Category: uncategorised

  • Nursing Leadership Reflection

    The textbook reference: Huston, C. J. (2022). Lippincott CoursePoint Enhanced for Marquis and Huston: Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nursing (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.

    Below are the assignment instructions from the professor:

    Requirements:

    1. Choose two objectives from the list above.
    2. Write a 12 page reflection connecting your selected objectives to nursing leadership, organizational change, or your professional/clinical experiences.
    3. Clearly explain how the objectives apply to improving healthcare delivery and advancing the nursing profession.
    4. Use APA 7th edition format for any references you include (minimum of one scholarly source within the last five years is encouraged).
    5. Submit your reflection in the designated folder by the due date on your class schedule.

    Purpose:

    This reflection will help you critically analyze the nurses role in leading quality care initiatives and responding to organizational change, while reinforcing the connection between theory and practice.

    The two objectives I have chosen are:

    7.1. Describe the nurse leader and managers role as a change agent.

    7.5. Examine strategies for effecting change.

    I am an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Registered Nurse so please relate it to this specialty of nursing whenever possible.

  • Week 6 Written Assignment: OLE Site Reflection (Chronic/Non-…

    Instructions :

    Write a 1-2 page paper connecting your OLE observations to the topics of chronic diseases. In your paper, address the following:

    1. Agency Context
    • Describe how your agency addresses chronic diseases.
    • Identify any programs, services, or strategies they use (e.g., treatment, health education, screenings).
    1. Chronic Disease Perspective
    • Choose one chronic disease (e.g., cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease).
    • Discuss whether your agency directly or indirectly addresses risk factors or prevention of this disease.
    1. Integration with Course Concepts
    • Relate your observations to key concepts from Schneiders chapter on Genetic and Chronic Diseases
    • Be specific: link what you saw or heard at your site to public health strategies described in the textbook.

    Format Requirements:

    • 12 pages, double-spaced
    • APA formatting
    • Reference Schneider (and other sources as needed)

    General Written Assignment Rubric

    General Written Assignment Rubric

    CriteriaRatingsPointsIntroduction and Purpose

    Highly Developed

    Clear, original introduction; purpose fully achieved.

    18.9 to 20 pts

    Developed

    Introduction is clear; purpose mostly achieved.

    17.1 to 18.8 pts

    Developing

    Introduction and purpose of the paper is vague or partially developed.

    15.3 to 17 pts

    Underdeveloped

    No clear introduction or purpose.

    0 to 15.2 pts

    /20 pts

    Organization and Structure

    Highly Developed

    Logical structure; smooth transition

    14.2 to 15 pts

    Developed

    Generally organized; some transitions.

    12.76 to 14.1 pts

    Developing

    Some structure; transitions lacking.

    11.5 to 12.75 pts

    Underdeveloped

    Disorganized or hard to follow.

    0 to 11.4 pts

    /15 pts

    Content and Development

    Highly Developed

    In-depth analysis; strong evidence and examples.

    18.9 to 20 pts

    Developed

    Adequate analysis; some supporting evidence

    17.1 to 18.8 pts

    Developing

    Limited analysis; weak support.

    15.3 to 17 pts

    Underdeveloped

    Minimal or irrelevant content.

    0 to 15.2 pts

    /20 pts

    Follows Assignment

    Highly Developed

    All elements of assignment included in a thorough and accurate manner.

    9.5 to 10 pts

    Developed

    Most elements of assignments included

    8.6 to 9.4 pts

    Developing

    Some elements of the assignment are missing or inaccurate,

    7.7 to 8.5 pts

    Underdeveloped

    Many elements of the assignment are missing or inaccurate.

    0 to 7.6 pts

    /10 pts

    Use of Sources

    Highly Developed

    23 credible sources; well-integrated and cited.v

    9.5 to 10 pts

    Developed

    2 sources used; mostly integrated and cited.

    8.6 to 9.4 pts

    Developing

    1 source or weak integration/citation.

    7.7 to 8.5 pts

    Underdeveloped

    No sources or improperly cited.

    0 to 7.6 pts

    /10 pts

    Critical Thinking

    Highly Developed

    Demonstrates insight and original thought.

    9.5 to 10 pts

    Developed

    Some critical thinking evident

    8.6 to 9.4 pts

    Developing

    Limited critical thinking.

    7.7 to 8.5 pts

    Underdeveloped

    Lacks critical thinking.

    0 to 7.6 pts

    /10 pts

    Grammar and Mechanics

    Highly Developed

    Virtually no errors in grammar or mechanics.

    9.5 to 10 pts

    Developed

    Few minor errors; do not affect clarity.

    8.6 to 9.4 pts

    Developing

    Several errors; somewhat affect clarity.

    7.7 to 8.5 pts

    Underdeveloped

    Frequent errors; hinder understanding.

    0 to 7.6 pts

    /10 pts

    APA Formatting

    Highly Developed

    Perfect APA formatting throughout

    4.8 to 5 pts

    Developed

    Minor APA errors.

    4.3 to 4.7 pts

    Developing

    Multiple APA errors.

    3.9 to 4.2 pts

    Underdeveloped

    No APA formatting.

    0 to 3.8 pts

    /5 pts

  • Past Tense Edit

    I need the paper in the past tense, the methodology and lit review sections especially, but the entire document has to be in past tense.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Dissertation.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • foundation on army leadership

    write me a 900 word 5 paragraph essays on The Foundation of Army Leadership with an outline and 2 references from ADP 6-22 with a references page . make it high school level writing

  • I need help

    This discussion post has several parts. Please answer each question.

    1) What is the difference between race and ethnicity?

    2) Ahearn’s chapter contains a lot of information, some of it (such as the particulars of AAVE, the Ebonics controversy, etc.) will be discussed in other units. What terms/items in the beginning part of the chapter stand out for you and why?

    3) An important term in considering the interaction between language, race, and ethnicity in racialization. This term is NOT presented in the materials of this unit, however, I would like you to find out what it means and how it can inform our understanding of the subject matter.

    Requirements: 11

  • Week 5 Primary Source Reading Summaries

    Short paragraphs summarizing each primary source documents given. Should include what the source is about and what you learned. The readings for the week should appear in a single document with gaps/titles to designate which you are discussing. Please type directly into the text box.

  • What is respiration? How does it happen in humans?

    What is respiration? How does it happen in humans?

    Requirements:

  • ADV100ZhuravlevV_Final Essay

    1. Participants will research the topic of Student Success in College (Module 4)
    2. Participants will need to locate 2 to 3 articles to support their essay (also called a thesis or academic argument)
    3. The articles must be peer-reviewed (Module 4)
    4. Students will compose a 3-to-5-page essay, or 1800 to 3000 words, using the findings of their research.
    5. The essay must be in APA format (Module 1 and Module 2)
    6. The essay must follow the rules of grammar (Module 3 and Module 4)
    7. The essay must be original work (Module 3)
    8. The essay must demonstrate a clear introduction, a review of the researched literature, and a conclusion (Module 5)

    APA format, apa format template that I created earlier in the class is attached NO AI! MUST HAVE TWO PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES AS REFRENCES.

  • Footnote and Bibliography Format Paper Assignment

    Footnote and Bibliography Format Paper Assignment Instructions

    Overview

    This assignment is designed to introduce you to the Liberty online library as well as the process of locating, integrating, and citing academic sources in proper footnote and bibliographic formats. This assignment will also prepare you for the Comparing and Contrasting Models Paper Assignment, which is a research-based comparative analysis of the attractional and missional church models. These models are introduced in this weeks reading, but you are being tasked with locating supplemental sources that also speak to these models because this is necessary for academic research at the doctoral level.

    Instructions

    For this assignment, you will provide 17 unique resources in proper Turabian footnote and bibliographic form, along with a quote from each source. (Note: Do not use the date-first Turabian style but utilize the style with the publication year near the end of the reference.)

    For the paper itself,

    Provide a properly formatted cover page and contents page.

    Provide an introductory paragraph that introduces the existence of the attractional and missional church models and presents a thesis statement. In this paragraph, the student should also explain the mission of the church and how different church models have evolved over time. The student should specifically mention the attraction and missional models while providing a clear thesis statement that an analysis will be provided regarding which model contains the most biblical objectives. (Note: you did this for the School of Divinity Formatting Standards Paper Assignment. Take that introduction and edit it based on the comments and feedback you received. Also, note that this introduction will not mention the sources or the rest of the paper for this week, but is refining the basis of the introduction you will use for your Comparing and Contrasting Models Paper Assignment.)

    Provide a bold heading for each of the 17 sources utilized for a paper.

    Under each heading, include a quote from the selected source, and then provide a footnote citing that source in precise Turabian formatting style.

    Provide a bibliography with each of the 17 sources cited in precise Turabian formatting style in alphabetical order by last name.

    Here are the 17 source types that must be included in the paper:

    2 Dissertations or Theses interacting with the Attractional Church. (Utilizing the dissertation database through the Jerry Falwell Library will help.)

    2 Dissertations or Theses interacting with the Missional Church.

    5 Academic Journal Articles interacting with the issues related to missional or attractional church approaches.

    5 Books interacting with the issues related to missional or attractional church approaches.

    A scholarly Commentary on Acts, Ephesians, and 1 Timothy. Thus, you will have three separate commentaries here. One for each of those books. The commentary selected can cover multiple books of the Bible, but one of these books must be present in the title for each citation. Do not cite a commentary that covers the entire Bible in one or two volumes. A scholarly commentary will extensively address a particular passage and extensively cite other sources. A scholarly commentary is different than a devotional commentary or one that reduplicates the author’s sermons.

    All formatting must follow current Turabian style standards precisely. Be sure to utilize the Turabian Chart of Citations provided in the assignment link as well as other resources available through the Online Writing Center (linked in the Footnote and Bibliography Format Paper Resources section).

    The assignment will be strictly graded based on the quality of the sources selected, the accuracy of the formatting provided, and the quality of the introduction and the thesis.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): THE ATTRACTIONAL CHURCH Growth Through a Refreshing.docx, Turabian-Chart-of-Citations-NB-09132022-1.pdf, Footnote and Bibliography Format Paper Grading Rubric -2.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Journal Critique #2

    • 1 Page Max
    • 12 point font
    • Single spaced
    • 1 Paragraph: describing the paper. This is the summary. DO NOT REWRITE THE ABSTRACT! Everything needs to be in your words, and NO QUOTES!
    • 1 Paragraph: Describe the strengths of the research. NOT THE GRAMMAR OR FLOW of the article.
    • 1 Paragraph: Describe the weaknesses of the research. NOT THE GRAMMAR OR THE FLOW of the article.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): bloodbld2019002538.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.