Category: uncategorised

  • Discussion 5

    For this discussion, I want to get the groups understanding and opinions on psychopathy. Let’s elaborate on a psychopath’s emotional experiences, personality characteristics, and tests that assess the traits. How common are psychopaths? What do we know about this concept of ‘successful psychopath?’

  • Writing in Social Work Practicum

    Students will view the presentation and provide 4 take-aways they learned and will apply during their Practicum placement. There Is No “Good Writing” “Good writing” varies… By discipline: E.g, English vs. Social Work. By context: E.g, classroom vs. workplace By GENRE of writing: E.g, within social work, functional writing vs. practice-oriented writing General principles: precision, specificity, rigor, and purpose (note that “clarity;” “jargon,” Writing is Everywhere Social Work Genre Sets Practice: Writing to document and improve practice – Audience: Usually other social workers, coworkers, supervisors Examples: – Case notes (workplace) – Interaction or observation reports (workplace) – Intervention proposals / reports (academic / workplace) – Case study (usually academic, but based on workplace) Genre Set: Functional writing Communicates information Requests information Requests action * Scenario: Emailing a supervisor. In a meeting, a student has asked a supervisor if he can adjust his hours. The supervisor checks her schedule, and emails a response. CC What Evidence Does it Use? Evidence (continued): When in doubt, ask a supervisor or experienced coworker for recommended terms or language More so than other genres, case notes may be all somcone sees of you-so “dress well” with your Client reports having a heroin addiction, and attending Narcotics Anonymous meetings irregularly for three years. Client is a heroin addict, and has attended Narcotics Anonymous mectings sporadically for Three years
  • hourly nurse rounding and fall prevention

    Im looking for help revising my Literature Review paper for my BSN Capstone course. Ive attached the instructions, template, and grading rubric, and its important that everything follows those exactly. Ive also included a DRAFT for reference, please fully rewrite it so the final paper is original and aligned with the template and rubric. My school uses Turnitin, so the work must be plagiarism-free and AI-free. The paper should be APA 7th edition, 56 pages (not including title and references), include at least 5 recent peer-reviewed sources, and clearly align with my PICOT question on hourly nurse rounding and fall prevention. Thank you so muchI really appreciate your help! ———————————————————————————— Objective Implement research for your project Deliverables Write a 5-6 page (not including the title and reference pages) APA-formatted paper with an introduction and conclusion APA headings for each section of the paper At least 5 peer-reviewed references Step 1: Capstone Project Write a thorough literature review paper Step 2: Consider Subheadings (Themes Discovered In Review) Notice Of Gaps In Knowledge At least 5 references within 5 years and peer-reviewed. Step 3: Write Write a paper that addresses the current literature for your project. Use the template attached below.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Literature Review DRAFT.docx, BSN485 Lit Review Template.docx, BSN485 Literature Review Rubric.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Econ

    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/07/beef-prices-are-soaring-heres-why-thats-hard-to-fix.html

    https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/beef-prices-soar-american-families-pay-steep-prices-steaks-burgers-nationwide

    Strictly follow the instructions given use the websites provides, and any other time relevant sources that are reliable

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): New Article Assignment 1 (Instructions).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Multidimensional framework analysis of child development int…

    The interview with the child (and/or caregiver) for the multidimensional framework analysis assignment needs to be completed by Week 4 and you will submit this worksheet as preparation for the paper due in Week 5. You can type notes for the information on development from the text, or ALL of it can be handwritten, but for sure you MUST HANDWRITE your observations in each of the BPS and cultural/spiritual domains. These are the notes you take during the interview. The worksheet will be scanned and submitted as a PDF to the course.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Multidimensional Framework Worksheet.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion 3

    What is the groups opinion on Lifestyle Theory (Hindelang, Gottfredson, and Farofalo, 1978)? Please comment on possible strengths and limitations to this theory.

  • W6operational risk

    FOR THIS DISCUSSION:

    Identify a specific legal or ethical (or combination) operational risk that yousee to be a compelling concern for a business today and propose a best practice that in your opinion a business can utilize to effectively prevent or mitigate that risk.

    In your initial post explain (with an example):

    • the specific legal or ethical risk,
    • the best practice, and
    • how you would implement the practice

    Keep using the law to support the conclusions

  • interview paper

    This assignment consists of two parts:

    Part 1 is the interview itself. Preferably, write the interview in a narrative form instead of transcribing the questions and answers. For instance:

    _____ described the psychiatrist as very professional, but not warm or interested in personal details about the experienced challenges at work and relationships. Per _______s report, the side effects were not intense, but the desired effects took a long time to emerge.

