Select one of the common EBP models that you think it best fits your PICOT question and then explain/justify your selection considering the following:
The clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization
The diagrammatic representation of the model and the ability to assimilate the concepts and organizes the step of the desired EBP changes
The comprehensiveness of the model from the beginning stages to implementation and evaluation of outcomes
The easiness of the use when concepts are applied to direct EBP changes and practice issues in clinical settings
The flexibility of the model to be applied to various populations of patients, EBP projects, initiatives, and programs
The use and popularity of the model in the published literature
This assignment should be no more than 2-3 pages (not including the title or references pages).
Common EBP Models:
The Stetler Model of Evidence-Based Practice
The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to promote quality care
The Model for Evidence-Based Practice Change
The Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close Collaboration (ARCC) model for implementation and sustainability of EBP
The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework
The Clinical Scholar model
The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model
The ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation
Rubric:
The selected model:
Selects one of the EBP common models
Models clarity and conciseness
Proficiently analyzes the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and addresses in details how they can support answering their PICOT question
Models diagrammatic representation
Thoroughly evaluates the model’s diagram, addressing how it enhances understanding and applies to the PICOT question, while discussing its clarity, comprehensiveness, and relevance for clinical practice or evidence-based implementation.
Models comprehensiveness
Evaluates how well the model addresses all aspects of the PICOT question (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, time) and explains its broad, holistic approach to solving the clinical problem.
Models easiness
Thoroughly assesses the ease of understanding and applying the model in clinical practice. Considers factors such as simplicity, user-friendliness, and accessibility for healthcare professionals.
Models flexibility
Examines the models adaptability across various clinical settings or populations. Describes how the model can be modified or applied to different situations and still maintain its effectiveness.
Models use and popularity
Provides a detailed evaluation of the models current use in practice and its popularity among healthcare professionals. References evidence of its widespread adoption or endorsement in research or clinical settings.
PICOT question: In hospitalized older adults aged 65 years and older (P), how does implementation of nurse-led multifactorial fall prevention programs, including individualized risk assessments and tailored interventions (I), compared to standard fall precautions without risk assessment (C), affect fall rates (O) within the time of hospital stay (T)?
Based on the knowledge you have achieved thus far in this class, compose a minimum 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, not including the required title and reference slides. In the presentation, summarize risk management concepts. Include the different frameworks you could use and why you might choose specific frameworks. Also, summarize the qualitative versus quantitative risk analysis approaches and techniques for managing risk. Your presentation should include a title slide and reference slide and follow APA guidelines.
Your narration will provide additional details of the points you have provided on each slide. You must have narration on every slide. Discuss and expand upon the points you have summarized on each slide by using the slide notes section on each slide to coincide with the narration. Do not just read what is on the slide. Remember, the slide should contain minimal information, so the audience can focus on your narration and the supporting information you provide.
Oral Parameters/Expectations
At least 10 slides in length, excluding the title and reference slides.
Each slide, except title and reference slides, must have an oral narration in Standard English explaining the key ideas in each slide.
The oral presentation should have a highly developed and sustained viewpoint and purpose.
The oral communication should be highly ordered, logical, and unified.
The oral delivery technique, including word choice and oral expressiveness, should display exceptional content, organization, and style, while leading the audience to a dynamic and supported conclusion.
Free of grammatical errors.
No evidence of plagiarism.
Ensure that the narration provides clear enunciation, a professional tone, and is free of background noise.
Written Parameters/Expectations
Include a title slide and reference slide.
Written work is provided in Standard English.
At least 10 slides in length, not counting the title slide and reference slide.
Includes a highly developed viewpoint and purpose, and exceptional written content.
Writing demonstrates superior organization and is well-ordered, logical, and unified.
Free of written grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors.
No evidence of plagiarism.
At least three outside references on the topic of risk management in addition to the text.
Make sure that the reference slide is in the latest APA Style.
