Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • PSY 530 SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

    What is cognitive dissonance? What role does it play in regards to attitude and/or behavior change? What is the role of external rewards in regards to attitude change?

    How might a new car salesperson use what he/she knows about cognitive dissonance (sometimes called buyer’s remorse) to make a customer more content with their purchase (and less likely to want to return their vehicle)?

    Use research from the to support your claims.

    Requirements: 2 Paragraphs

  • chamberlain chem120

    see attachment. more info to come

    Requirements: see rubic

  • Population Health (BIG Gems)

    Hello, this is an assignment for Population Health and clinical outcomes (Family NP program in USA). Please read the 3 uploaded files and follow the requirements. Your work should be run by one of through AI listed in the files and it should show less than 20 percent ai .

    Requirements: 900

  • Reflection

    1. Within two (2) pages, write a personal reflection about your clinical experiences during the DFC in this course.
    2. Discuss the following:
    • Professional Competence
    • Discuss what went well during clinical this semester.
    • Identify what could be improved upon. Include explanations and a measurable plan for improvement.
    • Identify and describe at least one new technique you observed and/or learned during this semester’s DFC experience.
    • Reflect on your current level of professional competence and subject knowledge, including strengths and areas for growth.
    • Challenging Situations
    • Describe challenges within the DFCs. Include reason(s) for the challenge, potential underlying cause(s), and develop a plan to prevent a similar situation from happening in future DFC experiences.
    • Analyze the situation to demonstrate insight into clinical decision-making and problem-solving.
    • Personal and Professional Growth
    • Discuss how this semester’s patient care experience will influence your future professional practice.
    • Reflect on personal and professional growth, including goals you set and progress made.
    • Describe any feedback you received and how it contributed to changes or adaptations.
    1. This is a journal-type entry where writing mechanics will be evaluated.
    • Formatting, grammar, references, and assignment length requirements are outlined in the grading rubric.

    Rubric:

    Professional Competence

    Examines current level of professional competence and required subject knowledge. Discusses areas of strength and weakness, including underlying reasons and developing a measurable plan for improvement.

    Challenging Situations in the Clinical Setting

    Analyzes and describes clinical experiences which were challenging during the DFCs. Discusses the reasons for the challenges, including potential underlying causes. Develops a plan to prevent similar situations in future clinical experiences.

    Personal and Professional Growth

    Thoroughly reflects and examines personal and professional growth facilitated by participation in the DFCs. Analyzes goals set and their fulfillment, including future goals. Describes feedback received and discusses resulting changes and adaptations.

    Formatting, Grammar, References, and Length

    Minimal (0-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation mistakes are made. AND the submission is written utilizing APA formatting, including a cover page; and any references used are credible and cited with in-text citations, if appropriate. AND the submission meets the stated page requirement (2 pages).

    I’ve attached the 4 days of clinical refection. please go based off that information. make sure to add in-text citation and an evidence based information.

  • Answer a question about medication in 100 words

    1. Why was RG prescribed metformin, lisinopril, and simvastatin? What do these medications do and how do they work?

    Requirements: 100 word

  • Psy 520 Reaserach Methods in PSYC II

    Describe your research question for your final project. What is the null hypothesis of your research question?

    Type I and type II errors are a result of incorrectly accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis. In what way might you commit a type I error and reject a null hypothesis when you should have accepted it? Provide and explain an example based on your research question.

    What about a potential type II error? In what way might you accept the null when you should reject it? Provide and explain an example from your research question.

    For both points above, be specific about how errors could creep into your final project. Be specific about how you could adjust your research design to address these potential errors.

    Why is it important for researchers to understand these errors?

    When responding to your classmates, address their assessment of the error risks in their projects from a scholarly perspective.

    Requirements: 2 paragraphs

  • Case Study CVS Health

    Post your 1-2 pages individual review of the CVS case study here. double spaced. You will need to provide a critical analysis of this case study. The document should reflect the student’s understanding of the case and provide a basis for engaging in questions and discussions during the presentation Q&A sessions. This analysis should be a 1-2-page document (double-spaced) that offers a concise analysis & critique of the case’s core challenges, potential solutions, and discussion questions.

    I have uploaded a rubric and the case study.

    Requirements: 2 pages

  • Discussion 2

    Post a brief explanation of three important components of the psychiatric interview and why you consider these elements important. Explain the psychometric properties of the rating scale you were assigned. Explain when it is appropriate to use this rating scale with clients during the psychiatric interview and how the scale is helpful to a nurse practitioners psychiatric assessment. Support your approach with evidence-based literature. Learning Resources Required Readings American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Section I: DSM-5 basics. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Classification. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev., pp. xiii-xl). Review Carlat, D. J. (2024). The psychiatric interview (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. Chapter 35, Writing Up the Results of the Interview Boland, R. & Verduin, M. L. & Ruiz, P. (2022). Kaplan & Sadocks synopsis of psychiatry (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. Chapter 1, Examination and Diagnosis of the Psychiatric Patient American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1995). Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents. American Psychiatric Association. (2016). Practice guidelines for the psychiatric evaluation of adults (3rd ed.). Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2017). Classification in psychiatry. In Kaplan and Sadocks Concise Textbook of Clinical Psychiatry (4th ed., pp. 18). Wolters Kluwer. Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2017). Psychiatric interview, history, and mental status examination. In Kaplan and Sadocks Concise Textbook of Clinical Psychiatry (4th ed., pp. 3952). Wolters Kluwer. Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2017). Medical assessment and laboratory testing in psychiatry. In Kaplan and Sadocks Concise Textbook of Clinical Psychiatry (4th ed., pp. 1621). Wolters Kluwer. Required Media Classroom Productions. (Producer). (2015). Diagnostic criteria [Video]. Walden University. MedEasy. (2017). Psychiatric history taking and the mental status examination | USMLE & COMLEX [Video]. YouTube. Psychiatry Lectures. (2015). Psychiatry lecture: How to do a psychiatric assessment [Video]. YouTube.

  • Week 2 discussion

    The emergence of modern science began as a move from theological-based reasoning to observational- and empirically-based reasoning. Two areas of reasoning evolved from this time, inductive and deductive. For example, Galileo, using mathematics and observation, explained the laws of the physical world through deductive reasoning. Francis Bacon, however, sought answers to questions of the physical world through observation and devised many theories from these observations. Cartesian dualism is one school of thought that examined the mind-body relationship. Several branches of scientific thought developed which was based in part on the philosophical underpinnings of the region (e.g. British, French and German). These included positivism, rationalism, and empiricism. From these philosophical views emerged a focus on understanding behavior or more precisely the mind. Compare and contrast the views of Galileo and Bacon. Explain why these two scientists had an impact on the development of psychology. Compare the basic principles of Rene Descartes, Immanuel Kant, and John Locke. How do these principles differ in their perspectives of the mind-body relationship? What do these principles add to the comprehensive understanding of psychology as a science? University Standard Rubric. Explain the cultural and even nationalistic influences on how the different schools of thought developed (positivism, rationalism, and empiricism)? Explain how theological or religious beliefs influence the different schools of thought as they had done to the philosophical views of early centuries? Justify your answers with appropriate research and reasoning. Comment on the postings of at least two peers. Provide an analysis of each peers postings while also suggesting specific additions or clarifications for improving the discussion question response.

  • Personal position: multiple relationships

    Personal Position: Multiple Relationships 100 100 Write a 2000-2500 word essay creating a response to articulate your personal position on the impact of multiple relationships. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper Support your ideas with at least three (3) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment. Assignment Assignment Expectations Length:2000-2500 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner. please include introduction and conclusion in paper Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word count for this assignment. References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.