Category: uncategorised

  • Ethical accountability and civilian harm in U.S. drone warfa…

    The Full Draft version of your research paper, submitted in this module, will be approximately 10 pages in length (i.e., approximately 2,500 words with 12-point font and double-spacing). You will receive feedback from your instructor in Module 7, leading to your final submission of the paper in Module 8. Primary Questions With the topic you have selected and researched across the term, you are required to address yourself, as much as is practicable, to these specific prompts: Identify the ethical dilemma, relationship, case, or issue/subject you are studying, and explain why it is significant, both to you and the U.S. national security community writ large. Provide relevant background on your research topic. If any, what have been the prior decisions or ethical baggage that has affected the current reality of the relationship, dilemma, case etc.? What key constituencies, interests, or stakeholders are involved in your study and how do they weigh in on your subject? How are ethical considerations present in your chosen topic, and which ethical principles are most at play in your chosen subject? You may shape the analysis of your topic through one or more relevant ethical viewpoints, including, eventually, your own. Through your analysis, what problems or dilemmas in national security are you uncovering in your research, and how might the situation or condition be remedied? What possible solutions can you recommend to the national security community, or the broader public? Finally, in your conclusion, how can what you have analyzed lead to improved practices, operations etc. in the relevant national security domain you investigated? Assume you are briefing someone senior, and lay out your assessments, conclusions and recommendations to the relevant national security community. Your final research paper submission will be evaluated in terms of how thoroughly you: answer the questions above; use resources to document your main points; and properly cite referenced work. Your essay should address all of the questions above and should consist of approximately 2,500 words of text (approximately 10 pages of double-spaced and 12 point font of text). Be sure to include specific examples and references from your research and any additional references you would like to include. Use in-text citations and a reference list that will make up an additional page. Below are helpful journals and research sites as well as more guidance on research paper formatting.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 301 research topic proposal.docx, 301 research outline.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • SOAP Note

    Please be sure to complete the SOAP note by following the grading rubric below in eLearn.

    Although it is necessary to perform and document a comprehensive history and physical examination (H&P) at the beginning of the patientprovider relationship, it is unnecessary and too time consuming to document that level of detail at subsequent visits.

    When such visits occur, visits are problem focused, either for monitoring of chronic conditions or for evaluation of a new problem. During a focused exam, you need to examine specifically the body part or system directly involved with the medical problem. One way to document problem-focused visits is with a SOAP note.

    SOAP stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. It is important to understand that sections of the SOAP note are interrelated. The completeness and accuracy of the history (subjective information) will help guide what you look for when performing a problem-specific physical examination (objective information) and formulating a list of possible causes, also known as differential diagnoses (DDX). Together, the subjective and objective information should lead you to, and should support, the assessment or most likely diagnosis. Once you have made an assessment, you can establish a plan of care.

    Directions

    This assignment utilizes a “Mock” patient. For any section of the SOAP Note that information is not provided for you, you must develop and document details that would support the diagnosis and plan for the patient.

    SOAP Note:

    1. Complete a SOAP note on a “mock” HEENT patient utilizing the SOAP Note Template. Please be sure to complete the SOAP Note in accordance with the “SOAP Note Grading Rubric” (Typed in Microsoft Word). Upload the completed SOAP template in Microsoft Word format. Complete the SOAP note on the following patient case below:

    Patient Profile:

    • Name: Mr. Jacob Whitman
    • Age: 32
    • Gender: Male
    • Date of Presentation: 2.6.2026
    • Clinical Setting: Adult Outpatient Clinic

    Presenting Symptoms:

    • 1. Severe left ear pain and tenderness
    • 2. Swelling and redness behind the affected ear
    • 3. Discharge from the affected ear (otorrhea)
    • 4. Low-grade fever
    • 5. Hearing loss or muffled hearing

    Assessment Findings:

    Upon examination, the nurse practitioner notes the following:

    Vital Signs:

    • Blood pressure: 112/64 mmHg
    • Heart rate: 100 beats per minute
    • Respiratory rate: 18 breaths per minute
    • Temperature: 38.5C (101.3F)
    • Pain: 8/10
    • Height: 73″
    • Weight: 201 lbs

    Ear Assessment:

    • Inflamed and swollen ear canal
    • Tenderness and pain upon palpation of the mastoid area behind the affected ear
    • Purulent discharge from the ear canal

    Otoscopic Examination:

    • Bulging and erythematous tympanic membrane on the affected side
    • Loss of visible landmarks due to inflammation

    Hearing Assessment:

    • Conductive hearing loss reported by the patient and confirmed through whisper or tuning fork tests

    Due Date

    The SOAP Note is due by at 11:59 PM EST, at the end of Week 5.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): NURSM 520 SOAP Note Template.docx, NURSM 520 SOAP Note Rubric- Detailed (3) (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Capstone Project Proposal Literature Review

    This is a literature revuew for a PICOT question using 4 sources this is the information provided by the school.

