Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Is questions and answers in an essay form

    Key Elements of what they need you to complete your Biography.

    Name and Current Role: Clearly state who you are and your current job title or company.

    Mission/Value Statement: A brief summary of your professional goals, values, or unique approach.

    Key Accomplishments: Specific achievements, awards, or milestones (with metrics if possible).

    Areas of Expertise: Specific skills, certifications, or technical capabilities.

    Professional Background: A concise overview of your career trajectory, including relevant past experience.

    Education: Relevant degrees or training.

    Personal Touch: 12 hobbies or personal interests to add personality.

    Call to Action/Contact: LinkedIn profile, portfolio link, or email address.

  • Persuasion

    Ch 7 Persuasion Application Describe about a time when you persuaded by peripheral or central route, or you resisted persuasion. What issue was it? Was it important to you? Alternatively, post a YouTube link and describe what kind of persuasion is demonstrated (Try to keep any YouTubes under 5 minutes). Keep it clean and legal please!

  • Legal Research & Analysis

    Using chapters 7 & 8 in Paralegal Today: The Legal Team at Work by Roger LeRoy Miller and Mary Meinzinger, Read the following article on the repercussions to one lawyer who relied on AI to their detriment. Link:

    Discuss what harm this attorney did to their client, what they should have done differently and whether you think the sanctions given were appropriate or do you believe the judge went overboard and why. Feel free to respond to other students thoughts whether that be in agreement or in disagreement. Remember to keep it respectful and fully back up your opinion with information learned from this and previous chapters.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Week 4 Walkthrough.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Unit III Homework

    Assignment objective: For this assignment, you will be applying critical thinking to case studies related to health care law.

    Length: Your submission should be at least two pages in length (all responses combined).

    References: APA style will not be required for this assignment. Cite any references that you use to formulate a response.

    Details: For this assignment, refer to Chapter 6 on page 151 of your textbook. Write your responses to the questions listed in the three Discussion Cases. Number your responses to each question and letter listed in the case studies.

    Submission: Save the submission as a Word document and upload the document to Blackboard.

    Discussion Cases

    Jessica Mass, a phlebotomist, drew a blood sample from Glenn Ross, a 30-year-old patient of Dr. Williams, to test for AIDS. As Glenn was leaving the office, his friend Harry came in and they greeted each other. Jessica took Harry into an exam room, and in the course of making conversation, he told her that he was a good friend of Glenns. He asked Jessica why Glenn was seeing the doctor. Jessica responded that it was just for a test for AIDS.

    When Harry arrived back home, he called Glenn and told him what the phlebotomist had said. Glenn called Dr. Williams and complained about Jessicas action and said that he planned to sue Dr. Williams. Dr. Williams dismissed Jessica. Dr. Williams told Jessica that if Glenn did bring a lawsuit against her and she lost, then she would sue Jessica.

    What should Jessica have done or said when Harry asked about Glenns reason for being in the office?

    Did Dr. Williams have a legal right to sue Jessica if she was sued and lost?

    What important right did Jessica violate?

    Denise, an LPN, works in a nursing home on the 3:00 to 11:00 pm shift. She is instructed to prepare medications to give to her own patients as they eat their evening meal. She is also told that it is the policy of the nursing home that she will also prepare all the medications to be distributed in the morning by the LPN who will pass medications at both breakfast and lunch the next day. Denise is told that the reason for doing this is because she will have more time, as the evening shift is not as busy as the morning shift. Denise does not want to object because she really needs the job.

    What are the potential problems with this policy?

    What should Denise do?

    If a patient is harmed by receiving the incorrect medicine, who would be charged with the negligence?

    David, an 89-year-old war hero with no living relatives, drove himself at night to a local hospital when he experienced shortness of breath and a headache. When he entered the emergency room (ER) he was placed in a wheelchair and briefly seen by an ER doctor. He was told that he could not be admitted because he was a veteran and had to go to a VA hospital, which was 90 minutes away, for treatment. David was wheeled into the hallway to wait for transportation to a VA hospital. The night shift was very busy. After sitting in the hall for five hours, David complained that he needed to lie down. The ER staff, who had been trying to move him to a VA hospital with no luck, finally transferred him by ambulance to a local nursing home. David had a massive stroke shortly after being admitted to the nursing home and died six weeks later.

    Does there appear to be negligence in this case?

    In your opinion, who might have acted on behalf of David?

    In your opinion, would contributory negligence be a defense if there is a malpractice lawsuit relating to Davids death?

  • Personal Statement

    our personal statement should include:

    What led you to the decision to apply to CUNY Law, a public interest law school;

    Your reasons for wanting to be a lawyer;

    Examples of traits you possess that you believe would benefit you in law school and as a lawyer

    Reflect on a time when you took a stand for social justice or equity. What motivated you? What impact did you make?

    Describe an experience that broadened your global perspective? How has this influenced your views?

    Describe a time you interacted with someone with whom you disagreed or who had a different perspective from your own. How did you resolve the situation or learn to coexist?

