Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 301 research topic proposal.docx, 301 research outline.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 301 research topic proposal.docx, 301 research outline.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Please be sure to complete the SOAP note by following the grading rubric below in eLearn.
Although it is necessary to perform and document a comprehensive history and physical examination (H&P) at the beginning of the patientprovider relationship, it is unnecessary and too time consuming to document that level of detail at subsequent visits.
When such visits occur, visits are problem focused, either for monitoring of chronic conditions or for evaluation of a new problem. During a focused exam, you need to examine specifically the body part or system directly involved with the medical problem. One way to document problem-focused visits is with a SOAP note.
SOAP stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. It is important to understand that sections of the SOAP note are interrelated. The completeness and accuracy of the history (subjective information) will help guide what you look for when performing a problem-specific physical examination (objective information) and formulating a list of possible causes, also known as differential diagnoses (DDX). Together, the subjective and objective information should lead you to, and should support, the assessment or most likely diagnosis. Once you have made an assessment, you can establish a plan of care.
Directions
This assignment utilizes a “Mock” patient. For any section of the SOAP Note that information is not provided for you, you must develop and document details that would support the diagnosis and plan for the patient.
SOAP Note:
Patient Profile:
Presenting Symptoms:
Assessment Findings:
Upon examination, the nurse practitioner notes the following:
Vital Signs:
Ear Assessment:
Otoscopic Examination:
Hearing Assessment:
Due Date
The SOAP Note is due by at 11:59 PM EST, at the end of Week 5.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): NURSM 520 SOAP Note Template.docx, NURSM 520 SOAP Note Rubric- Detailed (3) (1).pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
This is a literature revuew for a PICOT question using 4 sources this is the information provided by the school.
Instructions
Below is information about the structure of the literature review, finding credible information for research assignments, formulating research questions, search strategies and a literature review template:
Ruberic
15 ptsExemplaryIdentifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides direction for the content that is engaging and thought provoking. The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the presentation. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.
15 ptsExemplaryProvides five current, peer-reviewed sources that present accurate, distinguishing evidence and effectively integrate the main concept into the assignment. Sources are relevant, accurate, current (less than 5 years old) and reliable, reflecting and validating the strength of the content.
15 ptsExemplaryContent is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flows smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, and spacing are optimal for audience viewing
15 ptsExemplaryContent is well written and uses standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. APA guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. Includes in-text citations and references that are written correctly.
Example (The example is also attached it needs to be APA)
For the title page, follow the guidelines below. Information without brackets should remain as written. The learner should replace the information within the brackets with the requested information, and all prior information and brackets should be removed.
Literature Review
[Remove brackets & insert Your Full Name Here]
Nightingale College
[Remove brackets & insert Your Course Number, Section & Course Title]
[Remove brackets & insert Your instructors name using Professor or Dr. ________]
[Remove brackets & insert Month, Day, Year this is the date the assignment is due, not the date it is submitted]
Prior to submitting your paper, make sure to remove all instructions in brackets on the following pages.
Literature Review
[The introduction to the paper must be at least 5 sentences with 1 in-text citation, a fully stated purpose statement, and PICOT Question. In this section, introduce the topic to the reader. Indicate why the selected topic is important and why it is important to conduct a literature review as part of the project. Make sure the PICOT question is written as a quality improvement question, not a research question and that it contains all components of PICOT. End this section stating, “The purpose of this paper is … “]
Project Proposal Topic
[The project proposal section must be at least 1 fully formed paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length) with in-text citations. In this section, present an overview of the topic by discussing the topic in general. Consider providing some background information and describing the gap (current practice versus best practice) in nursing practice that was identified. Consider using statistics here to reinforce the point.]
Methods of Searching
[This section must be at least 1 fully formed paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length).This section should describe how the literature search was conducted. For example: A literature review was conducted using both electronic and manual resources… Describe how the search for literature was conducted by explaining what databases or search engines were used to find the peer-reviewed articles. Describe what keywords were used; what date range was used to obtain the most current information (remember they must be less than 5 years old); what things were excluded (example: blogs, websites with biased information, etc).]