    Instructions

    • A literature review is not an annotated bibliography in which you summarize briefly each article that you have reviewed.
    • While a summary of what you have read is contained within the literature review, it goes well beyond merely summarizing professional literature.
    • It focuses on a specific topic of interest and includes your critical analysis of the relationship among different works, and relating this research to your work.
    • In this case, your work will be your capstone project.
    • It may be written as a stand-alone paper or to provide a theoretical framework and rationale for a research study (such as a thesis or dissertation).
    • Your literature review will be written as a standalone paper.

    Below is information about the structure of the literature review, finding credible information for research assignments, formulating research questions, search strategies and a literature review template:

    Ruberic

    15 ptsExemplaryIdentifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides direction for the content that is engaging and thought provoking. The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the presentation. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.

    15 ptsExemplaryProvides five current, peer-reviewed sources that present accurate, distinguishing evidence and effectively integrate the main concept into the assignment. Sources are relevant, accurate, current (less than 5 years old) and reliable, reflecting and validating the strength of the content.

    15 ptsExemplaryContent is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flows smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, and spacing are optimal for audience viewing

    15 ptsExemplaryContent is well written and uses standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. APA guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. Includes in-text citations and references that are written correctly.

    Example (The example is also attached it needs to be APA)

    For the title page, follow the guidelines below. Information without brackets should remain as written. The learner should replace the information within the brackets with the requested information, and all prior information and brackets should be removed.

    Literature Review

    [Remove brackets & insert Your Full Name Here]

    Nightingale College

    [Remove brackets & insert Your Course Number, Section & Course Title]

    [Remove brackets & insert Your instructors name using Professor or Dr. ________]

    [Remove brackets & insert Month, Day, Year this is the date the assignment is due, not the date it is submitted]

    Prior to submitting your paper, make sure to remove all instructions in brackets on the following pages.

    Literature Review

    [The introduction to the paper must be at least 5 sentences with 1 in-text citation, a fully stated purpose statement, and PICOT Question. In this section, introduce the topic to the reader. Indicate why the selected topic is important and why it is important to conduct a literature review as part of the project. Make sure the PICOT question is written as a quality improvement question, not a research question and that it contains all components of PICOT. End this section stating, “The purpose of this paper is … “]

    Project Proposal Topic

    [The project proposal section must be at least 1 fully formed paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length) with in-text citations. In this section, present an overview of the topic by discussing the topic in general. Consider providing some background information and describing the gap (current practice versus best practice) in nursing practice that was identified. Consider using statistics here to reinforce the point.]

    Methods of Searching

    [This section must be at least 1 fully formed paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length).This section should describe how the literature search was conducted. For example: A literature review was conducted using both electronic and manual resources… Describe how the search for literature was conducted by explaining what databases or search engines were used to find the peer-reviewed articles. Describe what keywords were used; what date range was used to obtain the most current information (remember they must be less than 5 years old); what things were excluded (example: blogs, websites with biased information, etc).]

    Review of the Literature

    [There must be at least 5 fully formed paragraphs (at least 5 sentences in length) with 5 in-text citations that correlate with the current, peer-reviewed references used. This will be the bulk of the review. Organization of the material here is important. In one paragraph for each of the 5 current, peer-reviewed articles, elaborate on the relation to the project topic/PICOT question, as well as what best practices were identified. Integrate key details of each article, demonstrating a clear understanding of the content reviewed. Consider the main takeaways after reading each article as they relate to the project project/intervention. This section should outline details of each article and also include the learners insight as they relate to the project and PICOT. Also include any other pertinent information about the topic that was discussed in the articles chosen.]

