Category: uncategorised

  • Gynecological Health Care for Lesbian, Bisexual & Transg…

    The purpose of this paper is to better understand gynecological health care for lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals.

    • Define and describe for lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals.
      • Gender and sexuality concepts.
      • Social and political context.
      • Social determinants of health affecting lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals.
      • Barriers to health care.
      • Health care disparities.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
    • The paper is to be no shorter than 3-4 pages in length, excluding the title and references page.
    • Your paper should be formatted per APA.
    • Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism through Turnitin.
    • Incorporate current practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment and a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
  • Case Study

    Instructions in attachment

  • Value Creation, Capstone

    Required Playbook Assignment 23.3: Organizational Design for Value Creation (Capstone)

    • Due Apr 2 by 4:29pm
    • Points 20
    • Submitting a file upload
    • Available after Mar 26 at 1pm

    Module OutcomesLearning Outcome Addressed:

    1. Analyze an organizational design initiative, and assess how it creates value.

    This is a capstone assignment that will be counted as part of your final Capstone submission.

    As discussed in , your responsibilities related to the overall design of your organization will increase as you move into more advanced leadership roles. Restructuring clinical practice and leadership, creating greater integration, and growing the institution are some components of healthcare organizational design.

    In Module 6 and Module 7, you studied specific examples of these kinds of activities, including initiatives related to clinical integration, population health, and evidence-based medicine. In this playbook assignment, you will analyze an organizational design initiative and assess its relationship to value creation.

    To complete this assignment, follow these steps:

    • Download the Microsoft Word file , and save it to your computer.
    • Complete the activity, and respond to the prompts by entering your answers in the fillable fields. Your responses should draw from the program materials and your personal experience.
      • While your responses will not be shared with your peers, please do not provide any sensitive personal or organizational information in your playbook.
    • Save your Microsoft Word file to include your changes and add your first and last names to the saved file (i.e., Healthcare_Playbook-23.3-FirstName-LastName).
    • IMPORTANT: Please review the rubric below for details about how your submission will be evaluated before you begin work on it.
    • Note that a score of “Excellent” requires that you exceed the basic assignment requirements.

    Submission instructions:

    • Save the file with your responses to the questions.
    • Click the Start Assignment button.
    • Upload your saved file.
    • Click the Submit Assignment button.

    The average completion time for this activity is 1 hour 20 minutes.

    This is a required assignment and counts toward program completion.

    Your Assignment Submission
    Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded.

    Rubric

    Required Playbook Assignment 23.3: Organizational Design for Value Creation

    Required Playbook Assignment 23.3: Organizational Design for Value Creation

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe an organizational design initiative and at least one way it is related to one or more of the three components of value: quality, access, and cost. If any of the three components (quality, access, or cost) are not impacted by this initiative, give at least one reason a component is not impacted.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    The response describes an organizational design initiative and two ways it is related to quality, access, and/or cost. If quality, access, or cost is not impacted by the initiative, the response gives two reasons why the initiative doesnt affect that component.

    4 pts

    Proficient

    The response describes an organizational design initiative and one way it is related to quality, access, and/or cost. If quality, access, or cost is not impacted by the initiative, the response gives one reason why the initiative doesnt affect that component.

    0 pts

    Criterion not Met

    The response does not describe an organizational design initiative and at least one way it is related to quality, access, and/or cost or does not give at least one reason quality access and/or cost is not impacted.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe at least one way the effectiveness of this initiative is being or could be assessed.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    The response describes two or more ways the effectiveness of the initiative is being or could be assessed.

    4 pts

    Proficient

    The response describes one way the effectiveness of the initiative is being or could be assessed.

    0 pts

    Criterion not Met

    The response does not describe at least one way the effectiveness of this initiative is being or could be assessed.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe at least two things about the initiative that are working well. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, describe at least two things you would focus on as a manager to ensure success in creating value.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    The response describes three or more things about the initiative that are working well. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, the response describes at least three things a manager could focus on to ensure success in creating value.

    4 pts

    Proficient

    The response describes two things about the initiative that are working well. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, the response describes two things a manager could focus on to ensure success in creating value.