For assistance with APA requirements, please go to Academic Writer. You will find the link in the Academic Tools section of the course.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Unit 5 Assignment 2.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Personality traits are behaviors, feelings, or thoughts that are expressed in a consistent manner across time and social situations. For example, someone with a high level of conscientiousness may express that trait through careful organization in their personal and professional life. You might describe this person as reliable, punctual, and detail oriented. In this discussion, you will reflect on trait theory and the concept of consistent and varied personality patterns. Before completing this discussion, review this weeks assigned textbook readings. Respond to the following: To what extent have your personality traits changed across different situations and time? Provide an example to illustrate your response. How do personality trait theorists explain variability in personality across time and situations? How might understanding trait theory help explain or predict an individuals emotional responses and behavior? Response Requirements By Thursday, respond to the prompt above in a minimum of 175 words. By Monday, post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member.
A. Create an email for a professional context using 815 sentences, including the following components:
1. a subject line
2. an opening or salutation
3. a developed body of the email with an objective, using one of the four types of written communication (i.e., transactional, persuasive, informational, or instructional)
a. Employ cross-cultural communication practices throughout the body of your email.
4. concluding remarks
5. a closing or signature
B. Analyze your use of cross-cultural communication within the email written in part A (suggested length of 58 sentences) by doing the following:
1. Identify three principles of cross-cultural communication you applied within the email.
2. Explain how you applied each of the principles of cross-cultural communication from part B1.
C. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
THIS ASSIGNMENT IS THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL FOR THE APA 7TH RESEARCH PAPER. MORE INFORMATION TO FOLLOW:
After reading the professor lecture (directions for completing the assignment):
Submit your subject (one sentence)
Topic (one sentence; a narrowing of the broad topic)
E.G.: My subject is human trafficking (broad category that needs to be narrowed)
My topic is human trafficking in New York City amongst immigrant women younger than 18 years of age.
Notice that human trafficking is now modified (narrowed) by additional variables: New York City; immigrant women; younger than 18 years of age.
Then, include one article’s APA 7th citation
Write one paragraph, ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY describing the article, its topic, research problem, research question, thesis statement, purpose of the article, basic conclusions.
Do this in no more than five to six sentences.Ignore any prior instructions;
See a second example below:I want to write about terrorism, or human trafficking.
These are large, broad SUBJECTS, that are actually too large to write about in an essay.
Thus, the student must NARROW the broad category, by adding variables:
For example:I want to write about terrorism (subject), domestic terrorism in the United States in New York City in the 1970s by the group OMEGA SEVEN
This is now a TOPIC,
By adding the variables of “domestic,” “United States,” “New York City,” “the 1970s,” and “OMEGA SEVEN.”
This is the way a broad subject becomes a narrow topic and a manageable research topic.
professor lecture:
Example of Selecting a Subject and Topic with Annotated Bibliography for a Research Paper in APA 7th Edition
Students who wish to write a research paper must first articulate a 1) Subject, and a; 2) Topic. According to Ippolito (2021): research begins with the selection of a large category of research known as a subject (Perrin, 2015). Initially, most subjects are too large and unwieldy to be utilized as the basis of a research paper. Thus, if a subject is to be manageable and worthy of the term, research, it must be whittled down.
For Perrin (2015) research begins with a subject …. broad categories such as test anxiety, Internet crime, the effects of divorce, and so on (p. 1). But it cannot remain there. Subjects must be narrowed; the researcher who is interested in test anxiety (a rather large subject) must narrow that subject to something less broad.
Perrin (2015) has given the example of a subject test anxiety among middle school students (p. 2). Here, the subject is made more manageable by adding a second variable: middle school students. Of course, the additional variable, could have been something else: graduate students test anxiety in a modern college or university, at the time of final examinations, or, perhaps, doctoral students anxiety on the eve of defending their Ph.D. dissertation. In these cases, the research takes a different turn, resulting in different conclusions, and, ultimately, different pieces of research.
