Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Physical oral presentation WHNP

    Here is your case for the oral presentation. Remember the focus is not on the case presentation but on how to succinctly present with the pertinent information.

    A 22-year-old woman presents with painful urination, hesitancy, and frequency that started yesterday. Her urine seems a bit cloudy, and she must urinate every 2 to 3 hours. She denies flank pain, urinary discharge, hematuria, fever, or chills. The last time she had similar complaints was 3 years ago. She lives with her husband and 2 children. Her last menstrual period was 5 days ago. The patient does not smoke or take any prescription medicine. The city is under lockdown due to the coronavirus pandemic, and she does not want to go to the hospital in person out of fear of catching the virus. What is the next best step in managing this patient’s condition?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Oral Presentation Instructions – 12-29.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Design and Optimisation of a CNN-Based Chest X-Ray Classific…

    This assignment focuses on the MedScan AI scenario: classifying Chest X-ray images into 3 classes (Normal, Pneumonia, COVID-19) using a CNN/transfer learning approach. Task 1 requires designing and explaining a 5-layer CNN, and justifying Softmax for 3-class output plus whether to use Transfer Learning (e.g., ResNet50) due to limited data (~5,000 images). Task 2 analyzes training where validation loss rises after ~epoch 10 (overfitting), proposes 3 regularization methods (e.g., Dropout, Data Augmentation, Early Stopping), and states the 3-class cross-entropy loss: I will also discuss suitable evaluation metrics (Precision/Recall/F1) and ethical considerations.

  • Capstone Project Proposal Literature Review

    Please follow the assignment rubric

    • A literature review is not an annotated bibliography in which you summarize briefly each article that you have reviewed.
    • While a summary of what you have read is contained within the literature review, it goes well beyond merely summarizing professional literature.
    • It focuses on a specific topic of interest and includes your critical analysis of the relationship among different works, and relating this research to your work.
    • In this case, your work will be your capstone project.
    • It may be written as a stand-alone paper or to provide a theoretical framework and rationale for a research study (such as a thesis or dissertation).
    • Your literature review will be written as a standalone paper.

    Below is information about the structure of the literature review, finding credible information for research assignments, formulating research questions, search strategies and a literature review template:

    PLEASE USE THE DOCUMENTS ATTACHED TO COMPLETE ASSIGNMENT

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): BSN355 Capstone Project Proposal question.docx, BSN355 Lit Review Template 1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • United States v. Virginia (1996)

    Throughout the semester, students will be required to read, analyze, and draft case briefs. These will be based on mostly US Supreme Court cases and deal with issues pertaining to subject matter from the textbook. Full or edited case opinions will be provided. Case briefs tend to follow a similar framework (as seen below in the template provided). Please focus on the constitutional/legal questions and the Court’s analysis; facts are important but HOW the law is applied proves to be more compelling.

    Full and accurate citations for the court case you use are REQUIRED, including any other formal sources provided.

    Points will be deducted if no source is cited, or the citation is inaccurate.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Untitled document (19).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • What makes economic growth in future

    What makes economic growth in future


    Requirements:

  • Strategic PowerPoint Presentation

    Assignment: Preparation of Executive PowerPoint Presentation

    You are required to revise and deliver a professional PowerPoint presentation that clearly answers the assigned topic or strategic question.

    Objective

    The presentation must:

    • Address the topic directly and coherently.
    • Synthesize key elements from the existing material.
    • Present the main ideas at a strategic, high-level perspective.
    • Avoid excessive operational or technical detail.

    Expectations

    1. Structure
    • Follow a clear and logical flow (context analysis recommendations conclusion).
    • Ensure each slide supports the central argument.
    1. Content
    • Focus on key insights, not descriptions.
    • Eliminate redundancy.
    • Highlight strategic implications rather than operational details.
    1. Clarity
    • One core idea per slide.
    • Use concise bullet points (no long paragraphs).
    • Use message-driven slide titles.
    1. Professional Standards
    • Maintain clean, consistent formatting.
    • Use visuals (frameworks, charts, diagrams) where relevant.
    • Ensure the presentation is suitable for an executive audience.

    The final output should be structured, persuasive, and strategically focused.

  • Leadership Principles

    1. Leadership

    (7 pages) (APA format) (in-text citations are a must) (No Plagiarism)

    Must Cite: Hackman, M. Z., & Johnson, C. E. Leadership: A communication perspective (7th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

    *The person must be an American Citizen

    Written Assignment #1: Leader as Relationship Builder (Due Week 4 | 50 possible points)

    Select an individual you perceive to be a leader and with whom you have a relationship. This relationship may be an effective one or one where improvement may be needed. Arrange to spend time observing this persons leadership behaviors and talking with this person about leadership, including his/her philosophy of and beliefs about leadership.