    0 pts

    Criterion not Met

    The response does not describe at least two things about the initiative that are working well. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, the response does not describe at least two things you would focus on as a manager to further ensure success in creating value.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe at least one thing about the initiative that could be improved and at least one way it could be improved. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, describe at least two possible pitfalls that a manager would need to prepare for.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    The response describes two or more things that could be improved and at least one way each of them could be improved. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, describe at least three possible pitfalls that a manager should prepare for.

    4 pts

    Proficient

    The response describes one thing that could be improved and one way it could be improved. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, the response describes two possible pitfalls a manager should prepare for.

    0 pts

    Criterion not Met

    The response does not describe at least one thing that could be improved and at least one way it could be improved. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, the response does not describe at least two possible pitfalls that a manager would need to prepare for.

  • Organization Design and Value

    Required Playbook Assignment 23.3: Organizational Design for Value Creation (Capstone)

    • Due Apr 2 by 4:29pm
    • Points 20
    • Submitting a file upload
    • Available after Mar 26 at 1pm

    Module OutcomesLearning Outcome Addressed:

    1. Analyze an organizational design initiative, and assess how it creates value.

    This is a capstone assignment that will be counted as part of your final Capstone submission.

    As discussed in , your responsibilities related to the overall design of your organization will increase as you move into more advanced leadership roles. Restructuring clinical practice and leadership, creating greater integration, and growing the institution are some components of healthcare organizational design.

    In Module 6 and Module 7, you studied specific examples of these kinds of activities, including initiatives related to clinical integration, population health, and evidence-based medicine. In this playbook assignment, you will analyze an organizational design initiative and assess its relationship to value creation.

    To complete this assignment, follow these steps:

    • Download the Microsoft Word file , and save it to your computer.
    • Complete the activity, and respond to the prompts by entering your answers in the fillable fields. Your responses should draw from the program materials and your personal experience.
      • While your responses will not be shared with your peers, please do not provide any sensitive personal or organizational information in your playbook.
    • Save your Microsoft Word file to include your changes and add your first and last names to the saved file (i.e., Healthcare_Playbook-23.3-FirstName-LastName).
    • IMPORTANT: Please review the rubric below for details about how your submission will be evaluated before you begin work on it.
    • Note that a score of “Excellent” requires that you exceed the basic assignment requirements.

    Submission instructions:

    • Save the file with your responses to the questions.
    • Click the Start Assignment button.
    • Upload your saved file.
    • Click the Submit Assignment button.

    The average completion time for this activity is 1 hour 20 minutes.

    This is a required assignment and counts toward program completion.

    Your Assignment Submission
    Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded.

    Rubric

    Required Playbook Assignment 23.3: Organizational Design for Value Creation

    Required Playbook Assignment 23.3: Organizational Design for Value Creation

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe an organizational design initiative and at least one way it is related to one or more of the three components of value: quality, access, and cost. If any of the three components (quality, access, or cost) are not impacted by this initiative, give at least one reason a component is not impacted.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    The response describes an organizational design initiative and two ways it is related to quality, access, and/or cost. If quality, access, or cost is not impacted by the initiative, the response gives two reasons why the initiative doesnt affect that component.

    4 pts

    Proficient

    The response describes an organizational design initiative and one way it is related to quality, access, and/or cost. If quality, access, or cost is not impacted by the initiative, the response gives one reason why the initiative doesnt affect that component.

    0 pts

    Criterion not Met

    The response does not describe an organizational design initiative and at least one way it is related to quality, access, and/or cost or does not give at least one reason quality access and/or cost is not impacted.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe at least one way the effectiveness of this initiative is being or could be assessed.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    The response describes two or more ways the effectiveness of the initiative is being or could be assessed.

    4 pts

    Proficient

    The response describes one way the effectiveness of the initiative is being or could be assessed.

    0 pts

    Criterion not Met

    The response does not describe at least one way the effectiveness of this initiative is being or could be assessed.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe at least two things about the initiative that are working well. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, describe at least two things you would focus on as a manager to ensure success in creating value.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    The response describes three or more things about the initiative that are working well. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, the response describes at least three things a manager could focus on to ensure success in creating value.