    Findings

    [This section must be at least 2 fully formed paragraphs (at least 5 sentences in length) with in-text citations. In this section, provide a summary of the most significant findings found in the Review of the Literature section. Identify strengths and weaknesses of the literature (for example, small sample sizes that limit the validity of the findings or conclusions that you disagree with as an evaluator); and identify any gaps in the literature found. Begin with The literature has shown…]

    Conclusion

    [The section should be at least 1 paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length), summarize at least 3 key points, and contain at least 1 in-text citation. Provide a thorough summary with at least 3 key points. Although not required, it is suggested learners restate the PICOT question in this section, so the reader is drawn to refocus on the topic/question.]

    References

    [There must be at least 5 current (within the last 5 years), peer-reviewed references. Use APA-7 formatting specific to reference type, including (but not limited to) alphabetical order and hanging indent. Specific reference examples have been discussed in the webinars.]

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): BSN355 Capstone Project Proposal Template revised 92022.docx, article 4.pdf, article 3.pdf, Article 1.pdf, Article 2.pdf, BSN355 Lit Review Template 1 (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Are we Conserving Ohios Climate Resilient Lands?

    The goal of this assignment is to practice synthesizing information from credible sources to create a cohesive, informative written academic report designed for an expert audience.

    Instructions:

    Step 1: Review Your Initiative

    Take a moment to refresh your knowledge of the specific Nature Conservancy habitat conservation initiative you selected in Week 1 and think about the audience you need to address. You will be writing this report for other Nature Conservancy professionals and experts in your field, so you will be writing in a formal and objective manner.

    Step 2: Synthesize Your Research

    As the Staff Researcher, you will use credible resources to compile a Research Report.

    Your Research Report must synthesize information from a minimum of 5 sources. You may use the resources you found in Week 1 as the Research Intern as well as any additional sources that are relevant to your selected conservation initiative.

    While developing your synthesis, make sure you are also considering the appropriate writing elements described in the Learning Materials, including:

    • Organization
    • Tone
    • Evidence
    • Attribution
    • Clarity
    • Cohesion

    Double check that you are synthesizing (not summarizing) ideas from your sources using the

    , and that you are providing appropriate in-text citations and a list of references at the end of your report.

    Your report should be written in the third person perspective (avoid using I, me, and my).

    Step 3: Develop Your Evidence

    In week 1, as the Research Intern, you considered why your selected project was important why it mattered. This week you will support this position with evidence as the Staff Researcher. You are providing evidence from your sources to prove that your stance is well-informed.

    Note: You may need to find additional sources to support your position.

    Step 4: Length & Formatting

    Write 400500 words using APA style throughout your report. Your writing should include in-text citations and a References page to support your claims.

    Follow this organization:

    • Title Page Include your report title, your name, and the date.
    • Introduction Begin with a short paragraph that introduces your topic, explains your research question, and tells the reader why the issue matters. (Do not label this section Introduction.)
    • Background or Literature Review Summarize and synthesize what credible sources say about the issue. This section shows the landscape of whats already known.
    • Analysis or Discussion Explain the major themes, findings, or insights from your research. Connect ideas across sources and note where authors agree or disagree.
    • Conclusion Summarize what youve learned, highlight key takeaways, and identify remaining questions or possible next steps for future research.
    • References List all sources cited in APA format using hanging indents.

    Formatting Guidelines:

    • Double-spaced text, 1-inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman font
    • Clear section headings for each labeled part of the report (except the Introduction)
    • Submit as a Word (.docx) or PDF (.pdf) file

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): week1 Annotated bibliography.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Civil vs. Criminal Liability

    choose one business scenario that could give rise to both civil and criminal liability- Fraud Creat a comparison chart. The underlying facts of the scenario. the criminal consequences the civil consequences key differences in burden of proof,penalties, and business reputation and impact. include one real life example to support your analysis
  • ethical analysis essay

    Instructions: This assignment requires you to use the planning document you completed earlier in the course as your starting point for writing an essay analyzing the ethical dimensions in the film you have selected. If you have not selected a film, please choose from the list below. If you cannot access these films, you may choose a different film, but you will require prior approval from your instructor.

    Films for Ethical Analysis Essay:

    • The Jacket (2005) (R) – A Gulf War veteran is wrongly sent to a mental institution for insane criminals, where he becomes the object of a doctor’s experiments, and his life is completely affected by them. The film centers on a wounded Gulf War veteran who returns to his native Vermont suffering from bouts of amnesia.
    • In your essay, apply your selected theory and all of its core principles to the medical ethical dilemma in the film:Kantian Ethics Core Principles duty, universality, impartiality, reciprocity

    Essay Format:

    • Title Page – In APA format, include your papers title, name, and institution (i.e., Galen College) in that order.
    • Introduction – Provide a brief synopsis of the film in your own words that includes the ethical dilemma present in the film, what happens in the film, and the films ending. Introduce the ethical theory you will use to analyze the film. (Recommended one paragraph)
    • Ethical Analysis – Identify the ethical theory you selected in your planning document. Explain in detail how it applies to the film. Also, explain in detail how all of its core principles apply to the medical ethical dilemma in the film. Apply the theory and its core principles using the readings and course materials as textual evidence to explain the moral view.
    • Your goal is to critique the ethical decisions made in the film based on the core principles of the ethical theory you selected. (Remember that these ethical systems may or may not justify the ethical decisions made by the characters in the film.) (Recommended 4-6 paragraphs)
    • Reflection – Summarize what you have discussed in the essay and reflect on your learning. Lastly, discuss how your learning could be applied to your professional and personal life. (Recommended one paragraph)
    • Reference page Include references in APA format. You must also cite all sources in the body of your paper wherever you use ideas from them and immediately after all direct quotations, as in-text citations in APA format.

    APA Formatting: Your essay must be written using APA format (including APA-approved fonts e.g., Calibri or Times New Roman 12-point). It should be double-spaced, 4 pages long (excluding the title and reference pages).

    Required Citations and References: You must provide in-text citation(s) and reference for the film you select and course materials (media or readings) you use to inform your planning document. (USLO 10.4)

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): planning document.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Fiscal Policy

    Please rrevise my discussion postand add APAand cite any sources!

    Hi class,

    In the Debt Fixer simulation, I mainly focused on cutting defense spending, which gave me about $1.24 trillion in savings. Even with that, the debt to GDP ratio still went up over time (around 119% by 2036 and 140% by 2050). That showed me that cutting just one area isnt enough to really fix the debt problem long term. It takes a mix of spending cuts and revenue changes to make a real impact. I do think a high national debt can be a problem for future growth because a bigger share of the budget goes to interest instead of things like infrastructure, education, and other investments that help the economy grow. Ideally, keeping debt closer to or below 100% of GDP seems more sustainable. The simulation also made it clear that under current policies, the debt keeps rising, which isnt great for long-term stability. The crowding out effect is when government borrowing pushes up interest rates and makes it harder for businesses to borrow and invest. When the government takes up more of the available funds, private investment can slow down, which hurts long run economic growth. Thats why large, ongoing deficits can be a negative for the economy over time.

    Reference

    Mankiw, N.G. (2024). Principles of Economics (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

    • (465.65 KB)

    Ryan Young

    2 hours ago

    Hi Tara,

    I am trying to get my responses in early for students this week as I would like to see some changes made prior to the week ending and you can fix what seems to be an issue with your post this week.

    This week, you should have a minimum of two full APA citations, as you will need to use the simulation for the ideal Debt to GDP ratio and provide some support for where you found the definition of Crowding Out. Are you able to add these items?

    One of the other key parts of the learning this week is looking at relationships with other important economic factors. What are the drawbacks of high debt? What impacts does it cause to other areas? What are those areas? Aside from cutting spending, what is the other choice to relieve high debt?

    I look forward to seeing these changes this week and hearing back.

    Professor Ryan

    Fiscal policies are used by the government to stabilize the economy. During the 2020 emergency caused by the coronavirus pandemic, the U.S. government approved stimulus spending. According to the U.S. Department of Treasury, the federal government spent 91% more than it collected in revenue, creating a $3.1 trillion deficit. The federal debt grew from $26.9 trillion in 2020 to $34.59 trillion in March of 2024.

    For this discussion, first play the simulation (from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget), in which you make fiscal policy decisions in an attempt to reduce the U.S. debt. You can play the simulation as many times as you like.

    In your initial post, include the image (screenshot) of your simulation report in your response. (See the for guidance.) Then, address the following questions:

    • Share your experience in the simulation. What strategies did you pursue? Were you successful in reducing the debt?
    • In your opinion, is a high national debt a problem for future economic growth? What is the ideal debt-to-GDP ratio? Research academic sources or refer to the information available through the simulation to support your opinion.
    • Government spending increases national debt and can cause a crowding-out effect. Explain what the crowding-out effect is and why it’s considered a negative effect of increased government spending. Use information from the textbook to support your analysis.