Review of the Literature
[There must be at least 5 fully formed paragraphs (at least 5 sentences in length) with 5 in-text citations that correlate with the current, peer-reviewed references used. This will be the bulk of the review. Organization of the material here is important. In one paragraph for each of the 5 current, peer-reviewed articles, elaborate on the relation to the project topic/PICOT question, as well as what best practices were identified. Integrate key details of each article, demonstrating a clear understanding of the content reviewed. Consider the main takeaways after reading each article as they relate to the project project/intervention. This section should outline details of each article and also include the learners insight as they relate to the project and PICOT. Also include any other pertinent information about the topic that was discussed in the articles chosen.]
Findings
[This section must be at least 2 fully formed paragraphs (at least 5 sentences in length) with in-text citations. In this section, provide a summary of the most significant findings found in the Review of the Literature section. Identify strengths and weaknesses of the literature (for example, small sample sizes that limit the validity of the findings or conclusions that you disagree with as an evaluator); and identify any gaps in the literature found. Begin with The literature has shown…]
Conclusion
[The section should be at least 1 paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length), summarize at least 3 key points, and contain at least 1 in-text citation. Provide a thorough summary with at least 3 key points. Although not required, it is suggested learners restate the PICOT question in this section, so the reader is drawn to refocus on the topic/question.]
References
[There must be at least 5 current (within the last 5 years), peer-reviewed references. Use APA-7 formatting specific to reference type, including (but not limited to) alphabetical order and hanging indent. Specific reference examples have been discussed in the webinars.]
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): BSN355 Capstone Project Proposal Template revised 92022.docx, article 4.pdf, article 3.pdf, Article 1.pdf, Article 2.pdf, BSN355 Lit Review Template 1 (1).docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
The goal of this assignment is to practice synthesizing information from credible sources to create a cohesive, informative written academic report designed for an expert audience.
Step 1: Review Your Initiative
Take a moment to refresh your knowledge of the specific Nature Conservancy habitat conservation initiative you selected in Week 1 and think about the audience you need to address. You will be writing this report for other Nature Conservancy professionals and experts in your field, so you will be writing in a formal and objective manner.
Step 2: Synthesize Your Research
As the Staff Researcher, you will use credible resources to compile a Research Report.
Your Research Report must synthesize information from a minimum of 5 sources. You may use the resources you found in Week 1 as the Research Intern as well as any additional sources that are relevant to your selected conservation initiative.
While developing your synthesis, make sure you are also considering the appropriate writing elements described in the Learning Materials, including:
Double check that you are synthesizing (not summarizing) ideas from your sources using the
, and that you are providing appropriate in-text citations and a list of references at the end of your report.
Your report should be written in the third person perspective (avoid using I, me, and my).
Step 3: Develop Your Evidence
In week 1, as the Research Intern, you considered why your selected project was important why it mattered. This week you will support this position with evidence as the Staff Researcher. You are providing evidence from your sources to prove that your stance is well-informed.
Note: You may need to find additional sources to support your position.
Step 4: Length & Formatting
Write 400500 words using APA style throughout your report. Your writing should include in-text citations and a References page to support your claims.
Follow this organization:
Formatting Guidelines:
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): week1 Annotated bibliography.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Instructions: This assignment requires you to use the planning document you completed earlier in the course as your starting point for writing an essay analyzing the ethical dimensions in the film you have selected. If you have not selected a film, please choose from the list below. If you cannot access these films, you may choose a different film, but you will require prior approval from your instructor.
Films for Ethical Analysis Essay:
Essay Format:
APA Formatting: Your essay must be written using APA format (including APA-approved fonts e.g., Calibri or Times New Roman 12-point). It should be double-spaced, 4 pages long (excluding the title and reference pages).
Required Citations and References: You must provide in-text citation(s) and reference for the film you select and course materials (media or readings) you use to inform your planning document. (USLO 10.4)
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): planning document.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Please rrevise my discussion postand add APAand cite any sources!