    4 pts

    Proficient

    The response describes two things about the initiative that are working well. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, the response describes two things a manager could focus on to ensure success in creating value.

    0 pts

    Criterion not Met

    The response does not describe at least two things about the initiative that are working well. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, the response does not describe at least two things you would focus on as a manager to further ensure success in creating value.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe at least one thing about the initiative that could be improved and at least one way it could be improved. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, describe at least two possible pitfalls that a manager would need to prepare for.

    5 pts

    Excellent

    The response describes two or more things that could be improved and at least one way each of them could be improved. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, describe at least three possible pitfalls that a manager should prepare for.

    4 pts

    Proficient

    The response describes one thing that could be improved and one way it could be improved. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, the response describes two possible pitfalls a manager should prepare for.

    0 pts

    Criterion not Met

    The response does not describe at least one thing that could be improved and at least one way it could be improved. If the initiative is just launching or planned for the future, the response does not describe at least two possible pitfalls that a manager would need to prepare for.

  • PHI 6301 Homework

    three parts assignment

  • PHI 6301 Homework

    Instruction in Attachments

  • Week 12 Discussion Post

    INITIAL POST (Due by 11:59 pm on Monday): After viewing the guest lecture and reading the Wangari Walter et al. article, please respond to the following questions:

    – How do your experiences at your current practicum agency relate to information described in the guest lecture?

    – Which part(s) of the Wangari Walter et al. article resonated with you? OR challenged your thinking about working in social work settings? Explain.

    – Which recommendations offered in the article have you seen in place in organizations where you’ve worked (currently in the past)? Explain.

    – Which recommendations would you suggest for your current practicum agency? Explain.

    RESPONSE POST (Due by 11:59 pm on Monday): Utilizing this week’s readings and course content, respond to the posts of AT LEAST 2 of your classmates.

    Presentation:

  • Describe Alankara in Abhijanashakuntalam

    The word Alankra (Sanskrit: 3 Drag and literally means “ornament”) In Sanskrit poetics, Alankra rerers to figures of speech that enhance the beauty, expressiveness, and aesthetic appeal of poetry and drama.

    Just as ornaments beautiful a person, Alankras beautiful language.

    Types of Alankra

    Alankra (Sound-based) – beauty through sound (e.g., alliteration). Artha Alankra (Sense-based) – beauty through meaning (e.g., simile, metaphor).

    Alankra in Abhijnanashakuntalam Kalidasa is renowned for his natural, graceful, and suggestive use of Alankras, never overloading the text but blending them seamlessly with emotion (rasa)

    1. Upama (smile)

    One of the most frequent Alankras in the play.

    Kalidasa is often called the “master of

    similes.”

    Example :

    akuntala’s beauty is compared to:

    A creeper (lata) needing support

    A fresh blossom untouched by bees

    Highlights her delicacy, innocence, and natural charm.

    2. Rpaka (metaphor)

    Direct identification between two things without “like” or “as.”

    Example

    Nature is not just compared but treated as a living companion to Sakuntal.

    Effect :

    Creates unity between human emotions and nature, a hallmark of Kalidasa .

    3. Anuprsa (alliteration) :

    Repetition of similar sounds.

    Example :

    Musical quality in dialogues and verses enhances :

    Musical quality in dialogues and verses enhances dramatic appeal.

    Effect :

    Adds rhythm and lyrical beauty, especially in romantic and emotional scenes.

    4. Utpreks ( poetic fancy / imagination comparison)

    Suggesting a possibility in a highly imaginative way.

    Example :

    Musical quality in dialogues and verses enhances

    The forest seems to sympathize with akuntala’s sorrow when she leaves for the palace.

    Effect :

    Intensifies emotional depth and pathos (karua rasa).

    5. Atiayokti (Hyperbole)

    Deliberate exaggeration.

    Example :

    King Duyanta’s admiration of akuntala’s beauty is expressed in exaggerated po terms.

    Effect :

    Enhances romantic mood (rngra rasa )

    6. Arthntaranysa (Statement Supporting Idea)

    A general truth is supported by example.

    Effect :

    Gives philosophical depth to dialogues, especially in reflective passages.