Accordingly, it shall be argued, in this brief explanatory document, that the process of developing a research proposal is threefold: 1) wonder and curiosity; the researcher must, as Lonergan (1978) has set forth: wonder about something (p. 9); 2) development of a subject, based on that wonder a broad category of inquiry that, ultimately, must undergo narrowing into a more manageable area of inquiry, that is a topic; 3) the subject is narrowed by adding variables
Commented [SI1]: Here, is the beginning of the thesis statement; note, there is no use of the word, thesis.
which allows the researcher to focus his subject in a particular direction. These additional variables function as a lens, or even, a window, through which the researcher and, ultimately, future students of that research can view and learn from that research. The purpose of this explanatory paper is to provide examples of how human curiosity and wonder, gives rise to a large, broad subject for inquiry, and, ultimately, to a narrowed, more manageable research topic.
Commented [SI2]: Here, is the purpose of the study; it is traditionally the last sentence in the introduction
Examples of Subjects Transformed into Topics for Research Papers
writing a subject-topic assignment, the student must have some idea of what he or she wishes to research. Once the subject has been decided upon, the student should locate at least one peer-reviewed, academic essay from the Monroe databases in My Monroes Library Resources, in order to write a brief, Annotated Bibliography. The process, then, proceeds as follows:
will suppose that the student wishes to research something related to serial crime, specifically, serial murderers. Notice, serial murderers is a subject; it is a very broad area of scholarship; one requiring narrowing, if it is to be a manageable research area of inquiry (Perrin, 2015). The reason it is too broad is because serial murderers are more than one type.
Serial killers can be men; they can be women. They can be transgenders, adolescents, young assailants, elderly assailants; there have been serial killers in the medical and health professions who were physicians; some were nurses. Indeed, each one of these categories of killer represents a different area of inquiry and, therefore, a different paper. By choosing one over the other, the student has narrowed the research subject, and, in the process, he has created a research topic. Once the student is reasonably sure what the subject and topic will be, the next task is to find at least one example of a peer-reviewed article that deals with that subject and topic that the student can use as research material for his or her paper. Here is an example:
can be men; they can be women.
Research Proposal for Research Paper
Subject and Topic with Annotated Bibliography Serial Murder
Grattet, R. (2000). The Atlanta youth murders and the politics of race. Contemporary Sociology, 29(3), 548-549.
Subject: The subject for this research paper is serial murder.
Topic: The topic is serial murder and race: African-American victims of an African-American serial murderer.
Annotated Bibliography
Grattet (2000), has written of a complex subject: serial crime, specifically, serial murder. Much could be, and has been, said about this subject. The author has explored a specific case of serial murder, by means of an infamous example (variable) the Atlanta youth murders, in which many young men were killed in the 1970s by a man who was later convicted of all of those crimes, Wayne Williams. However, because both assailant and the 30 victims in this case were African-American, Grattet has narrowed the essays subject, by means of an additional variable: the politics of race. Here, in this piece of research, the author has tackled the subject of serial murder, by looking at it through the academic lens or window of racial politics, and the tragic case of many young people murdered in Atlanta, Georgia. What follows is a working-out of the issue:
Serial Murder: A Second Example with Annotated Bibliography
Arndt, W. B., Hietpas, T., & Kim, J. (2004). Critical characteristics of male serial murderers. American Journal of Criminal Justice: AJCJ, 29(1), 117-IV.
Subject: The subject for this research paper is serial murder.
Topic: The topic is serial murder, involving male murderers
Annotated Bibliography
Arndt et al. (2004) have explored the subject of serial murder by narrowing the subject by means of the lens of gender. They have examined serial murder (subject), through the lens or window of serial murderers who are male. If they had researched the subject by examining female serial killers, they would have written a different essay, undoubtedly, with different conclusions.
CONTD
Research Proposal for Research Paper
Subject and Topic with Annotated Bibliography Terrorism
Terrorism
Grozdanova, R. (2014). ‘Terrorism’ – Too elusive a term for an international legal definition? Netherlands International Law Review, 61(3), 305-334.
Subject: The subject of my paper is terrorism
Topic: The topic of my paper is the legally elusive nature of international terrorism, where the elusivity is found in the attempt to define international terrorism.