    Make sure you write the generic names of medications in lowercase and the brand names in capital initial letters. For instance, fluoxetine (Prozac), venlafaxine (Effexor), risperidone (Risperdal), alprazolam (Xanax), etc.

    Part 2 is your reflection as a prospective therapist working with clients who use psychotropic medications. Elaborate on your countertransference and biases, cultural and identity diversity sensitivity, clinical judgment, possible interventions you would employ as a therapist, and areas for your further growth.

    Parts 1 and 2 are equally important. It will be helpful to imagine that you should strive to obtain 50 points in Part 1 and 50 points in Part 2.

    Structure of the Interview Paper

    Part 1: Interview (2 to 3 double-spaced pages)

    • Firstly, keep the interviewees name confidential by changing it when writing the paper. Begin the interview section by providing demographic information (sexual orientation, gender identity, ethnic background, age, cultural background) and a brief list of the medications to treat the interviewees symptoms. For instance:

    The interviewee Tina Doe is a 35-year-old transgender woman of Haitian descent, who was reportedly diagnosed with anxiety after the deportation of her parents and an aunt nearly two months ago. Tina states that for a miracle she managed to go to the hospital, and was prescribed fluoxetine and alprazolam with no recollection of their dosages and the names of the prescribing physicians

    If you have a history of use of psychotropic medications and feel that this assignment will be significantly helpful in your development as a prospective therapist, you can be the interviewee.

    • Start the interview this way:

    State your name and identify yourself with your credentials (e.g., clinical psychology master’s students, MFT trainee, etc), and provide the name of the course and explain the purpose of this interview, and thank them for the opportunity to interview him/her/them. Emphasize that all information shared will be kept strictly confidential and that a fictitious name will substitute for the real name. Make the interviewee feel as safe and comfortable as possible. And present yourself with no judgment, respectfully and warmly. Make sure to make note of this (stating your credentials and the purpose of this interview) in your paper; it can be a brief sentence or two but this and the closing protocol do need to be explicitly mentioned, with the intent of training you to get used to information that must be included in intake or psychopharmocological interviews with clients (and documenting that it was verbalized).

    • Questions to ask the interviewee:
    1. Have you ever undergone treatment with psychotropic medications? If yes (for the purposes of this paper, of course the answer does need to be yes), what was the reason you started taking psychotropic medications? Do you know the names of these medications, the dosages, and who prescribed them?
    2. How would you evaluate the quality of the interaction with the prescribing doctor/nurse regarding warmth, listening, attention, and professionalism? How long was the assessment interview, and how long did it take to select the medications? Did your doctor/nurse explain what the medications were for and their potential side effects?
    3. How did you respond to the prescribed medications? Did you have positive effects?
    4. Did you have side effects? How did you address them?
    5. Were you being treated in psychotherapy conjointly?
    6. (If not) Would you have considered including psychotherapy if circumstances were favorable? In what ways could psychotherapy and the therapist be beneficial?
    7. (If yes) How do you evaluate the treatment with psychotherapy with prescribed psychotropic medications? Was this combination effective? Why? Was your therapist able to support you if you experienced undesirable effects from medications?
    8. Is there anything you would like to add to this interview?
    • Before ending the interview:

    Ask him/her/them if they would like you to email a draft of the interview for their review.

    Thank the interviewee sincerely for the opportunity to learn from his/her/their history. Make brief note of this important step in your paper.

    Part 2: Insights and reflection as a prospective therapist working with clients who take medications (1 to 3 double-spaced pages)

    • Elaborate on your countertransference and how it can impact your relationship with the client as a therapist. Part 2 must display self-awareness derived from deep intellectual reflection and intrapsychic investigation.
    • Assumptions you had about the interviewee based on his/her/their appearance, cultural and ethnic background, social class, race, and privilege. How did the assumptions impact the interaction?
    • If the interviewee were your therapy client, how would you support him/her/them? What would you do if there were complaints of side effects? Which interventions would you employ in the therapy sessions?
    • What are the areas for further growth as a prospective therapist working with clients who use psychotropic medications in their treatment?

    Clarity, Structure, and ComplianceFormatting and Presentation

    Criterion Score

    Narrative Form

    2 points

    Interview is presented in a narrative form (not Q&A transcription), effectively weaving the responses into a descriptive story.

    Score of Narrative Form,

    / 2

    Medication Nomenclature

    2 points

    Correct use of lowercase generic names and capitalized initial Brand names (e.g., fluoxetine (Prozac)).