    The paper should include the following:

    • Identification of the person youve chosen to work with including your relationship to this person and why you chose this person.
    • A list of interview or discussion questions used during your interaction with this person regarding leadership (not included in total page length of paper). Please attach questions asked to the end of the paper as an appendix.
    • Discuss the content, observations and insights gained from watching this person in action and the discussion you had about leadership.
    • Describe this persons communicative and relationship competencies as a leader.
    • Other questions to consider when completing this paper include: What leadership style(s) does the individual possess? What characteristics or traits does the leader feel are essential to success? What service activities does this leader participate in? What values are espoused by the leaders behavior? Do these values match with what the leader says is important? In what leadership competencies does this person excel? If you were this persons coach, what specific suggestions would you give to enhance this persons effectiveness as a leader?
    • Please note: this should not be a Q & A report of the interview. This paper should capture what you heard and what you observed, analyzing and integrating the leaders verbal and non-verbal communication with the readings.

    Graduate specifications:

    • Paper should be 7 pages in length.
    • Discussion should utilize a minimum of three scholarly articles and the textbook readings to support the analysis.
    • Paper will follow the APA Style Guide for cover page, citation formats, running header and reference page.
    • Week 4:
      • Meeting Leaders Skills (text) p. 225
      • Levels of Personal Diversity Awareness (text) p. 344
    • Week 5:
      • Communications Style Inventory (text) p. 274

    2. Leadership

    (Complete the 3 surveys Below) (Surveys are attached)

    Requirements: 7 pages adn 3 surveys

  • technology and policing

    bagaimana pengguna predictive policing (algoritma untuk memprediksi lokasi kejahatan) mempengaruhi prinsip keadilan? apakah ini membantu mencegah kejahatan atau justru memperkuat bias terhadap kelompok masyarakat tertentu??

    Requirements:

  • theoretical part for guest feed back and response in urban h…

    Topic 1: Digital Feedback & Service Recovery

    Title: The Impact of Digital Guest Feedback on Service Recovery Strategies in Urban Hotels: A

    Case Study of Grand Hotel Kochi.

    Aim: To analyze how real-time online feedback (Google, TripAdvisor, OTA reviews)

    influences the speed and effectiveness of service recovery processes within the hotel.

    Methodology: Mixed-Methods. Quantitative analysis of 2 months of recent online

    review data and Qualitative interviews with the Guest Relations/Front Office team

    regarding their "Service Recovery" workflow.

    Expected Outcome: A proposed "Rapid Response Framework" that helps the hotel

    minimize negative online sentiment by resolving guest issues before they escalate.

    In this suggested topic and objective, there is no objective that, for example, examines service recovery

    theory in order to define digital feedback concepts, which should help you to links findings to academic

    models.

    As a draft example of objectives

    1 – To examine scientific literature on digital guest feedback, service quality, and service recovery

    models in the hospitality industry.

    2 – To identify and classify the primary digital feedback channels used by guests at Grand Hotel Kochi.

    3 – To analyse the hotels service recovery Standard Operating Procedures in response to negative digitalfeedback.

    4 – To evaluate guest perceptions of service quality following implemented service recovery actions.

    5 – To propose a rapid digital service recovery framework for improving online guest satisfaction.

    In this case, you have

    Objective 1: covers Theoretical part

    Objectives 24: cover Analytical part or the empirical part.

    Objective 5 : more related to the conclusions.

    I want the the full theoretical part to be written asap. I have also provided sample works. It is imperative that the same structure, formatting is followed

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): EvansRuby-THM2.pdf, AmrharChaima-THM2.pdf, VF SRD metodiniai EN 2024 (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Etisalat strategic management in UAE telecom market

    The total assignment length is approximately 4,0005,000 words and consists of three parts: 1. Situation Analysis (1,2001,500 words) PESTEL analysis (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal) Porters Five Forces analysis Focus on the UAE telecom market and Etisalat 2. Internal and External Strategic Evaluation (1,2001,500 words) SWOT analysis Analytical matrix with strong narrative explanation Clear linkage between internal strengths/weaknesses and external opportunities/threats 3. Strategic Recommendations and Implementation (1,5002,000 words) Propose THREE strategic alternatives Include: Rationale and expected impact Risks and mitigation Implementation plan with timeline and KPIs Use strategic frameworks where relevant (RBV, Ansoff Matrix, Balanced Scorecard) REQUIREMENTS Graduate / MBA-level academic writing experience Strong knowledge of strategic management frameworks Familiarity with telecom or technology industry is a plus Proper APA citations At least 3 credible external sources (industry reports, journals, regulator data, company filings) 100% original content (no recycled or AI-detected text) Turnitin-safe work Figures or graphs are allowed, but if used, they must be labeled clearly (e.g., Source: Generated by AI).

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Assignment-1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.