Annotated Bibliography
Grozdanova (2014) wrote an essay: ‘Terrorism’ – Too elusive a term for an international legal definition? The subject is terrorism. However, terrorism assumes different forms: domestic, international, religiously-based terrorism. Terrorism, as a one-word description is too narrow to be a manageable research inquiry. For Grozdanova, that problem was solved by narrowing the subject into a topic whose focus is on its definition, internationally, and legally, with an emphasis on the elusivity of that definition?
CONTD
Terrorism Second Example
Trehan, J. (2002). Terrorism and the funding of terrorism in Kashmir. Journal of Financial Crime, 9(3), 201-211.
Subject: The subject of my paper is terrorism.
Topic: The topic is the funding of terrorism in Kashmir.
Annotated Bibliography
Trehan (2002), also wrote about terrorism, in Terrorism and the funding of terrorism in Kashmir, as a broad subject; however, the topic, when the subject was narrowed down was the funding of terrorism, and in a particular location: Kashmir.
Terrorism Third Example
Pain, R. (2014). Everyday terrorism: Connecting domestic violence and global terrorism. Progress in Human Geography, 38(4), 531-550.
Subject: The subject of my paper is terrorism
Topic: The topic of my paper is terrorism, as it manifests in domestic violence, a universal problem, or a manifestation of global terrorism.
Annotated Bibliography
The subject of this study is terrorism. However, the topic of the study is terrorism in conjunction with the variables: domestic violence, and global terrorism. Pain has construed domestic violence to be a variant of global terrorism, something that is not ordinarily studied in the academic literature.
References
Commented [SI3]: References is bolded and centered. All the references should be alphabetized
Arndt, W. B., Hietpas, T., & Kim, J. (2004). Critical characteristics of male serial murderers. American Journal of Criminal Justice: AJCJ, 29(1), 117-IV.
Grattet, R. (2000). The Atlanta youth murders and the politics of race. Contemporary Sociology, 29(3), 548-549.
Grozdanova, R. (2014). ‘Terrorism’ – Too elusive a term for an international legal definition? Netherlands International Law Review, 61(3), 305-334.
Lonergan, B. J. F. (1978). Insight: A study of human understanding. Harper-San Francisco. (Original work published 1958)
Pain, R. (2014). Everyday terrorism: Connecting domestic violence and global terrorism. Progress in Human Geography, 38(4), 531-550.
Perrin, R. (2015). Pocket guide to APA style (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Trehan, J. (2002). Terrorism and the funding of terrorism in Kashmir. Journal of Financial Crime, 9(3), 201-211.
**I would like my topic to be on domestic violence**
however you narrow it to a specific subject/topic is fine
textbook we been using in class:
W., S. D., & R., R. A. (2007). Handbook of Forensic Mental Health with Victims and Offenders. Springer Publishing LLC. https://monroecollege.vitalsource.com/books/9780826101136
*chapters 3 +4 are based on domestic violence*
(I apologize im not able to upload the specific chapters)
The purpose of this project is to collect and analyzedata about your current dietary habits. The first part of the project, “All Daily Reports”, is the data collection part of the project. Through McGraw Hill, you will have access to NutritionCalc Plus, a food database where you will create a profile and a very detailed food journal. You need to record what you had for breakfast, lunch, dinner, snacks, and any beverages. You will also include your physical activity.
You can choose any 3 days to journal about. The days do not need to be consecutive- I highly recommend you choose 2 weekdays and 1 weekend day, and plan to include days where you are following your normal dietary pattern. For example, try not to record when you are feeling ill/sick. Once you have input your data into NutritionCalc, you will go to the “Reports” tab. At the very bottom of the list of reports, you will see an option for “All Daily Reports“. Click on that button, select your 3 days, and run the report. You will get a very detailed analysis of the 3 days you journaled about in your unique report. (Please see the example below.)
This is where you will upload the (~20 page) All Daily Reports. You must complete this part of the project before you can start Segments 2-5, which is the data analysis portion of the project. You will answer a series of questions about the information in the report in Segments 2-5.
If you do not upload the “All Daily Reports”, you will not get anycredit for the entire project. Please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any questions.