    In your responses, comment on at least two posts from your peers by comparing and contrasting your experiences and opinions. Share current news articles or references from the textbook that support your decisions in the simulation and your claims related to the national debt.

  • AI for business

    Goal: The goal is to build a market research assistant that provides information on an industry chosen by the user. The intended user is a business analyst who conducts market research at a large corporation. Input-Output The market research assistant consists of 2 separate components: A) Industry report Input: An industry chosen by the user Output: An industry report based on Wikipedia B) Predictive analysis of startup success in the industry Input: An industry chosen by the user Outputs: Python code that: Creates a synthetic dataset of startups in the chosen industry, with: y: success (0/1) x: 10 features relevant to the focal industry Builds a supervised learning model that predicts startup success Execution of the code (optional), as it may not yet always be stable. Questions A) Industry report [5] Q1. Specify what information should be contained in the industry report. The report should include the url of any Wikipedia page used. [5] Q2. Provide the instruction (or system prompt) used for generating a report. Include the requirement that the report should be less than 500 words. [5] Q3. What approach did you take for testing the assistants performance for generating a report? [5] Q4. What steps did you take to improve the assistants performance for generating a report? You may list successful and unsuccessful steps. [30] Q5. Provide the url for the market research assistant that generates the industry report. We will assess the market research assistant using 5 different industries. B) Predictive analytics [5] Q6. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using synthetic data for this prediction task? [5] Q7. How would you split the data to prevent overfitting? [5] Q8. Provide the instruction (or system prompt) used for the predictive analysis. [5] Q9. What steps did you take to improve the assistants performance for conducting the predictive analysis? You may list successful and unsuccessful steps. [30] Q10. Provide the url for the market research assistant that conducts the predictive analytics. We will assess the market research assistant using 5 different industries. Hints You can use Microsoft Copilot (New agent), which is included in (https://m365.cloud.microsoft/chat/). Other options are fine too (e.g., OpenAI (Custom gpt) or Google Gemini (Gem)