    Significance of Alankra in the play

    1. Enhances Rasa ( Emotion )

    Alankras support dominant rasas: rgra (love)

    Karua (pathos)

    2. Harmony with nature 1. Enhances Rasa ( Emotion )

    Nature imagery (trees, rivers, animals) is

    richly ornamented, reflecting:

    Emotional states

    Spiritual connection

    3.Characterization

    akuntal gentle, natural imagery

    Duyanta heroic and romantic

    expressions

    4. Aesthetic Balence

    Kalidasa avoids excessive ornamentation;Alankras are:

    Natural (sahaja)

    Elegant (mdhurya)

    Conclusion :

    Alankra in Abhijnanashakunt mere decoration but an organi poetic expression. Through si metaphors, and imaginative c Kalidasa elevates the play intc masterpiece of beauty, emotic artistic harmony, perfectly blending form (alankra) with feeling (rasa)

  • Communications Question

    Instructions

    Although you worked as a group on the experimental design and data collection, each student will submit an individual five-page paper. If you write less than 4.5 pages, you are not making use of the space available to you and will be deducted points. If you write more than 5.5 pages, you are writing too much and you will be deducted points. Your paper is therefore expected to be between 4.5 and 5.5 pages in length. This page count does not include the title page, reference page, or any appendix. You may work together on the statistical analyses if you wish. However, the writing of the paper should be completed individually.

    Note: the expectation is you write a paper in a research methods style.

    • This means in the same style as the typical paper you have been reading in the readings for each week so far in the course.
    • This means using citations to support claims, statements, facts, or opinions you present. When you write the paper, do not write anywhere about the ‘assignment’ or ‘course/class’, Although you are writing this paper because of the course, you should not mention this in the paper.
    • Also, do not use the prompts listed below as questions/sub-headings in your paper. For example, don’t write ‘Justify why you selected this issue’ in the paper and then answer this question. You answer this question in the course of writing your page 1, just as the articles in the readings you read answer this question without specifically writing ‘justify why you selected this issue.’
    • You should stay close to the page specifications below but it is okay if a section is a few (23) lines shorter or longer than stated. In some cases, your method may be much shorter than the specified length in which case add additional text elsewhere in the paper to compensate.
    • Do not make up statistics or information.
    • The paper should be written in APA style. (Remember, this means double-spaced!) In this paper and other papers in the course, you should avoid personal stories about your personal experiences.
    • An abstract is not needed for this paper or any papers in the course.
    • You should not cite course materials (this includes live sessions).

    Page 12: Intro

    • Present a general surface-level description of the issue the paper’s content will examine (references).
    • Explain why understanding this case is important (references).
    • Justify why you selected this issue (references).
    • What specific question(s)/hypothesis(es) are you trying to answer?

    Page 3: Method

    • Use this , also found in the instructional materials for this week, to format this section.
    • Include a link to the Qualtrics experiment (the link you used in Turk) at the bottom of the method page as a footnote in Times New Roman 12-point font.

    Page 4: Results

    • Analyze the results from the experiment using statistical analyses you deem appropriate.
    • Present the results of the statistical analyses in APA style.
    • The analysis of the data from the experiment can be completed as a group, pairs, threes, or individually. The same for the write-up of these results in APA style. (Remember in the SPSS assignment, you wrote up the results in APA style). Whether you work alone or with others for the results section has no direct impact on your grade. Your grade for the results section of your paper is determined by what is in your results section, whether you did this alone or with others. Please note: that means that if you have a mistake in your results section that was the result of you accepting/trusting the work of someone else, that is your responsibility and your paper grade is lowered. You cannot claim points back by arguing that someone else conducted that analysis or miswrote up the report. If the work is in your results section it is your responsibility.
    • You do not need to analyze all the questions in the experiment. Analyze only what is sufficient to meet the page space of the results section as outlined in the paper instructions.
    • It is important to make sure the question/topic you pose in the introduction (pages 12) is answered at least in part by the results presented in the results section.
    • Upload the SPSS data file you used for your paper into Week 14 Checkpoint 01. For most teams everyone will have very similar or identical SPSS data files but it is ok if your data file is different.
    • You do not need to have significant results. Significant results are often more interesting for you personally to write about but your grade is not determined by whether your results are significant or non-significant.
    • There should be no SPSS output anywhere in the paper (this includes any Appendix). Everything your instructor needs from the data is in your APA style write-up or the master SPSS file that is uploaded.

    Page 5: Discussion

    • Explain what your data means.
    • Offer some tentative explanations as to why you think you found the data you did.
    • Include possible limitations of your experiment.
    • Provide some suggested practical implications from your results.

    Note: Remember 1-inch margins and only Times New Roman 12-point font. If you need Tables, these should go in an Appendix, which is placed after the references. Official APA rules allow Tables to be embedded directly in the paper, such as in the results, but in this course all tables will go in the Appendix.



    Week 13 Activity 01: Design and Conduct an Experiment (Group)

    Due: Sunday, April 5th

    Instructions:

    For this module, you will work within your groups to design an experiment on any topic of your choice.
    For this checkpoint, please have one group member post the following:

    1. Our research hypothesis is that when two products are identical in all aspects, (like price and design), adding a “discount label will make people more likely to buy the product.
    2. The independent variable (IV) is the discount label.
    • We will manipulate this by showing one group a product with a 20% OFF label and another group the same product without the label. Everything else will stay the same.
    1. A dependent variables (DVs) are:
    • How likely they are to buy the product (17 scale)
    • Whether they would choose this product over similar ones (17 scale)

    Here are three concrete examples of an experiment. Note the first experiment would not be a good one for your course paper as it is too hard and time consuming for you to implement in real time. It is presented however as a reminder for you of what happened in the live session.

    Example 1

    1. Candy improves memory. (Hypothesis as it makes a prediction.)
    2. IV = Candy, one group will receive candy, one group will not receive candy.
    3. DV = Number of words correctly recalled. (Note for your study, it is strongly recommended you have multiple DVs, the live session only had one DV to simplify the example.) Measured by number of words correctly recalled.

    Example 2

    1. What type of movie poster is most effective? (Question as no prediction.)
    2. IV = Type of movie poster, one group will see hero, one group will see villain, one group will see hero and villain. Everything else about the posters is identical apart from whether it is the hero, villain, or both hero and villain.
    3. DV = desire to see movie, likelihood of recommending movie to friend, likelihood of watching movie trailer on internet, likelihood of looking for movie on social media (e.g. facebook). All DVs measured on 7-point scale (1 = not at all, 7 = very much). Example question 1) “This movie poster makes me want to see this movie”. Example question 2) “This movie poster makes me want to watch the movie trailer”.

    Example 3

    1. In food packing, gluten-free statements are more effective than high protein at increasing consumer desire to purchase the product. (Hypothesis as it makes a prediction.)
    2. IV = Type of nutritional claim; one group will see the product with a gluten-free statement and one group will see the product with a high protein statement. Everything else about the product is identical apart from the nutritional claim. To create this you would find an image of the product on the Internet and then Photoshop in the two different nutritional claims.
    3. DV = desire to buy the product, likelihood of buying the product, frequency of buying the product. All DVs measured on 7 point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). Example question 1) “I want to buy this product”. Example question 2) “I would buy this product for my lunch”.


  • Business writing Business proposal project and presentation

    I will be attaching 2 files one is how to write a business proposal and the other is an example of it.Use them as guideline.

    It has to be based on sultanate of Oman My idea is Self-Service Car Wash

    Concept:

    A modern self-service car wash facility where customers wash their own cars using professional equipment, available 24/7.

    Problem in Oman:

    Car washes are overcrowded, especially on weekends (23 hours waiting)

    Most close early (1011 PM)

    No flexible options for people with busy or night schedules

    Some customers dont trust others with their cars

    Lack of access to professional tools for personal use

    Solution:

    Provide a self-service, automated car wash station where:

    Customers wash their cars themselves

    Pay per use (low cost)

    Open 24/7

    Fast, no waitingI sent everything but please let me know if you require further information.Also please dont forget to include the college MCBS and be careful of plagiarism or AI use as it will be submitted using turnit in.

    As for the presentation it should tops 5 minutes for me to present so please keep everything simple yet creative and informative.