    Score of Medication Nomenclature,

    / 2

    Length Compliance

    2 points

    Paper adheres to the suggested minimum length (Part 1: 2-3 pages; Part 2: 1-3 pages).

    Score of Length Compliance,

    / 2

    Part 1: Interview Content and StructureIntroduction and Demographics

    Criterion Score

    Confidentiality and Fictitious Name

    2 points

    Interviewee is kept confidential using a fictitious name.

    Score of Confidentiality and Fictitious Name,

    / 2

    Opening Protocol

    5 points

    Student states name, identifies credentials (e.g., MFT student), names course, explains purpose, and thanks the interviewee. The tone is respectful, warm, and non-judgmental.

    Score of Opening Protocol,

    / 5

    Demographic Information

    10 points

    Comprehensive demographic details provided (sexual orientation, gender identity, ethnic/cultural background, age).

    Score of Demographic Information,

    / 10

    Interview Execution and DetailInterview

    Criterion Score

    Reason and Medication History (Q1)

    5 points

    Clear details on the reason for starting medication, names, dosages (if known), and prescribing professional.

    Score of Reason and Medication History (Q1),

    / 5

    Prescriber Interaction (Q2)

    5 points

    Thorough evaluation of the quality of interaction (warmth, listening, professionalism), assessment length, and explanation of side effects/purpose.

    Score of Prescriber Interaction (Q2),

    / 5

    Response and Side Effects (Q3 & Q4)

    5 points

    Detailed account of positive/desired effects, side effects experienced, and how they were addressed.

    Score of Response and Side Effects (Q3 & Q4),

    / 5

    Psychotherapy Conjointly (Q5)

    5 points

    Comprehensive exploration of whether psychotherapy was combined with medication, evaluation of the combined treatment, and therapist support for side effects. (Or) Thorough discussion of considering psychotherapy and its potential benefits (if not combined).

    Score of Psychotherapy Conjointly (Q5),

    / 5

    Closing Protocol (Q6 & Ending)

    2 points

    Interviewee’s optional additions are noted, the offer to email a draft is made, and an effusive thank you is included.

    Score of Closing Protocol (Q6 & Ending),

    / 2

    Narrative Quality and FlowPart 1: Overall

    Criterion Score

    Engagement and Clarity

    5 points

    The narrative is engaging, well-organized, and the interviewees experience is conveyed with clarity and depth.

    Score of Engagement and Clarity,

    / 5

    Part 2: Insights and ReflectionSelf-Awareness and Introspection

    Criterion Score

    Countertransference and Biases

    10 points

    In-depth elaboration on potential countertransference specific to this client’s case and its likely impact on the therapeutic relationship.

    Score of Countertransference and Biases,

    / 10

    Assumptions and Impact

    10 points

    Deep intellectual reflection on assumptions (based on appearance, culture, race, class, privilege, etc.) and a critical analysis of how these assumptions did or could have impacted the interaction.

    Score of Assumptions and Impact,

    / 10

    Clinical Application and GrowthCountertransference and Biases

    Criterion Score

    Client Support and Interventions

    15 points

    Concrete and specific ways the student would support the client, including addressing side effect complaints, and outlining possible clinical interventions tailored to the case.

    Score of Client Support and Interventions,

    / 15

    Cultural/Identity Sensitivity

    10 points

    Reflection on and demonstration of sensitivity toward the client’s cultural background, identity diversity, and clinical judgment regarding medication use (integrated throughout the support/interventions section).

    Score of Cultural/Identity Sensitivity,

    / 10

    Areas for Further Growth

    5 points

    Clear identification and elaboration of specific, actionable areas for professional growth related to working with clients on psychotropic medications

  • Discussion 4 – Competency

    Chapter 5 – Competency mentions several brief examples of clients, please consider the following questions:

    • How might the professional talk about the challenges with the elder client wanting to live independently when some caregivers and professionals oppose this choice?
    • The analysis of Michele’s situation concluded that she was competent to refuse treatment and that it would not be justifiable to force her to undergo the new procedure. Do you agree? Under what other circumstances would it be morally acceptable to do so?

    MUST HAVE THE BOOKS!!!!!

    Christianity and Social Work 6th edition

    ISBN: ISBN: 978-0-9897581-6-1

    Authors: T. Laine Scales, Michael S. Kelly

    Edition: 6th edition

    The Helping Professional’s Guide to Ethics

    ISBN: 9780197502853

    Authors: Valerie Bryan, Scott Sanders, Laura E. Kaplan

    Publisher: Oxford University Press

    Publication Date: 2021-07-15