  • Patient Education

    Use the provided case study client to complete this Concept Map Assignment. Download and complete the template. If your assignment instructions Download assignment instructions Download assignment instructionsand rubric do not require you to complete all criterion, leave those boxes blank. Upload your completed map below. The template must be saved as a Word document (.doc or .docx). Do not save it as a PDF or .pages, as the assignment must be submitted through Turnitin before it can be graded. If it is not submitted through Turnitin, it will not be graded, and the late policy will apply. The concept for this week’s map is: Patient Education. David West is an 8-year-old caucasian male newly diagnosed with asthma. Past MedicalHistory: Age 6: tonsillectomy related to recurrent strep infections Negative family history History Of Present Illness: Two weeks ago, David began wheezing and states he “couldn’t catch my breath” after playing tag in physical education class. His parents brought him to his provider’s office where he was diagnosed with asthma. Provider orders: Self-administer albuterol inhaler 2 puffs with the onset of asthma symptoms Peak expiratory flow twice daily and record results Return to the clinic in 1 week for reevaluation David and his parents return to the clinic today to assess the status of his asthma, to determine if an adjustment in the plan of care is needed, and to receive anticipatory guidance about asthma management. David reports: Use of albuterol inhaler x 3 during recesses this week Peak expiratory flow readings taken every morning and every evening: Green zone: 86% of readings Yellow zone: 14% of readings (x 2 readings) Respiratory focused assessment: Respiratory rate 20 breaths/min Lung fields clear to auscultation No obvious distress noted Rubric DFC Concept Map Assignment Level 1 DFC Concept Map Assignment Level 1 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSBAR 4 pts Exemplary Learner identified key client background information in SBAR format addressing the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation. This information gives a brief, yet comprehensive, overview of the client presentation. 2 pts Developing Learner identified key client background information in SBAR format, but one or more of the sections is missing key information: situation, background, assessment, and recommendation. 0 pts Does not meet expectations Learner did not complete the SBAR section. 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMap concept 4 pts Exemplary The learner listed the concept of the map which is identified in the provided case study. 2 pts Developing The learner incorrectly identified the map concept. 0 pts Does not meet expectations The learner did not list the concept of the map. 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognize cues 4 pts Exemplary Based on available client data, the learner identified 4 relevant or important cues or information associated with the concept. Specific client values were included when appropriate (ie. heart rate, oxygen saturation, etc). Subjective and objective data could be considered. 2 pts Developing Based on available client data, the learner identified 3 relevant or important cues or information associated with the concept. Specific client values were included when appropriate (ie. heart rate, oxygen saturation, etc). Subjective and objective data could be considered. 0 pts Does not meet expectations Based on available client data, the learner identified zero to 2 relevant or important cues or information associated with the concept. Specific client values were not included when appropriate (ie. heart rate, oxygen saturation, etc). 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze cues 4 pts Exemplary Based on the cues identified, learner determined at least 2 conditions that might be present and are consistent with those cues. 2 pts Developing Based on the cues identified, learner determined 1 condition that might be present and is consistent with those cues. 0 pts Does not meet expectations The learner is unable to link the identified cues to the clients presentation and determine a condition that is consistent with those cues. 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrioritize hypotheses 4 pts Exemplary Learner used this strategy for this section: Where do I start? Based on the analysis of the client’s condition, the learner determined which explanations are most likely. They listed and ranked at least 2 hypotheses according to most urgent problems and priority order. 2 pts Developing Learner used this strategy for this section: Where do I start? Based on the analysis of the client’s condition, the learner determined which explanations are most likely. They correctly listed and 1 hypothesis. 0 pts Does not meet expectations The learner was unable to determine a hypothesis. 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGenerate solutions: SMART goals 4 pts Exemplary Using the hypotheses, the learner identified at least 3 desirable outcomes for the client. Goals were listed in SMART format (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound). 2 pts Developing Using the hypotheses, the learner identified 2 desirable outcomes for the client. Goals were listed in SMART format (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound). 0 pts Does not meet expectations Using the hypotheses, the learner identified zero to 1 desirable outcome(s) for the client listed in correct SMART format (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound). Also use this criterion if goals are not listed in SMART format. 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTake action 4 pts Exemplary Using the identified SMART goals, learner identified and described how at least 3 nursing interventions will be performed, administered, communicated, or taught. These interventions will address the priority concern and achieve the desired outcomes. Interventions are designed to help meet the clients goals. Intervention #1 should be crafted to help meet SMART goal #1. 2 pts Developing Using the identified SMART goals, learner identified and described how 2 nursing interventions will be performed, administered, communicated, or taught. These interventions will address the priority concern and achieve the desired outcomes. Interventions are designed to help meet the clients goals. Intervention #1 should be crafted to help meet SMART goal #1. 0 pts Does not meet expectations Using the identified SMART goals, learner identified and described how zero to 1 nursing intervention(s) will be performed, administered, communicated, or taught. Also use this criterion if the intervention(s) is/are not crafted to help meet the corresponding client goals. 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate outcomes 4 pts Exemplary Learner compared observed outcomes against expected outcomes. For each of the 3 listed interventions, the learner was able to discuss how to determine if the identified interventions were effective. This section requires 3 evaluation criteria. The evaluation should contain subjective/objective data to support the evaluation. Learner was able to correctly evaluate if Goal #1 was accomplished by Intervention #1 by the time frame specified; this was repeated for goals and their associated interventions. 2 pts Developing Learner compared observed outcomes against expected outcomes. For each of listed interventions, the learner was able to discuss how to determine if the identified interventions were effective. This section contained 2 evaluation criteria. The evaluation contained subjective/objective data to support the evaluation. Learner was able to correctly evaluate if Goal #1 was accomplished by Intervention #1 by the time frame specified; this was repeated for goals and their associated interventions. 0 pts Does not meet expectations Learner compared observed outcomes against expected outcomes. For each of listed interventions, the learner was able to discuss how to determine if the identified interventions were effective. This section contained zero to one evaluation criteria. The evaluation is missing subjective/objective data to support the evaluation. 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference(s) 3 pts Exemplary Learner correctly completed a Reference page and included in-text citations giving credit to their source(s) using APA 7th edition format. Listed in the reference are the author, the publication year, and the source. 1.5 pts Developing Learner incorrectly applied APA 7th edition format to references and/or in-text citations. 0 pts Does not meet expectations The learner did not complete a Reference page or utilize in-text citations. 3 pts Total Points: 35

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): DFC Concept Map Instructions Level 1 ASN BSN V1.docx, DFC Concept Map Template (Level 1) (2).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • berkualitas tinggi,responsif dan cepat,penjelasan dan jawaba…

    apa itu responsif?,jawan dan berikan penjelasan

    Requirements: