Category: uncategorised

  • Essay 1: Early America

    Writing Assignments: Almost all long-form writing for this class will occur outside of regular class-time.

    • All papers need to be formally presentedi.e. typed, spell-checked (theres really no excuse anymore), researched, and written for an academic audience. Additional sources should be included when asked for, and all references should be properly cited/documented in MLA format. (This is a literature class: do not use APA.)
    • Pay attention to details: if you misspell the name of an author or character, you risk losing my trust in what you have to say about the story as a whole. Sloppy mistakes tell me youre either not paying attention or dont care and if I get that impression, youll get that grade.
    • All essays should make use of the text of a short story weve read, not just summarize or paraphrase what has happened. Just as you would precisely quote lines of scripture to make a point about what the Bible says, for example, a secular authors actual words constitute evidence for what you will argue about his/her work. If your essay includes zero quotations from the stories you discuss, expect your grade to be quite low.
    • Provide page numbers for quoted material when applicable. All of our stories this semester are paginated, so theyll all require page references when quoting. All your written work should ideally refer to the editions Ive assigned. So, if you quote something found on p. 23 of your text, the same quote needs to be found on p. 23 of my text. (Do not quote the PDF page #; quote the books page #.)
    • If you look up something online (such as an authors bio on Wikipedia), make sure you cite what youve researched.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Essay 1_ Early America.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion Forum 6

    For this discussion you will examine the ideas regarding summations, closed-forms and the Big

    Oh. In your discussion, post and provide an example of the following:
    When analyzing the time complexity of an algorithm, we often encounter summations
    that describe the total number of operations. How would you approach evaluating a
    summation and finding its closed form?
    What are some common techniques or strategies, and how do they help in determining
    the Big-O complexity?

    Requirements: 300 words

  • Assessment 3 Implementing Evidence-Based Practice

    Create a poster presentation to communicate an implementation plan to bridge the gap between the evidence you will research and clinical practice. You will then record audio of no more than five minutes presenting your poster.

    Master’s-level nurses need to be able to think critically about the evidence, outcomes data, and other relevant information they encounter throughout their daily practice. Often the evidence or information that a nurse encounters, researches, or studies is not presented in the exact context of that nurse’s practice. A key skill of the master’s-level nurse is to transfer evidence from the context in which it was presented and apply it to a different context in order to maximize the benefit to patients in that new context.

    Collapse All

    Professional Context

    Critical appraisal of evidence is essential for nurses to practice evidence-based nursing, improve patient outcomes, contribute to research quality, make informed decisions, and fulfill their professional responsibilities. It is a key component of promoting excellence and continual improvement in nursing practice.

    Ethical research ensures that the rights and well-being of research participants are protected. This includes obtaining informed consent, maintaining confidentiality, and minimizing any potential harm to individuals involved in the research. Ethical research contributes to the long-term impact of evidence-based practice and greater acceptance of evidence-based practices. By conducting research ethically, you will generate knowledge that is more likely to stand the test of time and continue to inform practice and policy in the future.

    Master’s-level nurses understand the importance of utilizing evidence-based practice in their health care setting. The challenge is bridging the gap between the evidence and clinical practice. “This is the way we’ve always done it,” is a common response and may not indicate evidence-based practice is being utilized. Furthermore, when a practice problem is identified, what are the steps to communicate the need for change with the interprofessional team?

    One way to communicate the need for quality improvements, as well as your plans for achieving specific changes, is through a presentation poster. This type of communication tool is used in workplaces as well as professional and academic conferences. Being able to convey the essence and value of a project in a compelling and succinct way is a valuable skill, and it is vital within the constraints of a single poster.

    Scenario

    You have been asked to give a poster presentation based on your work and research on a clinical problem in your practice setting. The purpose is to lay out the evidence and a potential implementation plan to your colleagues in order to bridge the gap between the evidence and the practice and improve the quality and outcomes of care.

    Instructions

    Identify a clinical problem in your work setting and develop an implementation plan to carry out your evidence-based practice proposal using a poster presentation. You may use the Poster Presentation Template [PPTX] Download Poster Presentation Template [PPTX]to help structure and organize your assessment submission.

    Your Implementation Plan should include the following:

    Background on the clinical problem.

    PICOT question.

    Stakeholders that will be impacted.

    Action plan for implementation.

    Potential barriers to project implementation.

    Baseline data that will be needed to evaluate outcomes.

    Search strategy and databases used.

    Summary of the evidence with a critical appraisal of its quality.

    The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your poster presentation addresses all of them.

    Develop a PICOT question for a chosen clinical problem.

    Include a graphic that is relevant to the clinical problem.

    Provide a background on the clinical problem identified.

    Outline an action plan to implement the evidence-based project that includes:

    The recommended practice change.

    Proposed timeline for implementation.

    The tools or resources that will be needed to support the project.

    Identify the stakeholders, opportunities for innovation, and potential barriers to the practice change needed for project implementation.

    Who are the stakeholders who will be impacted?

    What are areas of the project that present opportunities for innovation?

    What are the potential barriers, such as a lack of knowledge, time, skill level, motivation, or resources that could impact project implementation?

    Propose outcome criteria to evaluate the evidence-based practice project and how they will be measured.

    How will outcomes be measured?

    How do your outcomes align with the Quadruple Aim?

    How will your outcome measures inform evidence-based practice, guidelines, or policies?

    Evaluate the evidence that supports the need for practice change.

    In the notes section of your poster presentation:

    Describe your search strategy and databases that were used.

    Summarize your findings with a critical appraisal of the quality, relevance, and validity of your resources.

    Note ethical considerations such as informed consent, protection of participant rights, and potential conflicts of interest.

    Convey purpose of the poster presentation, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.

    Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, using current APA style.

    If you choose not to use the provided template, there are templates in PowerPoint or on the Internet that can help you get started designing your poster.

    Before starting to record your presentation make sure you have:

    Set up and tested your microphone and headset using the installation instructions provided by the manufacturer. You only need to use the headset if your audio is not clear or high quality when captured by the microphone.

    Practice using the equipment to ensure the audio quality is sufficient.

    Consult Using Kaltura for guidance on how to record your presentation and upload it in the courseroom.

    Microsoft PowerPoint also allows you to record your narration with your slides. If you choose this option, simply submit your presentation to the appropriate area of the courseroom. Your narration will be included with your stories.

    Remember to practice delivering and recording your presentation multiple times to ensure effective delivery.

    Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact Disability Services at DisabilityServices@Capella.edu to request accommodations.

    Submission Requirements

    Font and font size: Appropriate size and weight for a presentation, generally 2428 points for headings; no smaller than 18 points for bullet-point text. Use a suitable professional typeface, such as Times or Arial, throughout the presentation.

    Length of presentation: No more than five minutes. Add detailed speaker notes to fully support the content of the poster presentation. Speaker notes must match the audio.

    Number of references: Cite a minimum of 35 sources of current scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current source material is defined as no older than five years unless it is a seminal work.

    APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.

    What to Submit

    Along with your recording, submit your slides with speaker notes as a PDF.

    Save your PowerPoint files as a PDF with notes.

    The speaker notes will be processed through Turnitin.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.

    Outline an action plan to implement the evidence-based practice project that includes the recommendations for practice change, a timeline, and tools or resources needed.

    Propose outcome criteria for evaluating the evidence-based practice project and how the outcomes will be measured.

    Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.

    Identify the stakeholders, opportunities for innovation, and potential barriers to the practice change needed for project implementation.

    Competency 3: Evaluate the value, relevance, and ethics of available evidence upon which clinical decisions are made.

    Develop a PICOT question for a chosen clinical problem.

    Evaluate the value and relevance of the evidence that supports the need for a practice change.

    Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.

    Convey purpose of the poster presentation in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.

    Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

    Scoring Guide

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Expand All

    Criterion 1

    Criterion 2

    Criterion 3

    Criterion 4

    Criterion 5

    Criterion 6

    Criterion 7

  • Chapter 12 TED TOPICS

    Visit Ted Talks Website and the subject i would like to be talked about is emotion. The video The history of human emotions by Tiffany Watt Smith video in the website is the the video the response is going to be about. At the top of my response include the tittle of the ted talk, the name of presenter and when it was filmed and along in the link to the video! this is the link to the video i will attach more information on this discussion
  • Assessment 2 Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Pl…

    For this assessment, you will create a 5-7 slide PowerPoint presentation about a population health improvement plan. You will then record a video of no more than five minutes presenting your PowerPoint.

    Expand All

    Introduction

    Professional Context

    Scenario

    Your organization has created an initiative to improve one of the pervasive and chronic health concerns in the community. Some examples of possibilities for health improvement initiatives include type 2 diabetes, HIV, obesity, and communicable diseases. You will need to do your own research to gather and evaluate the relevant data for your chosen issue.

    Once you have created a presentation for the initiative, you have been asked to present to a group of community stakeholders. The purpose of your presentation is to inform and enlist support for the initiative from your audience.

    Instructions

    Download Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan Presentation Template [PPTX]

    Submission Requirements

    What to Submit

    Competencies Measured

    Scoring Guide

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Collapse All

    Criterion 1

    Evaluate the environmental and epidemiological data about your community to determine a population-focused priority for care.

    Distinguished

    Evaluates the environmental and epidemiological data about your community to determine a population-focused priority for care. Support you evaluation with specific reference to professional best-practices or scholarly sources.

    Proficient

    Evaluates the environmental and epidemiological data about your community to determine a population-focused priority for care.

    Basic

    Describes environmental and epidemiological data about a community in an incomplete manner, leading to a flawed diagnosis of a population-focused priority for care.

    Non Performance

    Does not describe environmental and epidemiological data about a community.

    Criterion 2

    Develop an ethical health improvement plan with outcome criteria that addresses the population health priority for care identified in the evaluation.

    Distinguished

    Develops an ethical health improvement plan with outcome criteria that addresses the population health issue identified in the evaluation. Specifically notes environmental realities and challenges existing in the community, potential barriers or misunderstandings related to various cultures prevalent in the community, and why proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.

    Proficient

    Develops an ethical health improvement plan with outcome criteria that addresses the population health priority for care identified in the evaluation.

    Basic

    Describes an ethical health improvement plan. However, the description is either missing the outcome criteria or the criteria are not relevant to population health priority for care identified or described health improvement plan.

    Non Performance

    Does not describe an ethical health improvement plan.

    Criterion 3

    Explain a plan to collaborate with a specific community organization to support the implementation of the population health improvement in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.

    Distinguished

    Explains a plan to collaborate with a specific community organization to support the implementation of the population health improvement in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Notes specific strategies to allow for a respectful exchange of ideas and insights with the community organization. Specifically notes relevant community stakeholders, relevant, how communication will be mindful of data privacy and help make complex medical terms understandable to community members regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education.

    Proficient

    Explains a plan to collaborate with a specific community organization to support the implementation of the population health improvement in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.

    Basic

    Explains a communication strategy that falls short of being ethical, culturally sensitive, or inclusive.

    Non Performance

    Does not explain a strategy for communicating with community stakeholders and community members in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.

    Criterion 4

    Explain the value and relevance of the evidence and technology resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan

    Distinguished

    Explains the value and relevance of the evidence and technology resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan. Supports the explanation with reference to specific professional best-practices and scholarly sources.

    Proficient

    Explains the value and relevance of the evidence and technology resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.

    Basic

    Provides a weak or flawed explanation of the value or relevance of resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.

    Non Performance

    Does not explain the value and relevance of resources used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.

    Criterion 5

    Communicates the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional, effective manner that engages the community organization stakeholders and the community-at large to implement and sustain change.

    Distinguished

    Communicates the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional, effective manner that engages the community organization stakeholders and the community-at large to implement and sustain change. Provides specific actions that the community stakeholders can take themselves to help provide a feeling of community ownership in the plan.

    Proficient

    Communicates the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional, effective manner that engages the community stakeholders to implement and sustain change.

    Basic

    Communicates the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan in a professional manner. The communication is unclear or disorganized, which limits the engagement of community stakeholders to implement and sustain change.

    Non Performance

    Does not communicate the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan.

    Criterion 6

    Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

    Distinguished

    Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to APA style of in-text citations and references.

    Proficient

    Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

    Basic

    Integrates credible sources of evidence, but the sources used is not relevant or do not well support assertions. APA formatting of in-text citations and references is incorrect or inconsistent, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.

    Non Performance

    Does not integrate credible sources of evidence or apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

  • Foundation of American Democracy and Ethics Reflection Paper

    This 5 paragraph paper will focus on how the foundations of American democracy influence business ethics. You will explore the ways democratic principles and historical movements have shaped ethical standards, obligations, and decision-making in business.

    Choose ONE of the following guiding questions:

    • How do Martin Luther King Jr.’s arguments in Letter from Birmingham Jail inform ethical obligations in business practice, particularly in addressing racial disparities and systemic inequalities?
    • In what ways do historical struggles for civil rights reflect contemporary challenges in management and policy?
    • Should managers engage in civil disobedience when government policies conflict with ethical business practices? Why or why not?
    • How should democratic principles guide ethical decision-making during crises like pandemics or natural disasters?
    • What ethical responsibilities do corporate leaders and policymakers have in preserving democratic values while ensuring profitability?

    Requirements:

    • Choose one guiding question and answer it directly.
    • Refer to
    • at least once.
    • Use examples from business ethics (not healthcare).
    • Provide thoughtful analysis that connects democratic principles to real-world business contexts.

    Formatting Guidelines:

    • Use MLA format for your paper (font, spacing, citations, and header).
    • Use Times New Roman, 12-point font, double-spaced text.
    • Include a header with your last name and page number in the top right corner
  • worksheet matematika kelas 1

    worksheet matematiak kelas 1

    Requirements:

  • Discussion 5

    Reflect on a professional or personal experience when a seemingly minor incident had a much more significant impact than expected. What did you learn from this experience of complexity?

  • Evidence Based Practice Journal Review

    Create a hypothetical client with a diagnosis that intrigues you. Locate two current, peerreviewed journal articles that describe evidencebased treatment approaches relevant to the clients diagnosis. Using these sources, develop an APA 7th editionformatted PowerPoint presentation that explains the diagnosis and evaluates how the selected evidencebased treatment may benefit and/or hinder your clients progress in speech and/or language therapy. The PowerPoint must demonstrate your ability to apply, appraise, and evaluate evidence-based practice for your client.

    • Create a client (5 points)
    • Case history
    • Brief client bio (e.g., age, family, interests)
    • Clients level of function prior to diagnosis
    • Medical diagnosis
    • Treatment diagnosis (evaluation procedures and the results with examples)
    • Summary of typical communication skills expected for the clients age
    • 1 Long-Term Goal (LTG)
    • 2 Short-Term Goals (STGs)
    • Previous therapy, if applicable
    • Identify an Evidence-Based Treatment Practice approach relevant to the clients diagnosis (5 points)
    • Appraise the value of the evidence
    • Synthesize the best evidence
    • Assess the risks and benefits of the treatment approach
    • Design and Implementation
    • Describe the intervention plan based on the evidence (5 points)
    • Explain how the EBP would be implemented with your client (5 points)
    • Evaluate the process and the outcome for your client, generate your own clinical conclusions based on the evidence and client response (5 points)
    • APA formatting/grammar (10 points)
    • APA style (7th edition)
    • Scholarly and professional writing
    • Logical flow and organization
    • Proper grammar and mechanics
    • PowerPoint presentation (18 – 20 slides, cover and reference slides not included)

    This presentation will be about: Case: 5-year-old male with a receptive, expressive, and pragmatic language skills delay secondary to a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

    EBP Question: In a child with a receptive, expressive, and pragmatic language skills delay, how effective is high-tech AAC compared to low-tech AAC for improving functional communication?

    So, the two peer reviewed journal articles will be about high tech AAC and low tech AAC.

  • Economics Question

    Please ensure the research is written with great care and accuracy, as I aim to achieve the highest grades. All details are included in the attachment.The plagiarism tolerance for MBA is 8 %.

    Requirements: 2000words