Hi class,
In the Debt Fixer simulation, I mainly focused on cutting defense spending, which gave me about $1.24 trillion in savings. Even with that, the debt to GDP ratio still went up over time (around 119% by 2036 and 140% by 2050). That showed me that cutting just one area isnt enough to really fix the debt problem long term. It takes a mix of spending cuts and revenue changes to make a real impact. I do think a high national debt can be a problem for future growth because a bigger share of the budget goes to interest instead of things like infrastructure, education, and other investments that help the economy grow. Ideally, keeping debt closer to or below 100% of GDP seems more sustainable. The simulation also made it clear that under current policies, the debt keeps rising, which isnt great for long-term stability. The crowding out effect is when government borrowing pushes up interest rates and makes it harder for businesses to borrow and invest. When the government takes up more of the available funds, private investment can slow down, which hurts long run economic growth. Thats why large, ongoing deficits can be a negative for the economy over time.
Reference
Mankiw, N.G. (2024). Principles of Economics (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Ryan Young
2 hours ago
Hi Tara,
I am trying to get my responses in early for students this week as I would like to see some changes made prior to the week ending and you can fix what seems to be an issue with your post this week.
This week, you should have a minimum of two full APA citations, as you will need to use the simulation for the ideal Debt to GDP ratio and provide some support for where you found the definition of Crowding Out. Are you able to add these items?
One of the other key parts of the learning this week is looking at relationships with other important economic factors. What are the drawbacks of high debt? What impacts does it cause to other areas? What are those areas? Aside from cutting spending, what is the other choice to relieve high debt?
I look forward to seeing these changes this week and hearing back.
Professor Ryan
Fiscal policies are used by the government to stabilize the economy. During the 2020 emergency caused by the coronavirus pandemic, the U.S. government approved stimulus spending. According to the U.S. Department of Treasury, the federal government spent 91% more than it collected in revenue, creating a $3.1 trillion deficit. The federal debt grew from $26.9 trillion in 2020 to $34.59 trillion in March of 2024.
For this discussion, first play the simulation (from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget), in which you make fiscal policy decisions in an attempt to reduce the U.S. debt. You can play the simulation as many times as you like.
In your initial post, include the image (screenshot) of your simulation report in your response. (See the for guidance.) Then, address the following questions:
In your responses, comment on at least two posts from your peers by comparing and contrasting your experiences and opinions. Share current news articles or references from the textbook that support your decisions in the simulation and your claims related to the national debt.
Goal: The goal is to build a market research assistant that provides information on an industry chosen by the user. The intended user is a business analyst who conducts market research at a large corporation. Input-Output The market research assistant consists of 2 separate components: A) Industry report Input: An industry chosen by the user Output: An industry report based on Wikipedia B) Predictive analysis of startup success in the industry Input: An industry chosen by the user Outputs: Python code that: Creates a synthetic dataset of startups in the chosen industry, with: y: success (0/1) x: 10 features relevant to the focal industry Builds a supervised learning model that predicts startup success Execution of the code (optional), as it may not yet always be stable. Questions A) Industry report [5] Q1. Specify what information should be contained in the industry report. The report should include the url of any Wikipedia page used. [5] Q2. Provide the instruction (or system prompt) used for generating a report. Include the requirement that the report should be less than 500 words. [5] Q3. What approach did you take for testing the assistants performance for generating a report? [5] Q4. What steps did you take to improve the assistants performance for generating a report? You may list successful and unsuccessful steps. [30] Q5. Provide the url for the market research assistant that generates the industry report. We will assess the market research assistant using 5 different industries. B) Predictive analytics [5] Q6. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using synthetic data for this prediction task? [5] Q7. How would you split the data to prevent overfitting? [5] Q8. Provide the instruction (or system prompt) used for the predictive analysis. [5] Q9. What steps did you take to improve the assistants performance for conducting the predictive analysis? You may list successful and unsuccessful steps. [30] Q10. Provide the url for the market research assistant that conducts the predictive analytics. We will assess the market research assistant using 5 different industries. Hints You can use Microsoft Copilot (New agent), which is included in (https://m365.cloud.microsoft/chat/). Other options are fine too (e.g., OpenAI (Custom gpt) or Google Gemini (Gem)
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): DFC Concept Map Instructions Level 1 ASN BSN V1.docx, DFC Concept Map Template (Level 1) (2).docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
apa itu responsif?,jawan dan berikan penjelasan
Requirements: