Category: uncategorised

  • Advance pathophysiology week 7

    NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS

    In this exercise, you will complete a MindMap to gauge your understanding of this weeks content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap assignment.

    • Stroke
    • Multiple sclerosis
    • Transient Ischemic Attack
    • Myasthenia gravis
    • Headache: May choose migraine, cluster, tension
    • Seizure disorders: Adults or Children
    • Brain injury
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • Neuroblastoma
    • Parkinson’s Disease
    • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
    • Degenerative Disorders of the Spine: May choose Low back pain, Degenerative Disc Disease

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 7

    Submit your MindMap by Day 7 of Week 7.

    Rubric

    NURS_6501_Week 3, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric

    NURS_6501_Week 3, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one of the possible topics provided and complete the MindMap.Describe the Pathophysiology and Etiology of the primary diagnosis. List risk factors related to the primary diagnosis.

    30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentA thoroughly completed MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the pathophysiology at the cellular level and shows understanding of the primary diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly identifies etiology for the diagnosis and lists appropriate risk factors.27 to >23.0 ptsGoodA completed MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response describes the pathophysiology at the organ level of the primary diagnosis. The response does not identify specific etiology for the diagnosis and some risk factors are not linked to diagnosis.

    23 to >19.0 ptsFairAn inaccurately complete or vague MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies etiology for the diagnosis and all risk factors are not linked to diagnosis.19 to >0 ptsPoorAn incomplete MindMap with a selected topic was submitted, or is missing. The response does not describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis. The response does not identify etiology for this diagnosis and risk factors are missing.

    30 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat are the patients signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications?

    20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

    14 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how the diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications, or is missing.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat diagnostic tests or labs would you order to confirm the primary diagnosis?

    20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis and are appropriately linked within the Mind map.17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis but are not appropriately linked within the Mind map.

    14 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis and are not linked within the Mind map.12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications.

    20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately and thoroughly describes potential referrals and medications.17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately describes potential referrals and medications.

    14 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes potential referrals and medications.12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes possible referrals and medications, or is missing.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources and Mind map formatting/writing

    10 to >7.0 ptsExcellentThe response is articulate with demonstration of advanced terms and knowledge in writing style with no grammatical or spelling errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles that are within last 5 years. Research articles are also cited and linked within mind map.7 to >4.0 ptsGoodThe response is efficient with correct spelling and no gross grammatical and/or spelling errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles within last 5 years but not cited or linked within mind map.

    4 to >2.0 ptsFairThe response is fair with a few spelling and grammatical errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles but not within last 5 years and not cited or linked within mind map.2 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is poor with gross grammatical and spelling errors. Did not use appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Did not include reference list with at least two research articles.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

  • Real explanation and quick response

    I manage to do my math homework prepretty well and give a concise answer

  • Geography Question

    Natural resources are those that are taken from nature. They are used without modifying them, i.e. in the same form as they exist in. Rivers lakes, air, soils, minerals, trees, mountains, etc. are natural resources roads, telephone, etc. been provided to us by nature. Human beings have used their intelligence to manufacture them for their own use Examples include vehicles, buildings Human-made resources have not

    Human resources include people

    who serve us in any way Teachers, doctors, carpenters, cobblers, etc. are human resources

    On the basis of level of development, a resource can be actual or potential. An actual resource is one which is used currently. We know their quantity. A potential resource is one whose utility is not known at present or is not used despite having utility; instead it may be useful at some time in future. It means that it has the potential to have utility, although it does not have any today. Examples include uranium deposits in ladakh.

    On the basis of origin, a resource can be abiotic or biotic. A biotic resource is one that has life. An abiotic resource is non-living.

    Natural resources may also be classified as renewable and non-renewable.

  • Support Program Discussion

    Select two Florida school districts. Based on your reading about the school districts language education programs for ELL students and/or ESL/EAL/ESOL support programs, discuss the following:

    • What model program(s) is/are offered to ELL students in these school districts?
    • Based on what you have learned in this module, compare and contrast the two school districts programs. What is your opinion of these programs? I need 1 more to add, preferably Duval or St. Johns county in Florida.
    • This is what I have so far:
    • The increasing diversity in the student population necessitates school districts like Nassau County to implement ESOL programs that bridge the gap between native language and academic success. Nassau County achieves this through a Mainstream-Inclusion model that is focused on differentiated instruction and specialized ESOL support (Nassau County Schools, 2017). Nassau County Schools utilizes a mainstream-inclusion model or content-based programs that prioritize English-dominant instruction for all grade levels. The Countys ESOL program is structured around a Sheltered English framework that ensures ELL learners are integrated into general education classrooms, and at the same time receiving specific linguistic support (Nassau County Schools, 2017). More specifically, at the elementary level, the district provides specialized ESOL instruction delivered by trained teachers who focus on second language acquisition techniques aimed to enable students grasp foundational concepts. For high schoolers (9-12), the district emphasizes differentiated instruction. Teachers modify their lesson delivery and materials so that ELL can participate in the same grade-level content as their ENL speakers. Nassau Countys model is focused on inclusion. Some models adopt a dual-language approach where students learn in two languages; Nassaus model aims for rapid immersion into the English language to facilitate immediate participation. This policy ensures the students are not held back due to language barriers.Reflecting on the Nassau County ELL Plan, its reliance on English-dominant inclusion models has its strengths and limitations. On the plus side, the plan utilizes various staff to support ELL students, this includes bilingual paraprofessionals, teachers, counselors, and an ELL coach. Further, placement is determined by test scores, students prior academic history, interviews (in home language-Spanish to accommodate non-English speaking population), and social experiment. Some of its limitations include that the materials are provided in Spanish, but for other languages, a translator is provided only if available. Bilingual paraprofessional is prioritized for district schools where the ELL population is largest, possibly leaving students in smaller programs with minimal support (Nassau County, 2017). From the perspective of our textbook, Nassau Countys model is English-dominated. This means the goal is for students to become proficient in English. This is an efficient assimilation approach, but it misses the cognitive, linguistic, and social benefits of dual-language programs cited by proponents in Chapter 3 of Why Tesol? theories and issues in teaching English to speakers of other languages in K-12 classrooms. Overall, the various program models for dual language to transitional bilingual are beneficial in supporting language and literacy development; at the same time, they benefit teachers as they value the cultural identities of their students. ReferencesAriza, E., & Coady Bedard, M. (2024). Why Tesol? theories and issues in teaching English to speakers of other languages in K-12 classrooms.Nassau County Schools. (2017). District English Language Learners (ELL) plan. Florida Department of Education.
  • MT131 Discrete Math

    Hello,

    I need help and mentoring with my assignment in discrete math, logic to finizlize it. Thank you for your support.

  • How do fish breathe underwater

    My question is about how fishes breathe underwater , fishes have hills to absorb dissolved oxygen from water

  • Correct grammar and improve clarity of paragraph

    Hi! I will carefully check and correct your text for grammar, spelling, and clarity.

    You will receive a clean and improved version with explanations if needed.

  • Studypool Professional

    Important notes of class 9 of chapter 1 of science physics motion. This helps you in your exam. Special offer 20dollar1 dollar. Achi cheej ke thode paise to hote hain.

  • simple linear equation

    2x + 5= 25 find the value of x

  • Policy Change

    This assignment is designed to connect classroom learning about social welfare policy with real-world advocacy practice. By attending an advocacy event, students will critically examine how policy change is pursued, whose voices are elevated, and how social workers function as policy actors within broader social movements. The paper should integrate policy analysis, critical reflection, and professional role identification.

    Students must attend one policy-focused advocacy event during the semester. Examples include (but are not limited to):

    • Legislative advocacy days (local, state, or federal)
    • Rallies, marches, or demonstrations tied to a specific policy demand
    • Public hearings, town halls, or budget hearings
    • Advocacy trainings hosted by professional organizations
    • Coalition meetings or organized lobbying efforts

    The event must be tied to a specific social policy issue (e.g., income maintenance, housing, healthcare, immigration, child welfare, criminal legal reform). I work for Long Island Against Domestic Violence where we do have advocacy services or you can put that I went to an ICE protest?

    Follow Below:

    I. Description of the Advocacy Event (11.5 pages)

    Provide a concise but substantive overview of the event:

    • What was the event? (Who organized it? Where and when did it occur?)
    • What issue(s) or policy area(s) did it address?
    • Who participated (e.g., community members, advocates, legislators, social workers)?
    • What strategies were used (e.g., speeches, storytelling, lobbying, media engagement)?

    Focus on context and purpose, not just logistics.


    II. The Policy Issue and Proposed Change (22.5 pages)

    Analyze the policy issue at the center of the advocacy effort:

    • What specific policy, law, regulation, or funding decision is being challenged or promoted?
    • What problem does this policy create or fail to address?
    • Who is most affected, and how?
    • What change(s) are advocates seeking?

    Situate the policy within its historical, political, and structural context, drawing on course materials where appropriate.


    III. Policy Analysis and Power Dynamics (22.5 pages)

    Critically assess the advocacy effort:

    • What level(s) of government are targeted?
    • How does power operate in this policy space (e.g., who benefits from the status quo)?
    • What opposition exists, if any?
    • What barriers or facilitators to change were evident?

    In this section, demonstrate your ability to apply policy analysis frameworks (e.g., structural inequality, administrative burden, neoliberalism, racialized policy design).


    IV. The Role of Social Workers in Policy Advocacy (1.52 pages)

    Explicitly connect the event to the professional role of social workers:

    • Were social workers present or involved? In what roles?
    • How does this advocacy align with social work values and ethics?
    • What skills do social workers bring to policy advocacy (e.g., systems analysis, client storytelling, coalition building)?
    • What tensions exist between professional neutrality and advocacy?

    Reference the NASW Code of Ethics and course discussions of social workers as policy actors.


    V. Critical Reflection and Professional Growth (11.5 pages)

    Reflect on your experience and learning:

    • How did attending the event shape your understanding of policy change?
    • What surprised or challenged you?
    • How did the event complicate or reinforce ideas from the course?
    • How might this experience inform your future role as a social worker?

    This section should be reflective but analytically grounded.


    Writing & Evidence Expectations

    • Use course readings, empirical research, and policy sources to support your analysis
    • Cite at least 68 scholarly or policy sources
    • Avoid purely descriptive writing; analysis is required
    • Use professional, academic language
    • APA