Cybersecurity, Hacking, and Digital Identity involves understanding how you can protect yourself online by knowing what kind of attacks and defenses are out there. It also describes in detail what personal information of yours is available and how it can be used online.

    Guiding questions:

    Why is cybersecurity important?

    Cybersecurity is very important, especially nowadays when most things we do rely on being connected to the internet or some sort of electronic device. Without cybersecurity jobs and protocols, hackers can easily acquire someone’s personal data, or mess with an entire business causing disruption to their sales or hurting their reputation. Our national security and public infrastructure are also heavily reliant on cybersecurity to keep these services running smoothly.

    Where do cybersecurity risks exist?

    Cybersecurity risks can be found in any digital system that stores data online. These risks can also increase based on flaws in a system that can spread if they are connected like in a supply chain or a government sector.

    Real-world connection: Knowing how to protect myself and many of my accounts online is something I take great care of, because if you don’t, you are basically leaving the front door open for people who wish to steal your information. If an account were to get hacked due to poor security, it is something you need to act on quick even if it takes a lot of time. For example, I know someone who got their Xbox account hacked because they didn’t have a lot of security on it. Eventually they got it back, but it took months of trying to prove it was really their account.

    Reflection on ethics: When it comes to your account safety, both the individual and the company you are giving your information too are responsible for it. Companies specifically have the responsibility to be transparent with the user and to keep your information safe and only use it when authorized and is absolutely needed. Meanwhile, the individual is the one responsible for using as many security measures as the company allows, making strong passwords, and being aware of potential issues that pop up. This shared responsibility provides comfort and trust between individuals and the company so that we can enjoy ourselves safely and not need to worry about attacks on our digital and real-world identities.

  • computer ethics

    Please respond to cisco with 150 words no plagiarism, no a i. no chat bots

    One of the resources that really stood out to me this week was the CISA Digital Identity and Secure Our World guidance, because it clearly shows how user behavior plays a major role in cybersecurity and ethics.

    One of the main concepts emphasized by CISA is that protecting digital identities is not simply a technical task handled by organizations. It also depends on how people interact with technology on a daily basis. Actions such as enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA), using passkeys, and recognizing phishing attempts can all help reduce cyber attacks. This demonstrates that cybersecurity is a shared responsibility between individuals and organizations.

    In my own technology use, I rely most on my gaming account, email account, and social media accounts. If any of these were hacked, it would be extremely disruptive, especially since my email account is used for account recovery for almost everything else. I have received phishing emails before, one example was an email that appeared to come from Microsoft, but it was misspelled as Mlcrosoft. Because of experiences like this, I do not open emails unless I am expecting them, and I always carefully read the information before clicking anything. I have also started using second-step verification and passkeys, which has made me feel much more secure.

    Regarding my digital identity, I know that some information about me is already online, such as old photos from when I used to hang out with friends. However, the part of my digital identity that I believe is most vulnerable is my passive data, since I dont care about hiding my browsing habits or online activity. When I was younger, I reused passwords across multiple accounts, but I am now transitioning everything to passkeys, and MFA which is much more secure.

    From an ethical perspective, I believe responsibility for a compromised account is shared between individuals and companies. Many users assume that a strong password is enough and trust that large corporations are properly protecting their accounts. At the same time, companies have an ethical responsibility to treat user data as a trust rather than just an asset. A real-world example of this is the AT&T data breaches, where sensitive customer information was stolen.

    I was personally affected by the AT&T breach. My Social Security number was compromised and used for employment, which I discovered when I applied for a program and nearly lost my eligibility because my SSN was already in use. This experience made the risks of cybersecurity failures very real to me, and it has motivated me to educate my family members who may not fully understand these threats.

    After reflecting on this weeks assignments, one security habit I plan to implement is closing old accounts that I no longer use, since unused accounts can still be compromised. The easiest habit for me to follow is enabling MFA because it’s straightforward and effective. The most difficult habit is keeping my systems fully updated because, as a computer and gaming enthusiast, I know updates can sometimes interfere with programs or games that are working perfectly.

    Overall, I believe ethical cybersecurity behavior is important for my future career and reputation. I cannot advocate for security if I do not practice it myself. As the digital world continues to grow, maintaining ethical cybersecurity habits helps build a white-hat reputation, which is essential for trust, credibility, and long-term advancement.

  • Psb3002 power point

    Behavioral genetics is an area of study introduced by the field of biopsychology. The purpose of this assignment is to explore concepts related to behavioral genetics as it relates to human behavior. For this assignment, I want you to work as a group. Create a cohesive PowerPoint presentation that illustrates your thoughts on a hot topic in behavioral genetics. These can include but are not limited to:

    • Sexual behavior
    • Aggression
    • Cheating
    • Addiction
    • Personality
    • Religious attitudes
    • Political views
    • Mental health
    • Intelligence

    Your presentation should be at least 10-12 slides in length. Please support your points with information from the text and at least 5 additional peer-reviewed journal articles from the library. Each group member must contribute a minimum of two (2) educational/peer-reviewed sources from the library. These should be primary journal articles from psychology journals related to course topics. You can find access to free ones via the FIU library.

    Be sure to include speaker notes and images to support your points these are required. Take care to use APA formatting in citing your sources in both your speaker notes and a reference slide (not counted towards your total slide count). Slides should only include the main points. Avoid overcrowding your slides.

    See this article for more information: Add speaker note to your slide – . Voice is NOT needed.

    Your name clearly labeled on your slides. Only ONE group member is responsible for submitting the finalized project via their group project link in Canvas.

    Formatting Reminder: You are expected to format your presentation according to APA formatting guidelines. Please see the APA resources folder in our classroom for additional resources and tools for help in preparing your paper. Be sure to cite your sources accordingly, to avoid plagiarism as you would in your formal written assignments.

    You are expected to turn the PowerPoint presentation in by the due date depositing it in the appropriate section in the Canvas Classroom. Assignments may not be accepted after that deadline check the syllabus and assignment links for specific information on time and dates.

    Please label your presentation with your last name and the name of the assignment like this, PSB3002- ROARY_GroupPresentation.ppt.

    The format for the presentation must be in PowerPoint format. That means only .ppt files.

    PDF or other files will not be graded if you submit a file other than the specified required formats, your assignment will not be graded or will automatically be deducted 10 points. You will be asked to submit the correct file format by a specific deadline. If you fail to meet this deadline, your paper will not be graded. Check your email regularly.

    You will be required to submit an Initial Group Charter and a Revised Group Charter. One file per team will be submitted to the assignment link. These files will have unique due dates and will require you to work as a team to set deadlines, assign group roles, and stay on task throughout the term. It is intended to keep everyone up to date on the progress made on the presentation. Please use the charters to document communication and progress within the team – this includes any issues that may arise throughout the term, as this is the purpose of the group charter!

    Also, when you are sure your project is finalized, please have only one team member per group submit the file for everyone – be sure you submit the finalized file. The links will usually close once you submit the file to the group project assignment link. Group work is required. Please include the name of the person creating a given slide. Be sure to include all the names of the group members that collaborated on the project in the Title/Cover slide.

  • Phil Souad reflection

    You will submit your course reflection here. This reflection must address the ways in which each of the topics we covered played out in your daily life, how it impacted you or made you think differently. You may submit this as an essay, an audio recording, a video–whatever you choose. I do not have any length requirements–I just want to see that you’ve put in the effort to get something out of this class. It’s your chance to be creative and tell me how the topics we covered mattered to you. And if they didn’t matter to you, then tell me why.

    Week 1

    How Should One Live?

    This week, we are reading about the Buddha, and Socrates. More specifically, we are interested in what they are teaching us about the “good life.”

    What can we learn from their ideas, and the way they lived their lives about how we ought to live our lives? What did they think was important in life? Finally, what were some similarities and differences in their beliefs about how one ought to live?

    The Buddha and Socrates both teach ways to live a good life, focusing on self-improvement and ethical living. The Buddha emphasizes mindfulness, meditation, and letting go of attachments and desires as a way to reduce suffering and achieve inner peace. He encourages compassion for others and understanding the impermanent nature of life, suggesting that true happiness comes from within rather than from material possessions. Socrates, on the other hand, emphasizes questioning, reason, and living virtuously through knowledge and reflection. He believed that an examined lifeone in which individuals constantly seek truth and understand themselvesis essential to living well. Both stress morality, self-awareness, and personal growth, but they approach it differently: the Buddha focuses on cultivating inner calm and detachment from worldly desires, while Socrates focuses on rational understanding, dialogue, and the pursuit of wisdom. Despite these differences, both philosophies encourage living intentionally and ethically, showing that a meaningful life requires both awareness of oneself and consideration of others.

    Week 2

    Aristotle on Happiness

    What does it mean for someone to have achieved “happiness” according to Aristotle. Do you agree with these requirements or not? Explain.

    Next, respond to one or more of your peers with respect to how they answered the question. For example, did they help you understand something by their post? Did they cause you to think about something more deeply? Do you disagree with what they said?

    Aristotle defines happiness as the greatest human good which is realized through a good life of living virtuously and achieving his responsibility of being a rational being. He viewed pleasure to be not a momentary feeling but a life longundertaking which indicates moral grandeur. Virtues and purity as well as reason to determine choices enable people to form a character and have a good life. Aristotle also found that external goods, e.g. friendship and health, are also conducive to happiness, though they cannot substitute virtue.

    My personal responses to the needs of happiness as outlined by Aristotle are mostly positive since they focus on the issues of responsibility, self-discipline, and purposefulness. A virtuous life promotes growth and development of an individual and adds value to the society. Though, I do not quite agree with the concept that it is possible to determine happiness only in the end of life. In my opinion, human beings are able to perceive happiness in phases, despite their continuous growing and learning.

    Week 3

    Ethical Relativism

    This week we are discussing ethical relativism. What are the pros and cons of the belief that ethics ought to be relative, i.e. normative ethical/cultural relativism? In other words, it might be obvious that certain cultures do indeed have different ethical beliefs, but what do we make of the claim that this should/ought to be the case?

    Ethical relativism has both its advantages and disadvantages in regard to comprehending morality. The first benefit is that it fosters tolerance and respect to cultural differences. It makes us realize that we all did not revere in the same beliefs and traditions and what is normal to one people may not be normal to another. This view is able to minimize judgment and make people live contentedly together. One of the demerits however is that ethical relativism may render it hard to condemn harmful practices. When all is acceptable in a given culture, then the practices which are against the fundamental human rights may go unchecked. I believe, ethical relativism proves to be useful in the interpretation of other persons, yet there must be some worldwide norms to prevent people being hurt.

    Tao Te Ching

    This week, I’d like you to choose 2 or 3 passages from the Tao Te Ching and, in your own words, explain what you think it means. This is often students’ favorite reading of the semester, so have fun letting your mind wander with where the Tao takes it.

    We shape clay into a pot, but its the emptiness inside that makes it useful.
    This teaches that usefulness often comes from what isnt there and the space or quietness is what gives purpose.

    Knowing others is clever; knowing yourself is wisdom.
    This means real understanding starts from within, selfawareness is deeper than just understanding others.

    Week 4

    Descartes’ Meditations

    Of the arguments that Descartes uses to show that (almost) all of our knowledge is subject to doubt, which seemed the strongest? Why?

    Also, explain how Descartes arrives at his one “indubitable truth.”

    One of the arguments that seemed strongest was the Dream Argument. Descartes explains how when we dream, these dreams can feel like it is real life. This is what makes it challenging to believe if we are actually living these experiences or if they are just a dream in your deep sleep. This argument seemed strongest to me because it really shows us how we can doubt due to what we believe we are seeing, hearing, and feeling.

    Descartes arrives at his one “indubitable truth” by questioning our world, questioning the way we live. He believes that even if there was a chance that if everything we live in is fake or even like a simulation, that because he is questioning life that proves to him that he actually exists. I myself have been in the shoes of questioning life and everything around us, what also always proves to me that I truly exist is the fact that I am questioning what I am living.

    Week 6: Evidence

    This week, Clifford makes an interesting case for the moral responsibility we have to not believe anything without sufficient evidence. In fact, he states, “It is wrong everywhere for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.” After reading Clifford, what do you think counts as sufficient evidence? When do we know we have done our due diligence in seeking out the required evidence for our beliefs? Finally, do you think we actually do this in life? If we do, in what situations are we most likely to seek evidence before adopting a belief?

    In The Ethics of Belief, William Kingdon Clifford argues that it is wrong to believe something without enough evidence. I think sufficient evidence means information that comes from reliable sources and is supported by facts or research, not just personal opinions or rumors.

    We can say we have done our due diligence when we take time to question information, check different sources, and make sure the evidence supports the belief. This helps us avoid believing something that may not be true. In real life, people do not always do this. Sometimes beliefs are based on emotions or what others say. However, in important situations such as health, finances, or major life decisions, people are more likely to look for strong evidence before forming a belief.

    Week 6: James vs. Clifford

    After reading James and Clifford, who do you think has the most compelling argument for their position? Does James convince you that we must sometimes believe without evidence, or does Clifford convince you that belief without sufficient evidence is a moral and epistemic failure? Why?

    I feel as though both James and Clifford have compelling arguments and their positions can be applied to different situations. Clifford makes a strong point that we have an epistemic responsibility to form our beliefs based on sufficient evidence because careless beliefs that are not based on such evidence can lead to harmful consequences, not only for ourselves but for others as well. He emphasizes the importance of questioning our beliefs, doubting them, and then examining them. At the same time, James also makes a compelling argument that we cannot always wait to have sufficient evidence before making a decision or forming a belief. In situations where we face a genuine option, we may have to choose to believe even with uncertainty and rely on our values. In real life this makes sense because we cannot know everything, and sometimes it’s difficult to gather sufficient evidence, so we must accept some uncertainty and choose to believe. For example, when we put our trust in someone like a friend or partner, it often requires us to choose to believe that they will be loyal and not break our trust. However, if I had to choose one position, I would agree more with Clifford because it’s generally more responsible to base our beliefs on strong evidence.

    Week 7

    Minority Report

    After watching the movie, if a system like Pre-Crime could ever be perfected, would it be something you think society should have? Moreover, if it could be perfected, what would that mean for free will?

    A flawlessly accurate pre-crime system, akin to the one depicted in Minority Report, would remain highly contentious as it penalizes individuals for actions they have not yet committed. This challenges the principle that justice should be founded on actual behavior rather than anticipated actions. Even in the absence of errors, it raises significant issues regarding personal liberty, potential misuse of authority, and whether the prevention of harm justifies the infringement of autonomy. Furthermore, it presents a philosophical quandary concerning free will. If the system is indeed infallible, it suggests that our decisions are predetermined, rendering free will a mere illusion. Conversely, if individuals possess the ability to alter their predicted futures, then the system cannot be deemed truly perfect. This indicates that one cannot simultaneously achieve both absolute prediction and authentic human freedom.p

  • Research & Summaries Question

    Using the material we’ve studied and your own research, your task is to prepare a briefing on this week’s topic for your management team. Your briefing should be submitted as a Word doc of approximately 3-5 pages. Your briefing should describe the technology, benefits, and rationale for use, current or future risks associated with the technology, strategies to mitigate these risks, implementation strategies, and any other pertinent information that you believe your team should know.

    Alos Submit 3-5 PowerPoint slides that you would use to present the content of your written briefing to your management team. Consider these your guide or talking points that you would use when making a presentation to your team.

    More On Defining LLMs:

    Are LLMs Risky:

    More on the Risks of LLMs: https://www.malwarebytes.com/cybersecurity/basics/chatgpt-ai-security#:~:text=Is%20ChatGPT%20a%20risk%3F,create%20components%20of%20malicious%20software.

    OWASP List10 Most Critical Large Language:

  • VISIBLE BODY The Muscular System: Pelvis and Lower Limb

    visible body activity

  • The Muscular System: Pelvis and Lower Limb

    visible body lab activity

  • Public Health Question

    Reflection Paper #2

    Instructions: Based on the lecture readings, class discussion, and activities from the last four weeks, write a reflection that touches on the following:

    Health Disparities: roles in policies and community engagement

    Public Health Theoretical Frameworks: ecological model, life course theory, fundamental cause theory (trauma, lived experiences, ACEs/toxic stress), and others.

    Public Health Theoretical Frameworks: ecological model, life course theory, fundamental cause theory (trauma, lived experiences)

    Please ensure to highlight how this content will help shape your research project.

    The essay must be between 3-4 pages long, formatted in Arial font, 11 font size, with 1-inch margins. Students will upload their reflection papers via Brightspace by 11:59 p.m. on March 20th.

    Total Points: 5 points

  • organizacin financiera bsica.

    necesito citas nada de plagio o 0 inteligencia artificial esto es una investigacion que quiero poder poner en mi libro para crear conciencia desde la verda graficas citas de estudios de las persona que llegan ala rueza si los que nacen en buena familia o los pobres de que porsentaje hablamos si los hombres o las mujeres , mujeres solteras , o madres solteras y un secreto mejor juardado en mi libro que estoy escribiendo necito mas de 21 referencias comparativas estructuras legales que si pueden llevarte al exito , importante no plagio

  • HTY 489:CBE2-Special Topics in History (2026 Spring)

    Purpose of this Assessment

    Throughout this competency, you have learned about several infectious diseases of human history. The purpose of this summative assessment is for you to demonstrate your ability to apply this knowledge by selecting two infectious diseases and describing their impact(s) on human society, economy, culture, and politics.

    The project will have two components that will be combined together to create one project. These include: (1) a summary of three infectious diseases within their historical contexts, and (2) a description of the ways in which two of those infectious diseases affected human society, economy, culture, and politics.

    Items Required for Submission

    A 1500 word essay that includes the following:

    • A summary of three infectious diseases within their historical contexts.
    • A description of two infectious diseases, along with their impact(s) on human society, economy, culture, and politics.

    Before you submit, check to see if you believe you have met the criteria noted below. Did you.

    • Clearly explain and provide rationale for your viewpoint?
    • Write logically with accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation?
    • Adhere to the length requirements?
    • Follow APA formatting and referencing standards citations?
    • Convert all files to a doc, docx, ppt or pptx file.