  • Writing Question

    Please watch the following video and using the rubric and what you know about advocacy write a one page paper also include title page. Please see att

    Requirements: 1 page

  • excel 2 assign

    Due to a recent change in Yahoo.Finance.com, I decided to download all the stock price data for you. You can find them in the module “.” Note that you will have to find three files: HD, S&P500, and your assigned company data, and combine them into a single worksheet. The data have already been sorted properly.

    You will find your companys ticker symbol in the gradebook (under the “Company” grade item) on CougarView.

    Requirements: complete

  • Research Focus and Question Application

    NO ai no plagirism at all. 4-6 pages. attached is the instructions. need a 46 page, double-spaced APA-formatted paper (including title page and reference list) for an Organizational Communication capstone course. The paper must fully address all 8 prompts listed below and follow the assignment instructions precisely.

    Topic (already chosen):
    Organizational communication in dialysis units, with a focus on how communication practices shape patient trust, understanding of care, dignity, and perceptions of organizational care.
    This is an organizational communication project, not a medical or clinical analysis.

    Paper must include and clearly label sections addressing:

    1. Research topic, focus, or problem
    2. Why I want to study this topic
    3. Why the topic is significant and important (approximately one full page; evidence-rich and persuasive)
    4. How I plan to study the topic (preliminary methods only)
    5. Research question(s) (open-ended, exploratory; not yes/no)
    6. Ethical implications and how they will be managed (vulnerable population)
    7. Methodological paradigm(s) and justification (must reference organizational communication research paradigms and explain why the chosen methods are appropriate)
    8. Questions, concerns, or reflections about the emerging research plan

    Sources required:

    • 810 scholarly, peer-reviewed academic sources (organizational communication, healthcare communication, patient experience, etc.)
    • 23 contemporary examples (news articles, reports, industry sources)
    • All sources must be cited in-text and listed in a proper APA reference list
    • Must also integrate course readings on research paradigms/methods

    Style & Quality Expectations:

    • Written at an upper-division / capstone level
    • Clear organizational communication framing
    • No AI-sounding filler or generic healthcare language
    • Strong theoretical grounding
    • Clean APA formatting (7th edition)

    What is NOT needed:

    • No data collection
    • No surveys/interviews conducted
    • No IRB submission

    This is a research foundation paper, not a final proposal.

    Requirements: 4-6 pages

  • IMRAD for quantitative research

    My topic is Polypharmacy and Adverse Drug Reactions in Elderly Patients

    Part 1:

    Fill out the outline using ONE of these articles. You can pick which one they are all quantitative:

    Part 2:

    Answer these 2 questions with at least 100 words

    1. Describe the strengths and limitations of the report that you critiqued. Support your answer with quotations from your article.
    2. State how can you use what you learn from this assignment to support your research proposal

    Requirements: tbd

  • Econ Book Review

    Guidelines for Book Review:

    A full book review may concern only one book. Its length is about 1500-2000 words. It should

    give readers an engaging, informative, and critical discussion of the work. The review should

    follow the Guidelines below.

    The review should consider (you use as your outline):

    The intended audience for the book and who would find it useful

    The background of the author(s)

    The main ideas and major objectives of the book and how effectively these are

    accomplished

    The context or impetus for the book – – political controversy, implications of the book for

    research, policy, practice, or theory

    A comparison with other works on this subject

    Constructive comments about the strength and weaknesses of the book

    The front page of your review should include:

    Your first and last name

    Your student id

    Author(s) or editor(s) first and last name(s) (please indicate if it is an edited book)

    Title of book

    Year of publication

    Place of publication

    Publisher

    Number of pages

    Price (please indicate paperback or hard cover) if available

    ISBN

    Book Review

    In line with your guidelines, book review grading will be based on the following rubric with 4 components:

    • Background of author and audience.
    • Discussion of main ideas and objectives.
    • The context for the book and comparison with other work on the subject.
    • Comments about strengths and weaknesses and implications for research and public policy.

    Where each rubric would have a weight of 0.25 and would have 5 categories (5,10,15,20,25). There could be further penalties for poor presentation or grammar. Component Scoring Scale (525 points)

    25 (Exceptional): Comprehensive analysis with no gaps. All arguments are backed by specific evidence from the text.

    20 (Strong): -5 points if the analysis is clear but misses secondary objectives or provides a generic description of the audience/context.

    15 (Satisfactory): -10 points if the report is purely descriptive (summarizing what happened) rather than analytical (explaining why it matters).

    10 (Poor): -15 points for significant gaps, such as failing to compare the book to other works or missing the author’s primary thesis.

    5 (Minimal): -20 points for surface-level mentions that do not demonstrate the student actually read the book in its entirety.

    Furthermore:

    • You will get 0 points if you write a book review of a paper or a textbook, no exceptions allowed. You can get some suggestions of books in the first discussion section.
    • Plagiarism will not be tolerated, actions would be taken.

    The list of permitted books is included in the attachment.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Titles for book report.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.